쉐도잉 연습: Will AI Take Your Job in the Next 10 Years? Wrong Question | Vinciane Beauchene | TED - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

어려움
쉐도잉 컨트롤
0% 완료 (0/135 문장)
Back in the 50s, Alan Turing came up with an idea.
⏸ 일시 정지
재생 속도:
반복 횟수:
대기 모드:
자막 동기:0ms
모든 문장
135 문장
1
Back in the 50s, Alan Turing came up with an idea.
0:04.26 – 0:08.38 (4.1s)
2
If you couldn't tell if you were talking to a machine or a human, it meant the machine must be intelligent.
0:09.26 – 0:17.54 (8.3s)
3
He coined the Turing test.
0:17.58 – 0:19.34 (1.8s)
4
Today, most chatbots pass the test easily.
0:20.38 – 0:24.14 (3.8s)
5
But here's the catch.
0:25.14 – 0:26.98 (1.8s)
6
I believe the test was wrong.
0:27.02 – 0:29.10 (2.1s)
7
Because talking isn't what's going to change the world.
0:30.26 – 0:34.50 (4.2s)
8
Doing is. That's why I ask a slightly different question to the leaders I work with.
0:34.54 – 0:41.90 (7.4s)
9
On a daily basis, my role is to reshape organizations, trying to find the right mix of strategy, tech and talent.
0:41.90 – 0:51.66 (9.8s)
10
And my obsession is to make sure that talents do not get out of the equation.
0:52.30 – 0:57.78 (5.5s)
11
So the question I ask my clients is: if an AI could take over all of your team's tasks, who would you keep and why?
0:58.86 – 1:11.30 (12.4s)
12
That question is strategic.
1:11.34 – 1:13.78 (2.4s)
13
And the answer matters to me, not just intellectually, but because I have two daughters at home.
1:13.78 – 1:20.54 (6.8s)
14
They are five and nine.
1:20.58 – 1:22.34 (1.8s)
15
And right now, as you can see, they feel invincible.
1:22.38 – 1:26.66 (4.3s)
16
But I keep wondering: What is the world of work they will step into?
1:26.66 – 1:32.42 (5.8s)
17
We need to build a future where humans matter more, not less.
1:32.46 – 1:37.38 (4.9s)
18
Now let me try to illustrate how this is playing out in the field.
1:38.30 – 1:42.50 (4.2s)
19
A consumer goods client of mine is all in on AI.
1:43.50 – 1:47.74 (4.2s)
20
They didn't want to just deploy the next algo.
1:48.62 – 1:51.86 (3.2s)
21
They wanted to rethink the selling process itself.
1:51.86 – 1:56.22 (4.4s)
22
The trigger was agents.
1:56.26 – 1:58.66 (2.4s)
23
Have you heard about agents?
1:59.78 – 2:01.86 (2.1s)
24
They are the latest generation of AI: more autonomous, able to connect across systems, to plan, to take action, to learn, to adapt.
2:01.86 – 2:12.78 (10.9s)
25
The James Bond of AI.
2:12.78 – 2:14.58 (1.8s)
26
And applied to the selling process, you get an agent that is able to target the customer, make recommendations, negotiate, close the deal.
2:15.70 – 2:26.90 (11.2s)
27
All this with no human intervention.
2:26.90 – 2:29.50 (2.6s)
28
A fully autonomous sales engine.
2:30.38 – 2:33.42 (3.0s)
29
And it was technically feasible.
2:34.66 – 2:36.78 (2.1s)
30
But then an exec asked, "Hmm, if the machine does all of this, then what remains for humans?" This cracked everything open because when we looked deeper at their most loyal customers, we saw they weren’t sticking around because of prices or products but because of how the sales rep made them feel.
2:37.78 – 3:02.74 (25.0s)
31
So we flipped the model around.
3:03.74 – 3:06.34 (2.6s)
32
Humans were no longer going to be about pushing products.
3:06.38 – 3:10.26 (3.9s)
33
They were going to be about building relationship, belonging, loyalty.
3:10.30 – 3:15.90 (5.6s)
34
Very concretely, this meant new skills, new incentives, a very different mindset.
3:17.22 – 3:24.26 (7.0s)
35
Well it changed everything.
3:24.30 – 3:26.22 (1.9s)
36
But it worked.
3:26.26 – 3:28.90 (2.6s)
37
Because in the age of AI, human value isn't gone.
3:28.90 – 3:33.18 (4.3s)
38
It's just moved.
3:33.22 – 3:34.46 (1.2s)
39
Now I’m not talking about copilots anymore.
3:35.74 – 3:38.46 (2.7s)
40
For a while the narrative has been AI will augment us, not replace us.
3:38.50 – 3:45.06 (6.6s)
41
Well this is not where the tech is going today.
3:45.10 – 3:47.94 (2.8s)
42
And I believe we have real hard work to do if we want this narrative to stay true.
3:48.82 – 3:53.46 (4.6s)
43
So I'll say a few words about what I think needs to be done in a second.
3:55.50 – 3:59.74 (4.2s)
44
But first, let me tackle three myths that I think are holding us back.
3:59.74 – 4:04.58 (4.8s)
45
I call them "head in the sand" ideology.
4:05.82 – 4:09.02 (3.2s)
46
Number one.
4:10.26 – 4:12.02 (1.8s)
47
"All of this is overblown. We'll adapt." Yes. We've adapted to electricity, the industrial revolution, the internet.
4:12.06 – 4:23.82 (11.8s)
48
But we've done so on the back of generations that did not have the training nor the time to adapt.
4:23.82 – 4:29.58 (5.8s)
49
And in the case of this revolution, time is of the essence.
4:30.54 – 4:34.70 (4.2s)
50
You may think you have time because agents are just emerging.
4:35.66 – 4:39.10 (3.4s)
51
And it's a fact.
4:39.14 – 4:40.46 (1.3s)
52
Our research shows that today only 13 percent of companies have embedded agents in their workflows.
4:40.50 – 4:47.78 (7.3s)
53
But tech moves exponentially.
4:49.46 – 4:51.82 (2.4s)
54
Humans, they crawl linearly.
4:51.82 – 4:54.62 (2.8s)
55
If you don't prepare now, you'll struggle to keep up.
4:54.62 – 4:58.46 (3.8s)
56
And I'm not talking about science fiction.
4:59.26 – 5:01.94 (2.7s)
57
I'm not talking about AGI, artificial general intelligence, this moment where AI will be smarter than us.
5:01.94 – 5:09.98 (8.0s)
58
I'm referring here to ACI, artificial capable intelligence.
5:10.02 – 5:16.66 (6.6s)
59
The moment when AI will be able to take on ambiguous, complex goals with minimal oversight.
5:17.58 – 5:26.90 (9.3s)
60
And while AGI is speculative, ACI is a deadline.
5:26.90 – 5:32.62 (5.7s)
61
While we spend hours debating about superintelligence and consciousness, we miss the milestones that ACI is meeting with increasing frequency.
5:32.62 – 5:43.58 (11.0s)
62
ACI will change how work is done and by whom.
5:44.62 – 5:48.10 (3.5s)
63
Let's shape it, not wait and see.
5:49.06 – 5:51.50 (2.4s)
64
Now myth number two.
5:52.66 – 5:54.02 (1.4s)
65
"Soft skills are our sweet spot." Yes, it's lovely to believe that empathy, creativity are uniquely ours.
5:54.86 – 6:05.46 (10.6s)
66
But evidence says otherwise.
6:06.66 – 6:09.86 (3.2s)
67
More and more humans like to interact with AI because they feel it's more empathic.
6:09.86 – 6:16.90 (7.0s)
68
And why not?
6:18.46 – 6:19.74 (1.3s)
69
I mean, AI doesn't get tired, doesn't get cranky, doesn't judge you.
6:19.74 – 6:28.06 (8.3s)
70
So this moat we thought was ours, it's shrinking.
6:28.74 – 6:32.62 (3.9s)
71
And we need to stop asking what AI can't do and focus on where humans make a difference and why.
6:33.22 – 6:41.14 (7.9s)
72
At this stage, I'm sure you would love me to come up with the list of human qualities that will remain ours forever.
6:43.78 – 6:52.34 (8.6s)
73
But my point is, there is no universal list.
6:53.30 – 6:55.82 (2.5s)
74
Each company needs to figure it out based on its strategic positioning.
6:56.54 – 7:02.34 (5.8s)
75
This is hard, uncomfortable work, but it's work that you as leaders need to take on.
7:02.38 – 7:09.06 (6.7s)
76
Now myth number three.
7:10.34 – 7:11.74 (1.4s)
77
My preferred one. I'm French.
7:13.06 – 7:14.94 (1.9s)
78
"We need to protect jobs." Yes. I see where this one is coming from.
7:14.94 – 7:21.78 (6.8s)
79
Today, 41 percent of employees believe that their job will vanish in the next decade because of AI.
7:21.78 – 7:29.42 (7.6s)
80
But protecting jobs is like anchoring a boat in a storm.
7:30.62 – 7:34.78 (4.2s)
81
Jobs are fixed.
7:34.78 – 7:36.14 (1.4s)
82
The human potential to grow and adapt, on the other hand, is not.
7:37.06 – 7:40.94 (3.9s)
83
This is where we need to invest.
7:41.62 – 7:44.06 (2.4s)
84
The challenge is our organizations are not geared for that today.
7:44.10 – 7:48.02 (3.9s)
85
Org charts are static.
7:48.06 – 7:49.86 (1.8s)
86
Career paths are narrow.
7:49.86 – 7:51.78 (1.9s)
87
Training is occasional.
7:51.78 – 7:53.62 (1.8s)
88
This system will fall apart the day that the boundaries of jobs start melting away fast.
7:53.62 – 7:59.90 (6.3s)
89
So what do we need to do?
8:01.18 – 8:03.94 (2.8s)
90
Let me take you to an ideal company.
8:05.62 – 8:08.38 (2.8s)
91
Not a theoretical one, just the blend of the boldest clients I've worked with.
8:08.42 – 8:13.66 (5.2s)
92
First, they don't start with tech.
8:14.82 – 8:17.42 (2.6s)
93
They start with strategy.
8:18.62 – 8:20.02 (1.4s)
94
They focus on the outcomes that truly differentiate them on the market.
8:21.14 – 8:25.70 (4.6s)
95
They understand how agents will allow them to deliver against those outcomes in totally different ways.
8:26.38 – 8:33.50 (7.1s)
96
And they look at where people still make a difference for the better.
8:34.42 – 8:38.66 (4.2s)
97
As you can see, this is not incremental redesign of your operating model.
8:39.66 – 8:44.98 (5.3s)
98
It's radical AI-first reinvention.
8:45.02 – 8:48.34 (3.3s)
99
And we did this work for an industrial goods client of mine.
8:49.30 – 8:53.18 (3.9s)
100
Imagine having to go through 50 “hack a future” workshops, looking at how AI is going to disrupt each of your businesses, each of your function.
8:53.22 – 9:03.50 (10.3s)
101
Comfortable? It is not.
9:03.54 – 9:05.34 (1.8s)
102
But it allowed the leaders to align on a vision of where agents win, people matter and how best to pair them.
9:06.26 – 9:14.34 (8.1s)
103
Now once you have this vision, you want to translate it into a workforce model.
9:15.78 – 9:21.30 (5.5s)
104
How many people do I need?
9:21.34 – 9:23.26 (1.9s)
105
With what skills?
9:23.30 – 9:25.34 (2.0s)
106
No more guesswork, just informed, intentional reinvention.
9:25.38 – 9:30.34 (5.0s)
107
A multiyear skills forecast.
9:30.38 – 9:33.10 (2.7s)
108
And this is something we built for a consumer goods client that was facing a massive challenge.
9:33.14 – 9:39.42 (6.3s)
109
Imagine having to reformulate your entire product portfolio while keeping the leadership and innovation.
9:39.46 – 9:47.54 (8.1s)
110
Of course, AI unlocked the productivity that was required, but the work was much deeper.
9:47.58 – 9:54.10 (6.5s)
111
They needed to reinvent the role of the researcher.
9:54.14 – 9:57.14 (3.0s)
112
From chemist to data-driven biologist, from solo expert to multifunctional teammates.
9:58.06 – 10:05.74 (7.7s)
113
And they made it happen because they mapped very precisely the future skills that they needed, and they built a very effective upskilling and mobility engine.
10:05.74 – 10:15.50 (9.8s)
114
Then you want to publicly commit to taking your talents to their fullest potential.
10:17.10 – 10:24.02 (6.9s)
115
Now I know what you're going to tell me.
10:25.06 – 10:27.02 (2.0s)
116
Vinciane, why would we invest in talent if an AI can do their job faster, cheaper and without complaining?
10:27.06 – 10:37.38 (10.3s)
117
Well because the day that interacting with an AI becomes the new norm, a commodity, the interaction with humans is going to take an entire new meaning.
10:38.78 – 10:50.02 (11.2s)
118
Trust, authenticity, accountability.
10:50.62 – 10:54.42 (3.8s)
119
Those are the values we will anchor on.
10:55.46 – 10:57.86 (2.4s)
120
So the smartest companies will invest in talent.
10:58.94 – 11:03.22 (4.3s)
121
Not only tech talent, all talent.
11:03.26 – 11:06.14 (2.9s)
122
Not once, but systematically.
11:06.18 – 11:09.34 (3.2s)
123
And they will protect time to learn.
11:09.38 – 11:13.14 (3.8s)
124
Because today, while freelancers spend on average four hours per week learning, employees spend none.
11:13.18 – 11:22.74 (9.6s)
125
So no, the future isn't about being more human.
11:22.74 – 11:26.26 (3.5s)
126
It's about building the systems that will allow humans to do what matters most.
11:26.30 – 11:31.10 (4.8s)
127
This is not a story about job loss.
11:31.86 – 11:34.26 (2.4s)
128
It is a story about human differentiation.
11:35.22 – 11:37.86 (2.6s)
129
AI will keep on climbing. That is not up to us.
11:39.34 – 11:42.74 (3.4s)
130
But how fast we climb with it, that is up to us.
11:42.74 – 11:46.42 (3.7s)
131
So we need to stop asking: Will there still be jobs for humans?
11:47.30 – 11:52.30 (5.0s)
132
And focus on answering: What do we want humans to be best at?
11:52.34 – 11:57.66 (5.3s)
133
Because in the age of AI, being human isn't a fallback, it's a practice.
11:59.14 – 12:06.54 (7.4s)
134
Let's make it exceptional.
12:06.58 – 12:08.82 (2.2s)
135
Thank you. (Applause)
12:10.14 – 12:16.86 (6.7s)

맥락 및 배경

이 비디오에서는 인공지능(AI)의 발전이 인간의 일자리에 미치는 영향을 다루고 있습니다. 연사인 빈시안 보샤은 AI가 단순히 작업을 대신하는 것이 아니라, 인간의 가치와 역할이 어떻게 변화하는지를 설명합니다. 1950 년대 앨런 튜링의 튜링 테스트를 언급하며, 대화 능력보다 더 중요한 ‘행동’이 중요하다고 강조합니다. 결국, 기술의 발전에도 불구하고, 인간의 감정과 관계를 중시하는 시대가 되어야 한다는 메시지를 전달합니다.

일상 커뮤니케이션을 위한 5가지 주요 구문

  • “AI가 모든 작업을 대신할 수 있다면, 남아있는 인간은 누구일까요?” - 이 질문을 통해 인간의 역할에 대한 고민을 표현합니다.
  • “우리는 관계, 소속감, 충성도를 쌓아야 합니다.” - 인간 중심의 접근 방식을 강조합니다.
  • “시간이 없을 수도 있습니다. AI는 이미 등장하고 있습니다.” - 변화에 대한 긴급성을 나타냅니다.
  • “새로운 기술에 적응할 준비가 되어 있어야 합니다.” - 미래에 대한 준비와 학습의 필요성을 언급합니다.
  • “AI는 우리를 대체하는 것이 아니라, 보완할 것입니다.” - 기술의 발전과 인간의 협업을 주장합니다.

단계별 쉐도잉 가이드

이 세션을 통한 학습의 난이도는 높을 수 있지만, 다음 단계를 통해 영어 말하기 실력 향상에 도움을 줄 수 있습니다:

  1. 비디오를 여러 번 시청하세요. 처음에는 전체 내용에 주의를 기울여 이해하고, 이후에는 구체적인 문장 구조와 발음을 집중적으로 들어보세요.
  2. 중요한 구문을 반복적으로 따라 해 보세요. 위에서 제시된 5가지 구문을 선택하고, 각 문장을 소리 내어 반복합니다. 이 과정에서 영어 쉐도잉 기법을 활용하세요.
  3. 발음과 억양에 주의하세요. 원어민의 발음과 억양을 최대한 비슷하게 따라하려고 노력합니다. 필요한 경우, 느린 속도로 반복하여 연습하세요.
  4. 자신의 목소리를 녹음해 보세요. 따라한 내용을 녹음하여 자신의 발음과 억양을 확인하고, 개선할 점을 찾아보세요.
  5. 피드백을 요청하세요. 친구나 선생님에게 듣고 있는 내용을 들어보게 하고, 피드백을 받아 부족한 점을 개선하세요.

이와 같은 방법으로 shadow speech 및 shadow speak 훈련을 통해 IELTS 스피킹 시험 대비에 큰 도움이 될 것입니다. 이 비디오의 핵심 내용을 기반으로 꾸준한 연습을 통해 자신감을 키워보세요. 최선의 결과를 위해 shadowing site와 같은 자원을 활용하는 것도 좋은 방법입니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

ShadowingEnglish에서 효과적으로 학습하는 방법

  1. 영상 선택: 자연스럽고 명확한 영어가 사용된 YouTube 영상을 선택하세요. TED Talks, BBC 뉴스, 영화 장면, 팟캐스트, IELTS 모범 답변 영상이 좋습니다. URL을 복사해서 검색창에 붙여넣으세요. 짧은 영상(5분 이내)과 실제로 관심 있는 주제부터 시작하는 것이 동기 유지에 효과적입니다.
  2. 먼저 듣고 내용 이해하기: 처음에는 1배속으로 그냥 듣기만 하세요. 아직 따라 말할 필요는 없습니다. 문장의 의미를 파악하고, 화자가 어떻게 단어를 강조하고, 소리를 연결하고, 쉬어 가는지 주목하세요. 내용을 이해한 후 쉐도잉 연습을 하면 효과가 훨씬 좋아집니다.
  3. 쉐도잉 모드 설정:
    • Wait Mode (대기 모드): +3s 또는 +5s를 선택하면 한 문장이 재생된 후 자동으로 잠시 멈춰서 따라 말할 시간을 줍니다. 직접 컨트롤하고 싶다면 Manual을 선택해서 Next를 눌러 진행하세요.
    • Sub Sync (자막 동기화): YouTube 자막이 오디오와 맞지 않을 수 있습니다. ±100ms로 조정해서 정확한 타이밍에 따라갈 수 있도록 맞추세요.
  4. 소리 내어 쉐도잉하기 (핵심 연습): 이것이 연습의 핵심입니다. 문장이 재생되는 순간——또는 일시정지 중에——크고 자신감 있게 소리 내어 따라 하세요. 단순히 단어를 읽는 것이 아니라, 화자의 리듬, 강세, 음의 높낮이, 연음 방식을 그대로 흉내 내는 것이 중요합니다. 목표는 화자의 '그림자'처럼 들리는 것입니다. Repeat 기능으로 같은 문장을 여러 번 반복해서 자연스럽게 입에 붙을 때까지 연습하세요.
  5. 난이도 높이며 꾸준히 연습: 한 구절이 편해지면 더 도전적인 수준으로 올리세요. 속도를 <code>1.25x</code> 또는 <code>1.5x</code>로 높여 빠른 언어 반사 신경을 훈련하세요. Wait Mode를 <code>Off</code>로 설정해서 연속 쉐도잉을 하는 것이 가장 고급스럽고 효과적인 모드입니다. 매일 15~30분씩 꾸준히 연습하면 몇 주 안에 눈에 띄는 변화를 느낄 수 있습니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기

PayPal로 기부하기