シャドーイング練習: Why France’s Economy Is Stalling - YouTubeで英語スピーキングを学ぶ
C1
He was young, he was smart,
220 文
文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。
1
He was young, he was smart,
2
and he was supposed to embody a French renaissance.
3
In 2017, 39-year-old Emmanuel Macron won the French presidency with a supply-side economic program aimed at lowering taxes,
4
cutting unemployment, and reducing public spending.
5
He wanted to unleash the energy of the country.
6
Because he has this very pro-business image,
7
it really was the final piece of the puzzle that was missing.
8
The idea was to make the economy more dynamic in order to be able to afford the generous welfare system.
9
But over the years, the plan fizzled out.
10
By the end of 2025,
11
France's debt-to-GDP ratio had skyrocketed to 117% and is projected to reach 120% by 2027.
12
Meanwhile, GDP growth has stayed low,
13
with a rise of only 0.7%,
14
below the eurozone average of 1.3%.
15
The paradox is that Emmanuel Macron came to power on an agenda of strong public finances and a dynamic French economy.
16
Fast forward eight years, you actually see a greater debt and an economy that is not growing very much.
17
So what went wrong?
18
And why does France's economy still feel broken?
19
And looking back at the past eight years,
20
it's fair to say France hasn't had a smooth ride and neither has Emmanuel Macron.
21
First there was the gilet jaune,
22
then the pandemic, Russia's war on Ukraine and the resulting energy crisis,
23
a re-election, the pension reform and some self-inflicted wounds like the dissolution of parliament in 2024.
24
But beyond global external factors,
25
Macron's economic policies didn't give him the results he'd planned,
26
despite some encouraging debuts.
27
This is the place to be,
28
to invest, to work, to invent,
29
to launch your business, to become a start-upper.
30
The idea was that by lowering taxes for companies in particular,
31
for individuals as well, this would help revitalize the economy altogether.
32
Flat tax, basically capping at 30% the taxation on investment income,
33
suppression of the wealth tax replaced by a real estate tax.
34
So supply side policies which probably went in the right direction.
35
With the former president, there were some propositions to do some very high taxes,
36
which actually created a bit of a brain drain.
37
And there was really this feeling of France is hostile to entrepreneurs.
38
The launch of the startup nation was embodied by Station F,
39
the world's largest startups campus.
40
When Station F arrived, Macron arrived, that really changed.
41
People understood that it's okay to launch a business here.
42
Foreign direct investment began to flow into France's tech scene.
43
And in 2019, France overtook Germany and the UK as the top FDI destination in Europe.
44
It still held that title in 2024,
45
and that investment seems to be making an impact.
46
In 2016, France counted only three unicorns,
47
companies worth $1 billion or more.
48
By 2025, that number had increased by a tenfold to 30 unicorns.
49
When we started in 2017,
50
our companies raised 350 million.
51
Well, this year, our companies raised 1 billion in the first nine months of the year.
52
That's the equivalent of the whole country of Italy,
53
just happening at Station F.
54
The poster child of success is Mistral AI.
55
And the AI scene actually,
56
France is very well placed in Europe.
57
Of our 1,000 companies on campus,
58
roughly 80% is around AI.
59
But we still do have other sectors.
60
We have some climate, we have some robotics,
61
which is still linked to AI.
62
But we do have other sectors as well.
63
Another success of Macron's was reducing unemployment,
64
France's long-standing bugbear since the 1990s.
65
Unemployment is near some historic laws in France.
66
Essentially, some of the structural reforms I brought in helped with that.
67
More flexibility for companies to hire and fire workers as well.
68
We're still giving some protection,
69
allowed to retrain some of the workers as well.
70
Unemployment has dropped noticeably since 2015.
71
That year, 10.4% of the labour force was unemployed.
72
By 2024, that number had fallen to 7.4%.
73
However, France's youth is still out of work.
74
Although following the same trend as other age groups,
75
youth unemployment still stood at 18.5% in 2025,
76
a stark contrast to Germany's 6.6% rate.
77
While fixing employment is a priority in most countries,
78
it's especially key in France.
79
That's because pensions are mainly funded through employees' contributions.
80
France's current pension system started in 1945,
81
just after World War II.
82
Workers contribute to a fund that pays for their elders' pensions,
83
with the expectation that they'll be able to collect their own pension through the future workforce.
84
That system might have worked in the 20th century, but demographics have changed.
85
In 1960, France counted four workers for each pensioner.
86
In 2023, that ratio plummeted to just 1.8 workers per pensioner.
87
To solve this, contributions are regularly rising,
88
but that makes a dent in workers purchasing power.
89
Another potential solution to the problem was raising the pension age,
90
a reform Macron's government proposed in 2023.
91
Despite mass protests, the measure was ultimately passed.
92
However, the reform was paused in December 2025 to ease political tensions.
93
We have a whole group above 55 years old that are too young to retire,
94
but actually too old to find a new job.
95
The main reasons for unemployment include a skills mismatch with job opportunities and employer uncertainty about future growth.
96
Another factor often cited is the difficulty of letting go of employees.
97
That is, until the 2023 labor market reform gave companies more latitude.
98
There is more flexibility than people are usually aware of outside of France.
99
There's had some labor market reforms,
100
the introduction of some experience rating,
101
what we call bonus malus system to make firms accountable for their layoff,
102
capping basically the amount of money which can be demanded from firms when they dismiss a worker.
103
We need to protect workers.
104
That's important, but we have to do it in an efficient way.
105
There are lots of wrong policies in labor market protection.
106
And this applies to both workers and companies.
107
Normally, when an employee resigns,
108
they aren't entitled to unemployment benefits.
109
But in France, if both parties agree to dismissal by agreement,
110
the employee can claim benefits while the company is protected from wrongful dismissal claims.
111
And that's ultimately at the expense of the social security system.
112
The dismissal by agreement system cost the state an estimated 10 billion euros in 2024.
113
We do have nearly 40% of companies that say that they're actually able to get up and running thanks to unemployment benefits.
114
People can take six months off,
115
a year off, say they have been fired by the firm and get unemployment benefits.
116
It's a scandal.
117
While France has a relatively average corporate tax rate for Europe at 25%,
118
it surpasses its neighbors in employer social security contribution.
119
On average, employers bear cost equivalent to around 45% of an employee's gross salary.
120
But on the flip side,
121
companies also benefit from subsidies.
122
BPI France, which is the sovereign fund in France,
123
is funding over 50% of our companies here.
124
And that's directly because they're also investors in a lot of funds.
125
But there's also ones for research and innovation,
126
which is one of the most advantageous tax credits that we have in Europe.
127
Do you remember Mario Draghi's famous 2012 speech to save the euro?
128
The ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro.
129
In 2020, Macron mirrored that approach with another whatever-it-takes moment.
130
France is one of the most redistributive countries of the developed economies.
131
And certainly what we've seen,
132
the answer to the multiple crises over the past few years,
133
is to kind of redistribute and give more money.
134
Take the pandemic's one-off 150 billion euros state-guaranteed loan to keep businesses afloat,
135
or the 26.3 billion euros worth of subsidies in response to the surge in European energy prices following Russia's war on Ukraine.
136
Like everywhere, there were adverse elections,
137
and that zombie firms took advantage of that to stay alive longer.
138
Because these loans were open to all firms without vetting the sector or viability,
139
state funds helped keep these so-called zombie companies afloat.
140
Now, bankruptcies in France are surging to catch up.
141
A recent Senate report also found that French businesses received between 108
142
and 211 billion euros worth of tax relief and subsidies in 2023,
143
with little follow-up or monitoring.
144
This is a very difficult policy to perform
145
because we don't have the information usually about whether the companies are still worth it, worth preserving.
146
Now, in terms of taxing the firms,
147
it's a very bizarre situation where we tax the firms a lot.
148
And then we realize that and then we give them some stuff.
149
So the policies we use are not necessarily the best thing.
150
Macron has tried to actually reduce,
151
for example, production tax, which are taxes,
152
for example, that are on turnover rather than profits.
153
Economists want taxes to be on profit,
154
not on turnover, because it's distortive.
155
But Macron has reduced the tax,
156
which is a very good thing.
157
Yet, cutting production taxes didn't do enough to help boost productivity.
158
For a long time, France ranked amongst the most productive countries in the world.
159
But that has recently changed.
160
From the turn of the century,
161
productivity growth rates, measured as the value added to GDP per hour worked, have been slipping.
162
After Covid, it got even worse.
163
And like much of Europe,
164
the country has struggled to find its way back towards growth.
165
It's been the focus on low productivity services sector of the economy.
166
It's been a lower adoption of technology in some sectors as well,
167
heavy regulation in some sectors.
168
Purchasing power is actually stagnating,
169
like in many countries, but more in France than elsewhere,
170
in part because we have under-invested in many things.
171
So that's what I call the time bombs.
172
The time bombs mean that if you don't do anything for a year or two,
173
it doesn't matter.
174
But after a while, it actually has a cost.
175
So debt in 1975 was like 30% of GDP.
176
Now it's 115%.
177
Education has actually decreased in quality.
178
Innovation is another case in part.
179
But innovation is more generally a prime of Europe
180
because all the big tech and biotech firms are in the US and China nowadays.
181
So that means that we lose in productivity,
182
we lose in competitivity, and people aren't happy because their wage is stagnating.
183
According to the Bank of France,
184
The recent drop in productivity primarily came from a rise in apprenticeships due to students being both employed and in training,
185
and the delay in COVID-related bankruptcies.
186
Both factors are linked to French state subsidies.
187
They ended up in a situation where they had to spend
188
a lot of money to maintain the fabric of the French economy during this crisis,
189
but not having as much tax revenue as they expected coming into the coffers.
190
There were a bunch of things which were not dealt with.
191
In part, the pension reform,
192
there was nothing on the reform of the state.
193
It's still a bloated state,
194
rather inefficient in some respects, with talents as well.
195
It's not like it's black and white.
196
Now you could argue, actually,
197
now the French economy is quite resilient.
198
If all these measures hadn't been put into place,
199
maybe the situation would be even worse right now.
200
So is France doomed to remain trapped in a cycle of high debt and heavy spending?
201
France right now is really a good example of zero-sum thinking.
202
Basically viewing the economic life as a zero-sum game.
203
So the pie is fixed and we fight to grab the biggest share in a sense.
204
Forgetting that in this fighting we actually reduce the size of the pie instead of trying to increase it through economic growth,
205
innovation, productivity gains and so on think about the current debate in the parliament.
206
It's all about grabbing stuff and no discussion of policies that could improve education,
207
solve the climate issue or is going to raise innovation.
208
We see this problem now of the debt really growing at a really fast pace in the country
209
and in parallel you have this polarization and political instability that means addressing these key economic issues becomes more and more difficult.
210
Part of me thinks that there is a chance that this this ecosystem is solid enough that regardless of the outcome,
211
it will just continue to move forward.
212
I do think that if we hit the extremes for the presidency,
213
that could take a different turn.
214
But for the moment, I'm still very optimistic that we won't go that way.
215
In French, people understand compromise is a compromission.
216
And you basically betray your friends if you accept any agreement with the others.
217
But we need to get more mature,
218
and I'm sure we will.
219
We have to invest for our children.
220
Nice.
アプリをダウンロード
話したすべての文をAIが採点
TRENDING
人気動画
コンテキストと背景
このビデオでは、フランスの経済の停滞に関する状況が詳しく議論されています。エマニュエル・マクロン大統領の政権下で進められた経済政策は、税金の引き下げや公共支出の削減を目指していましたが、結果として経済成長は鈍化しました。2025年までにフランスのGDP比の債務が117%に達し、さらに2027年には120%に上昇するという予測が出ています。この経済の現状と、マクロン政権が直面した課題について深く考察することで、英語学習者にも実際の経済用語や表現を学ぶ機会を提供します。
日常コミュニケーションのためのトップ5フレーズ
- “フランス経済はなぜ停滞しているのか？” - 経済に関する質問を投げかける表現。
- “公的財政の強化” - 経済政策の重要な要素を示すフレーズ。
- “スタートアップ国家の実現” - 企業家精神を促進するためのビジョンを表現。
- “人材の流出” - 高税金がもたらす影響を示すフレーズ。
- “パンデミックの影響” - 経済活動に対する外的要因を討論する表現。
ステップバイステップシャドーイングガイド
このビデオの内容を通じて英語シャドーイングを行うことは、英語の発音を良くするために非常に有効です。以下のステップを実践してみましょう：
- まず、ビデオを一度通して視聴し、全体の内容を理解します。この段階で、専門用語やフレーズの背景を把握しておくことが重要です。
- 次に、各フレーズや文を部分的に再生し、発音を聞きます。特に“スタートアップ国家の実現”のような重要なフレーズを意識的に聞くことで、文脈を理解しましょう。
- 再生しながら、実際に声に出して繰り返します。特にリズムやイントネーションに気をつけると、自然な発音が身に付きます。
- もう一度確認したい場合は、一時停止を用い、その後でシャドーイングを行うと良いでしょう。これにより、IELTS スピーキング対策にも役立ちます。
- 最後に、ビデオの内容について自分の意見を英語でまとめ、他者とディスカッションすることで、実践的なスピーキング能力を高めることができます。
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。