쉐도잉 연습: Should social media be censored? Here's what both sides have to say - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

C1
There's been much debate this past year about freedom of speech and social media.
⏸ 일시 정지
82 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
There's been much debate this past year about freedom of speech and social media.
2
We should err on the side of greater expression.
3
They are literally spreading lies, misinformation, propaganda.
4
Companies that engage in censoring or any political conduct will not be able to keep their liability shield.
5
The dilemma, should social media companies censor speech that they deem to be hateful or violent or false?
6
Or should they keep it up in the spirit of freedom of speech?
7
And what happens when the speaker is an elected official?
8
I believe that we have two responsibilities.
9
To remove content when it can cause real danger as effectively as we can,
10
and to fight to uphold as wide of a definition of freedom of expression as possible.
11
Of course, the First Amendment doesn't legally apply to Facebook or to Twitter or to Instagram or YouTube.
12
It was written solely to stop the government,
13
not private companies, from censoring speech.
14
The debate has intensified due to one particular post from President Donald Trump,
15
When the looting starts, the shooting starts.
16
Twitter placed a warning label on the tweet saying it glorified violence.
17
Facebook did nothing.
18
You could say that you're all for free speech,
19
but you also need to protect society,
20
especially when you're in the position Facebook is in.
21
Mark Zuckerberg would say that he is standing for a democratic principle
22
which is freedom of expression and he says
23
that you know a private company like his who is he
24
a billionaire to to be able to you know in some way restrict the speech of the president of the United States.
25
Do you buy that argument?
26
I do not.
27
I think that that argument is entirely in Mark Zuckerberg's profit interest.
28
I think what we're seeing is Mark Zuckerberg is saying,
29
you know, I don't want to rile up the president.
30
I don't want to invite regulatory action.
31
I don't want to tick off the president's following, which also uses Facebook.
32
And, you know, I don't want to alienate them from my own platform
33
because that will detract from my own revenue and engagement on my own platform.
34
But those who argue Facebook should operate in the spirit of free speech say it's a slippery slope to remove
35
or even to fact check political speech.
36
Where would you draw a line if you were Facebook when it comes to a Trump post?
37
So I think that Facebook cordons off a couple of very narrow areas which are wise to
38
shut down and that is things like misleading speech about elections themselves.
39
If Trump posted Hey everyone,
40
go vote on election day on this date,
41
and it was the wrong date.
42
I think that's reasonable to take down because it is timely and also obviously misleading.
43
For things like hate speech,
44
I think that people should know if the president is using hate speech.
45
You don't think that Facebook should be fact-checking political ads?
46
I don't trust Facebook to do a good job fact-checking political ads.
47
A lot of political claims are tricky, are difficult to fact-check check.
48
A lot of them are true but misleading.
49
These are the kind of categories that the American people needs to hear a full debate about,
50
not Mark Zuckerberg's idea of what the debate should be about.
51
But in fact much of the philosophical debate about freedom of speech and social media has been just that, philosophical.
52
In practice Facebook has taken down political posts.
53
It took down an ad run by the Trump campaign,
54
Twitter has labeled the president's tweets,
55
and all the major platforms have rules restricting posts containing nudity.
56
Facebook's been taking this kind of stuff down that entire time,
57
and now all of a sudden it's an issue.
58
Why is that happening?
59
And you hear conservative bias,
60
but it's actually not conservative bias.
61
They've been taking down that same type of hate speech since 2008,
62
2009, and there's just more of that type of hate speech.
63
The speech of Trump and his party has like come to the rule.
64
It is not that they have all of a sudden changed the rules to be biased against conservatives.
65
I think people who genuinely believe that,
66
you know, private companies should not in any way interfere with anything a politician is saying,
67
no matter how objectionable it might be.
68
Do you think that there is an argument there?
69
That is a valid argument.
70
That yes, if you're Mark Zuckerberg,
71
It makes sense to say that,
72
look, if I start moderating content,
73
I'm going to invite a discussion over the regulatory terms that be,
74
over my company, over content moderation.
75
And to that I would say, well, let's welcome that.
76
Because I think the time is ripe to have an open discussion about what's right in this society and what's wrong,
77
especially when we have such a dirty and noisy media environment thanks to Facebook.
78
In a blog post, Facebook said the responsibility to fact check political ads shouldn't be left to private companies,
79
writing, The sooner Facebook and other companies are subject to democratically accountable rules on this, the better.
80
But in the meantime, ahead of the 2020 election,
81
Facebook announced it is allowing users to opt out of political ads.
82
For some critics though, the question remains, is it enough?

앱 다운로드

당신이 말하는 모든 문장을 AI가 채점

스캔하여 다운로드
스캔하여 다운로드
Download on theApp Store
Get it onGoogle Play
TRENDING

인기 동영상

맥락 및 배경

소셜 미디어와 표현의 자유에 대한 논의는 현재 매우 뜨거운 주제입니다. 한편에서는 표현의 자유를 지키자는 주장을 하고, 다른 편에서는 허위 정보와 혐오 발언으로부터 사회를 보호해야 한다고 주장합니다. 이 대화는 도널드 트럼프 전 대통령의 트윗을 계기로 더욱 주목받았으며, 소셜 미디어 플랫폼들이 이러한 종류의 표현을 어떻게 다뤄야 하는지에 대한 복잡한 질문을 제기하고 있습니다. 이 대화에서 다양한 의견과 원칙들이 제시되며, 언론과 사회의 책임을 논의하게 됩니다.

일상적인 의사소통을 위한 상위 5개 구문

  • 우리는 더 많은 표현의 자유를 지켜야 한다고 믿습니다. (We should err on the side of greater expression.)
  • 이건 정말 위험할 수 있는 내용입니다. (This can cause real danger.)
  • 정당한 표현의 정의를 넓히기 위해 싸워야 합니다. (We must fight to uphold a wide definition of freedom of expression.)
  • 소셜 미디어는 이러한 발언을 조정해야 할까요? (Should social media companies censor these types of speech?)
  • 정치적 광고에 대한 사실 확인을 신뢰하지 않습니다. (I don't trust Facebook to do a good job fact-checking political ads.)

단계별 쉐도잉 가이드

이 비디오에서 다룬 내용을 효과적으로 습득하기 위해 영어 쉐도잉 기술을 활용하세요. 다음 단계에 따라 연습해 보세요.

  1. 비디오를 시청하세요: 내용을 이해하기 위해 전체 비디오를 처음에는 한 번 그대로 시청합니다.
  2. 섹션별로 나누세요: 비디오를 짧은 섹션으로 나누고 각 섹션을 반복해서 듣습니다.
  3. 대사 따라 읽기: 각 섹션의 내용을 들으면서 발음을 맞춰 작은 소리로 따라 읽습니다. 이때 영어 발음 교정에 신경 쓰세요.
  4. 쉐도잉 연습하기: 원어민의 발음과 억양을 따라 하며 shadowspeak 하듯이 반복합니다. 이 시간 동안 자신의 발음을 녹음해 보세요.
  5. 피드백 받기: 친구나 선생님에게 피드백을 요청하여 자신의 발음과 억양을 개선해 보세요. 이것은 영어 회화 연습에 큰 도움이 됩니다.

이 과정을 통해 언어 능력을 향상시키고 타인의 발음과 패턴을 따라하며 영어를 자신감 있게 구사할 수 있도록 합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기