शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Why Bernie Sanders wants to force AI companies to share their wealth - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

here in the Senate on Capitol Hill,

⏸ रुका हुआ

गति:

157 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

here in the Senate on Capitol Hill,

Senator Bernie Sanders has just announced plans to introduce a new bill

that would give the government a direct ownership stake in the largest American AI companies.

Senator Sanders is my source tonight,

and thank you, Senator, for being here.

We see what the president signed today.

Regarding your legislation, can you explain how this would work if the federal government owned half of these AI companies?

I think the concern all over the country about AI

is that it is owned and directed by a handful of the wealthiest people in the world,

Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and those guys.

And nobody believes that they have the welfare of the American people at heart.

They want to get richer and even more powerful.

So the question is, should we allow a handful of oligarchs to determine literally the future of humanity?

AI is going to be the most transformational technology in the history of the world.

So what my legislation will do are several major things.

Number one, it says that because the foundation of AI is based on all human knowledge,

all right, AI will absorb what this program is about.

The five books that I read,

all the poets, all the scientific work,

that's what AI is about, okay?

People who contribute to that deserve some of the wealth that is being created.

More importantly, we cannot allow just a handful of oligarchs to determine the future.

If we have 50 percent of public ownership of these companies,

we can say no to ideas that will lead to mass unemployment,

invasion of privacy, endangerment of children's health,

or maybe even an existential threat to the planet if AI becomes independent of human.

Why do you need to take control of them?

Why can't you just regulate them,

tax them as is currently?

Well, for two reasons.

Well, one, I think, Javi,

this is, again, this is the most transformational technology in history,

and it is based on human knowledge.

So human beings deserve to be compensated for what they put into AI.

Second of all, we need to determine the future.

Can't just be a handful of billionaires.

That's why.

I mean, when you look at this in terms of how this works,

some of these companies might just see this and say,

if this legislation passes, I'm just going to move my company to another country.

Well, that's the same.

That's what they're saying in California about a wealth tax.

I mean, that's a whole other- You would have deciding power here, the government would.

Yeah, we think, I think,

and I think most Americans agree,

that the future of humanity should not be determined by a handful of the wealthiest people on earth.

That the public in a democratic process should have input into the way the world is going to move.

And also, you know, you talked about the American people deserving part of the profits from this,

part of the money from this.

The president has signed an executive order about creating a sovereign wealth fund for the United States.

I mean, that's what you're suggesting here.

The Trump administration also has equity now,

equity stakes in, I think,

more than 20 private companies.

How is what you're doing different than what the president is doing?

Well, it is radically different.

And by the way, the idea of a sovereign wealth fund is not a radical idea.

You know, Norway has a fund based on their oil revenue of over $2 trillion.

But from the revenues.

From their revenues.

They don't have a controlling stake in the actual companies.

Right, right.

And Alaska, by the way,

the state of Alaska, also has a sovereign wealth fund where they distribute money based on oil revenue as well.

But oil is a natural resources,

and so is human labor.

All of the contributions that humanity has made into AI deserves to be compensated,

and people deserve to get that wealth redistributed back to them.

But is this an area where you see agreement with the president?

Well, the president says a whole lot of stuff.

I happen not to trust much of what he says.

But I'm talking about sovereign wealth fund.

The concept of a sovereign wealth fund is not a radical idea.

It exists.

I think there are at least 100 of them around the world.

Again, bottom line is people have the foundation of AI is the knowledge that human beings have contributed.

We deserve to be compensated.

Second of all, we need to put breaks on AI when it leads to mass unemployment,

endangering children's health, etc. You know,

when you look at this,

if this plan existed right now,

if this legislation went through and passed,

you know, what you have described,

this technology that you've said is a threat to everything the American people hold dear,

I believe was your exact quote.

I mean, the president and Republican majorities would have deciding factors in these companies.

That's true.

But on the other hand, that is democracy.

And I hope very much that President Trump and the Republicans will not be in power for that much longer.

But at the end of the day,

I'm just saying if it passed.

Well, all right.

So the question is, do we want Democratic control?

Or do we want Mr. Musk and a handful of billionaires to make those decisions?

I prefer the democracy where people still could have impact on Republicans, on Mr. Trump.

You can't have that impact on the CEOs of these large corporations.

Sam Altman is going to be in Washington.

I believe tomorrow he's got meetings lined up.

I know at the White House,

100

I believe with some of your colleagues.

101

Are you going to be meeting with him?

102

Yeah.

103

Oh, okay.

104

And are you going to talk to him about your legislation?

105

Who set that meeting up?

106

He did.

107

And do you think it was because of this? Who knows?

108

What are you going to say to him?

109

What am I going to say to him?

110

I'll say to him tomorrow what I'll say to him. But,

111

I mean, what we will discuss is the need for a moratorium

112

so that we can have a democratic debate and discussion about the future of AI,

113

talk about that.

114

We will talk about the need for international cooperation so that we do not have a super intelligence,

115

super AI created, which can escape human control.

116

I'm just wondering what he's going to say when you,

117

I mean, in your video announcing your legislation,

118

you said the time has come to reclaim what has been stolen from us.

119

Yes.

120

Since AI is built on the collective knowledge of humanity,

121

the wealth it generates must also benefit humanity,

122

not just Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos.

123

That's right.

124

Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison.

125

You didn't name Sam Altman there,

126

but I assume he's in that category.

127

Put him in, yeah.

128

I mean, how do you think he views you saying reclaim what was stolen from us?

129

Well, I don't know how he will respond.

130

That is my view.

131

That is the foundation of AI.

132

Your program is going to be part of AI.

133

This discussion is part of AI.

134

Do you think the people in the world who contributed,

135

who created, in a sense,

136

the knowledge that is AI deserve to be compensated?

137

I do.

138

You know, people might watch this

139

and think that's a really radical idea in terms of the government having this ownership stake in this.

140

But I mean, we haven't seen a ton of criticism from Republicans for the president taking these stakes

141

that they've taken in more than 20 companies.

142

I think, look, AI is so consequential and so transformational that I think the American people are sitting back and saying,

143

wait a minute, we cannot just allow these guys to re-alter society.

144

We have got to have some input in that.

145

And you are seeing that,

146

Caitlin, right now all over this country in terms of opposition to data centers.

147

And I think clearly a significant part of that opposition is people don't want to pay higher electric bills.

148

They're worried about the noise, the environmental impact.

149

But I think in the back of people's minds saying,

150

hey, are my kids going to be able to have any jobs?

151

Is my daughter going to be hooked up to some AI bots in an emotional relationship?

152

Are millions of jobs going to be wiped out?

153

People are very worried about AI.

154

They want some input into how it unfolds in the future.

155

So Sam Altman will be on Capitol Hill tomorrow.

156

You'll be meeting with him.

157

We'll see what happens there.

TRENDING

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

☕ हमें एक कॉफी पिलाएं

आपके समर्थन के कारण ShadowingEnglish 100% मुफ्त है। सर्वर और AI की लागत अधिक है — आपकी कॉफी हमें आगे बढ़ने में मदद करती है! 🙏

PayPal के माध्यम से दान करें

ShadowingEnglish.com – अंग्रेज़ी शैडोइंग अभ्यास

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Why Bernie Sanders wants to force AI companies to share their wealth - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

लोकप्रिय

इस वीडियो के साथ बोलने का अभ्यास क्यों करें?

संदर्भ में व्याकरण और अभिव्यक्तियाँ

सामान्य उच्चारण के जाल

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Why Bernie Sanders wants to force AI companies to share their wealth - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

इस वीडियो के साथ बोलने का अभ्यास क्यों करें?

संदर्भ में व्याकरण और अभिव्यक्तियाँ

सामान्य उच्चारण के जाल

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?