쉐도잉 연습: Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong | Johann Hari | TED - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

C2
쉐도잉 컨트롤
0% 완료 (0/139 문장)
One of my earliest memories is of trying to wake up one of my relatives and not being able to.
⏸ 일시 정지
모든 문장
139 문장
1
One of my earliest memories is of trying to wake up one of my relatives and not being able to.
2
And I was just a little kid, so I didn't really understand why, but as I got older, I realized we had drug addiction in my family, including later cocaine addiction.
3
I'd been thinking about it a lot lately, partly because it's now exactly 100 years since drugs were first banned in the United States and Britain, and we then imposed that on the rest of the world.
4
It's a century since we made this really fateful decision to take addicts and punish them and make them suffer, because we believed that would deter them; it would give them an incentive to stop.
5
And a few years ago, I was looking at some of the addicts in my life who I love, and trying to figure out if there was some way to help them.
6
And I realized there were loads of incredibly basic questions I just didn't know the answer to, like, what really causes addiction?
7
Why do we carry on with this approach that doesn't seem to be working, and is there a better way out there that we could try instead?
8
So I read loads of stuff about it, and I couldn't really find the answers I was looking for, so I thought, okay, I'll go and sit with different people around the world who lived this and studied this and talk to them and see if I could learn from them.
9
And I didn't realize I would end up going over 30,000 miles at the start, but I ended up going and meeting loads of different people, from a transgender crack dealer in Brownsville, Brooklyn, to a scientist who spends a lot of time feeding hallucinogens to mongooses to see if they like them -- it turns out they do, but only in very specific circumstances -- to the only country that's ever decriminalized all drugs, from cannabis to crack, Portugal.
10
And the thing I realized that really blew my mind is, almost everything we think we know about addiction is wrong, and if we start to absorb the new evidence about addiction, I think we're going to have to change a lot more than our drug policies.
11
But let's start with what we think we know, what I thought I knew.
12
Let's think about this middle row here.
13
Imagine all of you, for 20 days now, went off and used heroin three times a day.
14
Some of you look a little more enthusiastic than others at this prospect.
15
(Laughter) Don't worry, it's just a thought experiment.
16
Imagine you did that, right?
17
What would happen?
18
Now, we have a story about what would happen that we've been told for a century.
19
We think, because there are chemical hooks in heroin, as you took it for a while, your body would become dependent on those hooks, you'd start to physically need them, and at the end of those 20 days, you'd all be heroin addicts. Right?
20
That's what I thought.
21
First thing that alerted me to the fact that something's not right with this story is when it was explained to me.
22
If I step out of this TED Talk today and I get hit by a car and I break my hip, I'll be taken to hospital and I'll be given loads of diamorphine.
23
Diamorphine is heroin.
24
It's actually much better heroin than you're going to buy on the streets, because the stuff you buy from a drug dealer is contaminated.
25
Actually, very little of it is heroin, whereas the stuff you get from the doctor is medically pure.
26
And you'll be given it for quite a long period of time.
27
There are loads of people in this room, you may not realize it, you've taken quite a lot of heroin.
28
And anyone who is watching this anywhere in the world, this is happening.
29
And if what we believe about addiction is right -- those people are exposed to all those chemical hooks -- What should happen? They should become addicts.
30
This has been studied really carefully.
31
It doesn't happen; you will have noticed if your grandmother had a hip replacement, she didn't come out as a junkie. (Laughter) And when I learned this, it seemed so weird to me, so contrary to everything I'd been told, everything I thought I knew, I just thought it couldn't be right, until I met a man called Bruce Alexander.
32
He's a professor of psychology in Vancouver who carried out an incredible experiment I think really helps us to understand this issue.
33
Professor Alexander explained to me, the idea of addiction we've all got in our heads, that story, comes partly from a series of experiments that were done earlier in the 20th century.
34
They're really simple.
35
You can do them tonight at home if you feel a little sadistic.
36
You get a rat and you put it in a cage, and you give it two water bottles: One is just water, and the other is water laced with either heroin or cocaine.
37
If you do that, the rat will almost always prefer the drug water and almost always kill itself quite quickly.
38
So there you go, right? That's how we think it works.
39
In the '70s, Professor Alexander comes along and he looks at this experiment and he noticed something.
40
He said ah, we're putting the rat in an empty cage.
41
It's got nothing to do except use these drugs.
42
Let's try something different.
43
So Professor Alexander built a cage that he called "Rat Park," which is basically heaven for rats.
44
They've got loads of cheese, they've got loads of colored balls, they've got loads of tunnels.
45
Crucially, they've got loads of friends. They can have loads of sex.
46
And they've got both the water bottles, the normal water and the drugged water.
47
But here's the fascinating thing: In Rat Park, they don't like the drug water.
48
They almost never use it.
49
None of them ever use it compulsively.
50
None of them ever overdose.
51
You go from almost 100 percent overdose when they're isolated to zero percent overdose when they have happy and connected lives.
52
Now, when he first saw this, Professor Alexander thought, maybe this is just a thing about rats, they're quite different to us.
53
Maybe not as different as we'd like, but, you know -- But fortunately, there was a human experiment into the exact same principle happening at the exact same time.
54
It was called the Vietnam War.
55
In Vietnam, 20 percent of all American troops were using loads of heroin, and if you look at the news reports from the time, they were really worried, because they thought, my God, we're going to have hundreds of thousands of junkies on the streets of the United States when the war ends; it made total sense.
56
Now, those soldiers who were using loads of heroin were followed home.
57
The Archives of General Psychiatry did a really detailed study, and what happened to them?
58
It turns out they didn't go to rehab. They didn't go into withdrawal.
59
Ninety-five percent of them just stopped.
60
Now, if you believe the story about chemical hooks, that makes absolutely no sense, but Professor Alexander began to think there might be a different story about addiction.
61
He said, what if addiction isn't about your chemical hooks?
62
What if addiction is about your cage?
63
What if addiction is an adaptation to your environment?
64
Looking at this, there was another professor called Peter Cohen in the Netherlands who said, maybe we shouldn't even call it addiction.
65
Maybe we should call it bonding.
66
Human beings have a natural and innate need to bond, and when we're happy and healthy, we'll bond and connect with each other, but if you can't do that, because you're traumatized or isolated or beaten down by life, you will bond with something that will give you some sense of relief.
67
Now, that might be gambling, that might be pornography, that might be cocaine, that might be cannabis, but you will bond and connect with something because that's our nature.
68
That's what we want as human beings.
69
And at first, I found this quite a difficult thing to get my head around, but one way that helped me to think about it is, I can see, I've got over by my seat a bottle of water, right?
70
I'm looking at lots of you, and lots of you have bottles of water with you.
71
Forget the drugs. Forget the drug war.
72
Totally legally, all of those bottles of water could be bottles of vodka, right?
73
We could all be getting drunk -- I might after this -- (Laughter) -- but we're not.
74
Now, because you've been able to afford the approximately gazillion pounds that it costs to get into a TED Talk, I'm guessing you guys could afford to be drinking vodka for the next six months.
75
You wouldn't end up homeless.
76
You're not going to do that, and the reason you're not going to do that is not because anyone's stopping you.
77
It's because you've got bonds and connections that you want to be present for.
78
You've got work you love. You've got people you love.
79
You've got healthy relationships.
80
And a core part of addiction, I came to think, and I believe the evidence suggests, is about not being able to bear to be present in your life.
81
Now, this has really significant implications.
82
The most obvious implications are for the War on Drugs.
83
In Arizona, I went out with a group of women who were made to wear t-shirts saying, "I was a drug addict," and go out on chain gangs and dig graves while members of the public jeer at them, and when those women get out of prison, they're going to have criminal records that mean they'll never work in the legal economy again.
84
Now, that's a very extreme example, obviously, in the case of the chain gang, but actually almost everywhere in the world we treat addicts to some degree like that.
85
We punish them. We shame them. We give them criminal records.
86
We put barriers between them reconnecting.
87
There was a doctor in Canada, Dr. Gabor Maté, an amazing man, who said to me, if you wanted to design a system that would make addiction worse, you would design that system.
88
Now, there's a place that decided to do the exact opposite, and I went there to see how it worked.
89
In the year 2000, Portugal had one of the worst drug problems in Europe.
90
One percent of the population was addicted to heroin, which is kind of mind-blowing, and every year, they tried the American way more and more.
91
They punished people and stigmatized them and shamed them more, and every year, the problem got worse.
92
And one day, the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition got together, and basically said, look, we can't go on with a country where we're having ever more people becoming heroin addicts.
93
Let's set up a panel of scientists and doctors to figure out what would genuinely solve the problem.
94
And they set up a panel led by an amazing man called Dr. João Goulão, to look at all this new evidence, and they came back and they said, "Decriminalize all drugs from cannabis to crack, but" -- and this is the crucial next step -- "take all the money we used to spend on cutting addicts off, on disconnecting them, and spend it instead on reconnecting them with society." And that's not really what we think of as drug treatment in the United States and Britain.
95
So they do do residential rehab, they do psychological therapy, that does have some value.
96
But the biggest thing they did was the complete opposite of what we do: a massive program of job creation for addicts, and microloans for addicts to set up small businesses.
97
So say you used to be a mechanic.
98
When you're ready, they'll go to a garage, and they'll say, if you employ this guy for a year, we'll pay half his wages.
99
The goal was to make sure that every addict in Portugal had something to get out of bed for in the morning.
100
And when I went and met the addicts in Portugal, what they said is, as they rediscovered purpose, they rediscovered bonds and relationships with the wider society.
101
It'll be 15 years this year since that experiment began, and the results are in: injecting drug use is down in Portugal, according to the British Journal of Criminology, by 50 percent, five-zero percent.
102
Overdose is massively down, HIV is massively down among addicts.
103
Addiction in every study is significantly down.
104
One of the ways you know it's worked so well is that almost nobody in Portugal wants to go back to the old system.
105
Now, that's the political implications.
106
I actually think there's a layer of implications to all this research below that.
107
We live in a culture where people feel really increasingly vulnerable to all sorts of addictions, whether it's to their smartphones or to shopping or to eating.
108
Before these talks began -- you guys know this -- we were told we weren't allowed to have our smartphones on, and I have to say, a lot of you looked an awful lot like addicts who were told their dealer was going to be unavailable for the next couple of hours. (Laughter) A lot of us feel like that, and it might sound weird to say, I've been talking about how disconnection is a major driver of addiction and weird to say it's growing, because you think we're the most connected society that's ever been, surely.
109
But I increasingly began to think that the connections we have or think we have, are like a kind of parody of human connection.
110
If you have a crisis in your life, you'll notice something.
111
It won't be your Twitter followers who come to sit with you.
112
It won't be your Facebook friends who help you turn it round.
113
It'll be your flesh and blood friends who you have deep and nuanced and textured, face-to-face relationships with, and there's a study I learned about from Bill McKibben, the environmental writer, that I think tells us a lot about this.
114
It looked at the number of close friends the average American believes they can call on in a crisis.
115
That number has been declining steadily since the 1950s.
116
The amount of floor space an individual has in their home has been steadily increasing, and I think that's like a metaphor for the choice we've made as a culture.
117
We've traded floorspace for friends, we've traded stuff for connections, and the result is we are one of the loneliest societies there has ever been.
118
And Bruce Alexander, the guy who did the Rat Park experiment, says, we talk all the time in addiction about individual recovery, and it's right to talk about that, but we need to talk much more about social recovery.
119
Something's gone wrong with us, not just with individuals but as a group, and we've created a society where, for a lot of us, life looks a whole lot more like that isolated cage and a whole lot less like Rat Park.
120
If I'm honest, this isn't why I went into it.
121
I didn't go in to the discover the political stuff, the social stuff.
122
I wanted to know how to help the people I love.
123
And when I came back from this long journey and I'd learned all this, I looked at the addicts in my life, and if you're really candid, it's hard loving an addict, and there's going to be lots of people who know in this room.
124
You are angry a lot of the time, and I think one of the reasons why this debate is so charged is because it runs through the heart of each of us, right?
125
Everyone has a bit of them that looks at an addict and thinks, I wish someone would just stop you.
126
And the kind of scripts we're told for how to deal with the addicts in our lives is typified by, I think, the reality show "Intervention," if you guys have ever seen it.
127
I think everything in our lives is defined by reality TV, but that's another TED Talk.
128
If you've ever seen the show "Intervention," it's a pretty simple premise.
129
Get an addict, all the people in their life, gather them together, confront them with what they're doing, and they say, if you don't shape up, we're going to cut you off.
130
So what they do is they take the connection to the addict, and they threaten it, they make it contingent on the addict behaving the way they want.
131
And I began to think, I began to see why that approach doesn't work, and I began to think that's almost like the importing of the logic of the Drug War into our private lives.
132
So I was thinking, how could I be Portuguese?
133
And what I've tried to do now, and I can't tell you I do it consistently and I can't tell you it's easy, is to say to the addicts in my life that I want to deepen the connection with them, to say to them, I love you whether you're using or you're not.
134
I love you, whatever state you're in, and if you need me, I'll come and sit with you because I love you and I don't want you to be alone or to feel alone.
135
And I think the core of that message -- you're not alone, we love you -- has to be at every level of how we respond to addicts, socially, politically and individually.
136
For 100 years now, we've been singing war songs about addicts.
137
I think all along we should have been singing love songs to them, because the opposite of addiction is not sobriety.
138
The opposite of addiction is connection.
139
Thank you. (Applause)
App Store 및 Google Play에서 4.9/5

Shadowing English 모바일에서

Shadowing English 앱으로 언제 어디서나 영어를 배우세요. 오늘 의사 소통 능력을 향상 시키십시오!

학습 진행 상황 추적
AI 채점 및 오류 수정
풍부한 비디오 라이브러리
Download on theApp Store
GET IT ONGoogle Play
Shadowing English Mobile App

맥락 및 배경

이번 영상에서 요한 하리는 중독에 대한 우리의 일반적인 이해가 잘못되었다고 주장합니다. 그는 자신의 가족에서 중독 문제를 경험하며 이를 깊이 연구하고, 여러 나라를 여행하면서 다양한 중독 관련 사례를 분석했습니다. 중독이 단순히 약물의 화학적 의존성 때문만이 아니라, 환경과 사회적 요인에 의해 큰 영향을 받는다는 사실을 밝혀냅니다. 이러한 통찰은 중독 예방과 치료 방법을 새롭게 바라보는 계기를 제공합니다.

일상 대화를 위한 주요 5가지 표현

  • 중독에 관한 이야기: "우리가 중독에 대해 알고 있는 것은 잘못되었습니다." 이 표현은 중독에 대한 기존의 믿음을 도전할 때 유용합니다.
  • 개인 경험을 언급할 때: "저는 중독 문제를 개인적으로 경험해본 적이 있습니다." 이러한 표현은 자신의 이야기로 대화를 시작하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
  • 새로운 연구 결과를 소개할 때: "연구에 따르면, 환경이 중독에 미치는 영향이 큽니다." 정보를 공유할 때 적합한 문장입니다.
  • 현실적 예시를 제시할 때: "예를 들어, 동물 실험에서는 환경이 중독 행동에 큰 영향을 미쳤습니다." 사례를 들며 설명할 때 유용합니다.
  • 의견을 제시할 때: "이렇게 생각합니다; 중독의 원인은 단순하지 않습니다." 자신의 생각을 표현할 때 유용한 표현입니다.

단계별 쉐도잉 가이드

이 영상을 효과적으로 활용하기 위해 영어 쉐도잉 연습 방법을 소개합니다.

  1. 영상 시청: 처음에는 영상을 전체적으로 시청하며 내용을 이해합니다. 중독에 관한 하리의 논점을 기록합니다.
  2. 구간 나누기: 영상을 짧은 구간으로 나누어 각 구간을 반복적으로 청취합니다. 중복되는 부분에서 내용이 어떻게 전개되는지 집중합니다.
  3. 모방하기: 하리의 발음을 따라해 보세요. 특히 감정과 억양에 유의하며, ielts 스피킹에서처럼 자연스럽게 말하도록 연습합니다.
  4. 의미 살리기: 단순히 따라하는 것 외에도, 하리의 발언이 무엇을 의미하는지 고민하며 이해의 깊이를 더합니다.
  5. 반복 연습: 이 과정을 반복하여 습득한 내용을 자연스럽게 사용할 수 있도록 만듭니다. shadowspeaks와 같은 자료를 활용하여 다양한 주제를 연습하는 것도 좋습니다.

이러한 단계별 연습을 통해 영어 회화 연습을 더욱 효과적으로 진행할 수 있습니다. 중독에 대해 깊이 있는 논의를 나누고 싶다면, 이 과정을 통해 보다 자신감 있게 대화할 수 있을 것입니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기