ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: What Really Won the Trillion-Dollar Supreme Court Case | Neal Kumar Katyal | TED
C1
There is a mahogany podium at the Supreme Court of the United States.
204 ประโยค
หากประโยคสั้นหรือยาวเกินไป กดที่ Edit เพื่อปรับแก้
1
There is a mahogany podium at the Supreme Court of the United States.
2
One person died there, mid-argument, a stroke.
3
Another collapsed there, dying soon thereafter.
4
That's the podium.
5
It also happens to be where I practice law.
6
The most powerful court on earth.
7
Nine minds ready to attack -- and you stand 10 feet away from them.
8
There are no prepared speeches in this court.
9
Instead, 50 questions thrown at you in 30 minutes.
10
I'm making hundreds of decisions in real time.
11
Every argument I choose to make or not make, every word, every pause, every tone.
12
There are no rewinds.
13
Flinch and the justices pounce.
14
That's my courtroom.
15
But each of you has something like that.
16
A place in which words matter.
17
The right words can win and the wrong words [make a] huge difference.
18
Five months ago, I stood before that podium asking the Supreme Court to do something it had never done in its history: declare a president’s four-trillion-dollar signature initiative unconstitutional.
19
(Applause) And I had a secret.
20
April 2, 2025.
21
The president dusts off a 1977 law and imposes tariffs on virtually every country on earth.
22
No congressional vote -- nothing like that whatsoever -- just his word.
23
And here’s what’s at stake: if the president can command the global economy by yelling emergency, what can't he do?
24
Checks and balances don't just bend, they break.
25
I was hired to kill it.
26
Legal scholars, commentators [and] my own colleagues said it was impossible.
27
They said the president has nominated three of the justices on the court, and three others were appointed by Republican presidents.
28
They're not going to go against their president, they said.
29
I thought that was wrong.
30
But the real problem was that the Supreme Court never in its history, in 237 years, has declared a signature initiative of the president unconstitutional.
31
I was hired to do what no lawyer had done in 237 years.
32
My first thought?
33
"Hell, yes." (Laughter) My second thought?
34
“What in the world is wrong with me?” People have died at that podium, and I'm about to tell the world's most powerful man he can't do what he just did?" I had the self-preservation instincts of a moth near a bug zapper.
35
(Laughter) So for months, I prepared for the argument of my life.
36
Three weeks before that argument, one of my own teammates decided to try and take me down so that he could argue the case.
37
He campaigned, he lobbied, he made calls.
38
Just a few days before the argument, about two weeks, The Washington Post runs an editorial somehow, and I’m going to read this to you word for word: "Strategic mistake." I read it over breakfast.
39
Look, I don't begrudge the guy.
40
I mean, whatever.
41
(Laughter) I had more important things to do because I wasn't replaced.
42
Up I walked to that mahogany podium, and I won.
43
The President's tariffs declared unconstitutional.
44
(Applause) OK, look, I know how this sounds.
45
Lawyer wins big case, gets a fancy TED talk invitation, talks for 14 minutes about how great he is.
46
I’ve seen that guy at dinner parties -- nobody stays for dessert.
47
So that's not what this is.
48
This is the behind-the-scenes story of four teachers that helped me connect.
49
And it's also about one secret that I've never told anyone about when I walked out of that courtroom.
50
[The] first connection I needed was with myself.
51
I was terrified of blowing the case.
52
And that Washington Post editorial didn’t help matters.
53
A month before the argument, I met Ben.
54
Ben coaches sports legends, Andre Agassi, Olympians and the like.
55
His whole thing is about “game day.” That moment when everything you’ve been preparing for either shows up, or it doesn't.
56
Ben's first question to me: "What are you afraid of?" Now look, at that point, I’d argued 52 cases.
57
I’d saved the Voting Rights Act.
58
I'd struck down the Guantanamo military tribunals.
59
But Ben forced me to admit a truth I'd buried from myself.
60
Every time I walked into the court, I looked at those portraits on the walls and thought: they don’t look like me, I don't belong here.
61
Imposter syndrome doesn't care about how many cases you won.
62
It cares about only your doubts.
63
Ben didn’t dismiss this.
64
He worked with it.
65
He had me write down five adjectives and visualize them every day before our pretend court.
66
About 18 hours before the argument, Ben calls and says, “How are you feeling?” And I say, "Honestly, I'm terrified.
67
I've got to do a great job.
68
I've got to remember 500 things.
69
I've got to deliver an argument for history." Ben says, “You know, change the vowel, use an ‘e’ instead of an ‘o.’” He says, "What do you get to do?" And instantly it pours out of me: "I get to defend the Constitution of the United States.
70
I get to, the son of immigrants, remind the country of what it's about.
71
I get to defend my parents' vision of America." (Cheers and applause) One letter.
72
The terror didn't disappear, but it transformed into joy.
73
So was Ben the secret, an elite sports coach, who teaches people about mindset?
74
No. But he got me ready.
75
The second thing I needed was connection to information at scale.
76
I assembled the most relentless legal team in the country.
77
They stress-tested every argument until only the best ones survived.
78
But I needed more.
79
I needed someone who was absolutely relentless.
80
I found Harvey.
81
Harvey reads the 200th tariff case the same way as he reads the first.
82
Shoot. Honestly, this is my first time using PowerPoint.
83
I've given hundreds of speeches -- (Laughter) I didn't want to use it, but they told me to.
84
So anyway -- (Laughter) The picture's not coming up, but that's fine.
85
Don't worry about it.
86
So let's see.
87
OK, fine, good, we're good.
88
You know, a month before the argument, Harvey told me that I should expect a question from Justice Barrett about license fees.
89
And the yellow is what Harvey told me to predict, and blue is what Justice Barrett actually said at the argument.
90
It's almost verbatim.
91
So Harvey taught me peripheral vision: the idea [that] if you read a lot, you can see patterns and come up with stuff and anticipate the angles of attack before it arrived.
92
So was this secret a team of relentless lawyers who never slept, who pressure-tested everything?
93
Closer, but that's not it either.
94
The third thing I needed was the hardest.
95
And it’s something we’ve been talking about today: connection.
96
Here, I needed to connect with nine very skeptical legal minds and to do so in real time.
97
Enter Liz, my improv coach.
98
What does improv have to do with the Supreme Court of the United States?
99
Everything.
100
Liz's secret: “Neal, you need to actually listen.
101
Actually listen.” She taught me to quiet my own thoughts and to trust myself to come up with the words after the other person had spoken.
102
That’s the essence of “yes, and.” Absorb the question and then build on it.
103
When the justices attacked, I validated their concerns and then bridged back.
104
The interrogation became a dialogue.
105
The room's energy flipped.
106
(Audio) NKK: This power, as Justice Gorsuch said, as Justice Barrett said, is going to be stuck with us forever.
107
Justice Alito, I think you've said many times, the purpose isn't what you look at, you look to actually what the government is doing.
108
Thank you, Justice Kavanaugh.
109
So, five answers on the Nixon precedent.
110
Tariffs are constitutionally special because our Founders feared revenue raising, unlike embargoes.
111
There was no Boston Embargo Party, but there was certainly a Boston Tea Party.
112
Justice Sotomayor, I wish I had an hour to talk about this with you, because this argument by the government is wrong every which way.
113
Justice Alito: I wonder if you ever thought that your legacy as a constitutional advocate would be "the man who revived the non-delegation argument?" NKK: Heck, yes, Justice Alito.
114
So was the secret an improv coach who taught a lawyer to “yes, and” the justices?
115
That would be a hell of a TED talk.
116
But no, that's not it either.
117
(Laughter) Liz taught me the power of connection.
118
And the fourth teacher, the fourth teacher, the one who taught me the most important thing.
119
The thing we forget: to connect with yourself.
120
Enter Bob, my meditation coach.
121
Now I am just about the last person to meditate.
122
I thought meditation was for people who own crystals.
123
I do not own crystals.
124
(Laughter) But -- (Laughter) Way before, way before the tariffs argument, I started working with Bob, and he had me, 20 minutes a day, focus on a single word.
125
He didn't send an app.
126
He actually rented an apartment a block from the court.
127
And we worked together every day, focusing on that word.
128
Bob didn't just give me a mantra, he gave me a weapon.
129
When I walked into court that day, the static was cleared.
130
I was calm. I was dangerous.
131
Was Bob the secret, the crystal-free meditation coach?
132
No. But close.
133
Because Bob, like Ben, like Liz, are human.
134
That fourth teacher is not.
135
Harvey is an AI.
136
A bespoke system I'd been building with a legal AI company for the last year.
137
And I trained it on every question asked by a Supreme Court justice in the last 25 years and everything they've written, every opinion, every concurrence, every dissent, every separate opinion.
138
And in that, patterns emerged.
139
It predicted the contours of the very argument I would face.
140
It knew that Justice Gorsuch would ask me about the taxing power.
141
It knew Justice Kavanaugh was going to grill me on tariffs versus embargoes.
142
It nailed Justice Barrett's worry about tariff refunds.
143
And the Chief Justice?
144
It didn’t just predict his question, it predicted a possible escape route.
145
How the Chief Justice could vote for us and at the same time protect the institution he had spent his entire career defending.
146
Harvey glimpsed that narrow door, I held the door open, the Chief Justice walked through it, riding a six-to-three opinion, striking down the tariffs.
147
Harvey even predicted Justice Gorsuch's separate opinion, striking down the tariffs, almost verbatim.
148
Now I want to be precise about something.
149
I'm a lawyer, precision really matters.
150
What we were doing was not some trick.
151
We weren't pulling some fast one over on the court when we predicted these things.
152
Because predictability is what we want, especially in courts.
153
A justice who returns to the same principles case after case, year after year, is a justice with character.
154
Predictability is just consistency made visible.
155
It is, in every sense, a compliment.
156
What Harvey found in these justices was not weakness.
157
It was integrity.
158
But if I had just parroted Harvey's output, I would have lost the case 10-zero, and there aren’t even 10 justices.
159
(Laughter) Because AI has a shadow side.
160
When a tool is powerful, when a tool is powerful, you've all seen it, people stop thinking.
161
"The computer says so." Four words, human judgment ends, then people just fold like a cheap lawn chair.
162
The machine thinks, the human just nods, and in that nod somewhere, we disappear.
163
My legal team never nodded.
164
Harvey was not some god, it was our sparring partner -- brilliant, tireless, occasionally insufferable -- but not a god.
165
Harvey asked the questions, we found the answer[s].
166
Now this is bigger than just law.
167
It's about all of us.
168
For centuries, the expert was the person who read the most, who remembered the most, who'd seen the most, the seasoned doctor, the experienced lawyer.
169
Their edge was accumulated knowledge.
170
AI is making that edge nearly worthless.
171
Not because humans no longer matter, but because that particular advantage, pattern recognition across vast data and breadth of knowledge, is now available to anyone.
172
AI can analyze, AI can predict.
173
But the one thing AI can't do is the thing that actually won that argument.
174
Connect. That's the last irreplaceable human skill.
175
Persuade one person to change their mind by appealing to something beneath the surface.
176
Adjust not just the argument, but the delivery, the pause, the tone, the look that says, "I hear you.
177
And here is my answer." You know, at one moment in the argument, Justice Barrett asked a question that Harvey hadn't predicted.
178
And I remember it felt like she and I were the only two people in that marble and mahogany room.
179
And in the half-second before I answered, I did something no algorithm can do.
180
I looked at her.
181
I really looked.
182
I wanted to understand her worry.
183
And I answered the worry.
184
That lesson is true for all of us.
185
You don't just got to do it, you get to do it, in an interview, in a negotiation, in a conversation that could save a marriage or end one.
186
Any place in which you need to reach another human and actually connect.
187
The question AI poses to every one of us is not will you be replaced?
188
The question is, what is the irreducibly human thing that you do?
189
Go deeper into it.
190
Not to "survive AI," but to come home to yourself.
191
That's where your edge lives.
192
So Ben taught me to reframe, Harvey gave me foresight, Liz taught me to listen and Bob taught me stillness.
193
Four teachers, four connections, one argument.
194
An argument that some have called the most important decision the Supreme Court has made in a century.
195
When I walked into the court that day, I never felt more like I was exactly where I was meant to be.
196
I brought to the podium no mountain of legal notes, just an email from Liz about the power of connection.
197
And on the top of that, in my own handwriting, scrawled my parents' names, my children's names, my wife's name.
198
The people I was fighting for.
199
My father was my first audience.
200
He didn't get to live to see this argument, but as I walked out of the courtroom afterwards, past those marble walls, past the portraits of people who didn't look like me, I got a text on my phone, an email from Ben.
201
"So happy for you, Neal!
202
I think your dad was watching over you too." The newest technology, the oldest human wisdom, the most powerful court.
203
I get to do that.
204
(Applause and cheers)
ดาวน์โหลดแอป
AI ให้คะแนนทุกประโยคที่คุณพูด
TRENDING
ยอดนิยม
บริบท & พื้นหลัง
ในวิดีโอ TED ที่ชื่อว่า "What Really Won the Trillion-Dollar Supreme Court Case" เราได้พบกับ Neal Kumar Katyal ที่เล่าถึงประสบการณ์การต่อสู้ในห้องพิจารณาคดีที่ทรงพลังที่สุดในโลก นอกจากเรื่องราวของคดีที่จะเปลี่ยนประวัติศาสตร์และการตัดสินใจที่มีผลกระทบต่อเศรษฐกิจโลกแล้ว เขายังเปิดเผยถึงความท้าทายส่วนตัวที่เขาเผชิญในขณะที่ต้องพูดให้กับผู้พิพากษานั้น ความจริงที่ว่าเขาต้องเตรียมตัวให้พร้อมทั้งในด้านกฎหมายและการสื่อสารจึงทำให้เรามองเห็นถึงความสำคัญของการเลือกคำพูดที่ถูกต้องในการสื่อสาร
5 วลีสำคัญสำหรับการสื่อสารประจำวัน
- "คำพูดที่ถูกต้องสามารถชนะได้" - หมายถึงความสำคัญของการเลือกคำพูดที่เหมาะสมในการสื่อสาร
- "คุณต้องไม่กลัวที่จะยืนหยัดในสิ่งที่เชื่อ" - การมีความกล้าในการแสดงความเห็น
- "นี่คือการต่อสู้ที่ยิ่งใหญ่" - แสดงให้เห็นถึงความสำคัญของการมีส่วนร่วมในคดีที่มีผลกระทบ
- "มีมากกว่าความเสี่ยงที่คุณคิด" - สนับสนุนให้มีความคิดสร้างสรรค์ในการต่อสู้เพื่อสิ่งที่ถูกต้อง
- "การเตรียมตัวคือกุญแจสู่ความสำเร็จ" - เน้นย้ำถึงความสำคัญของการเตรียมตัวล่วงหน้า
คู่มือการ Shadowing แบบทีละขั้นตอน
การเรียนภาษาอังกฤษจากวิดีโอนี้สามารถใช้วิธี ชาโดว์อิ้งภาษาอังกฤษ เพื่อช่วยให้การสื่อสารของคุณไปสู่ระดับใหม่ นี่คือวิธีการที่คุณสามารถทำตามได้:
- เลือกช่วงที่คุณสนใจจากวิดีโอ ให้ฟังครั้งแรกโดยไม่หยุด
- ฟังอีกครั้งและจดบันทึกวลีที่สำคัญหรือคำที่ไม่รู้จัก
- แบ่งวิดีโอออกเป็นส่วนสั้น ๆ ฟังซ้ำ ๆ และฝึกพูดตามในเวลาเดียวกัน
- ใช้เทคนิค shadowspeak โดยพูดตามเสียงพูดของ Neal และพยายามเลียนแบบน้ำเสียงและจังหวะ
- เมื่อคุณรู้สึกมั่นใจในเพลงพูดเหล่านั้น ลองขยายวลีหรือประโยคของคุณเองด้วย
การใช้ shadow speech และการทำความเข้าใจถึงบริบทในแต่ละประโยคจะช่วยให้คุณพัฒนาทักษะการสื่อสารและความมั่นใจในการพูดภาษาอังกฤษของคุณได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ เมื่อคุณทำตามคำแนะนำด้านบน คุณจะเห็นถึงความแตกต่างในการนำเสนอและการใช้ภาษาในชีวิตประจำวันของคุณอย่างแน่นอน!
เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?
Shadowing เป็นเทคนิคการเรียนรู้ภาษาที่ได้รับการรับรองทางวิทยาศาสตร์ พัฒนาขึ้นสำหรับการฝึกนักแปลมืออาชีพ วิธีการนี้เรียบง่ายแต่ทรงพลัง: คุณฟังเสียงภาษาอังกฤษจากเจ้าของภาษาและพูดตามทันที — เหมือนเงาที่ตามผู้พูดด้วยช่วงเวลาห่าง 1-2 วินาที การวิจัยแสดงว่าเทคนิคนี้ปรับปรุงความแม่นยำในการออกเสียง ทำนองเสียง จังหวะ การเชื่อมเสียง การฟังเข้าใจ และความคล่องแคล่วในการพูดได้อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ
☕ เลี้ยงกาแฟเราสักแก้ว
ShadowingEnglish ยังคงเปิดให้ใช้งาน ฟรี 100% ได้ด้วยการสนับสนุนจากคุณ ค่าใช้จ่ายสำหรับเซิร์ฟเวอร์และ AI นั้นสูงมาก — กาแฟของคุณช่วยให้เราเดินหน้าต่อไปได้! 🙏