Shadowing Practice: Why America (Still) Loves Guns - Learn English Speaking with Video

Hey guys, all horses videos are available ad-free, uncensored, and one week early on Patreon.

Patrons also get exclusive videos and 20% off the Horses Store.

Check it out at patreon.com slash horsespt.

T. Compared to similar countries, America is a violent place.

In America, people die violent deaths at a much higher rate than in other rich capitalist countries.

This violence has expressed itself in a number of ways throughout history.

But guns are currently and have always been part of the American language of violence.

This video is not intended to prescribe some solution for American gun violence.

I will not advocate for gun rights or for gun control in this essay.

Instead, this video will identify in an objective way why America seems to have a genetic,

unending, and unstoppable fondness for firearms.

The first thing we should determine is simple.

Do Americans actually love guns?

The answer here is complicated.

According to the Pew Research Center, only 32% of Americans say they actually own a gun.

This stat alone would indicate that perhaps Americans don't actually love guns as much as we may believe.

But when we dig further into these statistics, we get a more comprehensive version of the truth.

Despite a statistical ambivalence about gun ownership, Americans have more guns per capita than any other country in the world, by a large margin.

Per 100 residents, America has about 120 guns.

The next highest country is Yemen, with about 53.

So within the context of the globe, yes, we can say that Americans relatively do love guns.

The majority of Americans do believe that gun ownership is a right.

Depending on whose statistics you look to, this support ranges from just over 50% to over 70%.

Loving guns isn't inherently bad, but among high-income countries, America has the seventh highest rate of gun homicides.

The countries that are ahead of America, though, are small nations with whom America probably can't be compared.

Panama, the Bahamas, Trinidad, and Tobago, to name a few.

Notably, two of the countries that America trails are American territories, Puerto Rico and the U.S.

Virgin Islands.

When we compare American homicide by gun rates with our global peers, America is an outlier.

Among high-income countries with populations over 10 million, America is first with 4.52 gun homicides per 100,000 people.

Saudi Arabia is a distant second.

Canada has 0.62.

The UK has .01.

All of this put together can lead to a reasonable and objective conclusion.

America leads the world by some margin in gun violence.

But still, Americans love guns.

So here we arrive at the core of this video.

Why?

Data can provide us with a contemporary but perhaps shallow answer to this question.

Statistics show that 67% of gun owners have a gun for protection, 38% for hunting, 30% for sports shooting,

13% as part of a gun collection, and 8% for their job.

On an individual level, these are reasonable justifications.

But this data doesn't really tell us how or why guns have become so ingrained in American culture.

The French have wine, Canadians have hockey, in much the same way, Americans have guns.

Why is this?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, America's affinity for guns started a long, long time ago.

When early colonists arrived in North America, they found Native Americans who were no strangers to violent conflict.

However, these colonists brought with them a technology that would make conquering the New World fairly straightforward.

That technology was, of course, the rifle.

The colonists realized their rifles gave them an immense advantage over the native people, so colonial leaders mandated gun ownership.

In 1658, Virginia required that,

quote, Around this time, Plymouth County also instated a similar law requiring every male to own a gun.

This law would shortly thereafter be extended to the entirety of Massachusetts.

At the time, these weapons were primarily intended to attack and defend against Native Americans.

In his book, The Barbarous Years, historian Bernard Bailyn notes that there was one group,

Europeans, using violence to assert its will over another group, Native Americans.

This basically set the precedent that violence, specifically gun violence, was a legitimate method of settling disputes and enacting one's own will in America.

And sure enough, colonists began settling their own disputes with violence.

Rates of European-on-European violence rose during this period.

So perhaps it could even be an understatement to say that America was founded on violence.

America was from its very beginning steeped in gun violence.

Certainly conquering land is different than shooting up a school, but the point remains.

Since Europeans arrived, America has had violence through the use of firearms.

As America moved into the Revolutionary War, we see the evolution of America's gun culture.

We shouldn't go so far as to say the Revolutionary War happened over the right to own guns.

The British made some haphazard attempts at confiscating American guns, but this was not the driving force of the Revolution.

In reality, the Revolution came from issues over taxes and representation in British government.

But in any case, we won the Revolutionary War by using guns without firearms today there would likely be no United States of America.

This is an important thing to remember as we discuss the country's ongoing cultural love for guns.

Following the war, early colonists still had fresh memories of British troops and their treatment of American citizens.

With this in mind, America and its leaders were not too keen on the idea of a standing American army.

Quite the opposite, the idea of a national army was seen as antithetical to American liberty.

However, the Founding Fathers did recognize that some type of military might would be necessary to keep the peace.

So, they set out to protect the private citizens' rights to organizing militias.

Gun ownership is pointedly discussed within America's Bill of Rights.

The Second Amendment reads, A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Both gun rights and gun control activists often claim that the Second Amendment is written in clear language.

Both sides will proclaim that this amendment clearly supports their own argument.

Indeed, when we examine this amendment, things can become confusing quite quickly.

First of all, we have simple grammatical syntax.

The English language has changed since this was written.

Today, the sentence is difficult to parse.

If we examine it only in form, as purely a grammatical exercise, the Second Amendment is difficult to understand.

What do all of these commas mean?

What exactly shouldn't be infringed?

The militia or the guns themselves?

To the modern reader, the Second Amendment is not written very clearly.

After all, if it was, there certainly wouldn't be so much debate about it.

The meanings of words have also changed in ways that can enhance arguments for either side of the issue.

Take the word regulated.

Pulitzer Prize-winning constitutional scholar Jack Rakove says that in the 18th century,

regulated did not mean subjected to laws or government restrictions.

Rather, it meant that the militia would be armed, organized, and properly effective.

So we could take this interpretation to mean the Second Amendment does not endorse government regulation of firearms.

But then there's the phrase bear arms.

Saul Cornell is another leading constitutional scholar who is considered one of the foremost authorities on revolutionary era legal thinking.

Cornell has indicated that the right to bear arms had almost nothing to do with personal self-defense in revolutionary America.

At the time, firearms were not considered tools for self-defense, they were military objects.

100

Edged weapons and blunt objects were more in line with the idea of self-defense.

101

To use a gun for defending oneself would have been like using a hatchet to cut vegetables.

102

It would work, but the idea was just kind of outlandish.

103

So this interpretation seems to indicate that the Second Amendment doesn't protect the right to gun ownership.

104

Rakove and Cornell are both equally esteemed and qualified constitutional scholars, and each of them can lead us down different paths with the Second Amendment.

105

These are just two examples, but there are endless more.

106

Modern America has not been able to reach a conclusion on the Second Amendment because a lot of intelligent,

107

qualified individuals have wildly differing interpretations of the text.

108

Even the federal interpretation of the Second Amendment has swung wildly throughout time,

109

For decades and decades, courts agreed that the Second Amendment did not protect individual rights to gun ownership.

110

Rather, early Americans read the Second Amendment as protecting the existence of militias.

111

However, in 2008, Supreme Court justices declared that the Second Amendment does in fact protect the right to individual gun ownership.

112

Even still, this decision came with its fair share of conditions.

113

Antonin Scalia, noted that firearms were subject to restrictions and regulations.

114

The point of all of this is not to come to a conclusion on constitutional law.

115

There are a lot of other Second Amendment stones I have left unturned here, and that is intentional.

116

It is not my desire to advocate for any particular reading of the amendment, but rather we can take all of this to understand two things.

117

First, the founding fathers believed that people should be allowed to keep rifles at home.

118

This is included in the Bill of Rights.

119

Second, America has never really known what to do about this.

120

The Second Amendment has continuously been interpreted and reinterpreted as the basis for wildly divergent opinions and pieces of legislation.

121

As we move forward past the 18th century, America's gun culture truly begins to take shape.

122

In the mid-19th century, guns were still not seen as instruments of violence.

123

Instead, they were tools.

124

They were more shovel than sword.

125

This was perhaps in part because they just didn't work very well.

126

These guns were clunky, unreliable, inaccurate, and generally troublesome tools.

127

But then a young man named Samuel Colt got to work.

128

Around this time, Texans were fighting against the Comanche tribe.

129

More accurately, they were trying to kill off the Comanches entirely.

130

After hearing a remarkable battle story from a Texan named Sam Walker, Colt realized that firearms could have some romance about them.

131

They could be more than tools.

132

Guns could have some emotional meaning.

133

So Samuel Colt began a massive marketing campaign.

134

He associated his guns with the so perceived bravery of defending America against foreigners and Native Americans alike.

135

Just as early colonists had, Colt framed violence as a premier strategy for settling disputes.

136

Samuel Colt sent free merchandise to politicians, he circulated pamphlets, he hired a famous painter to depict scenes of Colt guns saving American lives.

137

Other firearms manufacturers soon followed suit.

138

They all focused their efforts on handguns, which could be produced quite cheaply in America.

139

For a long time, guns had been prohibitively expensive.

140

That was no longer the case.

141

Manufacturers like Colt made cheaper and cheaper handguns.

142

In 1850, a Colt revolver was $12.

143

By the year 1900, a .22 caliber Colt could be had for 18 cents.

144

The country also had fewer restrictions on firearms than Europe, which alone incentivized gun ownership.

145

People could, so they would.

146

These newer, smaller guns were also quite convenient.

147

They were more reliable than past firearms and could be neatly tucked away into the beltline.

148

Combine all of this with an effective marketing campaign, and firearms like the new Colts were immensely successful.

149

These guns made it easier to kill people.

150

Strangling or beating a person to death brought an immense amount of risk.

151

You could get hit There's also a lot of thought that had to occur before, during, and after such an act.

152

Rifles were too cumbersome and bulky to carry around on one's person.

153

There were essentially barriers to entry as far as violence was concerned, but handheld revolvers and handguns broke these down entirely.

154

Now within a second or two you could kill a man without a whole lot of effort, psychological or physical.

155

During In the 14 years when these changes were happening, firearms ownership ballooned to 10 times what it had been at the turn of the century.

156

This reality was occurring against an increasingly violent backdrop.

157

As the country hurled itself towards a civil war, America was becoming more and more homicidal.

158

With the proliferation of slavery, there arose a new group which Americans desired to control.

159

Taking cues from their forefathers, slave owners and other Americans used widely available firearms to control African slaves.

160

Homicide rates skyrocketed across the nation in a time that is often called the Riot Era.

161

Alongside this, increasing industrialization was making American cities more bountiful and more populated.

162

This surge in productivity required more labor.

163

So immigrants began to pour into America's largest cities.

164

They were met with rampant xenophobia, which often translated to violence.

165

Some American political parties declared that these immigrants, Scottish, Irish, and German, would bring with them violence,

166

and that increased immigration meant increased danger for Americans.

167

All of this, the violence and the proliferation of firearms, just spread and spread.

168

The American West became the Wild West as prospectors clashed with Native Americans.

169

So across the entire country in the late 1800s, American violence was again in its ascendancy.

170

Gun violence had worked for the colonists, it had worked for the revolutionaries, so now it was working for post-Civil War Western prospectors,

171

Southern Americans, and xenophobic urbanites.

172

These conflicts all reflect an idea that guns should be used to settle disputes.

173

It is this idea which is perhaps at the core of America's gun culture.

174

So for decades that was exactly what happened.

175

In the 1900s, America just got more and more homicidal.

176

In 1900, the homicide rate was roughly 1 per 100,000 people.

177

By 1930, it was almost 10 per 100,000 people.

178

Much of this was due to gun violence surrounding prohibition and organized crime.

179

America was in a sort of Tommy Gun era, and its impacts were devastating.

180

And so, we come to the next major force in America's gun culture.

181

The NRA.

182

By the 20s, the NRA had already been around for some 50 odd years.

183

The group was originally founded to increase marksmanship abilities.

184

For decades, they mostly organized shooting competitions.

185

But after the Great Depression, the NRA began to drift into the political sphere.

186

Their goal, though, was not the loosening of restrictions.

187

Often, the opposite was true.

188

In the early 20s, the NRA successfully pushed for increased firearms regulation, hoping to ensure that only respectable, serious individuals could own guns.

189

President Roosevelt signed two pieces of legislation which regulated commercial firearms sales,

190

the 1934 National Firearms Act and the 1938 Federal Firearms Act.

191

These two acts imposed paid registration on some weapons and federal registration for gun dealers.

192

They also prohibited felons from purchasing guns at all.

193

The NRA convinced Congress to exclude handguns from this new legislation, but broadly supported the bills.

194

In 1934, the NRA president said in a testimony to Congress, I do not believe in the general promiscuous toting of guns.

195

I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses.

196

The NRA began to change, though, when a new wave of violence came to America.

197

After the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., a wave of riots spread across Baltimore.

198

There emerged an increasing level of anxiety and violence around the civil rights movement.

199

Richard Nixon was elected president as a law and order candidate.

200

One of his first moves was to militarize urban police forces with heavier weaponry.

201

And so Nixon continued these traditions of guns

202

and violence being used to control a disobedient group and to settle conflict in America.

203

Gun violence went again on the upswing.

204

Gun homicides increased sharply by 51%.

205

Assaults using firearms rose even more by an astounding 84%.

206

Guns were also becoming cheaper.

207

Inexpensive handguns were being imported from overseas like never before.

208

In 1955, 67,000 handguns were imported to the US.

209

In 1968, that number increased to about a million.

210

At this time, the NRA was still firmly on the side of gun control.

211

In 1968, NRA president Harold Glasson said in a lecture,

212

Does the right to keep and bear arms mean that every individual has a right to carry a gun at all times, concealed or openly?

213

Obviously not.

214

This same year, the U.S government passed the Gun Control Act of 1968, prompted by the assassination of President Kennedy.

215

However, the conservative movement in America was beginning to change dramatically.

216

Increasingly, conservatives saw any and all government regulation as inherently problematic.

217

Conservatives placed more and more value on personal freedoms.

218

People like Barry Goldwater, Jerry Falwell, and Howard Jarvis pushed legislation under this new anti-government sentiment.

219

The NRA was a conservative organization, and so they too underwent a seismic shift almost overnight.

220

In the 1970s, a man named Harlan Carter was an increasingly vocal member of the NRA.

221

He took a hard-line stance, believing that no amount of firearms legislation was acceptable.

222

When asked if violent criminals and the mentally ill should be allowed to own guns, Harlan replied that it was the, quote, price we pay for freedom.

223

Harlan wrote a letter to NRA leadership imploring them to take his position, declaring that we can win it on a simple concept.

224

No compromise.

225

No gun legislation.

226

In the mid-70s, Carter would go on to essentially lead a coup against NRA leadership.

227

This resulted in him winning the position of executive vice president.

228

Under Harlan's leadership, the NRA entered into an entirely new era.

229

The new NRA spread a narrative that the U.S government had a secret plan to disarm all Americans.

230

The gun, Carter said, was the sole tool for defeating this government oppression.

231

Further, Carter's NRA leveraged rising crime rates and racial anxieties to rally support for gun rights.

232

This was all a massive success.

233

Membership in the NRA tripled under Carter from 1 million to 3.7 million.

234

Carter hired a team of lobbyists and activists who racked up victories across the country.

235

Several states under NRA guidance added the right to bear arms into their constitution.

236

The NRA repeatedly defeated efforts to increase gun control measures on a federal level.

237

Even after Carter left his position in the 80s, the NRA continued to find political success.

238

They raised $70 million for Republican House Leader Newt Gingrich, and they spread pro-gun messaging throughout important swing state elections.

239

Near the turn of the century, the NRA capitalized on the unpopularity of Bill Clinton, tax increases, and failed government reform policies.

240

However, as Senator Chris Murphy points out in his book, the NRA accomplished a lot after the year 2000, despite having very little actual power.

241

The NRA did not spend a lot of money compared to other lobbyists and super PACs.

242

In 2012, NRA endorsed candidates only won one out of seven elections.

243

During this time, there was very little statistical electoral advantage to having the NRA on your side.

244

Bizarrely, the NRA had become an effective political force without actually having much in the way of political capability.

245

Murphy, a politician himself, notes the phenomenon of the squeaky wheel.

246

While a small minority of Americans support everything the NRA advocates for, the NRA encourages that minority to be as loud as possible.

247

This, of course, skews public perception, which can result in real legislative and electoral action.

248

The NRA also has a remarkably strong brand.

249

For a politician, the NRA endorsement broadcasts a lot more than gun rights gun rights.

250

It's a conservative badge of honor.

251

Whether or not the voting population agrees with the NRA on individual policy issues,

252

a candidate earning their endorsement can be an important piece of the electoral puzzle.

253

Culturally, the NRA also has a significant impact among citizens.

254

The NRA, building on centuries of tradition, continues to tie gun ownership to liberty and personal freedom.

255

Whether or not you, personally, the viewer, agrees with this notion, it must be said, this is the angle for the NRA.

256

They are carrying the torch of their forefathers.

257

Like Samuel Colt, the NRA proclaims that guns are more than just objects.

258

They are symbols of freedom.

259

For a long time, the NRA was viewed quite favorably among Americans, and so this messaging was very successful.

260

In recent years, though, they have begun to lose much of this cultural capital.

261

But when we put all of this story into a pot, we get the American gun culture.

262

Up to this point, I have omitted one perhaps large part of American gun culture.

263

Media.

264

America is the land of media.

265

Much of this media is very violent, and much of it includes guns.

266

Research on the correlation between violent media consumption and violent behavior has produced mixed findings.

267

This media is a part of the American gun culture, but if we blame violent video games, movies, and music for this culture,

268

I think we are looking at the equation from the wrong end.

269

After all, violent media does not just erupt out of nowhere and produce violent behavior en masse en masse.

270

Video games, movies, music are all created as reflections of American sensibilities.

271

Companies produce violent media because America wants violent media.

272

These things are part of the existing gun culture and maybe they even exacerbate that culture.

273

But they are not the cause of it.

274

They are more symptoms than virus.

275

It seems to me that America's affinity for guns comes from three places.

276

It is the sum of three parts.

277

Tradition, rights, and mythology.

278

In this country, we have a long-standing tradition of gun violence.

279

The landmass was conquered through gun violence.

280

The country itself was founded on gun violence.

281

Time and time again, social conflicts have been solved through the means of force, often with a firearm.

282

This macro tradition has leaked into the micro.

283

For some Americans, guns are now a legitimate way to settle disputes or control groups of people.

284

The right to own guns is expressed in the American Bill of Rights rights.

285

The country was founded with firearms in mind in one way or the other, but due to aging language, changing times, and increasing polarization,

286

there is little agreement on how exactly America should protect this right.

287

Guns have a profound mythological meaning in America.

288

In the very early days of the country, capitalists began active efforts to galvanize the mythology of guns within American culture.

289

They were successful and this is a process which has not stopped.

290

Its effects have not abated.

291

For hundreds of years American companies and organizations have produced messaging that ties guns directly to American identity.

292

All nations around the world have their collective cultural interests.

293

Guns are the American incarnation of this phenomenon.

294

Gun control activists say that something must give, that gun violence is out of control, and that we simply must act.

295

More often than outright removal of firearms, activists often demand a compromise that takes the form of increased gun regulation.

296

The other side says that we already have regulations in place, that they already have compromised.

297

They point to the thousands and thousands of gun laws which already exist on federal, state, and local levels.

298

This debate just It goes on and on and I'm not really sure what the path forward is.

299

But I do think that understanding the gun within American history and mythology could be a good place to start.

¿Qué es la Técnica de Shadowing?

Shadowing es una técnica de aprendizaje de idiomas respaldada por la ciencia, desarrollada originalmente para la formación de intérpretes profesionales y popularizada por el políglota Dr. Alexander Arguelles. El método es simple pero poderoso: escuchas audio en inglés nativo y lo repites en voz alta de inmediato, como una sombra que sigue al hablante con solo 1-2 segundos de retraso. A diferencia de la escucha pasiva o los ejercicios de gramática, el shadowing obliga a tu cerebro y músculos de la boca a procesar y reproducir simultáneamente patrones de habla reales. Las investigaciones muestran que mejora significativamente la precisión de la pronunciación, la entonación, el ritmo, el habla conectada, la comprensión auditiva y la fluidez al hablar, convirtiéndola en una de las metodologías más efectivas para la preparación del IELTS Speaking y la comunicación en inglés en el mundo real.

Shadowing Practice: Why America (Still) Loves Guns - Learn English Speaking with Video

Speaking Goals for This Clip

Phrase Bank

Fix Your Weak Spots

¿Qué es la Técnica de Shadowing?