शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Should social media be censored? Here's what both sides have to say - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

C1
There's been much debate this past year about freedom of speech and social media.
⏸ रुका हुआ
82 वाक्य
यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।
1
There's been much debate this past year about freedom of speech and social media.
2
We should err on the side of greater expression.
3
They are literally spreading lies, misinformation, propaganda.
4
Companies that engage in censoring or any political conduct will not be able to keep their liability shield.
5
The dilemma, should social media companies censor speech that they deem to be hateful or violent or false?
6
Or should they keep it up in the spirit of freedom of speech?
7
And what happens when the speaker is an elected official?
8
I believe that we have two responsibilities.
9
To remove content when it can cause real danger as effectively as we can,
10
and to fight to uphold as wide of a definition of freedom of expression as possible.
11
Of course, the First Amendment doesn't legally apply to Facebook or to Twitter or to Instagram or YouTube.
12
It was written solely to stop the government,
13
not private companies, from censoring speech.
14
The debate has intensified due to one particular post from President Donald Trump,
15
When the looting starts, the shooting starts.
16
Twitter placed a warning label on the tweet saying it glorified violence.
17
Facebook did nothing.
18
You could say that you're all for free speech,
19
but you also need to protect society,
20
especially when you're in the position Facebook is in.
21
Mark Zuckerberg would say that he is standing for a democratic principle
22
which is freedom of expression and he says
23
that you know a private company like his who is he
24
a billionaire to to be able to you know in some way restrict the speech of the president of the United States.
25
Do you buy that argument?
26
I do not.
27
I think that that argument is entirely in Mark Zuckerberg's profit interest.
28
I think what we're seeing is Mark Zuckerberg is saying,
29
you know, I don't want to rile up the president.
30
I don't want to invite regulatory action.
31
I don't want to tick off the president's following, which also uses Facebook.
32
And, you know, I don't want to alienate them from my own platform
33
because that will detract from my own revenue and engagement on my own platform.
34
But those who argue Facebook should operate in the spirit of free speech say it's a slippery slope to remove
35
or even to fact check political speech.
36
Where would you draw a line if you were Facebook when it comes to a Trump post?
37
So I think that Facebook cordons off a couple of very narrow areas which are wise to
38
shut down and that is things like misleading speech about elections themselves.
39
If Trump posted Hey everyone,
40
go vote on election day on this date,
41
and it was the wrong date.
42
I think that's reasonable to take down because it is timely and also obviously misleading.
43
For things like hate speech,
44
I think that people should know if the president is using hate speech.
45
You don't think that Facebook should be fact-checking political ads?
46
I don't trust Facebook to do a good job fact-checking political ads.
47
A lot of political claims are tricky, are difficult to fact-check check.
48
A lot of them are true but misleading.
49
These are the kind of categories that the American people needs to hear a full debate about,
50
not Mark Zuckerberg's idea of what the debate should be about.
51
But in fact much of the philosophical debate about freedom of speech and social media has been just that, philosophical.
52
In practice Facebook has taken down political posts.
53
It took down an ad run by the Trump campaign,
54
Twitter has labeled the president's tweets,
55
and all the major platforms have rules restricting posts containing nudity.
56
Facebook's been taking this kind of stuff down that entire time,
57
and now all of a sudden it's an issue.
58
Why is that happening?
59
And you hear conservative bias,
60
but it's actually not conservative bias.
61
They've been taking down that same type of hate speech since 2008,
62
2009, and there's just more of that type of hate speech.
63
The speech of Trump and his party has like come to the rule.
64
It is not that they have all of a sudden changed the rules to be biased against conservatives.
65
I think people who genuinely believe that,
66
you know, private companies should not in any way interfere with anything a politician is saying,
67
no matter how objectionable it might be.
68
Do you think that there is an argument there?
69
That is a valid argument.
70
That yes, if you're Mark Zuckerberg,
71
It makes sense to say that,
72
look, if I start moderating content,
73
I'm going to invite a discussion over the regulatory terms that be,
74
over my company, over content moderation.
75
And to that I would say, well, let's welcome that.
76
Because I think the time is ripe to have an open discussion about what's right in this society and what's wrong,
77
especially when we have such a dirty and noisy media environment thanks to Facebook.
78
In a blog post, Facebook said the responsibility to fact check political ads shouldn't be left to private companies,
79
writing, The sooner Facebook and other companies are subject to democratically accountable rules on this, the better.
80
But in the meantime, ahead of the 2020 election,
81
Facebook announced it is allowing users to opt out of political ads.
82
For some critics though, the question remains, is it enough?

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

आपके बोले हर वाक्य के लिए AI स्कोरिंग

डाउनलोड करने के लिए स्कैन करें
डाउनलोड करने के लिए स्कैन करें
Download on theApp Store
Get it onGoogle Play
TRENDING

लोकप्रिय

इस पाठ के बारे में

इस पाठ में, Learners को सोशल मीडिया पर सेंसरशिप के मुद्दे पर बातचीत के दौरान महत्वपूर्ण वाक्यांशों और शब्दावली का अभ्यास करने का अवसर मिलेगा। इस विषय के माध्यम से, Learners अंग्रेजी बोलने का अभ्यास कर सकते हैं और अपने विचारों को स्पष्टता से व्यक्त करने की शैली विकसित कर सकते हैं। वे इस सामग्री के साथ शैडोइंग तकनीक का उपयोग करके अपनी उच्चारण और सुनने की क्षमताओं में सुधार करेंगे। यूट्यूब से अंग्रेजी सीखें और अपनी भाषा कौशल को बढ़ाएं।

महत्वपूर्ण शब्दावली और वाक्यांश

  • स्वतंत्रता की अभिव्यक्ति - Freedom of expression
  • दीवानापन - Misinformation
  • असत्य - Falsehood
  • राजनीतिक विज्ञापन - Political ads
  • घृणा भाषण - Hate speech
  • भ्रमित करने वाला भाषण - Misleading speech
  • वास्तविक जोखिम - Real danger
  • विनियामक कार्रवाई - Regulatory action

अभ्यास टिप्स

इस video's की स्पीड और टोन को ध्यान में रखते हुए, Learners के लिए शैडोइंग करना अत्यंत लाभदायक होगा। संवाद में शामिल विभिन्न भावनाओं और संवाद शैली को समझने के लिए, पहले आसान आवाज़ों के साथ अभ्यास करें। आप प्रत्येक वाक्यांश को ध्यान से सुनें और फिर उसे दोहराएं, जिससे उच्चारण में सुधार होगा। शुरुआत में, छोटे वाक्यांशों पर ध्यान दें, फ़िर धीरे-धीरे लंबी बातें करने का प्रयास करें। ध्यान रखें कि आपकी आवाज़ समान गति और टोन में हो, जिससे आपका अंग्रेजी बोलने का अभ्यास और भी प्रभावी हो सके। इस प्रक्रिया के दौरान, यह स्वाभाविक रूप से आपके संचार कौशल को बढ़ाएगा और आपको आत्मविश्वास दिलाएगा।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

☕ हमें एक कॉफी पिलाएं