쉐도잉 연습: They Said His Phone ‘Exploded’… But There Was a Hole in His Head | Cradle Fund CEO Murder - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기
C2
A firefighter is forced to open a bedroom door.
267 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
A firefighter is forced to open a bedroom door.
2
It's been locked from the outside.
3
Inside, a man is lying dead on the bed.
4
Burn marks cover parts of his body,
5
and the damage is concentrated near the bed frame and around his head.
6
But the rest of the room is almost completely untouched.
7
Papers are still on the desk.
8
The curtains are intact.
9
It's the eve of Hari Raya Idyulfi tree,
10
the holiday marking the end of Ramadan.
11
Across Malaysia, families are getting ready to celebrate.
12
But in this home, Nazrin Hassan's family won't be celebrating.
13
They will be planning a funeral.
14
This is the case of Nazrin Hassan,
15
one of the most talked about cases in Malaysia's recent history.
16
And I have to say,
17
this one raises more questions than it answers.
18
It's the early hours of June 14th, 2018.
19
In an affluent neighborhood in Petalingjaya,
20
Malaysia, a security guard notices something wrong.
21
Smoke is rising from a two-story house.
22
He walks closer and finds the homeowner's wife,
23
Samira Muzaffar, standing on the porch.
24
She isn't on the phone.
25
She isn't calling for help.
26
She isn't doing anything.
27
For some reason, none of the members of the household called the emergency services.
28
It was the neighbors who reached out for help.
29
The firefighters arrive to find Samira still standing at the front door.
30
She is completely expressionless.
31
No crying, no wailing, even as her husband is burning in the room above her.
32
There is no emotion at all.
33
The firefighters rush upstairs.
34
Inside the bedroom, they find Nasrin Hassan's body on the bed,
35
with burn marks covering roughly 30% of his body.
36
The room is partially burned,
37
but the pattern doesn't look like that of an accidental fire.
38
The damage is concentrated in specific areas,
39
rather than spreading evenly across the room.
40
Flammable items elsewhere are completely untouched.
41
And another questionable detail is that Nazarene's body is just lying on the bed.
42
There was no sign that he tried to escape,
43
no sign that he tried to move at all.
44
It was a very strange scene.
45
What on earth had happened in this room?
46
To understand why this case would go on to grip an entire nation,
47
let's first look into who Nazarene Hassan was.
48
He was the group CEO of Kradl Fund,
49
a government-linked agency under Malaysia's Ministry of Finance.
50
Kradl provided grant funding to early-stage technology startups,
51
and over the years, it backed hundreds of companies,
52
including a ride-hailing startup that would eventually become Grab.
53
within Malaysia's tech community Nasrin was seen as something rare a leading figure who genuinely understood entrepreneurship
54
because he had actually lived it before running Cradle he had
55
been a startup founder himself people who worked with him described him as articulate thoughtful
56
and direct he believed that entrepreneurs weren't just building businesses they were trying to create something that mattered.
57
He once said that Cradle's job was simply to help as many founders as possible reach commercial success,
58
and that what they did with it after that was up to them.
59
When people showed up for his funeral on June 15th,
60
2018, the turnout said everything.
61
It was the kind of crowd you would expect for a head of state,
62
not someone working behind the scenes at a grant agency.
63
For many people in Malaysia's startup world,
64
Cradle had been the only institution that ever believed their idea.
65
And Nasrin had been the person behind that.
66
For those who had questions about his death,
67
his family and Cradle Fund had answers.
68
Both groups stated that Nasrin had gone to sleep after taking medication for a migraine,
69
migraine, and that while he slept,
70
the Blackberry phone charging behind his bed had exploded.
71
The autopsy carried out at Kuala Lumpur Hospital appeared to support this.
72
It concluded that his death was caused by complications from a blast and blunt penetrating injuries,
73
consistent with a phone explosion.
74
A tragic accident, case closed.
75
Except 10 days after Nazrin had been laid to rest, everything changed.
76
On June 25th, a forensic report from the Fire and Rescue Department came back,
77
and its findings didn't match the official story at all.
78
The department found traces of petrol on Nazrin's body,
79
on the bed frame, on the mattress, and on his phone.
80
In light of these findings,
81
the state's Fire and Rescue Department director said it was far too early to conclude that the phone had caused the fire.
82
Then on August 6, 2018,
83
the police made it official.
84
The case was reclassified.
85
Nasrin Hassan's death was no longer considered an accident.
86
It was murder.
87
Rather than waiting for the authorities to act,
88
Nasrin's siblings began pushing for answers themselves.
89
His older brother, Dr. Melek Hassan,
90
was the first to publicly question the autopsy results.
91
Another brother, Dr. Abdulaziz Hassan,
92
was a lawyer and helped coordinate the family's efforts.
93
And their sister, Chey Eleni Chey Hassan,
94
obtained the death certificate and compared it to the fire and rescue department's findings.
95
And things weren't adding up.
96
She made a formal request to the court for the right to exhume Nasrin's body for a second autopsy.
97
On October 1st, 2018, the Magistrates' Court granted police permission to do exactly that.
98
But Nasrin's widow, Samira, was opposed to this,
99
and her lawyers challenged the decision.
100
But the High Court upheld the initial ruling.
101
Nasrin's body was exhumed on October 8th and transported to the University of Malaya Medical Center for a second autopsy.
102
And here they uncovered something that the first one had not.
103
Nasrin had not died from an exploding phone.
104
He had died from multiple blunt impacts to the head.
105
On March 12, 2019, four people were formally charged with Nasrin's murder.
106
The first was his widow, Samira Muzaffar.
107
The second and third were her two teenage sons from a previous marriage,
108
then aged 17 and 14.
109
And the fourth was Ekka Waiu Lestari,
110
an Indonesian domestic helper employed by the family.
111
For some reason that has never been made clear,
112
Ekka was charged, but never actually arrested,
113
so she was absent for all court proceedings.
114
They were accused of killing Nazrin at his home sometime between 11.30 pm on June 13th and 4 a.m on June 14th.
115
The charge was murder, but it was brought jointly against all of them.
116
This meant the prosecution had to prove not only that they had murdered Nasrin,
117
but that they had acted together with the shared intention to kill him.
118
In Malaysia, murder carries a mandatory death sentence upon conviction,
119
though that doesn't apply to anyone who was a minor at the time of the offense.
120
The teenagers were safe, but Samira's life was on the line.
121
The trial began on September 6,
122
2019, before the High Court in Shah Alam.
123
All three who appeared in court pleaded not guilty.
124
The courtroom was packed.
125
Nasrin had been a prominent figure,
126
and Samira was by no means unknown.
127
She was a senior executive at the Malaysian Intellectual Property Corporation,
128
and her father was Chandra Muzaffar,
129
one of Malaysia's most prominent political scientists and human rights figures.
130
Her father sat in the public gallery to support her.
131
These were not people on the margins of society.
132
They were educated, well-connected, and high profile.
133
Exactly the type of people to draw public attention.
134
And the case itself was compelling.
135
The prosecution wasn't just suggesting the fire had been set deliberately.
136
They were saying Nasrin may have already been dead before the fire even started.
137
Blood spatter found on the wall of the burned room matched Nasrin's DNA.
138
A National Police Forensic Officer testified that the pattern was consistent with blunt force trauma,
139
not a blast, and that it must have occurred before the fire,
140
because the evidence of this was found beneath the suit.
141
The prosecution argued that Nazrin had been struck in the head with something consistent with a hammer,
142
and that the fire had had been set deliberately in targeted areas to destroy the evidence.
143
But there was another forensic detail that raised even more questions.
144
A prosecution forensic witness testified that Nasrin had a penetrating wound track in his brain,
145
measuring 6.8 centimeters deep and 0.4 centimeters in diameter.
146
So to put that in perspective,
147
that's a wound track into the brain that's about the length
148
of a dollar bill through a channel half the width of a pencil.
149
A separate penetrating wound was also found on the front of his neck.
150
How had he suffered so many different injuries?
151
Before the trial, investigators had looked into whether these wounds could have been caused by something other than a blunt weapon.
152
In September 2018, sources told local media
153
that one of Samira's teenage sons had been brought in for questioning in connection with a neck injury.
154
It's suggested that the wound may have been caused by an arrow,
155
and both boys were members of their school archery club.
156
These details were never formally established in court.
157
No findings were ever made linking any specific injury to a particular weapon or person.
158
These remain allegations.
159
But there were other things found at the scene that raised their own questions.
160
When a forensic officer visited the house in September 2018,
161
three months after the incident,
162
he found three fragments in the compound consistent with arrow components.
163
And inside the house, in a storeroom,
164
he found a CCTV recorder.
165
It hadn't been switched off.
166
It had been completely disconnected from its wiring and removed from sight.
167
So whatever happened in that house between 11.30 p.m and 4 a.m.
168
went undocumented.
169
A firefighter also testified that on the morning of June 14th,
170
the day Nasrin's body was discovered,
171
he saw one of the teenagers leaving the house with a box.
172
What was inside has never been discovered.
173
But what could their motive have been?
174
As the trial progressed, the prosecution called a series of witnesses to build a picture of the household.
175
As a family unit, Samira and Nasrin had one son together,
176
and both had children from previous marriages.
177
From the outside, it looked like a stable, successful household.
178
Nasrin's personal assistant called this into question,
179
testifying that Nasrin's work performance had declined after the marriage.
180
A colleague described moments where Nasrin seemed unsettled after phone calls with his wife.
181
Instead, he had spoken about her spending,
182
and at times had mentioned considering a divorce.
183
The marriage may not have been as happy as it once seemed.
184
There were also reports that Nasrin had received threatening phone calls,
185
which he later discovered had come from one of Samira's children.
186
The court also heard that Nasrin's clothing had been deliberately damaged by that same child.
187
The defense pushed back on the prosecution's portrayal of a fractured family.
188
Nasrin's driver testified that family outings in the months before his death seemed completely normal,
189
nothing out of the ordinary.
190
In addition, text messages from Samira's phone in the days before the incident
191
were later described by one of the judges as normal,
192
intimate exchanges between a husband and wife.
193
The prosecution's main problem was that their case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence.
194
They argued that Samira and the two teenagers were the last people seen with Nasrin before his death.
195
And Samira had entered Nasrin's room about three hours before the fire broke out.
196
She was later seen standing on the porch as smoke rose from the house,
197
making no attempt to call for help and showing no emotion.
198
And they said the fire had been set deliberately in specific areas to destroy evidence.
199
The defense dismantled each piece individually.
200
They pointed out that the chemistry department had found no traces of petrol on the walls,
201
directly contradicting the fire and rescue department's findings.
202
They also raised serious concerns about how the scene had been handled.
203
Because the death was initially ruled an accident,
204
the house had never been treated as a crime scene.
205
It had been cleaned.
206
People had continued living in it.
207
The arrow fragments and the disconnected TV recorder weren't found until three months after Nazrin's death.
208
The blood spatter wasn't discovered until five months after the incident.
209
The defense argued that, given all of this,
210
the reliability of the evidence collected from the site simply couldn't be guaranteed.
211
And then there was Ekawahi Lestari, the family's domestic helper.
212
She had been in the house on the night Nasrin died.
213
She had been charged, and yet she had never been arrested.
214
She wasn't hard to find.
215
She was living in another city,
216
working in a coffee shop,
217
and yet she was never brought before the court to answer a single question about what she might have seen.
218
On June 21st, 2022, the High Court acquitted all three defendants without requiring them to present a defense.
219
By that point, the two teenagers were 20 and 17.
220
The judges found that the prosecution had failed to present even the minimum evidence required to proceed with the trial.
221
There was simply nothing to show that any of the accused had caused Nasrin's death.
222
Outside the courtroom, Nasrin's brother,
223
Dr. Abdulaziz Hassan, told reporters the family still had unanswered questions and hoped the prosecution would appeal.
224
His sister, Cheyelini Cheyassan, was direct.
225
The family wasn't trying to send anyone to the gallows.
226
They just wanted the truth.
227
The prosecution did appeal.
228
They raised the additional question of the door to Nasrin's room being locked from the outside.
229
However, they still didn't have enough.
230
On February 8th, 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
231
There was no proof of a common intention among the three accused.
232
The Petro evidence was rejected outright,
233
given its direct contradiction by the chemistry department.
234
And the court noted, again,
235
that another person charged with Nazrin's murder had been living openly within the country.
236
and that nobody had ever gone to get her.
237
The prosecution appealed one final time to the federal court,
238
the highest court in Malaysia.
239
On January 7th, 2026, the three judges unanimously dismissed the appeal.
240
They too found the evidence to be insufficient.
241
And so, Samira Muzaffar and her two sons are,
242
in the eyes of the law, completely innocent.
243
All three were acquitted at every level of Malaysia's court system.
244
Ekawayu Lestari remains at large.
245
Nobody has been convicted of Nasrin Hassan's murder.
246
After the federal court's decision,
247
Nasrin's brother, Dr. Malek Hassan, spoke to reporters.
248
Our feelings are mixed, he said.
249
My sister is deeply saddened because they were very close.
250
She only wants to know what actually happened.
251
not who is to blame.
252
And we really don't know what happened.
253
There were so many different findings from different sources that it's truly impossible to discern.
254
A localized fire, traces of petrol,
255
a foam explosion, blood spatter,
256
blunt force trauma to the head,
257
a deep injury to the brain,
258
arrow fragments, a door locked from the outside,
259
and a wife who decided for whatever reason not to call for help.
260
All we know for sure is this.
261
Nasrin Hassan went home on the last evening of Ramadan.
262
There was a fire in his room,
263
and by morning, his family was preparing for his burial.
264
We can only hope that in the future his family members get the answers they need.
265
That is all for today.
266
Thank you for watching.
267
you
앱 다운로드
당신이 말하는 모든 문장을 AI가 채점
TRENDING
인기 동영상
맥락 및 배경
이 영상에서는 말레이시아의 유명한 사건인 나스린 하산(Nazrin Hassan) 씨의 죽음에 대해 다루고 있습니다. 그는 크레이들 펀드(Cradle Fund)의 CEO로, 말레이시아 정부 재무부 산하의 기관으로서 신생 기술 스타트업에 자금을 지원하는 역할을 맡고 있었습니다. 이 사건은 그가 발견된 시점에서 방 안의 설정이 이상하다는 점과 함께 여러 의문을 남겼습니다. 이는 유튜브 영어 공부를 통해 듣기 및 말하기 실력을 향상시키려는 학습자에게도 흥미로운 학습 소재가 될 수 있습니다.
일상 대화를 위한 5가지 핵심 어구
- "What’s happening here?" - 무엇이 일어나고 있는 걸까요?
- "Call for help!" - 도움을 요청해 주세요!
- "There’s something strange!" - 이상한 점이 있어요!
- "I need you to stay calm." - 진정해 주세요.
- "Let’s find out the truth." - 진실을 파악해 보자고요.
위 어구들은 비상 상황에서 자주 사용될 수 있는 표현들입니다. 이러한 문장들을 유튜브 영어 공부에 적용하여 실제 상황에서 쉽게 사용할 수 있도록 연습해 보세요.
단계별 쉐도잉 가이드
이 비디오의 내용을 효과적으로 연습하기 위해 쉐도잉 기법을 사용할 수 있습니다. 이를 위해 다음 단계를 따라보세요:
- 1단계: 영상 시청 - 처음부터 끝까지 영상을 한 번 시청하면서 전체적인 흐름을 파악하세요.
- 2단계: 반복 청취 - 영상을 여러 번 재생하며 각 문장을 듣고 따라 읽어 보세요. shadow speak 기법을 사용하여 발음과 억양을 집중적으로 연습합니다.
- 3단계: 핵심 문장 연습 - 위에 언급된 5가지 어구를 반복하여 연습하세요. 암기하기보다는 상황에 따라 자연스럽게 사용할 수 있도록 목표로 하세요.
- 4단계: 장면 재현 - 특정 장면을 재연해 보며 대사를 말해보세요. 친구와 함께 연습하면 서로 피드백을 주고받을 수 있어 좋습니다.
- 5단계: 감정 표현 연습 - 영상 속 등장인물의 감정을 흉내 내 보세요. shadow speech를 통해 말뿐만 아니라 감정을 표현할 수 있는 능력을 기르세요.
이러한 방법을 통해 영어 회화 연습을 효과적으로 진행할 수 있습니다. 유튜브 영어 공부는 다양한 주제를 통해 실력을 쌓을 수 있는 좋은 기회를 제공합니다.
쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법
쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.
☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기
ShadowingEnglish는 여러분의 지원 덕분에 100% 무료로 운영됩니다. 서버 및 AI 유지 비용이 많이 듭니다. 여러분의 커피 한 잔이 큰 힘이 됩니다! ��