Shadowing Practice: 457. Conclusions about Language Learning from the David Crystal Interview (Part 2) - Learn English Speaking with Video

Creando lección...
1
Hello, welcome back to another episode of this podcast for learners of English.
2
This episode is sponsored by italki.
3
If you're looking for one -to -one lessons or a teacher
4
or English speakers who you can talk to on a regular basis
5
or language partners and other people you can share the experience of learning English with, then you might want to check out italki because they offer you a flexible approach,
6
a very convenient approach to getting speaking time and English lessons into your daily or weekly routine.
7
It's all done through Skype and it's very convenient.
8
Italki have many, many teachers from many different places who are there waiting to provide you with their English training
9
and also just English speakers from the UK
10
and all over the world who also you can talk to on a regular basis as well.
11
And you can make friends and have good experiences.
12
I got a message from someone who said that they'd fallen in love with someone they met on italki.
13
I can't remember who that was now.
14
But I've definitely got a message from someone saying that they'd actually fallen in love with someone they met on italki.
15
So, you know, it's a genuine thing.
16
It's a real thing.
17
People are actually out there connecting and improving their English
18
and also even finding love in some cases
19
and don't forget uh with this sponsorship you can get um
20
basically a voucher worth a lesson it's like basically a free lesson
21
when you buy some lessons with italki they'll send you a voucher worth a free lesson um to get
22
that offer go to teacherluke .co .uk slash talk or click an italki logo on my website
23
You're listening to Luke's English Podcast.
24
For more information, visit teacherluke .co .uk.
25
Hello, everyone.
26
Welcome to the podcast.
27
How are you doing out there in podcast land?
28
I hope you're well.
29
Here's part two of what has become a double episode.
30
going through the David Crystal interview that I did in episodes 454 and 455.
31
Those episodes were full of so much interesting content from David Crystal
32
that I thought it would be a good idea to go through that stuff again and, I mean, essentially repeat what he said, but also try and break it down
33
and try to deal with the question of how does this
34
relate to learning English as a foreign language? um you should
35
if you haven't listened to the others you should probably listen to episode
36
454 first and then 455 and then uh listen to the catch -up episodes after that okay um right then so
37
in the last one i was asking david crystal uh questions
38
that i had that i prepared sort of based on his recent work
39
and things like that
40
and then in episode 455 um david crystal answered questions from
41
the podcast audience from the Lepsters out there in podcast land
42
and so that's what we'll be looking at in this episode we'll be looking at the answers
43
that David Crystal gave and the various different points of interest
44
that can be significant if you are trying to learn a language especially English
45
because that's what we'll be focusing on here okay
46
so then the first question in in the list was from Hamid
47
and he asked if English keeps taking on words from other languages will it stop being English
48
and so David said
49
that this is basically the story of English English is a
50
vacuum cleaner of a language it sucks up other words
51
and this is one of the reasons why English is such a big language with
52
so many different words because it sort of incorporates new words into English all the time.
53
Something like 300 to 600 languages have influenced English with words.
54
And if you look at English today, you ask yourself, where are the Germanic words?
55
Because you kind of think it's a Germanic language.
56
But actually, they only make up about 20 % of all the words.
57
And the other 80 % is from French, Spanish, Latin, and others.
58
So there's no single dominating influence on English today.
59
In fact, what it does is it's just sort of like, you could say, steals words from other languages and sort of turns them into English.
60
Now, that includes Urdu words.
61
How many Urdu words have come into English?
62
Maybe a hundred, but English has over a million words.
63
So there's no new cluster of words coming in is going
64
to come in all at once like a tidal wave they tend to come in drip by drip
65
so the point is that although English does take on other words from other languages
66
they usually come in sort of bit by bit rather than as one single sort of tidal wave.
67
And as a result, the influence is, well, it's not negative.
68
If anything, it's positive because often these words are assimilated in order to reflect a need, for example, to describe a different type of food or something.
69
So really, there's no threat to English from this process.
70
In fact, it's evidence of the power of English that it absorbs so many other influences from other languages and cultures.
71
and then sort of it seems to make it stronger it's like the blob or something
72
next was a question from Jill Marnie who asked basically what's the future of English
73
and as David Crystal said it's basically unpredictable that's basically an unanswerable question
74
and apparently you should never try to predict the future of a language
75
because you just don't know I mean you can never predict the future it seems
76
that you know big events often will change the fortunes of a language.
77
Those big events could be things like macroeconomic factors
78
that are impossible to predict or just events like the election of Donald Trump
79
or the referendum decision or some other election decision or terrorist attack or whatever it is.
80
Events can just change the nature of history and the language kind of follows it.
81
So it's really hard to predict that's what david crystal said
82
um one question actually from someone i can't remember who i can never remember who anymore
83
but one question was basically will brexit reduce the influence of
84
english in the european union um david crystal actually answered
85
that question himself but it was one of the questions in the list um
86
and i think that was from paul i think there was a listener called paul actually who sent
87
that one in so um as david crystal said uh he thinks
88
that Brexit won't really reduce the influence of English in the world or in the European Union much,
89
but it will change the character of English that you will hear in Brussels,
90
for example, because it won't be used by so many native English speakers.
91
Without the Brits there, there'll be fewer native English speakers actually using English in those areas.
92
So there will probably be more developments into Euro English,
93
which is a sort of form of English that's used in the administrative sort of walls and corridors,
94
within the walls and corridors of the European Union sort of administrative head offices and stuff like that, a kind of Euro English, which I think does exist a bit.
95
There is a sort of form of, you know, sort of a specific kind of English, which is this international form,
96
which is very influenced by various bits of like French and Spanish and German, for example.
97
So there is a sort of Euro English, which probably will become, it will emerge more and more probably without the influence of the native speakers.
98
But English as a global language will continue to change and diversify, according to David Crystal.
99
Jairo asked about managing the workload of studies.
100
So Jairo is a student who's doing a philology degree,
101
and he was wondering how you can manage the burden of all the books
102
that you have to read
103
and all the studies you have to do well david crystal agreed
104
that learning about language is a huge burden there's
105
so much to take on um you know learning about a language you have to learn the history society
106
and the events of the time uh to understand why people
107
were using language in those particular ways you've got to understand sort of their motivations for saying the things
108
that they said not just the things that they said it's going back to
109
that thing again again of looking for looking for the pragmatic
110
answers as to why particular bits of language were being used not just the form
111
and structure of those languages but the you know the reasons why
112
and that informs your understanding of why those particular forms were used
113
so for example David asked what was it like to be
114
an old Norse speaker understanding what it was like would probably help you understand the language a bit more
115
but most philologists don't have a psycholinguistic background to their studies
116
psycholinguistics that's the study of the relationships between linguistic behavior
117
and psychological processes including the process of language acquisition
118
so apparently most philologists don't have a psycholinguistic background to their studies
119
so they don't take those things into account and as a result philology can be a bit dry.
120
But I guess David Crystal's advice to Jairo, if you're studying about language, that you should try and study a little bit of the history as well,
121
which helps you to understand the motivations.
122
So David prefers the socially aware approach to the history of language, which doesn't just ask what happened and when, but asks why it happened.
123
So let's explore the nature of the people who made it happen
124
and this should ease the process of studying the language Kat commented with her question,
125
saying, basically, English syntax.
126
Can you explain English syntax?
127
And can you compare it to the syntax of other languages like German?
128
And David Crystal was like, come on, Kat, you're asking for a book here.
129
Such a huge question.
130
But actually, according to him, it's not such a big deal.
131
English, first of all, has a fairly simple morphology compared with German or French.
132
So we start talking, okay, we start really, we're talking here about the difference between the nature of English.
133
And we've chosen syntax, like sentence structure.
134
But we could focus on other areas, like, for example, the morphology, the way that the words are formed, like the way we form past tenses with ed endings,
135
you know, suffixes and prefixes and things like that, the way that words are formed.
136
So we could look at that.
137
We could look at the phonology of it as well, like the way that it sounds and the way that those sounds are made.
138
Here, Kat has decided to focus on the syntax of English, and why is it that it's different to the syntax of other languages?
139
And David actually, first of all, started by talking about the morphology, the words, and in fact, compared to German or French or many other languages,
140
English has a fairly simple morphology.
141
I mean, what this means is that how many different forms of a single word are there.
142
If you take the word go, it's basically go, goes, went,
143
gone, maybe been as a past participle, going. Is that it?
144
That might be it.
145
Go, went, gone, been, goes, going.
146
That's kind of it.
147
It's only about six.
148
And then, of course, you've got the different tenses and things like that.
149
But in terms of just the word on its own, it's only about six forms of it, which is not
150
that complicated whereas in other languages you've got all the different
151
types of gender you've got like a many many many different forms for different time expressions
152
and things like that
153
so the morphology of English is is pretty simple really you
154
know how many possible word endings are there for a verb in English not
155
that many but the so the difference between English
156
and German is morphological but on a to a large extent
157
but also it's syntactic as well you know meaning the way
158
that we structure our sentences uh subject verb or object and
159
so on uh in fact english and german are relatively close
160
because that as two languages they only diverged from each other about 2 000 years ago
161
but it's true that the word order between english
162
and german is a bit different um
163
but you know david told a story about how he went to german
164
and he spoke to people with his broken german and he says
165
that everyone understood him when he went to germany
166
and he spoke german with the wrong word order with the wrong syntax um
167
and you know despite the lacking the correct syntax people still understood him
168
and there aren't that many differences although there aren't
169
that many differences in syntax between english and german although the few differences
170
that there are are very noticeable because of you know the the the way
171
that they're so different um
172
so his question is actually he asked the question back to cat
173
which is why are you worried about local areas of syntactic difference between English
174
and German why has this become an issue and this again comes back to that question of identity
175
and speaking with a slight German syntax might make you sound a bit German
176
but it's not the greatest it's not the biggest concern really
177
when you know being intelligible is probably the bigger issue and maybe learning about the morphology in English,
178
you know, maybe the bigger point as well.
179
So it comes down to identity.
180
German English, used by people who've learned it really well, still is distinctively German English.
181
So the point is, from David to Kat, is don't be too concerned about micro differences in syntax between your language and English.
182
As long as we understand you, that's the main thing.
183
Now, that doesn't mean that you can just go ahead
184
and sort of make any error that you want because you'll find
185
that most of the time you have to be accurate in English
186
because it's through the accuracy that you manage to explain exactly what you mean.
187
You know, using the right tense positions all the events in relation to each other in the correct way,
188
which allows us to understand the narrative drive of a story, okay?
189
So, you know, it doesn't mean that you can just make any mistake you want.
190
But the main thing is that as long as we understand you that's the main thing
191
and obviously style is important
192
so I imagine you want to write in the style of a native speaker although
193
which which native speaker I wonder about that
194
but you might have to accept
195
that it's important to find your own voice in English
196
which might be influenced a bit by who you are I mean it is your own voice after all
197
which in this case is someone who lives in Germany now that's not to say
198
that your English can be totally different and be completely like German
199
but with English words that would obviously be unintelligible and a bit ridiculous but micro differences aren't such a big deal.
200
So the point here is really don't sweat the small stuff because it's just small stuff.
201
So next question was from Wesley, and it was about psychology and languages.
202
And he asked, do people who speak different languages think differently?
203
And David had some interesting things to say.
204
He said, it's difficult to translate words sometimes.
205
If you're a translator listening to this, then you'll know it's difficult to translate words because there are some words
206
which don't directly translate because there isn't an equivalent word.
207
I'm sure that when you were learning English, probably in the earlier days, you probably spent a lot of time attempting to translate words in your head,
208
in your language, into English.
209
And many times you discover that there isn't really a direct translation.
210
Apparently 10 to 15 % of the words
211
that you want to translate may be untranslatable um i don't know
212
which language that is maybe from french
213
but in chinese for example it's a lot more um but
214
when you do psycholinguistic experiments we discover that people can see the different concepts
215
so the question was like if
216
if two languages two people two sets of people have different
217
like words like let's say uh in one culture they've got
218
a word for a particular color like a sort of orangey
219
red kind of color they've got a specific word for it
220
and in another language they don't have a word for
221
that color can they actually see the color does the language
222
like does the our linguistic sort of option to be able to name
223
that particular color does it somehow enhance our ability to perceive
224
the difference as well is somehow the language driving the experience
225
or is it the other way around is is it that
226
we notice that color more
227
because it maybe performs a significant role in our lives like
228
let's say you use it as a dye in the culture
229
that you live in or it's the color of the the rock
230
or the stone that's used to build the buildings and
231
because of that specific uh requirement to name
232
that color you've come up with the name
233
that other cultures don't you know come up with but but everyone can still see the colour.
234
We can all see the difference.
235
We would all be able to identify it in a list of colours.
236
It's just that we might not have a word for it.
237
So what was I saying?
238
David Crystal was saying that when we do psycholinguistic experiments, we discover that people can see the different concepts,
239
but having those specific words makes it easier to talk about those things.
240
You might see the colours, but you might not have the language for describing it because you haven't grown up in a context in which that,
241
let's say, colour is particularly important.
242
So different languages might not have the same word for something, but it doesn't mean that they think about them any differently either.
243
Yeah.
244
So in English, we don't have a word, and I've talked about this before, we don't have a word for a certain thing in Japanese,
245
which is like this feeling of nostalgia.
246
If you go back to a place that you haven't visited for 10 years and it suddenly feels familiar, you'd say, ah, which is like,
247
oh, it feels nostalgic or it takes me back.
248
You see?
249
Now, we don't have that word in English.
250
We don't have a specific word for that, but we totally understand the feeling.
251
I've always had that feeling
252
and we just have other ways of describing it for example oh it takes me back
253
or it's all good old you know like good old london
254
or it feels nostalgic or it's good to be back
255
so it doesn't seem to be the case that languages affect
256
or reflect different perceptions of the world um you know
257
but i mean my thoughts here wesley i think there might be something to it for example
258
if you look at sense of humor or patterns of understatement things like
259
that they all contribute towards expressing a sardonic outlook on life rather than a direct attitude in the Mediterranean, for example.
260
But maybe that's not linguistic.
261
That's more cultural that in English, for example, we have a certain sardonic sense of humour.
262
Again, fair enough.
263
I guess it comes from the culture.
264
It's not dictated by the language.
265
David Crystal goes on to talk about translating words or assuming that all individual words have direct translation in other languages,
266
the fallacy is that it's words that translate.
267
Okay, that's a fallacy.
268
It's not true that words translate.
269
It's in fact sentences which translate.
270
So a group of words together are in fact what hold meaning rather than individual words on their own.
271
It's how words go together in groups or sentences.
272
So even if there is no single word equivalent for something in another language, you could just put some words together and make a sentence.
273
And that's how the language transcribes, basically.
274
And that's how it translates.
275
So, you know, the fact that there isn't a word for something, let's say in English, is not evidence that English speakers can't see that thing.
276
It's just that they find other ways, like on a sentence level, to express it.
277
You know, we had the example of snow that you use to build an igloo with.
278
snow that you use to build an igloo with
279
so the the um um who are the people eskimos the
280
people who live in um igloos uh they might have a single word for
281
that kind of snow
282
but in english we'd still be able to deal with it by saying snow
283
that you use to build an igloo with it's a bit longer
284
but we can still see it we can still name it
285
so there there it is um
286
so i guess what this means for learners of English is
287
that you have to learn not only the vocabulary of a new language, it's not just about translating.
288
Okay, there's three things that you can learn from this one.
289
One is that you should avoid translating individual words directly from your language into English or the other way around.
290
So I've seen people's notebooks, vocabulary notebooks, and it's a list of English words, individual words, with a list of individual translation words on the other side.
291
And what people do is they go through the list and they just remember the translation.
292
That's not necessarily the way to do it.
293
That's number one.
294
Second thing is that you need to look at words in groups because that's where they really get their power, where they combine with other words.
295
So you should be looking for collocations of new words, the words that commonly go with them.
296
And also you should look at sentences
297
and even things like the typical contexts in which that kind of language would be used.
298
So sentences, concepts, typical cultural references that are made with those particular words.
299
And you can do that by doing things like a Google search.
300
If you found a new word, you can stick that individual word or phrase in speech marks into Google, click search, and then click the news tab on Google,
301
and you'll see news stories that contain the word or phrase.
302
And that's a good way of getting a sense of kind of how people are using that language.
303
Bear in mind, sometimes it'll come from blog articles or newspaper articles.
304
And so you should think about the style being used, but often you will see quotations and things with those phrases being used.
305
And it's just a good way of seeing the phrases being used in a sentence, but also in a cultural context as well.
306
And so the third thing is
307
that you should not only learn the vocab you need to
308
learn the culture as well okay um you know uh to
309
learn a language properly you need to learn all about the culture the mindset the reference points
310
that are being made and you you know you can see all of those things too
311
but having certain words and expressions uh makes it easier to talk about them
312
so you know it's a question of understanding the things
313
that are important and then the language
314
that goes along with it um yeah the result is
315
that in languages it's easier to talk about commonly occurring cultural phenomena
316
because the language has the tools to do it
317
but people are all still basically the same we might just
318
take a little bit longer to talk about a concept
319
that in your language is very normal all right then next question was from mayumi
320
and she asked why do british people use indirect language we've said many times before
321
that the english are famous for saying sorry
322
and for not being able to give a negative response we
323
kind of have this ambiguous indirect kind of language why um
324
and um it's it's difficult to from a language point of view to be able to answer
325
that question you have to end up looking at a sort of psychological social uh point of view
326
but um a linguist might not have the answer to why it is
327
that british people behave in this
328
so -called polite way it's just a cultural difference maybe it's the British temperament the reason for
329
that is hard to say maybe it's
330
because the UK is an island like Mayumi suggested and
331
that the psychogeographic factors might affect the kind of language use
332
and the way
333
that we communicate with each other pragmatics comes back into it
334
again here that's the study of why people are using specific bits of language
335
and you know really we see that language norms or the way that language is used reflect the cultural context and that's,
336
as David Crystal said, that's the identity argument.
337
There may be an argument that language norms reflect the cultural context here, meaning the cultural context being that British people are a bit indirect,
338
which I think is what Wesley was getting at.
339
You know, the idea that language norms reflect the cultural context.
340
Actually, I'm not sure that's what Wesley were getting at, so I'm going to just rewrite that.
341
I don't think Wesley was getting it.
342
I think wesley was suggesting that
343
because we have different language we see the world in a different way
344
and that's defined by our language but in fact it's the other way around anyway um
345
uh maybe you know the question is is english too prone
346
to humor to be able to sustain fascism oh this is
347
a complicated one i'm gonna have to come back to
348
that later on but anyway the point is why does the uk use this kind of polite language
349
and the answer is we don't really know you'd have to ask why british people want to be polite
350
but obviously it's because we're such nice people isn't it
351
that has to be the answer we're just lovely people and we just like to be nice
352
I don't know so basically Naomi you just have to accept the cultural differences you have to try
353
and learn about them and accept them
354
because basically that's just who we are should be a good enough answer
355
and that's probably the best answer we can give like why do British people communicate in this way just
356
because we're English because we're British so as ever you must just accept cultural differences.
357
Just like when you discover them in language and you discover them in social situations, you just have to accept the cultural differences and remember they're not weird, they're just different.
358
I don't think Mayumi thinks that the indirect communication style is weird because I think that's kind of normal in Japan too.
359
But sometimes there isn't really an answer, you just have to accept it.
360
It's a good bit of advice for anyone coming into contact with another culture.
361
It's a good bit of advice to remember.
362
It's not weird, it's just different.
363
Now, you can speculate about why people behave the way they do, but ultimately, you've just got to accept it and move on, like the way you often have to accept that in English,
364
this is just what people say in this language, and that's it.
365
Okay, so in my notes here, I've got reference to two words, the synchronic and diachronic methods.
366
And David Crystal talked about using a synchronic method and not a diachronic method.
367
So we're getting into some terminology here.
368
And according to Wikipedia, synchrony and diachrony are two different and complementary viewpoints in linguistic analysis.
369
A synchronic approach considers a language at a moment in time without taking its history into account.
370
Synchronic linguistics aims at describing a language at a specific point of time, usually the present.
371
By contrast, a diachronic approach considers the development and evolution of a language through history.
372
So David Crystal says that we should use a synchronic approach to understand these things.
373
So basically, why is this particular person choosing to say it in this way right now um
374
so so there you go i mean you know and
375
and the answer for why british people are polite is
376
that we don't really know unfortunately uh you could probably a
377
similar reason for why japanese people are um some more modern
378
dictionaries now contain extra information to help you with all this
379
stuff like they help you by giving you often collocations
380
or maybe a little bit of background information uh little essays about usage and pragmatics, which help us to identify how culture affects language.
381
So it's worth reading the extra comments and information pages that you find in many dictionaries.
382
They're full of really useful background information.
383
You should also consider reading cultural guides about different countries or English -speaking countries, as well as just purely linguistic ones,
384
that if you're going to communicate with people from a particular country, you should probably read up on that culture and sort of prepare yourself
385
and you know see how it affects the communication style
386
and then the english as well um antonio asked whether artificial
387
intelligence would ever replace the need for language learning imagining this idea where we all have computers in our heads
388
or computer headphones and we can go around
389
and talk to people in different languages and the technology instantly translates it
390
and we're able to then just have meaningful conversations
391
and relationships just like we do now
392
but instead of having to learn the languages you wouldn't have
393
to spend any time you wouldn't listen to luke's english podcast
394
there'd be no reason for this to exist it's like some
395
sort of uh frightening uh brave new world where it's all robots
396
and cyborgs and everything's really clean
397
and there's a like slight undercurrent of evil you know
398
and one of the robots is going to go bad
399
and it's going to make everyone evil and then there'll be a big fight
400
and it'll be like the matrix all because of no luke's english podcast
401
that will be the outcome
402
if this podcast ever ends it'll basically end with the a futuristic apocalypse with robots um
403
so there's something to look forward to but anyway this is what i think
404
and this is partly what antonio was thinking about a future where people will use technology to translate instantly
405
and so they won't need to learn languages again
406
and it made david crystal think of the the babel fish
407
or babble fish from uh the hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy this wonderful book uh by douglas adams
408
which um I don't um, has this idea of this, this Babel fish, which is like a little fish that if you put it in your ear, it swims into your ear and it automatically,
409
it will translate every language that you hear.
410
So if you've got a Babel fish in your ear, you can understand everybody.
411
And the Babel fish in the book, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, apparently is, uh, is the thing that destroys, um, the arguments for the existence of God.
412
Because, um, what was it?
413
How does it go in the book.
414
The religious people say that there can be no faith with evidence, that evidence destroys faith.
415
The whole purpose of having faith is that it's a leap of faith, you know, that you just have to have faith.
416
And if you require evidence for that faith, then it sort of destroys the whole concept of it.
417
So evidence destroys faith.
418
And then the Babelfish comes along and it's so perfect and
419
so amazing and so advanced as an organic creature
420
that will translate any language it's so perfect that the argument is
421
that this is uh the you know the only conclusion can be
422
that this was created by an intelligent designer it's the ultimate uh it's the ultimate evidence of an intelligent designer
423
and because suddenly this evidence exists it destroys the religious faith
424
and god disappears in a cloud of logic uh that's how
425
it goes in the book anyway the babel fish is like this little fish
426
that you put in your ear and uh it translates everything
427
so it's that idea and david crystal thinks
428
that in a hundred years the technology probably will be perfect
429
and i mean i've certainly seen the automatic subtitles on my youtube videos have improved recently
430
so probably certainly within a hundred years automatic translations will probably be perfect um
431
so imagine a situation though where the the babel fish in your ear is operating perfectly
432
and it would solve lots of problems, certainly.
433
But the problem is here, the thing that's missing is the question of identity.
434
Because the point is that if you're French, you might still want to be French and the artificial intelligence might not include those differences.
435
People will still hold on to their languages in order to express their identity.
436
So it won't affect language diversity because people will still be using their own languages to express identity.
437
So that's the idea of it being a threat to language diversity.
438
But my question was whether or not this kind of technology might make the need for global language redundant.
439
Maybe artificial intelligence will replace English.
440
So why bother learning an international language?
441
And David said that there are various answers to that.
442
Technology, for example, might let you down.
443
There might be a situation where, for example, you don't have electricity and so you can't power other technology
444
so you might uh not choose to constantly rely on it um
445
and also uh will artificial intelligence manage to be perfect like
446
a human with the ability to translate with a view to expressing the culture
447
because human translations choose uh human translators um
448
when they're translating from one language to another choose between many different competing nuances of translation.
449
And in fact, any person when they're speaking, they make certain choices to express certain different nuances of English.
450
So for example, I could say it this way, or I could say it this other way.
451
So we make those decisions based on complex social and psychological factors.
452
And a computer might not have that kind of cultural sensitivity.
453
Or maybe that sort of thing would only come in the very long term.
454
So the number of people learning languages might be reduced, it's true.
455
But it's also ignoring another factor in learning another language, and that is the desire to become aware of the culture,
456
the history and the literature of the other language.
457
So there are many reasons for learning a language other than just being able to communicate.
458
It's also about the personal satisfaction in learning another language and enjoying the pleasant things about it.
459
So people learn languages because they want to do it, not necessarily because they need to.
460
It's a pleasure to learn another language.
461
People seem to enjoy listening to Luke's English podcast.
462
So there are many reasons to want to continue to learn other languages.
463
It's not just about intelligibility.
464
It's also about identity.
465
So maybe they won't completely replace, you know, language learning.
466
For the foreseeable future, and for the foreseeable future,
467
David can't see that it would be economically viable to create the kind of technological solution for language
468
when the traditional methods are already the best way to foster genuine relationships between people.
469
Now, the next question was from Jack.
470
And we don't know where Jack comes from.
471
I don't know who you are.
472
I don't know what you want.
473
We don't know where he's from, but he is famous in the comments section for writing in this kind of Ali G dialect.
474
Okay.
475
Do you remember that?
476
The Ali G dialect.
477
So in the Ali G dialect, people speak like this.
478
Me want to just ask a question like that kind of thing.
479
bit strange, you might think.
480
And I sort of think, why does Jack choose to write like that?
481
And I asked David Crystal Jack's question in his kind of Ali -G voice.
482
And first of all, David didn't mind at all being addressed in the Ali -G dialect.
483
It didn't bother him at all.
484
Certain features of that dialect, which are basically that dialect comes from sort of like, I don't know it's I guess originally it's from a sort
485
of Afro -Caribbean community in London who spoke with a sort of Jamaican patois sort of influence on English
486
and then that spread to
487
other people living in London who weren't part of that community
488
so for example even just sort of white working class kids
489
who worked who lived in the same neighborhood might start speaking like
490
that as well
491
and then you end up with a character like Ali G
492
who is basically a sort of a middle class lower middle
493
class white guy teenager who lives in his bedroom who fancies
494
himself as a sort of rapper he's a wannabe rapper
495
and um so he's adopted this kind of speech he's a kind of fake uh uh fake rapper
496
or something he's adopted this speech pattern in order to try and be cool
497
okay um and
498
so the features are things like saying me instead of i
499
at the beginning of a sentence like me wants to know for example uh
500
or subject verb agreement like i is you know i is well impressed for example
501
and little phrases like booyakasha which comes from um i guess jamaican like dialect
502
and certain other words like it's a well big honor well big uh well being used to mean very
503
or really you know it's a well big honor to have you on the podcast
504
so i mean the first thing
505
that david talked about really was um jack's uh option to speak in this dialect
506
or at least write in this dialect in the in the comments section
507
and um we see
508
that it's quite a skill in fact to be able to
509
switch between registers uh between registers like different styles of english
510
sometimes we break the rules in english as a stylistic choice like for example with the expression
511
if it ain't broke don't fix it which is a
512
which basically is a fixed phrase if it ain't broke don't fix it meaning
513
if it if it's not broken don't fix it
514
but it's got sort of incorrect grammar if it ain't broke don't fix it
515
which is basically
516
but you know the sort of thing you'd say about a system you know like don't change the system
517
if it's if it works then there's no need to fix it
518
if it ain't broke don't fix it just leave it the way it is don't change it um
519
so you know you can you can break the rules as a stylistic choice like
520
if you want to use an expression like that or
521
if for whatever reason you want to talk like Ali G maybe as some sort of joke
522
or a reference I don't know
523
but it is important to be able to switch between different styles
524
and registers and I have seen Jack switch between styles sometimes he writes like
525
that sometimes he writes kind of ordinarily which suggests to me
526
that his English is actually pretty good
527
so I'm not bothered by it in the comments section of my website
528
because it you know because uh it doesn't really bother me
529
but you but um you should be aware jack
530
that some other people might find it a bit weird
531
or inappropriate like for example if you write
532
that in forums on other websites
533
or in the comment section of amber's new podcast about paris history
534
or in like a business meeting that you attend it might be a bit weird and inappropriate there.
535
So you need to seriously think about the appropriacy of the things that you're doing and the reasons why you're doing them.
536
And that means the style of English that you're using, although I don't mind the LEG stuff,
537
really, or also the decision to post dodgy pictures of cakes on my website, for example.
538
So, you know, they're worth thinking about.
539
That's the point.
540
So the other question was, well, Jack's actual question was, should the listeners of this podcast learn the rules of grammar
541
or should they just focus on meaning and let the rules look after themselves
542
and we kind of answered this question already at the beginning of part one I think
543
and David's answer is that you should do both
544
but in a structured sort of way
545
so you should you know look at the grammar
546
but you also should just look at the English being spoken
547
and being used in an authentic context
548
and just sort of uh focus on the meaning and
549
and the grammar will kind of slot into place as well
550
but also a bit of studying uh
551
and david talked about different types of different types of teaching there was communicative teaching
552
which is an approach to english teaching that focused on giving students communicative tasks
553
and letting them work out how to achieve them and then the grammar would kind of come in afterwards.
554
but then that sort of meant that the structured side which is also quite important got lost
555
also just listening for example just listening to this podcast
556
and working things out by being dropped in at the deep end is a bit of a big step
557
and it takes a while for
558
that to have an impact on your English I think the thing is for listeners to this podcast here is
559
that you should consider listening to Luke's English podcast as a sort of a long -term thing
560
or whatever it is you're to.
561
You should consider it to be a long -term thing.
562
And it needs to be a regular thing as well. So long, regular, long.
563
Let's say like that.
564
Long, regular, long.
565
Long meaning long -term.
566
So you should be doing it, you know, not...
567
Obviously, you wouldn't just listen to the podcast for a couple of weeks, but it's something that you would do on a long -term basis if you like it.
568
What was it?
569
Long, what, long?
570
Oh, God, I can't remember now.
571
Long something long.
572
I can't remember what i just said that's annoying anyway long
573
term the thing in the middle um i'll come back to
574
if i can remember it
575
and the other long meant for a long time like for example for an hour i think that's better
576
that you're listening to english for a slightly longer period of time
577
because that really allows the english to bed in a little bit
578
so it was long regular long
579
that was it long regular long long long term regular meaning on a regular basis um
580
and long meaning for a longer period of time when you listen
581
and uh that's important just sort of loading lots of english into you uh english
582
that you're focusing on the meaning and just trying to understand it
583
and enjoy it so long uh long regular long
584
and also you know a bit of studying too it's also important to do some structure work um
585
but also to explore expose yourself to things
586
that illustrate the language point being used in a functional way
587
so when you do um
588
when you do study the language you know look beyond just the form towards how exactly it's being used remember
589
that yin and yang thing
590
that your your exposure your listening should be punctuated by a bit of noticing of grammar
591
and your grammar studies uh your study of structure
592
and form should be also punctuated by the desire to see how exactly
593
that language is being used in a natural context by for example googling the phrases
594
that you're you're looking at
595
so as we've said before do both do some structured language work combined with exposure in
596
which you are really focused on following the meaning of what's
597
being communicated then probably some more reflection on the way it was done with language
598
so moving between grammar and pure meaning and back to grammar
599
and pure meaning moving between those two things it's the yin
600
and the yang it's the tau of english learning um
601
so all right so the next question was uh back to the conversation i had with amber
602
and paul recently about failing standards in english i was talking about how brits get really upset really uptight
603
when they notice someone say like how are you oh i'm good like it's not good i'm i'm fine
604
They get annoyed by that, and other little examples of failing standards.
605
Now, David actually doesn't mind these things that other people perceive as being failing language standards, because as long as the language is intelligible,
606
then really it's just a sign of changing identities.
607
It's a sign of the times.
608
Let's take, how are you?
609
I'm good as an example, okay?
610
Now, what some Brits will say when they hear, how are you?
611
I'm good, they will get annoyed and say
612
and their evidence for why it's not correct is
613
that it sounds like you're saying i'm good like i'm morally good i'm a morally good person
614
but really i think it's i think it's highly unlikely that
615
if someone walks into the room and you say hi how are you
616
and they say i'm good it's highly unlikely that you're going to take that to mean i'm morally good.
617
I'm a morally good person.
618
Of course you're not.
619
You entirely understand what they mean when they say I'm good.
620
You know exactly what that means.
621
It means I'm fine.
622
Okay.
623
It could even mean I'm in good health, right?
624
I'm fine.
625
So there's really no question of it being unintelligible, but that's the example that people will give.
626
It's like, well, I didn't ask about your moral condition.
627
You know, they kind of get all weird about it like that.
628
So it's not that it's unintelligible but it is a question of changing identities
629
because really I'm good comes from American English and
630
so people get uptight about
631
that they don't like the change they feel like it sounds sloppy
632
but really it's just a different cultural way of doing things
633
so unfortunately it's just a sign of the times
634
if people don't like the changing times then they're just going to have to roll with it
635
because ultimately the language is still operating effectively it's just that it just looks and sounds a little bit different.
636
Um, are we better at communicating than we used to be?
637
Which is the question that kept coming up in that conversation with Amber and Paul.
638
Are we actually better at communicating than we used to be?
639
And really it's, it's almost, well, it's very difficult to measure that.
640
It is possible to measure it, but it's not possible to give a simple answer.
641
Uh, according to David Crystal, it depends on the situation.
642
And in fact, he wrote a book about it, uh, called The Gift of the Gab.
643
If you've got the gift of the gab, it means you're gifted, you're talented with eloquence.
644
It means you can talk and talk.
645
We often say that Irish people have the gift of the gab
646
because Irish people are well known for being able to talk and talk and talk a lot.
647
So if you've got the gift of the gab, it means you're able to talk a lot and you're very eloquent.
648
So eloquent standards do vary.
649
They change from generation to generation and circumstance to circumstance, individual to individual.
650
For example, Obama and Trump, there are differences in eloquence between the two of them.
651
We often consider Obama to be the more eloquent, articulate person, and Trump is somehow more basic in his communication, and so on.
652
There are differences, but is Trump incoherent, and is Obama actually a better communicator?
653
Well, many people would say that Trump is incoherent and inarticulate.
654
But it's not necessarily true, considering Trump's ability to communicate with his core voters.
655
Trump seems to be able to communicate extremely well with the people who voted for him.
656
So it's not really true that he's incoherent or inarticulate.
657
People cite various things as examples of falling eloquent standards.
658
For example, using like.
659
So I was like, I don't know.
660
And, you know, and I was like, what am I going to do now?
661
Like.
662
But often these aren't really examples of falling or failing standards.
663
It's just a question of style.
664
So how do we use like?
665
Well, basically we use like to just fill a gap in any sentence.
666
We like just use like to like fill a like gap in a like sentence.
667
Now, obviously you shouldn't do it too much because it starts to sound a bit ugly, but as long as it doesn't get in the way.
668
It's just a question of style.
669
And in fact, if we don't use like, there may be other expressions that we use which are considered to be socially acceptable.
670
Other little words and things which are more accepted than like.
671
So again, people see language changes and they equate it with decline
672
and it's not really decline it's just change um okay
673
so you know usually people are just giving examples of things
674
that are just a different type of eloquence
675
so a change um back to trump's english david crystal says
676
that trump's english has a style with its own values
677
and he avoids the sort of typical rhetorical style of barack obama with his balanced and complex sentences,
678
which is how, obviously, that's how, that's like the quick version of the Obama impression.
679
Yeah, it's just a load of noises.
680
Anyway, Trump uses everyday conversational strategies.
681
You know, he says like, look, believe me, believe me, folks, we've got the greatest, we've got all the greatest words in English.
682
You're going to come to English and you're going to get, you're going to make so much money.
683
You're going to get so rich with these words, you know, that sort of simple everyday conversational English.
684
He doesn't use carefully crafted sentences.
685
He changes direction mid -sentence.
686
And these are all features of sort of informal American speech.
687
And semantically, it can be extremely difficult to understand what he really means you know if
688
so i i i'm gonna get the bread it's my job
689
it's not my job okay it's it is my job it is not my job
690
but one thing's for sure we will be getting the greatest
691
bread we're gonna have sandwiches it's gonna be terrific um it's not entirely clear what he's talking about um uh
692
but um adopting that style has allowed him to appeal to certain people
693
which has been crucial to his success unless of course there's
694
a unless of course there's something else involved in the whole
695
trump success he's being investigated by the fbi at this moment for questions relating to his handling of secret information
696
and whether or not the the russians are backing him what on earth is going on uh ladies
697
and gentlemen with uh donald trump at the moment
698
and these sort of allegations that uh somehow he's working for russia
699
and that russia was involved in the uh the american presidential election
700
and brexit and all this stuff what on What on earth is going on?
701
It's extremely weird times.
702
Anyway, Trump doesn't speak in the classical sort of eloquent way,
703
but he's very effective as a communicator because he's managed to mobilize all these people.
704
Now, these days, as David said, Trump may have become a little bit more formal.
705
But during the campaign, he was noticeably less formal
706
and more colloquial than Clinton and the other candidates
707
and as a result he clearly stood out from the crowd
708
during a climate of dissatisfaction with the traditional political class people
709
were fed up with the type of boring politician speaking in
710
that boring old way and they thought
711
that they were out of touch with ordinary people
712
and part of a crooked system people a lot of people didn't trust obama
713
because of his laid -back cool complex way of speaking trump
714
got in by presenting himself as an alternative to this established political system
715
and the way he used English was a big part of that.
716
All right, there you go.
717
That's the end of that.
718
I've been through most of the points made by David Crystal in our conversation, and so there we go.
719
All right, I'm going to leave it at this point because I've got loads of things to do.
720
I've got tons of stuff to do.
721
I've got to go out to the post office.
722
I've got to do some shopping.
723
I'm a busy person today, so I don't have time to ramble on anymore.
724
But there will be more rambling coming soon.
725
By the way, I just saw from the news that Theresa May has joined coalition,
726
joined in coalition government with the DUP, the Democratic Unionist Party.
727
So we have got, this is what it says on the Guardian's website, election 2017.
728
Theresa May says Tories will work with DUP to proceed with Brexit.
729
All right, fine.
730
There you go.
731
That's the latest update on the election stuff.
732
So the Tories are going to stay in with support from the DUP then.
733
OK, well, what a disaster that was for Theresa May, though, because she's just lost a bunch of influence in the House of Commons by doing that snap election,
734
which totally worked against her expectations.
735
Anyway, we'll keep up with this story.
736
I'll probably talk to you more about it on the podcast soon at some point.
737
But for now, it's just time to say goodbye.
738
Bye, bye, bye, bye, bye.

Contexto y antecedentes

En este video, exploramos conclusiones clave sobre el aprendizaje de idiomas basadas en una entrevista con David Crystal, un experto en lingüística. Además, se habla de herramientas prácticas como italki, una plataforma que conecta a aprendices con profesores y hablantes nativos, fomentando la interacción real y hasta relaciones personales. Todo esto se enmarca en un podcast orientado a mejorar el inglés, con tips prácticos para aplicar en el día a día.

5 frases clave para la comunicación diaria

  • "If you're looking for one-to-one lessons" (Si buscas clases individuales): útil para pedir o recomendar clases personalizadas.
  • "a flexible approach" (un enfoque flexible): ideal para describir métodos de aprendizaje adaptables a tu rutina.
  • "getting speaking time" (obtener tiempo de conversación): esencial para hablar de la importancia de practicar la oralidad.
  • "connecting and improving their English" (conectando y mejorando su inglés): resume el objetivo principal de interactuar con otros hablantes.
  • "English is a vacuum cleaner of a language" (El inglés es una aspiradora de lenguaje): metáfora memorable para explicar cómo absorbe palabras de otros idiomas.

Guía paso a paso para el shadowing

El técnica de shadowing es perfecta para mejorar la pronunciación en inglés y la fluidez. Aquí te mostramos cómo aplicarla con este video:
1. Escucha y observa: Reproduce un fragmento corto (30 segundos) y presta atención a la entonación y el ritmo.
2. Repite al instante: Detén el video y repite la frase al mismo tiempo que el hablante, imitando su tono y acento. Usa una app de shadowing si necesitas ajustar la velocidad.
3. Compara y corrige: Graba tu voz y compárala con la original. Presta atención a las palabras difíciles, como "vacuum cleaner" o "flexible".
4. Incrementa la duración: Una vez dominas los fragmentos cortos, pasa a secciones más largas.
5. Practica diariamente: 10 minutos al día con este método (llamado shadowspeak por algunos expertos) harán que notes progresos rápidos en tu pronunciación y confianza al hablar.

Recuerda: el shadowing no solo mejora tu pronunciación, sino que también te ayuda a internalizar la gramática y el vocabulario en contexto. ¡Anímate a probarlo hoy mismo!

Gramática en este vídeo

Las estructuras que más usa el hablante, con las palabras exactas del vídeo:

EstructuraEn el vídeo
Oraciones condicionales if + oración, will/would + verbo — una condición y su resultadoif this podcast ever ends it'll basically
“Used to” used to + verbo — un hábito o estado pasado que ya no es ciertoused to be
Present perfect have/has + participio pasado — una acción pasada que sigue importando ahorahas become · haven't listened · have influenced
Voz pasiva be + participio pasado — importa lo que ocurre, no quién lo haceis sponsored · are assimilated · are formed

¿Qué es la Técnica de Shadowing?

Shadowing es una técnica de aprendizaje de idiomas respaldada por la ciencia, desarrollada originalmente para la formación de intérpretes profesionales y popularizada por el políglota Dr. Alexander Arguelles. El método es simple pero poderoso: escuchas audio en inglés nativo y lo repites en voz alta de inmediato, como una sombra que sigue al hablante con solo 1-2 segundos de retraso. A diferencia de la escucha pasiva o los ejercicios de gramática, el shadowing obliga a tu cerebro y músculos de la boca a procesar y reproducir simultáneamente patrones de habla reales. Las investigaciones muestran que mejora significativamente la precisión de la pronunciación, la entonación, el ritmo, el habla conectada, la comprensión auditiva y la fluidez al hablar, convirtiéndola en una de las metodologías más efectivas para la preparación del IELTS Speaking y la comunicación en inglés en el mundo real.

Técnica de shadowing: lee la guía completa paso a paso →