쉐도잉 연습: The Art of Storytelling in the News World | Palki Sharma Upadhyay | TEDxMICA - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

어려움
쉐도잉 컨트롤
0% 완료 (0/127 문장)
Transcriber: André Ribeiro Reviewer: Robert Tucker Hello, everyone, and thank you TEDxMica for having me here.
⏸ 일시 정지
재생 속도:
반복 횟수:
대기 모드:
자막 동기:0ms
모든 문장
127 문장
1
Transcriber: André Ribeiro Reviewer: Robert Tucker Hello, everyone, and thank you TEDxMica for having me here.
0:00.00 – 0:09.80 (9.8s)
2
The subject of today’s talk is “Mind the Gap”.
0:09.80 – 0:12.12 (2.3s)
3
And the first thought that comes to mind is the metro train, and its constant advice to mind the gap that we don’t really dwell on once we’re off the train.
0:12.12 – 0:19.60 (7.5s)
4
But “Mind the Gap” can and does have a more profound meaning.
0:19.60 – 0:23.36 (3.8s)
5
Today, I’m telling you about the gaps that I grappled with, and how I tried to fill them in my own way.
0:23.48 – 0:28.76 (5.3s)
6
This is my story, and before I begin it, I have a question for you.
0:28.88 – 0:33.12 (4.2s)
7
What is your story?
0:33.44 – 0:34.96 (1.5s)
8
When you grow up and talk to your grandchildren, what’s the story that you want to tell?
0:35.40 – 0:39.72 (4.3s)
9
Will your story be even more exciting than your CV?
0:39.84 – 0:42.40 (2.6s)
10
Or will you say you woke up, went to work, completed projects, met deadlines and targets, got promoted every other year, basically went through the motions of life, did not drop too many balls, but did not disrupt very much either.
0:42.56 – 0:54.24 (11.7s)
11
Think of the story you want to tell a few decades from now, and then start writing it today.
0:54.32 – 0:59.00 (4.7s)
12
Because our world today is essentially a grand storytelling competition.
0:59.36 – 1:03.60 (4.2s)
13
We’re all striving to present our own national, cultural, and personal stories in the most persuasive manner.
1:03.72 – 1:10.36 (6.6s)
14
I remember reading somewhere that in the olden times we said, “If you want to poison a people, you must poison their wells.” But in this day and age, as novelist Ben Okri said, “If you want to poison a people, poison their stories.” Because stories sway people; they change the course of policies, politics, and indeed the world.
1:11.04 – 1:29.52 (18.5s)
15
I’ll give you an example.
1:30.24 – 1:31.52 (1.3s)
16
During the Second World War, America had a list of Japanese cities that it wanted to bomb with the atom bomb.
1:31.56 – 1:37.20 (5.6s)
17
The city of Kyoto was on that list, but it was removed by the Secretary of War, American Secretary of War, Henry Stimson.
1:37.32 – 1:45.68 (8.4s)
18
Instead, they put Nagasaki.
1:46.00 – 1:47.64 (1.6s)
19
Why do you think he removed Kyoto?
1:47.92 – 1:50.00 (2.1s)
20
Because he'd gone there for his honeymoon, he’d seen Kyoto’s beauty and culture, and he did not want to see it destroyed.
1:50.08 – 1:56.56 (6.5s)
21
You could say Kyoto story saved it.
1:57.12 – 1:59.24 (2.1s)
22
And that's why it's very important to be in control of your story, to actively shape it.
1:59.36 – 2:04.04 (4.7s)
23
And this is the first gap I encountered in my career as a journalist.
2:04.40 – 2:07.88 (3.5s)
24
We are a country of 1.4 billion people, we have hundreds of channels, a very aware and politically engaged audience, but we did not have a single news channel or newspaper that told our story to the world.
2:07.88 – 2:20.16 (12.3s)
25
“The New York Times” writes something about India, and it becomes a Twitter trend.
2:20.92 – 2:24.96 (4.0s)
26
You may trash it, but you're still consuming it and reacting to it.
2:25.04 – 2:28.64 (3.6s)
27
“The Economist” weighs in on an Indian election, and it becomes part of the political debate.
2:28.84 – 2:33.40 (4.6s)
28
We are letting the foreign press shape our self-image.
2:33.72 – 2:36.96 (3.2s)
29
Which Indian newspaper triggers a similar response in the West?
2:37.20 – 2:40.48 (3.3s)
30
If there is disturbance in Kashmir, the world learns about it from the BBC or Al Jazeera.
2:41.00 – 2:45.92 (4.9s)
31
They use their own lens, their own editorial biases, and for the moment, that’s besides the point.
2:46.60 – 2:51.32 (4.7s)
32
The argument I am making is very simple: Why can’t India, the land of epics like the Mahabharat and Ramayana, tell its own story in its own words?
2:51.32 – 2:59.56 (8.2s)
33
This gap was filled by WION, India’s first international news channel, of which I am a part.
2:59.72 – 3:04.48 (4.8s)
34
Gap number two: You have a story, but why should anyone listen to it?
3:04.64 – 3:08.92 (4.3s)
35
There are multiple channels with heavyweight anchors, all discussing the same story, with the same guests, the same graphics, the same visuals, and the same decibel levels.
3:08.92 – 3:17.08 (8.2s)
36
We're like that song: “I’m just a copy of a copy of a copy.” We all kept looking at each other, and perhaps forgot the viewer.
3:17.24 – 3:24.32 (7.1s)
37
We wanted to do what someone else was doing bigger, bolder, brighter, but not necessarily better.
3:24.76 – 3:30.76 (6.0s)
38
If you have 10 windows, I’ll have 12.
3:31.00 – 3:33.00 (2.0s)
39
But we forgot to ask what the viewer wants.
3:33.24 – 3:36.16 (2.9s)
40
Do you want to see so many talking heads?
3:36.28 – 3:38.84 (2.6s)
41
Do you want an endless and, frankly, useless shouting match every day?
3:38.92 – 3:43.08 (4.2s)
42
And if you want to see a good stunt, will you watch “Avengers” or anchors.
3:43.60 – 3:48.00 (4.4s)
43
In this clutter, how do you become different?
3:48.80 – 3:50.96 (2.2s)
44
What sets you apart is the way you tell the story, and that brings me to the concept of the katha and the kathakar.”r If you have a child, or a niece or a nephew, you would have noticed something.
3:50.96 – 4:01.44 (10.5s)
45
They all ask for the same story to be told over and over again.
4:01.56 – 4:05.16 (3.6s)
46
We did the same with our grandparents.
4:05.20 – 4:07.08 (1.9s)
47
We know the story from beginning to end, but we want to hear it again.
4:07.16 – 4:11.08 (3.9s)
48
Why do we like the same story retold?
4:11.36 – 4:13.64 (2.3s)
49
Because what is pulling us is not the katha, the story, but the kathakar, the storyteller, the manner in which that story is told.
4:13.88 – 4:21.72 (7.8s)
50
That’s what holds the magic.
4:22.00 – 4:23.44 (1.4s)
51
How do we create this magic in news?
4:24.08 – 4:26.28 (2.2s)
52
Well, I was introduced to the life changing concept called “Orbit Shift”.
4:26.92 – 4:30.76 (3.8s)
53
It’s a very simple concept.
4:31.24 – 4:32.84 (1.6s)
54
You all know what a gravitational pull is: In the simplest of terms, it keeps you grounded.
4:33.00 – 4:38.44 (5.4s)
55
But it also prevents you from flying.
4:38.44 – 4:40.60 (2.2s)
56
As professionals, and individuals, we’re saddled with many levels of gravity.
4:40.64 – 4:45.08 (4.4s)
57
Number one is personal gravity: this is what I can do, this is what I cannot do, there is self-doubt, and there are limitations that your mind sets for you.
4:45.12 – 4:53.60 (8.5s)
58
Number two is company gravity.
4:53.64 – 4:55.24 (1.6s)
59
This cannot be done in our organization, because you lack cross-functional support, or because यहाँ ऐसा ही काम होता है, [the way it is here] we’ve all heard this and accepted it.
4:55.24 – 5:04.00 (8.8s)
60
Number three is industry gravity.
5:04.12 – 5:06.12 (2.0s)
61
How can you do a 9 PM show without guests? It doesn’t happen anywhere.
5:06.20 – 5:09.56 (3.4s)
62
How can you not take a break in the middle of the show?
5:09.56 – 5:12.24 (2.7s)
63
This is the industry practice, and soon it becomes industry gravity and we do not challenge it.
5:12.24 – 5:17.76 (5.5s)
64
Number four is a social or cultural gravity.
5:17.88 – 5:21.00 (3.1s)
65
Prejudice, preconceptions.
5:21.04 – 5:22.64 (1.6s)
66
In India, we flaunt the Jugaad.
5:22.64 – 5:25.24 (2.6s)
67
We do not want a long-term plan because we believe in figuring something out at the last moment with Jugaad.
5:26.00 – 5:31.68 (5.7s)
68
Now, think of the number of times when you’ve had to struggle with this cumulative gravity.
5:31.92 – 5:36.80 (4.9s)
69
It is the biggest hurdle in the path of innovation.
5:36.96 – 5:39.40 (2.4s)
70
It kills ideas, and you rationalize all of it in the name of practicality.
5:39.40 – 5:43.60 (4.2s)
71
But sometimes you have to be impractical.
5:43.64 – 5:47.08 (3.4s)
72
You have to throw yourself [in] at the deep end, and burn the bridge to safety, to come up with something that is really transformative.
5:47.48 – 5:54.40 (6.9s)
73
And that is what is called an orbit shift.
5:54.68 – 5:57.32 (2.6s)
74
And that’s what we did with Gravitas, or we hope we did.
5:57.40 – 6:00.12 (2.7s)
75
We created a prime-time news and views show, minus multiple guests.
6:00.16 – 6:04.40 (4.2s)
76
We went back to the drawing board to focus on tight scripts on relevant subjects, research, analysis, fact checks, basic things really, which should ideally be SOP for all news, but they were not.
6:04.48 – 6:16.32 (11.8s)
77
Gap number three, or should I say challenge?
6:17.40 – 6:19.56 (2.2s)
78
Who watches TV news anymore?
6:20.00 – 6:21.92 (1.9s)
79
There is an explosion of content around you.
6:22.16 – 6:24.60 (2.4s)
80
Television is already the second screen; the mobile phone has taken the top spot.
6:24.64 – 6:28.72 (4.1s)
81
So, my news story is competing with the WhatsApp forward, an Instagram reel, a YouTube spoof, and what have you.
6:29.40 – 6:36.20 (6.8s)
82
One editor famously said, “My competition is not other news shows; my competition at 9 o’clock is ‘Big Boss’ or ‘Kapil Sharma’.” Another one asked for fizz, and said, "Do not do water journalism, colourless, flavourless, odourless." This is the age of coke, find your flavour.
6:36.48 – 6:51.96 (15.5s)
83
Well, what should that flavour be?
6:52.48 – 6:54.44 (2.0s)
84
Inform without making a fuss.
6:54.68 – 6:57.12 (2.4s)
85
"Give your viewer value for time".
6:57.12 – 6:59.20 (2.1s)
86
That’s the flavour we decided on.
6:59.28 – 7:01.20 (1.9s)
87
Use the old playbook of Aristotle to make your story compelling.
7:01.44 – 7:04.72 (3.3s)
88
He gave us five elements of a good story, some 2,000 years ago.
7:05.12 – 7:09.64 (4.5s)
89
And these are the five elements.
7:09.92 – 7:11.52 (1.6s)
90
Ethos: authority and character, which comes with credibility and commitment to the issues that you raise in your broadcast.
7:11.52 – 7:18.56 (7.0s)
91
Do people trust you?
7:18.56 – 7:19.64 (1.1s)
92
Do they see you as an authority on a subject?
7:19.64 – 7:22.20 (2.6s)
93
If they do, they will listen to you.
7:22.20 – 7:24.24 (2.0s)
94
Number two.
7:24.36 – 7:25.44 (1.1s)
95
Logos: That is reason, which involves making a logical appeal, using data and facts to make a rational argument, because you cannot make an assertion with no basis in fact or logic.
7:25.44 – 7:35.08 (9.6s)
96
Number three is pathos.
7:35.24 – 7:36.76 (1.5s)
97
Emotion - and this is different from drama.
7:36.76 – 7:39.00 (2.2s)
98
It’s a genuine connect with the audience through honest and effective communication.
7:39.04 – 7:44.40 (5.4s)
99
Number four is metaphor, which helps the viewer process complex issues.
7:45.12 – 7:49.64 (4.5s)
100
When you give them relatable parallels, it makes you more memorable.
7:49.72 – 7:53.60 (3.9s)
101
And number five is brevity, using short sentences, punchy lines, informative tag-outs.
7:53.64 – 7:58.96 (5.3s)
102
And finally, the gap that is common to all human stories, the gap that I continue to try to fill: The question of purpose.
7:59.52 – 8:07.92 (8.4s)
103
What is the purpose of what you're doing?
8:08.00 – 8:10.96 (3.0s)
104
What do you really want to do?
8:11.08 – 8:12.80 (1.7s)
105
And to what end?
8:12.80 – 8:14.08 (1.3s)
106
It’s like the dreaded interview question: Where do you see yourself five years from now?
8:14.44 – 8:18.68 (4.2s)
107
Where do you see yourself at the end of this journey you've embarked on?
8:18.68 – 8:22.16 (3.5s)
108
Honestly, I've not been able to answer this question, so I gave myself another one: Which is the one story that changed your life?
8:22.20 – 8:28.76 (6.6s)
109
If that sounds too dramatic, the one story that profoundly impacted you, or just stayed with you.
8:28.80 – 8:34.60 (5.8s)
110
For me, that story was the story of the ugly duckling.
8:34.60 – 8:37.28 (2.7s)
111
It's a nursery tale, you may remember it.
8:37.32 – 8:39.76 (2.4s)
112
A duck lays some eggs, they hatch, all ducklings look similar, except one.
8:39.76 – 8:45.36 (5.6s)
113
He is bigger, awkward, doesn’t have webbed feet.
8:45.36 – 8:48.60 (3.2s)
114
He feels sad about not fitting in.
8:48.76 – 8:50.96 (2.2s)
115
Until he sees a flock of swans, and realizes he was never even a duck in the first place; he was a swan, bracketed with ducks by mistake.
8:51.52 – 8:59.24 (7.7s)
116
He realizes he’s beautiful and not ugly, and he flies away.
8:59.24 – 9:02.64 (3.4s)
117
And I find the story very powerful because it is simple and relatable, it talks to me.
9:02.68 – 9:08.00 (5.3s)
118
I think at some point in our lives, we’ve all been the ugly duckling, under immense pressure to fit in and beating ourselves up for not being able to.
9:08.40 – 9:16.20 (7.8s)
119
I'm sure all of you have sad stories.
9:16.32 – 9:18.28 (2.0s)
120
You read them, or saw them, and then the penny dropped - or: "This is what this is about"> And these stories shaped us.
9:18.44 – 9:25.08 (6.6s)
121
Where do you find them?
9:25.52 – 9:26.84 (1.3s)
122
In books, in movies and TV shows, cartoons, basically mass media.
9:26.84 – 9:30.72 (3.9s)
123
And if mass media has such a profound impact on minds, my purpose, I believed, as a cog in the wheel of mass media, should be to find and tell such stories that inspire, that motivate, or at the very least, that trigger ideas and conversations.
9:31.00 – 9:45.32 (14.3s)
124
So, that, I would say, became my purpose: to shape ideas, to make sense of the news, to empower you to form your own opinion, because you're intelligent, intelligent enough to choose.
9:45.68 – 9:57.76 (12.1s)
125
I'm going to wrap with that.
9:57.84 – 9:59.20 (1.4s)
126
All the very best.
9:59.20 – 10:00.24 (1.0s)
127
Thank you.
10:00.28 – 10:01.32 (1.0s)

이 레슨에 대해

이번 TEDx 강의에서 Palki Sharma Upadhyay는 보도에서 스토리텔링의 중요성에 대해 이야기합니다. 강의는 각 개인이 자신의 이야기를 어떻게 잘 전달하고, 그로 인해 세상에 어떤 영향을 미칠 수 있는지를 탐구합니다. 학습자는 이 강의를 통해 영어 말하기 연습에 필요한 다양한 어휘와 표현을 익힐 수 있으며, 쉐도잉 기법을 통해 자연스러운 발음 연습을 진행할 수 있습니다. 강의에서는 이야기의 배열과 전달 방식이 얼마나 중요한지를 강조하며, 이를 통해 자신만의 이야기를 어떻게 구성할 수 있는지에 대한 통찰을 제공합니다.

주요 어휘 및 표현

  • Mind the gap: "간격에 주의하라"는 의미로, 무엇인가가 결여되었음을 인식하라는 경고.
  • Storytelling: 이야기를 전달하는 기술 또는 예술, 정보를 효과적으로 전달하기 위해 이야기를 사용하는 방법.
  • Katha: 이야기 그 자체를 뜻하며, 전통적으로 전해 내려오는 이야기의 형식.
  • Kathakar: 이야기를 전하는 사람, 즉 스토리텔러.
  • Self-image: 자신이 생각하는 이미지나 자아상, 주로 사회적 인식과 관련이 깊음.
  • Persuasive manner: 사람들을 설득하는 방식, 신뢰를 주고 행동을 유도하기 위한 방법.

이 동영상 연습 팁

이 강의의 내용에 기반한 발음 연습을 위해 양질의 쉐도잉 연습을 진행해 보세요. 처음에는 강사의 말 속도를 천천히 따라 하며 내용 이해에 집중하고, 점차 속도를 높여가며 억양에 주의합니다. 특히, 이야기의 매력을 느끼기 위해 감정이 실린 억양을 따라해 보세요. 또한, 각 섹션별로 중요한 메시지를 기억하며 연습하면 영어 유창성을 향상하는 데 큰 도움이 됩니다. 강의에서 언급된 구체적인 사례를 바탕으로 자신만의 이야기를 만들어 보는 것도 좋은 방법입니다. 이 과정은 IELTS 스피킹 연습에도 상당히 유용합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

ShadowingEnglish에서 효과적으로 학습하는 방법

  1. 영상 선택: 자연스럽고 명확한 영어가 사용된 YouTube 영상을 선택하세요. TED Talks, BBC 뉴스, 영화 장면, 팟캐스트, IELTS 모범 답변 영상이 좋습니다. URL을 복사해서 검색창에 붙여넣으세요. 짧은 영상(5분 이내)과 실제로 관심 있는 주제부터 시작하는 것이 동기 유지에 효과적입니다.
  2. 먼저 듣고 내용 이해하기: 처음에는 1배속으로 그냥 듣기만 하세요. 아직 따라 말할 필요는 없습니다. 문장의 의미를 파악하고, 화자가 어떻게 단어를 강조하고, 소리를 연결하고, 쉬어 가는지 주목하세요. 내용을 이해한 후 쉐도잉 연습을 하면 효과가 훨씬 좋아집니다.
  3. 쉐도잉 모드 설정:
    • Wait Mode (대기 모드): +3s 또는 +5s를 선택하면 한 문장이 재생된 후 자동으로 잠시 멈춰서 따라 말할 시간을 줍니다. 직접 컨트롤하고 싶다면 Manual을 선택해서 Next를 눌러 진행하세요.
    • Sub Sync (자막 동기화): YouTube 자막이 오디오와 맞지 않을 수 있습니다. ±100ms로 조정해서 정확한 타이밍에 따라갈 수 있도록 맞추세요.
  4. 소리 내어 쉐도잉하기 (핵심 연습): 이것이 연습의 핵심입니다. 문장이 재생되는 순간——또는 일시정지 중에——크고 자신감 있게 소리 내어 따라 하세요. 단순히 단어를 읽는 것이 아니라, 화자의 리듬, 강세, 음의 높낮이, 연음 방식을 그대로 흉내 내는 것이 중요합니다. 목표는 화자의 '그림자'처럼 들리는 것입니다. Repeat 기능으로 같은 문장을 여러 번 반복해서 자연스럽게 입에 붙을 때까지 연습하세요.
  5. 난이도 높이며 꾸준히 연습: 한 구절이 편해지면 더 도전적인 수준으로 올리세요. 속도를 <code>1.25x</code> 또는 <code>1.5x</code>로 높여 빠른 언어 반사 신경을 훈련하세요. Wait Mode를 <code>Off</code>로 설정해서 연속 쉐도잉을 하는 것이 가장 고급스럽고 효과적인 모드입니다. 매일 15~30분씩 꾸준히 연습하면 몇 주 안에 눈에 띄는 변화를 느낄 수 있습니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기

PayPal로 기부하기