Prática de Shadowing: Why Bernie Sanders wants to force AI companies to share their wealth - Aprenda a falar inglês com o YouTube
B2
here in the Senate on Capitol Hill,
157 frases
Se as frases estiverem muito curtas ou longas, clique em Edit para ajustá-las.
1
here in the Senate on Capitol Hill,
2
Senator Bernie Sanders has just announced plans to introduce a new bill
3
that would give the government a direct ownership stake in the largest American AI companies.
4
Senator Sanders is my source tonight,
5
and thank you, Senator, for being here.
6
We see what the president signed today.
7
Regarding your legislation, can you explain how this would work if the federal government owned half of these AI companies?
8
I think the concern all over the country about AI
9
is that it is owned and directed by a handful of the wealthiest people in the world,
10
Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and those guys.
11
And nobody believes that they have the welfare of the American people at heart.
12
They want to get richer and even more powerful.
13
So the question is, should we allow a handful of oligarchs to determine literally the future of humanity?
14
AI is going to be the most transformational technology in the history of the world.
15
So what my legislation will do are several major things.
16
Number one, it says that because the foundation of AI is based on all human knowledge,
17
all right, AI will absorb what this program is about.
18
The five books that I read,
19
all the poets, all the scientific work,
20
that's what AI is about, okay?
21
People who contribute to that deserve some of the wealth that is being created.
22
More importantly, we cannot allow just a handful of oligarchs to determine the future.
23
If we have 50 percent of public ownership of these companies,
24
we can say no to ideas that will lead to mass unemployment,
25
invasion of privacy, endangerment of children's health,
26
or maybe even an existential threat to the planet if AI becomes independent of human.
27
Why do you need to take control of them?
28
Why can't you just regulate them,
29
tax them as is currently?
30
Well, for two reasons.
31
Well, one, I think, Javi,
32
this is, again, this is the most transformational technology in history,
33
and it is based on human knowledge.
34
So human beings deserve to be compensated for what they put into AI.
35
Second of all, we need to determine the future.
36
Can't just be a handful of billionaires.
37
That's why.
38
I mean, when you look at this in terms of how this works,
39
some of these companies might just see this and say,
40
if this legislation passes, I'm just going to move my company to another country.
41
Well, that's the same.
42
That's what they're saying in California about a wealth tax.
43
I mean, that's a whole other- You would have deciding power here, the government would.
44
Yeah, we think, I think,
45
and I think most Americans agree,
46
that the future of humanity should not be determined by a handful of the wealthiest people on earth.
47
That the public in a democratic process should have input into the way the world is going to move.
48
And also, you know, you talked about the American people deserving part of the profits from this,
49
part of the money from this.
50
The president has signed an executive order about creating a sovereign wealth fund for the United States.
51
I mean, that's what you're suggesting here.
52
The Trump administration also has equity now,
53
equity stakes in, I think,
54
more than 20 private companies.
55
How is what you're doing different than what the president is doing?
56
Well, it is radically different.
57
And by the way, the idea of a sovereign wealth fund is not a radical idea.
58
You know, Norway has a fund based on their oil revenue of over $2 trillion.
59
But from the revenues.
60
From their revenues.
61
They don't have a controlling stake in the actual companies.
62
Right, right.
63
And Alaska, by the way,
64
the state of Alaska, also has a sovereign wealth fund where they distribute money based on oil revenue as well.
65
But oil is a natural resources,
66
and so is human labor.
67
All of the contributions that humanity has made into AI deserves to be compensated,
68
and people deserve to get that wealth redistributed back to them.
69
But is this an area where you see agreement with the president?
70
Well, the president says a whole lot of stuff.
71
I happen not to trust much of what he says.
72
But I'm talking about sovereign wealth fund.
73
The concept of a sovereign wealth fund is not a radical idea.
74
It exists.
75
I think there are at least 100 of them around the world.
76
Again, bottom line is people have the foundation of AI is the knowledge that human beings have contributed.
77
We deserve to be compensated.
78
Second of all, we need to put breaks on AI when it leads to mass unemployment,
79
endangering children's health, etc. You know,
80
when you look at this,
81
if this plan existed right now,
82
if this legislation went through and passed,
83
you know, what you have described,
84
this technology that you've said is a threat to everything the American people hold dear,
85
I believe was your exact quote.
86
I mean, the president and Republican majorities would have deciding factors in these companies.
87
That's true.
88
But on the other hand, that is democracy.
89
And I hope very much that President Trump and the Republicans will not be in power for that much longer.
90
But at the end of the day,
91
I'm just saying if it passed.
92
Well, all right.
93
So the question is, do we want Democratic control?
94
Or do we want Mr. Musk and a handful of billionaires to make those decisions?
95
I prefer the democracy where people still could have impact on Republicans, on Mr. Trump.
96
You can't have that impact on the CEOs of these large corporations.
97
Sam Altman is going to be in Washington.
98
I believe tomorrow he's got meetings lined up.
99
I know at the White House,
100
I believe with some of your colleagues.
101
Are you going to be meeting with him?
102
Yeah.
103
Oh, okay.
104
And are you going to talk to him about your legislation?
105
Who set that meeting up?
106
He did.
107
And do you think it was because of this? Who knows?
108
What are you going to say to him?
109
What am I going to say to him?
110
I'll say to him tomorrow what I'll say to him. But,
111
I mean, what we will discuss is the need for a moratorium
112
so that we can have a democratic debate and discussion about the future of AI,
113
talk about that.
114
We will talk about the need for international cooperation so that we do not have a super intelligence,
115
super AI created, which can escape human control.
116
I'm just wondering what he's going to say when you,
117
I mean, in your video announcing your legislation,
118
you said the time has come to reclaim what has been stolen from us.
119
Yes.
120
Since AI is built on the collective knowledge of humanity,
121
the wealth it generates must also benefit humanity,
122
not just Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos.
123
That's right.
124
Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison.
125
You didn't name Sam Altman there,
126
but I assume he's in that category.
127
Put him in, yeah.
128
I mean, how do you think he views you saying reclaim what was stolen from us?
129
Well, I don't know how he will respond.
130
That is my view.
131
That is the foundation of AI.
132
Your program is going to be part of AI.
133
This discussion is part of AI.
134
Do you think the people in the world who contributed,
135
who created, in a sense,
136
the knowledge that is AI deserve to be compensated?
137
I do.
138
You know, people might watch this
139
and think that's a really radical idea in terms of the government having this ownership stake in this.
140
But I mean, we haven't seen a ton of criticism from Republicans for the president taking these stakes
141
that they've taken in more than 20 companies.
142
I think, look, AI is so consequential and so transformational that I think the American people are sitting back and saying,
143
wait a minute, we cannot just allow these guys to re-alter society.
144
We have got to have some input in that.
145
And you are seeing that,
146
Caitlin, right now all over this country in terms of opposition to data centers.
147
And I think clearly a significant part of that opposition is people don't want to pay higher electric bills.
148
They're worried about the noise, the environmental impact.
149
But I think in the back of people's minds saying,
150
hey, are my kids going to be able to have any jobs?
151
Is my daughter going to be hooked up to some AI bots in an emotional relationship?
152
Are millions of jobs going to be wiped out?
153
People are very worried about AI.
154
They want some input into how it unfolds in the future.
155
So Sam Altman will be on Capitol Hill tomorrow.
156
You'll be meeting with him.
157
We'll see what happens there.
Baixar aplicativo
Pontuação por IA para cada frase que você fala
TRENDING
Populares
Por que praticar a fala com este vídeo?
Praticar a fala com o vídeo de Bernie Sanders é uma excelente oportunidade para aprender a expressar opiniões sobre temas relevantes e atuais, como a inteligência artificial e suas implicações sociais. Ao assistir e repetir as falas, você não apenas melhora sua pronúncia, mas também aprende a construir frases complexas e a utilizar vocabulário específico. Essa prática de "shadow speak", ou fala em sombra, é eficaz porque você se coloca no contexto de um debate real, onde a eloquência e a clareza são essenciais. Além disso, você vai entender como argumentar e defender uma posição de forma convincente, uma habilidade valiosa tanto em inglês quanto em qualquer outro idioma.
Gramática & Expressões em Contexto
Vamos analisar algumas estruturas gramaticais e expressões que aparecem na fala do senador:
- "we cannot allow just a handful of oligarchs to determine the future": Esta frase usa a forma negativa para enfatizar a necessidade de uma mudança.
- "the foundation of AI is based on all human knowledge": Aqui, a préposição "on" é crucial para entender a base de um conceito, mostrando o uso de preposições na formação de frases complexas.
- "the future of humanity should not be determined by a handful of the wealthiest people": A estrutura condicional "should not be determined" é interessante, pois indica uma perspectiva ética e moral sobre a responsabilidade coletiva.
Essas expressões e estruturas não só enriquecem seu vocabulário, mas também ajudam a dominar a construção de argumentos que são essenciais em discussões formais.
Armadilhas Comuns de Pronúncia
Algumas palavras e frases que o senador usa podem ser desafiadoras para quem está aprendendo inglês:
- "oligarchs": A pronúncia pode ser complicada, com o som do "g" que pode ser facilmente confundido. Preste atenção na diferença entre "g" suave e forte.
- "transformational": Esta palavra possui uma fonética complexa, especialmente no som "tion" ao final. Pratique a divisão silábica para dominar a pronúncia.
- "existential threat": A combinação de sons nesta expressão pode ser fácil de errar se não forem praticados com atenção. Focar na entonação e no ritmo ajuda a melhorar.
Ao praticar essas palavras e frases através do vídeo, você não apenas se torna proficiente na pronúncia, mas também fica mais confortável em utilizar vocabulários relacionados a debates sociopolíticos, essenciais para melhorar seu inglês falado.
O que é a Técnica de Shadowing?
Shadowing é uma técnica de aprendizado de idiomas com base científica, originalmente desenvolvida para o treinamento de intérpretes profissionais. O método é simples, mas poderoso: você ouve áudio em inglês nativo e repete imediatamente em voz alta — como uma sombra seguindo o falante com 1-2 segundos de atraso. Pesquisas mostram melhora significativa na precisão da pronúncia, entonação, ritmo, sons conectados, compreensão auditiva e fluência na fala.
☕ Pague-nos um café
O ShadowingEnglish permanece 100% gratuito graças ao seu apoio. Os custos de servidor e IA são altos — seu café nos mantém ativos! 🙏