Shadowing-Übung: The Future of TV is Bleak - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit YouTube

Hey guy!

⏸ Pausiert

Geschwindigkeit:

258 Sätze

Wenn Sätze zu kurz oder zu lang sind, klicke auf Edit, um sie anzupassen.

Hey guy!

Sorry I haven't posted a video in a while.

I went to Europe on vacation, but we accidentally locked our keys in the car, so we had to swim back.

Boy are my arms tired.

Oh come on!

That's the best you could pop it?

It's been like two months, man.

You suck!

Ah, shit.

In case you didn't hear, the Writers Guild of America went on strike this month for the first time in 15 years.

As a result, shows like Saturday Night Live, The Daily Show, and Late Night with Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy, and Jimmy have ceased production until negotiations are agreed upon.

The longer the negotiations take, However, the more shows will be delayed and affected.

It won't just be daily talk shows, it'll be entire seasons of your favorite Netflix show.

And for the shows that insist on powering through without writers, it will have the potential to completely tank the entire series.

Because that's what happened last time, and there's a very good chance it's going to happen again.

If you don't remember the 2007 writers' strike, it was a weird time for TV.

Scrambling to come up with new programming without being able to employ writers, a lot of networks started doubling down on reality shows,

which really altered the landscape of television for years and years after that, even though the strike itself only lasted about 13 weeks.

I mean, TLC started just falling around families with a bunch of kids for a while.

That was kind of weird.

The Apprentice went from being nearly cancelled to one of the most popular shows on TV, which I'm sure didn't have any political ramifications about nine years later.

But maybe worst of all, they started airing prices right.. at night.

A lot of scripted shows at the time basically imploded from the strike.

Seasons would be cut short, or instead they'd just try to keep on making them without the writers, and that was usually a disaster.

The one I personally remember being affected the most was Heroes.

This show was so fun to watch when it first came out.

It felt like a big event that everyone was tuned into.

But starting out it was very similar to Lost's first season, where you've got this huge ensemble of characters, and as it goes you kind of spend each one episode fleshing them out each individually,

and you start to realize how they're all intertwined.

I remember the finale being like hinted at from the beginning, so you kind of knew where everything was gonna converge, but you were still fascinated just to see how they would get there.

Also, the main villain of the show could cut people's heads open by pointing at them, and that was cool as hell.

So when season two started, the showrunner developed this big vision for everything that would come, but had to slow things down for a bit, set up some new characters and plot points, get the ball rolling on that.

And it was a little confusing, but you felt like it was all leading to something until the writer's strike hits.

Suddenly they have to scramble to condense 12 episodes into a two-part finale

and what was already a little bit of a mess only gets a hundred times messier.

All of the momentum the show needed going forward was gone.

A lot of these new characters got so little airtime

but then became integral to the story

and In the Dust was left a show that ultimately survived the strike but never fully recovered from the damage.

Most movies weren't affected nearly as much as scripted TV was but the ones that were were hit hard.

Quantum of Solace was shot with very little script and obviously no writers on set.

So they just had Daniel Craig improvised lines that he thought James Bond would say and you know, we'll fix it in post.

They did not fix it in post.

Revenge of the Fallen began filming with no script, just a 14 page outline written by Michael Bay himself.

But honestly knowing Transformers, 14 pages actually kind of seems like a lot.

I can only assume he was using a really big font.

But as rough as things got for the movies that bombed and the shows that got cancelled, these failures were ultimately necessary for the Writers Guild to win,

because they were able to prove the value that they had to companies who seemed to think that they didn't have any.

All it took was hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue for Universal and Paramount to be like, wait, if we don't have writers to write the shows,

then we can't make any shows, and then we can't make any money off the shows?

Why didn't you explain it to me like that in the first place?

So eventually their demands were met, the strike ended, and the producers and writers lived happily ever after.

Until like 12 days ago.

The WGA is striking again with a few main bullet points.

They're trying to stop production companies from continuing to shrink writers' rooms.

They're fighting to be paid residuals for streaming shows rather than just a day rate.

And they're fighting to keep AI out of the writers' room altogether, because as much as Silicon Valley tech bros look at ChatGPT with dollar signs in their eyes,

it completely undermines writers, and really the entire point of art in the first place.

Not that that matters.

So one of the biggest differences between this strike

and the last one is that a lot of the demands coming from the writers are in regards to streaming services, which for years have been treated by Hollywood as like this fun little side thing

that doesn't come close to matching the allure and prestige of cable television.

I am a surgeon.

Even though almost every popular and well-respected show from the past seven years has come from Apple TV, Netflix, or HBO Max.

But because streaming is still archaically being viewed in this way, the writers are not able to receive nearly the same benefits.

For example, thanks to past strikes and negotiations, network TV writers continue to get paid every time their show re-airs in syndication.

So since shows like The Office and It's Always Sunny

air over and over and over again on cable television and therefore continue to earn revenue, the writers keep getting paychecks.

Which makes sense, right?

As long as something keeps making money, then everyone involved in making it should keep getting a percentage of that money.

But on streaming, there is no potential for growth for the people who helped bring it into existence.

If you're involved in writing something

that goes on to become the most popular show on Hulu for weeks

and causes thousands of people to sign up for a subscription

that they didn't have before just because they want to see the show you made, and maybe they even like it so much that they just continue to pay that subscription until the next season comes out,

none of that matters to you because you'll never see any of that extra revenue that you helped earn.

There's no financial upside for doing a good job.

So overall, that's probably the biggest issue of the strike, but there are a few others.

For years, production companies have been pushing for smaller and smaller writing rooms, which puts more work on the shoulders of fewer people

and gets rid of the job security

that used to be there for everyone who is now brought on for just as short of a time as humanly possible.

Most of those people are paid for just a couple of weeks of work.

They come in, they learn the show, they contribute a few ideas, and then they're told to get the fuck out of there

so we don't have to put your name in the credits

and we don't have to keep you employed while we continue to work on the thing that you helped come up with.

And I think this is where one of the biggest misunderstandings about scripts comes in, where people treat it as if it's something the writers just type up

and then they print it out and then the script is done.

Now we can send all those people home and show them the movie when we're done filming it in six months.

But that's not how it works, or at least not how it should and has in the past.

Scripts are constantly evolving, even once filming starts.

Sometimes everyone shows up to set

and a joke doesn't really work as it was written

because it just doesn't sound right coming from the actor

or a prop doesn't look like the way they had intended and now this line doesn't make sense.

Or the location doesn't accommodate the shot that they had planned.

So now we gotta quickly get together and figure out an alternative, because every second that we don't get work done, we are burning through our budget.

Let's brainstorm, guys.

From what I've heard from people in the industry, this stuff happens literally every day.

It's just how filming goes.

100

So having people in the room who wrote the words

101

and understand the story inside and out is the best way to make a quick change

102

that doesn't disrupt the flow of filming.

103

It's a collaborative process from everyone involved in order to make the best thing possible.

104

And sometimes that means adapting on the fly rather than just sticking with words that were typed four months ago, no matter what happens.

105

But like I said, this entire part of the process has slowly been getting cut out in order to save costs.

106

And this is having two major effects on the industry.

107

One, it's making shows not as good as they could be

108

because you're having fewer people on set to contribute ideas when changes are inevitably needed.

109

And two, writers are missing out on the invaluable experience that comes with being on set during your production,

110

where they would get a glimpse into the entire process and everything that goes into bringing these scripts to life.

111

Experience that historically has been vital as these writers continue to move up the career ladder to showrunner, director, executive producer.

112

Like, they have to realize that they're cutting out this entire sector of built-in,

113

inexpensive, on-the-job training in an industry where more and more money keeps getting thrown at these giant productions, but then you're handing the keys over to people who've never

114

been even remotely taught to be in charge of something like

115

that in my own experience i had a full room for

116

20 weeks with brilliant group of writers none of them were

117

allowed to come to set their contracts ended before we started production

118

so they're all technically writer producers some of them had the title of producer

119

but they were not welcome to set to produce their episodes

120

which is both robbing the show of their perspective

121

but your point is it's robbing the future of the industry

122

because the things you learn on set are completely different than what you learn in a room just writing scenes

123

that don't cost anything and you can put them anywhere you want

124

and then you end up with this continuing cascade of problems, right?

125

Where like people are suddenly given a chance to make their own show as they should, but they don't have the experience on set and they're set up to fail.

126

So ironically, what's going to happen is there are going to be more and more issues that arise on sets.

127

Expensive issues that result in reshoots and delays and extended post-production timelines.

128

And before you know it, all of the money the studio was trying to save by

129

pinching pennies at every corner is just gonna burst into flames anyway.

130

I read that even one day of reshoots can cost like a quarter of a million dollars.

131

When you have these writers who are just trying to stay employed for a few extra weeks

132

so they can help out on set, where they could have helped prevent the reshoots in the first place, almost 100% of the time,

133

it would have been cheaper just to pay them.

134

It's so stupid.

135

You've got the real-life embodiment of Kendall Roy out here making business-first creative decisions

136

that make shows worse and then lose money anyway.

137

So in my opinion, everything the WGA is fighting for is more than fair.

138

Everyone deserves to be paid what they're worth

139

and there's absolutely no reason in this situation to be rooting

140

for the CEO of Warner Brothers who can't even seem to figure out what they want their app to be called.

141

And yet, even though to me, it seems like a no-brainer thing to support, that hasn't stopped some of the dumbest people on the planet, Twitter blue subscribers, from sowing discourse.

142

Like there's this weird thing where people seem to assume everyone in Hollywood is filthy rich just

143

because the industry they're a part of is.

144

But on average, writers are earning less than they did 10 years ago.

145

Writing jobs don't last nearly as long as they used to because seasons are significantly shorter now, and no one wants to keep the writers around once they feel like their job is done, even though it's not.

146

In the past, residual checks from previous gigs would keep them afloat in between jobs,

147

but without that, a lot of them are having to deliver Postmates and find side hustles just to make ends meet.

148

But then you've got these people who are salivating over the idea of spoiled Hollywood writers finally getting a reality check.

149

Good riddance, Hollywood losers.

150

Or should I say Holly-weird?

151

Who even needs human writers anymore?

152

Just have ChatGPT do it.

153

Everything's just sequels and remakes now anyway.

154

And this sentiment that I've seen shared by hundreds of people online is so infuriatingly stupid.

155

Number one, if you're in support of a company replacing thousands of jobs with one single AI program, you are anti-worker.

156

You are only supporting the billionaires in pursuit of screwing over everyone possible in order to maximize their wealth.

157

Now I understand that you don't give a shit

158

because you don't see any value in creative jobs and think

159

that everyone who complains about it should just go into a real line of work.

160

If you didn't wanna get replaced by AI, then learn to code.

161

Disregarding how joyless of an outlook this is to have on life, one where no one gets to make art or do anything they're passionate about,

162

and we should all just be typing code all day while computers get to do all the fun stuff.

163

What makes you think only writing jobs will be replaced by AI?

164

They're not gonna stop at the jobs that you don't care about.

165

They're going to replace all of the jobs.

166

I think we should be in support of any workers who are fighting to prevent this from happening,

167

but you seem to be so distracted by this one tree that you've yet to notice the forest you're standing in.

168

Number two, the idea that everything is just a remake or a sequel now anyway, so it's not like these writers are even coming up with original ideas.

169

Yeah, there's a lot of rehashed IPs in Hollywood.

170

Guess what?

171

You don't have to watch those.

172

Do you know how much shit has come out in just like the past few years alone?

173

It's been unlike anything I've ever seen before.

174

These 10 out of 10 shows and movies that have unique plots

175

and original characters and up and coming actors that aren't just Chris Pratt doing a voice.

176

And give me emotions that I can't even describe, but I guess you were too busy complaining about how woke the new little mermaid is to notice any of them.

177

That's your own fault.

178

Look, I get annoyed at how many sequels and reboots and superhero movies there are now too, but you know why they keep making them?

179

Because they make a shit ton of money every time.

180

You know why they make a shit ton of money every time?

181

Because you keep going to see them.

182

Go watch something else, dude.

183

But if you want more originality in Hollywood, you know what's not going to solve that problem?

184

Fucking chat GPT.

185

AI does not create original ideas because it can't.

186

It doesn't have unique life experience or a sense of humor that it can draw upon.

187

It is a glorified search engine

188

that just plagiarizes a bunch of elements of already existing human creations and regurgitates it onto a Word document.

189

Can you believe this entire trailer is AI generated?

190

Yeah, I can actually, because this shot is identical to one that already exists.

191

Also, it looks like crap.

192

And on the topic of AI, which is only a small part of the strike, but it's what a lot of these dumb asses are pointing to, to try to devalue writers and people who create art.

193

To me, it's almost not even a matter of if an entire show could be written by ChatGBT, it's that even if it can,

194

I don't give a shit.

195

I have negative interest in watching, what, like an algorithmically generated show written by software.

196

Using math, we've perfectly optimized this script for human enjoyment.

197

Like that's what we're gonna do now?

198

No thanks!

199

I like watching TV and movies because they're a celebration of human creativity.

200

I want to see people tell stories about their lives

201

or turn hard times into art because it's incredible that it's even possible to do that.

202

And when you see something that resonates with you

203

and speaks to a part of you that you've never quite been able to put into words and makes you feel emotions, like that's that good shit.

204

And then you get done watching it

205

and you can look up behind the scenes videos

206

and interviews with the director and the writers

207

and figure out like how they filmed this crazy shot or how they came up with the idea for the ending.

208

Like I just think it's one of the most beautiful things that we as a human race have created.

209

And I can't even relate to the mindset of someone and was like, yeah, but my computer could do all that.

210

I have nothing in common with that person.

211

And to the people who treat every writer like they're the scum of the earth because they didn't personally enjoy one show,

212

I don't think you realize that a lot of the changes that have been taking place throughout the streaming era, you know, the things the union is striking against,

213

are contributing factors as to why you might not like a show as much as you used to.

214

If there are fewer writers in the room than the writers they have get stretched thin.

215

If writers aren't paid to be on set while they're filming, then the shows are going to suffer.

216

But most importantly, if someone can't afford to pay rent from doing their job, and they have to waste all their time and energy on side hustles just so they can barely afford to eat,

217

they're not going to do as good at the job.

218

And that goes with any industry, obviously.

219

If you take care of your employees and give them all the conditions they need to succeed, the work will be better.

220

And when the work is better, more people talk about it, and it makes more money, and then everyone wins.

221

It's so simple.

222

Why are we against this?

223

Just so one guy can have a third helicopter?

224

That's the side you're on?

225

He's not gonna let you ride it.

226

He doesn't know you.

227

It blows my mind that because of a handful of crappy remakes you've seen,

228

you think every single writer in Hollywood is some millionaire hack looking down on you from their golden throne of infinite money.

229

No, that's the people they're striking against.

230

At the rate things are going, writing will not be a viable career path much longer.

231

The only people who are gonna be able to afford to do it are 22 year olds with rich parents.

232

And I don't wanna watch those shows.

233

I hate 22 year olds with rich parents.

234

So if you want TV to get better, you should be on the side of the people who are best equipped to make that happen.

235

The last thing I'll say is that if you watch this video and you thought, well, I sympathize with the writers here, but this kind of thing is happening in every industry.

236

The economy's in shambles, everything's more expensive now and wages aren't going up to offset that.

237

I agree.

238

All of that is bad.

239

I'm only focusing on this specifically because it's something that's happened before that I was interested then, I'm interested in now, and it's actively going on as we speak.

240

I hope the writers win this, get everything they demand, and then it inspires other people to do exactly the same thing.

241

Imagine if every public school teacher in the country went on strike at exactly the same time.

242

Society would crumble in like an hour.

243

Their demands would be met instantly.

244

It's a perfect crime.

245

Anyway, thank you so much for watching this video.

246

I'm gonna put a bunch of links to Twitter threads

247

and news articles and podcasts and things that helped me write the video.

248

One thing in particular, there's like a seven page document written by a showrunner named Eliza Clark about how to be a writer on set,

249

coming from someone who has years of experience being a writer on set.

250

And I thought this was fascinating, like a really insightful look you don't normally see into everything that goes on behind the scenes.

251

How many decisions need to get made, how many people are involved in making those decisions.

252

I don't know, really interesting stuff.

253

Anything makes Holly weird, sad, mad and cry.

254

Give me a smile.

255

They called me a naisy for years.

256

So be it.

257

This is me being a naisy to them.

258

I will never support anything woke, Holly, weird does or believe or says.

TRENDING

Beliebt

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.

☕ Kauf uns einen Kaffee

ShadowingEnglish bleibt 100% kostenlos dank deiner Unterstützung. Server- und KI-Kosten sind hoch — dein Kaffee hält uns am Laufen! 🙏

Über PayPal spenden

ShadowingEnglish.com – Englisch-Shadowing-Übung

Sprich fließend Englisch mit der Shadowing-Technik. Höre nativen YouTube-Videos zu, wiederhole Satz für Satz und baue echte Aussprache und Sprachflüssigkeit auf — weltweit von IELTS-Lernenden genutzt.

Shadowing-Übung: The Future of TV is Bleak - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit YouTube

Beliebt

Warum das Sprechen mit diesem Video üben?

Grammatik & Ausdruck im Kontext

Häufige Aussprachefallen

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing-Übung: The Future of TV is Bleak - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit YouTube

App herunterladen

Warum das Sprechen mit diesem Video üben?

Grammatik & Ausdruck im Kontext

Häufige Aussprachefallen

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?