Shadowing Practice: Scientists still don't know the answer to this infamous question - Charles Wallace & Dan Kwartler - Learn English Speaking with YouTube

C1
After waking up alone in a locked room, two documents are slipped under your door: a note in an alien language and a detailed instruction manual in your language.
⏸ Paused
37 sentences
If sentences are too short or too long, click Edit to adjust them.
1
After waking up alone in a locked room, two documents are slipped under your door: a note in an alien language and a detailed instruction manual in your language.
2
The manual explains that for each alien character in the note, you should write an indicated corresponding symbol.
3
Following this chart, you write a response that you slip out the door.
4
And for the next several days, this exchange continues.
5
Outside the room, alien scientists are thrilled because they believe you’re conversing with them.
6
But you still have no idea what these characters mean.
7
This scenario isn’t just a bizarre misunderstanding— it’s a valuable thought experiment for understanding artificial intelligence.
8
Philosopher John Searle developed the original version of this premise in 1980, as a response to some of the AI work being done at the time.
9
But while modern AI models don't work like those outdated machines or the prisoner in Searle’s hypothetical, the question motivating his thought experiment is still relevant.
10
To quote Searle, he wanted to interrogate whether an “appropriately programmed computer literally has cognitive states.” In other words, if a computer looks like it understands something, does that mean it actually understands the way a human does?
11
Searle’s question falls into a long tradition of exploring whether or not AI could have a mind like ours.
12
But answering these inquiries is incredibly difficult because, as philosophers and cognitive scientists will tell you, we still don’t know how our minds work.
13
Even our fundamental definitions are slippery!
14
Theorists generally agree that concepts like understanding, sentience, and consciousness are all different, but also that they’re related, and we don’t know how.
15
Worse still, our usual scientific tools struggle to help us understand these experiences.
16
Consider drinking a cup of coffee.
17
Scientists can observe the physical process of ingesting the coffee, and we can measure the chemical impacts of caffeine on your body.
18
These things are objective realities.
19
But your collective sensation of smelling, sipping, evaluating, and experiencing a morning routine is more than the sum of its parts.
20
This is consciousness— your subjective experience of being alive.
21
And despite major leaps in psychology, cognitive science, and neurology, researchers still don’t know how various firing neurons bring about this experience.
22
So if we can't define consciousness and understanding or identify what's uniquely human about them, how can we possibly test for these states in computers?
23
Assessments like the Turing Test propose that if a human can't tell they're conversing with a computer, that computer could be seen as having some internal cognition.
24
But this scenario is exactly what Searle was criticizing!
25
This computer might just have the appearance of understanding.
26
And just like cognitive scientists struggling to map consciousness onto brain activity, today’s AI researchers know how they trained their creations, but not how AIs reach their exact conclusions.
27
There are some ways in which modern machine learning models are less mysterious than their predecessors.
28
Approaches like neural networks and deep learning are designed to mimic known elements of human cognition.
29
Like us, these models excel at pattern recognition— they learn by becoming familiar with information and forming connections across data sets.
30
This kind of processing arguably approaches Searle’s definition of understanding— but it also reveals a bias in his original question.
31
Since humans learn through pattern recognition and we believe ourselves to be conscious, we might also be predisposed to think other beings who learn the same way are somehow closer to consciousness as well.
32
To combat this bias, some theorists have developed a different metric; specifically, that a fully conscious AI could draw connections beyond the information in its data set.
33
For example, one lab’s “artificial consciousness test” probes AIs that have no data about consciousness for information they could only acquire from being conscious.
34
This might involve asking an AI if it understands dreaming, or can report having had dreams itself.
35
Can it understand a story about body swapping, where consciousnesses are shuffled between physical forms?
36
It’s unclear when or if an AI will be able to understand us the way we understand each other.
37
But whatever happens, it’s up to us already conscious creatures to chart the path forward.

Download App

AI scoring for every sentence you speak

Scan To Download
Scan To Download
Download on theApp Store
Get it onGoogle Play
TRENDING

Popular

Context & Background

The discussion between Charles Wallace and Dan Kwartler dives into a thought-provoking scenario rooted in cognitive science and artificial intelligence. It begins with an imaginative setup where a person in a locked room receives messages in an alien language, contrasting this with detailed instructions in their native tongue. This sets the stage for a deep exploration of understanding and cognition—core themes that remain relevant despite advancements in AI. As Wallace and Kwartler navigate these complex ideas, they highlight the limitations of our current understanding of both human consciousness and machine learning, making it a rich context for English learners interested in philosophical discourse.

Top 5 Phrases for Daily Communication

  • "I have no idea what this means." - A common expression showing confusion or lack of understanding.
  • "It’s a valuable thought experiment." - Indicates an idea worth considering, often used in discussions.
  • "We still don’t know how our minds work." - A statement reflecting on the mysteries of human cognition.
  • "These experiences are more than the sum of their parts." - A phrase highlighting the complexity of certain phenomena.
  • "This scenario raises important questions." - Useful for engaging in discussions about complex topics.

Step-by-step Shadowing Guide

To maximize your learning and improve your spoken English skills using this fascinating video, follow this structured shadowing approach:

  1. Watch the Video Without Sound: Begin by observing the visual cues and gestures of the speakers. This will help you understand their emotions and emphasis.
  2. Listen Actively: Play the video with sound, focusing on how the speakers articulate their ideas. Take note of their inflections and rhythm.
  3. Repeat Phrases: Select the top phrases listed above. Pause the video after each phrase and repeat it aloud. Mimicking their pronunciation and intonation will enhance your speech clarity.
  4. Use a Shadowing App: Incorporate a shadowing app to practice these phrases while syncing with the video. This technique allows for real-time feedback on your pronunciation.
  5. Engage in Dialogue: Create a discussion group or find a conversation partner to practice these phrases in context. Engaging in dialogues will reinforce your English speaking practice in a natural setting.

By following this guide, you will not only strengthen your linguistic skills but also gain a deeper understanding of the complex themes discussed, making it a fulfilling way to learn English with YouTube.

What is the Shadowing Technique?

Shadowing is a science-backed language learning technique originally developed for professional interpreter training and popularized by polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. The method is simple but powerful: you listen to native English audio and immediately repeat it out loud — like a shadow following the speaker with just a 1–2 second delay. Unlike passive listening or grammar drills, shadowing forces your brain and mouth muscles to simultaneously process and reproduce real speech patterns. Research shows it significantly improves pronunciation accuracy, intonation, rhythm, connected speech, listening comprehension, and speaking fluency — making it one of the most effective methods for IELTS Speaking preparation and real-world English communication.

☕ Buy us a coffee