シャドーイング練習: What Really Won the Trillion-Dollar Supreme Court Case | Neal Kumar Katyal | TED - YouTubeで英語スピーキングを学ぶ
C1
There is a mahogany podium at the Supreme Court of the United States.
204 文
文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。
1
There is a mahogany podium at the Supreme Court of the United States.
2
One person died there, mid-argument, a stroke.
3
Another collapsed there, dying soon thereafter.
4
That's the podium.
5
It also happens to be where I practice law.
6
The most powerful court on earth.
7
Nine minds ready to attack -- and you stand 10 feet away from them.
8
There are no prepared speeches in this court.
9
Instead, 50 questions thrown at you in 30 minutes.
10
I'm making hundreds of decisions in real time.
11
Every argument I choose to make or not make, every word, every pause, every tone.
12
There are no rewinds.
13
Flinch and the justices pounce.
14
That's my courtroom.
15
But each of you has something like that.
16
A place in which words matter.
17
The right words can win and the wrong words [make a] huge difference.
18
Five months ago, I stood before that podium asking the Supreme Court to do something it had never done in its history: declare a president’s four-trillion-dollar signature initiative unconstitutional.
19
(Applause) And I had a secret.
20
April 2, 2025.
21
The president dusts off a 1977 law and imposes tariffs on virtually every country on earth.
22
No congressional vote -- nothing like that whatsoever -- just his word.
23
And here’s what’s at stake: if the president can command the global economy by yelling emergency, what can't he do?
24
Checks and balances don't just bend, they break.
25
I was hired to kill it.
26
Legal scholars, commentators [and] my own colleagues said it was impossible.
27
They said the president has nominated three of the justices on the court, and three others were appointed by Republican presidents.
28
They're not going to go against their president, they said.
29
I thought that was wrong.
30
But the real problem was that the Supreme Court never in its history, in 237 years, has declared a signature initiative of the president unconstitutional.
31
I was hired to do what no lawyer had done in 237 years.
32
My first thought?
33
"Hell, yes." (Laughter) My second thought?
34
“What in the world is wrong with me?” People have died at that podium, and I'm about to tell the world's most powerful man he can't do what he just did?" I had the self-preservation instincts of a moth near a bug zapper.
35
(Laughter) So for months, I prepared for the argument of my life.
36
Three weeks before that argument, one of my own teammates decided to try and take me down so that he could argue the case.
37
He campaigned, he lobbied, he made calls.
38
Just a few days before the argument, about two weeks, The Washington Post runs an editorial somehow, and I’m going to read this to you word for word: "Strategic mistake." I read it over breakfast.
39
Look, I don't begrudge the guy.
40
I mean, whatever.
41
(Laughter) I had more important things to do because I wasn't replaced.
42
Up I walked to that mahogany podium, and I won.
43
The President's tariffs declared unconstitutional.
44
(Applause) OK, look, I know how this sounds.
45
Lawyer wins big case, gets a fancy TED talk invitation, talks for 14 minutes about how great he is.
46
I’ve seen that guy at dinner parties -- nobody stays for dessert.
47
So that's not what this is.
48
This is the behind-the-scenes story of four teachers that helped me connect.
49
And it's also about one secret that I've never told anyone about when I walked out of that courtroom.
50
[The] first connection I needed was with myself.
51
I was terrified of blowing the case.
52
And that Washington Post editorial didn’t help matters.
53
A month before the argument, I met Ben.
54
Ben coaches sports legends, Andre Agassi, Olympians and the like.
55
His whole thing is about “game day.” That moment when everything you’ve been preparing for either shows up, or it doesn't.
56
Ben's first question to me: "What are you afraid of?" Now look, at that point, I’d argued 52 cases.
57
I’d saved the Voting Rights Act.
58
I'd struck down the Guantanamo military tribunals.
59
But Ben forced me to admit a truth I'd buried from myself.
60
Every time I walked into the court, I looked at those portraits on the walls and thought: they don’t look like me, I don't belong here.
61
Imposter syndrome doesn't care about how many cases you won.
62
It cares about only your doubts.
63
Ben didn’t dismiss this.
64
He worked with it.
65
He had me write down five adjectives and visualize them every day before our pretend court.
66
About 18 hours before the argument, Ben calls and says, “How are you feeling?” And I say, "Honestly, I'm terrified.
67
I've got to do a great job.
68
I've got to remember 500 things.
69
I've got to deliver an argument for history." Ben says, “You know, change the vowel, use an ‘e’ instead of an ‘o.’” He says, "What do you get to do?" And instantly it pours out of me: "I get to defend the Constitution of the United States.
70
I get to, the son of immigrants, remind the country of what it's about.
71
I get to defend my parents' vision of America." (Cheers and applause) One letter.
72
The terror didn't disappear, but it transformed into joy.
73
So was Ben the secret, an elite sports coach, who teaches people about mindset?
74
No. But he got me ready.
75
The second thing I needed was connection to information at scale.
76
I assembled the most relentless legal team in the country.
77
They stress-tested every argument until only the best ones survived.
78
But I needed more.
79
I needed someone who was absolutely relentless.
80
I found Harvey.
81
Harvey reads the 200th tariff case the same way as he reads the first.
82
Shoot. Honestly, this is my first time using PowerPoint.
83
I've given hundreds of speeches -- (Laughter) I didn't want to use it, but they told me to.
84
So anyway -- (Laughter) The picture's not coming up, but that's fine.
85
Don't worry about it.
86
So let's see.
87
OK, fine, good, we're good.
88
You know, a month before the argument, Harvey told me that I should expect a question from Justice Barrett about license fees.
89
And the yellow is what Harvey told me to predict, and blue is what Justice Barrett actually said at the argument.
90
It's almost verbatim.
91
So Harvey taught me peripheral vision: the idea [that] if you read a lot, you can see patterns and come up with stuff and anticipate the angles of attack before it arrived.
92
So was this secret a team of relentless lawyers who never slept, who pressure-tested everything?
93
Closer, but that's not it either.
94
The third thing I needed was the hardest.
95
And it’s something we’ve been talking about today: connection.
96
Here, I needed to connect with nine very skeptical legal minds and to do so in real time.
97
Enter Liz, my improv coach.
98
What does improv have to do with the Supreme Court of the United States?
99
Everything.
100
Liz's secret: “Neal, you need to actually listen.
101
Actually listen.” She taught me to quiet my own thoughts and to trust myself to come up with the words after the other person had spoken.
102
That’s the essence of “yes, and.” Absorb the question and then build on it.
103
When the justices attacked, I validated their concerns and then bridged back.
104
The interrogation became a dialogue.
105
The room's energy flipped.
106
(Audio) NKK: This power, as Justice Gorsuch said, as Justice Barrett said, is going to be stuck with us forever.
107
Justice Alito, I think you've said many times, the purpose isn't what you look at, you look to actually what the government is doing.
108
Thank you, Justice Kavanaugh.
109
So, five answers on the Nixon precedent.
110
Tariffs are constitutionally special because our Founders feared revenue raising, unlike embargoes.
111
There was no Boston Embargo Party, but there was certainly a Boston Tea Party.
112
Justice Sotomayor, I wish I had an hour to talk about this with you, because this argument by the government is wrong every which way.
113
Justice Alito: I wonder if you ever thought that your legacy as a constitutional advocate would be "the man who revived the non-delegation argument?" NKK: Heck, yes, Justice Alito.
114
So was the secret an improv coach who taught a lawyer to “yes, and” the justices?
115
That would be a hell of a TED talk.
116
But no, that's not it either.
117
(Laughter) Liz taught me the power of connection.
118
And the fourth teacher, the fourth teacher, the one who taught me the most important thing.
119
The thing we forget: to connect with yourself.
120
Enter Bob, my meditation coach.
121
Now I am just about the last person to meditate.
122
I thought meditation was for people who own crystals.
123
I do not own crystals.
124
(Laughter) But -- (Laughter) Way before, way before the tariffs argument, I started working with Bob, and he had me, 20 minutes a day, focus on a single word.
125
He didn't send an app.
126
He actually rented an apartment a block from the court.
127
And we worked together every day, focusing on that word.
128
Bob didn't just give me a mantra, he gave me a weapon.
129
When I walked into court that day, the static was cleared.
130
I was calm. I was dangerous.
131
Was Bob the secret, the crystal-free meditation coach?
132
No. But close.
133
Because Bob, like Ben, like Liz, are human.
134
That fourth teacher is not.
135
Harvey is an AI.
136
A bespoke system I'd been building with a legal AI company for the last year.
137
And I trained it on every question asked by a Supreme Court justice in the last 25 years and everything they've written, every opinion, every concurrence, every dissent, every separate opinion.
138
And in that, patterns emerged.
139
It predicted the contours of the very argument I would face.
140
It knew that Justice Gorsuch would ask me about the taxing power.
141
It knew Justice Kavanaugh was going to grill me on tariffs versus embargoes.
142
It nailed Justice Barrett's worry about tariff refunds.
143
And the Chief Justice?
144
It didn’t just predict his question, it predicted a possible escape route.
145
How the Chief Justice could vote for us and at the same time protect the institution he had spent his entire career defending.
146
Harvey glimpsed that narrow door, I held the door open, the Chief Justice walked through it, riding a six-to-three opinion, striking down the tariffs.
147
Harvey even predicted Justice Gorsuch's separate opinion, striking down the tariffs, almost verbatim.
148
Now I want to be precise about something.
149
I'm a lawyer, precision really matters.
150
What we were doing was not some trick.
151
We weren't pulling some fast one over on the court when we predicted these things.
152
Because predictability is what we want, especially in courts.
153
A justice who returns to the same principles case after case, year after year, is a justice with character.
154
Predictability is just consistency made visible.
155
It is, in every sense, a compliment.
156
What Harvey found in these justices was not weakness.
157
It was integrity.
158
But if I had just parroted Harvey's output, I would have lost the case 10-zero, and there aren’t even 10 justices.
159
(Laughter) Because AI has a shadow side.
160
When a tool is powerful, when a tool is powerful, you've all seen it, people stop thinking.
161
"The computer says so." Four words, human judgment ends, then people just fold like a cheap lawn chair.
162
The machine thinks, the human just nods, and in that nod somewhere, we disappear.
163
My legal team never nodded.
164
Harvey was not some god, it was our sparring partner -- brilliant, tireless, occasionally insufferable -- but not a god.
165
Harvey asked the questions, we found the answer[s].
166
Now this is bigger than just law.
167
It's about all of us.
168
For centuries, the expert was the person who read the most, who remembered the most, who'd seen the most, the seasoned doctor, the experienced lawyer.
169
Their edge was accumulated knowledge.
170
AI is making that edge nearly worthless.
171
Not because humans no longer matter, but because that particular advantage, pattern recognition across vast data and breadth of knowledge, is now available to anyone.
172
AI can analyze, AI can predict.
173
But the one thing AI can't do is the thing that actually won that argument.
174
Connect. That's the last irreplaceable human skill.
175
Persuade one person to change their mind by appealing to something beneath the surface.
176
Adjust not just the argument, but the delivery, the pause, the tone, the look that says, "I hear you.
177
And here is my answer." You know, at one moment in the argument, Justice Barrett asked a question that Harvey hadn't predicted.
178
And I remember it felt like she and I were the only two people in that marble and mahogany room.
179
And in the half-second before I answered, I did something no algorithm can do.
180
I looked at her.
181
I really looked.
182
I wanted to understand her worry.
183
And I answered the worry.
184
That lesson is true for all of us.
185
You don't just got to do it, you get to do it, in an interview, in a negotiation, in a conversation that could save a marriage or end one.
186
Any place in which you need to reach another human and actually connect.
187
The question AI poses to every one of us is not will you be replaced?
188
The question is, what is the irreducibly human thing that you do?
189
Go deeper into it.
190
Not to "survive AI," but to come home to yourself.
191
That's where your edge lives.
192
So Ben taught me to reframe, Harvey gave me foresight, Liz taught me to listen and Bob taught me stillness.
193
Four teachers, four connections, one argument.
194
An argument that some have called the most important decision the Supreme Court has made in a century.
195
When I walked into the court that day, I never felt more like I was exactly where I was meant to be.
196
I brought to the podium no mountain of legal notes, just an email from Liz about the power of connection.
197
And on the top of that, in my own handwriting, scrawled my parents' names, my children's names, my wife's name.
198
The people I was fighting for.
199
My father was my first audience.
200
He didn't get to live to see this argument, but as I walked out of the courtroom afterwards, past those marble walls, past the portraits of people who didn't look like me, I got a text on my phone, an email from Ben.
201
"So happy for you, Neal!
202
I think your dad was watching over you too." The newest technology, the oldest human wisdom, the most powerful court.
203
I get to do that.
204
(Applause and cheers)
アプリをダウンロード
話したすべての文をAIが採点
TRENDING
人気動画
この動画でスピーキング練習をする理由
このTEDトークでは、合衆国最高裁判所での法廷でのやり取りが描かれています。実際の法廷では、正確な言葉遣いと瞬時の判断力が求められます。こうしたダイナミックでプレッシャーのかかる環境は、英語スピーキングの練習において非常に役立ちます。特に、IELTS スピーキング対策や英語スピーキング練習を行う際には、言葉がどのように使われ、どのように感情や意図が伝わるかを学ぶ絶好の機会です。
文法と表現の文脈
- 受動態: 「It was declared unconstitutional」という表現では、誰が何をしたかを強調するのではなく、出来事そのものに焦点を当てています。スピーキングでは、こうした受動態を使うことで、よりフォーマルな印象を与えることができます。
- 疑問文の使用: 「What can't he do?」のような質問形式は、聴衆の興味を引きつけ、考えさせる効果があります。こうしたスタイルを取り入れることで、会話をより引き立てることができます。
- 比喩の使用: 「self-preservation instincts of a moth near a bug zapper」という表現は、強いイメージを生み出します。日常会話においても比喩を使うことで、より生き生きとした表現が可能になります。
これらの文法構造を意識して練習することで、より自然な英語を身につけることができるでしょう。shadowspeakやshadowspeaksの練習を通じて、これらの表現を自分のものにすることができます。
一般的な発音の落とし穴
この動画の中で特に注意したい単語は「unconstitutional」や「initiative」などです。これらの単語は、言い慣れるまで時間がかかります。言葉を正確に発音することは、スピーキングにおいて重要です。特に「unconstitutional」のように音節が多い言葉は、練習を重ねて流暢に言えるようになることが求められます。
また、「president」や「tariffs」のようなスラングやアクセントも注意が必要です。こうした発音の練習をすることで、英語スピーキングの効果を抜群に高めることができます。このように高度な表現と発音に挑戦することは、英語スピーキング練習において非常に価値があります。
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。