Shadowing Practice: AI Slop Is Destroying The Internet - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

103 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
AI Slop is saturating the internet and  things are becoming dramatic pretty quickly.
2
In an online world where  money is made with attention, fake users spread their slop in review sections, generate fake traffic or poison discourse.
3
AI has supercharged this and  made slop much harder to spot.
4
Today about half of internet traffic is bots, the majority of them are used  for destructive purposes.
5
It's never been easier to make mediocre content – from the black hole of meaninglessness that is LinkedIN, low effort short videos just engaging enough to  hypnotise kids and fry their attention spans, to endless soullessly rewritten books on amazon.
6
AI music is invading streaming platforms.
7
Google AI is summarizing websites  instead of sending traffic to them.
8
On Youtube, new channels publish long  form videos multiple times a week with AI generated thumbnails, voices and scripts.
9
True crime, video essays,  science, no space is safe.
10
We’re in the golden era of soulless slop.
11
And sadly, actual creative human work  is used to train these AI models.
12
Every reddit comment, original YouTube video or human drawing on deviant art has  been sold out to the AI companies.
13
Or straight up stolen by them.
14
Without attribution or payment  to the actual creators.
15
Creative theft on a scale where it  is impossible to protect against it, already putting loads of creatives’ work  in danger – so AI companies can get rich.
16
While this is sad and frustrating,  what’s even worse is that generative AI truly has the potential to  break the internet irreversibly.
17
By making it harder and  harder to tell what is true.
18
At First AI Looked Great!
19
A kurzgesagt script starts with basic  research that is turned into a script and then fact checked in depth by 2-3 people.
20
We try to confirm our info  with what we deem trustworthy, ideally first hand sources, ideally papers.
21
Then we get 1-3 experts for input and critique.
22
Fact checking and compiling our sources  alone takes around 100 hours per video.
23
Of course we make mistakes or oversimplify,  and you can disagree with our conclusions – it’s unavoidable, we are only human after all.
24
But it is fair to say that our process  is extensive and after a decade, we know what we are doing.
25
When AI appeared we were very excited.
26
A mechanical brain able to super  quickly collect information!
27
So we went to work and it looked amazing!
28
And then we started fact checking.
29
We didn’t expect it to be perfect –  but it was way worse than we thought.
30
Confidently Incorrect – AI is SO Bad at This We’ll summarize and generalize our experiences over multiple projects and months  condensed into one fake project.
31
A video about why Brown Dwarfs are the  worst and should be ashamed of themselves.
32
So we got all the pro accounts of  all the AI models and got to work.
33
Using deep research tools to create  a summary and overview of all the information about the failed stars, brown dwarfs.
34
And wow it was great!
35
Dozens of pages of outlines with unique  information nuggets and links to sources!
36
Then we started to look deeper.
37
More than 80% of the info and  factoids were pretty solid and we could reconstruct where they were from.
38
Wikipedia, papers, legit articles.
39
What about the rest? It was great stuff,  like the speed of brown dwarf superstorms, the nature of their insides or  how disappointed their moms are.
40
But we could not find where  the AI got this info from.
41
Which is not automatically a bad sign – after all, the models contain pretty much all  the internet and books ever written.
42
So we asked experts for input – and  they flagged the exact same facts, even asking where we found it.
43
To fulfil its goal, to make us happy,  the AI had invented or extrapolated information to make brown dwarfs more  interesting than they really are.
44
Like a bad journalist making up details to  make a story hit harder or fit a narrative.
45
Now we wanted to know more and dove in deeper, reading the seemingly more solid  sources the AI had given us in full.
46
One was an article from a news  site written by a human journalist – or was it?
47
It had a very familiar structure  and surely purely coincidentally, read like what you get if a human  slightly changes AI wording.
48
An AI essay detection tool gave it a 72% match.
49
So an AI article without sources, used  as a credible source for AI research.
50
Which makes sense since in 2025 there  were already well over 1200 confirmed AI News Websites publishing massive amounts of AI  generated misinformation and false narratives.
51
This mix of correct, dubiously sourced  and straight up made up information also leads AI to present really shoddy conclusions that sound strong or novel but are often  half truths or misrepresentations.
52
Oh well. We salvaged what we could  and went back to the drawing board.
53
And after a few weeks it happened.
54
By pure stupid chance, we saw a brown dwarf  video popping up, by a relatively new channel.
55
It had hundreds of thousands of views and  was pretty good, nice footage, great editing!
56
But we had seen the structure and rhythm before.
57
And would you look at that, it contained all the brown dwarf facts we had flagged as  unreliable or straight up made up by AI.
58
This is where the death of the internet begins.
59
Now there is a proper source of  brown dwarf misinformation online.
60
When the next AI repeats the same research, it will find a transcript from  a video with a lot of views.
61
The misinformation is now true.
62
It will spread.
63
Even before AI it was pretty hard to  find the origin of facts that sound great but are not true – just watch  our video about a 100 year old lie.
64
As AI use goes on it may become  impossible to know what is true or not.
65
The Most Corrosive Lie The problem with AI is how trustworthy it  seems. How it is correct enough to seem super smart and how incredibly  confidently incorrect it is.
66
Casually lying to your face, often very subtly.
67
When you catch it lying, it immediately  admits it, vows to never do it again.
68
And then it does it again.
69
As eloquent as current language  models feel, there is nobody home.
70
No greater intelligence or  consciousness is talking back to you.
71
Current AI is a very complex hammer that does not  understand what it is doing or what nails are.
72
But we are letting it add new shelves  to the library of human knowledge.
73
AI is changing quickly, so this may get  better, but right now it's pretty grim.
74
Way too many people blindly trust AI.
75
Studies looked into the language  of millions of scientific papers published before and after the rise of LLMs.
76
They found an abrupt and sharp increase in  the frequency of words that AIs like to use.
77
So it seems clear that now a significant portion  of papers have been at least assisted by AI, usually without acknowledgement.
78
And just in July 2025 it was  discovered that a number of researchers had started to sneak  hidden messages into their papers.
79
In white text or too small for  the human eye they prompted AIs to review them positively and not point out flaws.
80
As more and more people are using AI carelessly, the library of human knowledge is  getting less and less reliable.
81
Which brings us the last  part: How are we using AI?
82
And will kurzgesagt survive the AI slop age?
83
Will AI Slop Kill Kurzgesagt And Artists?
84
On the internet there is only one truly  valuable resource: human attention.
85
If current trends continue it is not  that far fetched that cheap slop content, stuff just good enough, will soak  up the majority of human attention.
86
It could make us dumber, less informed,  our attention spans even worse, increase political divides and make  us neglect real human interaction.
87
If AI eats the majority of the attention pie,  channels like ours will become unfeasible.
88
Or forced to downsize or use AI themselves to be  able to compete. We don’t want to play this game.
89
How will we use AI?
90
Like the align tool in adobe illustrator.
91
If you have a bunch of boxes and  you want them to line them up, you can do this manually, one by one.
92
Or you can just select them, click “align”  and have them perfectly aligned in an instant.
93
It’s the same with AI programing tools for animation or using it as a  faster google alternative.
94
AI is a helpful tool, but the  creativity and integrity is still ours.
95
So dear internet, here is  what we are offering to you: kurzgesagt is made by humans, for  humans and it will remain that way.
96
We will produce well researched content and invest a lot of time and our human creativity  into our illustrations and animations.
97
Put in our creative soul into our work.
98
We will continue to fact check  and discuss our research with human experts, to give you the most  trustworthy information that we can.
99
When we make mistakes, they will be our mistakes.
100
We would rather quit than make AI slop.
101
But to go on we need your support.
102
kurzgesagt is almost 70 full time  people and a lot of freelancers on top.
103
This is a lot of salaries, software  licences, laptops, rent and coffee.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “AI Slop Is Destroying The Internet”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: slop, dwarf, brown, internet, source. Deze video bevat 103 zinnen en 1559 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 9:35. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 163 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. Slechts 81% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
slop zelfstandig naamwoord/slɑp/smurrie
trustworthy bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈtɹʌst.wɜː.ði/betrouwbaar
summarize werkwoord/ˈsʌməˌɹaɪz/samenvatten, opsommen
incorrect bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˌɪn.kəˈɹɛkt/incorrect
creativity zelfstandig naamwoord/kri.eɪˈtɪv.ᵻ.ti/creativiteit
abrupt bijvoeglijk naamwoord/əˈbɹʌpt/abrupt, plots
acknowledgment zelfstandig naamwoord/əkˈnɑ.lɪd͡ʒ.mənt/erkenning, bekentenis
blindly bijwoord/ˈblaɪndli/blind, blindweg
compile werkwoord/kəmˈpaɪl/samenstellen
condense werkwoord/kənˈdɛns/verdichten
deviant zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈdiː.vi.ənt/afwijkeling, afvallige
downsize werkwoord/ˈdaʊnsaɪz/afslanken, reorganizeren
eloquent bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈɛl.əˌkwənt/welsprekend, eloquent
freelancer zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈfɹiˌlæn.səɹ/freelancer, zzp'er
frustrate werkwoord/ˈfɹʌsˌtɹeɪt/frustreren

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
point out werkwoordaanwijzen, aanduiden
pop up werkwoordopduiken, te voorschijn komen

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doetis made · has been sold · is turned
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telthas supercharged · It's never been · has been sold

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 4 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals didn't, don't, we'll. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: trustworthy /ˈtɹʌst.wɜː.ði/, thumbnail /ˈθʌm.neɪl/, rhythm /ˈɹɪð.əm/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: misinformation /ˌmɪs.ɪn.fɚˈmeɪ.ʃən/, attribution /ˌæ.tɹɪˈbju.ʃən/, misrepresentation /mɪsˌɹɛpɹɪzɛnˈteɪʃən/, shoddy /ˈʃɒd.i/, casually /ˈkæʒuəli/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: misinformation /ˌmɪs.ɪn.fɚˈmeɪ.ʃən/, confidently /ˈkɑnfɪdəntli/, ideally /aɪˈdi.ə.li/, creativity /kri.eɪˈtɪv.ᵻ.ti/, acknowledgment /əkˈnɑ.lɪd͡ʒ.mənt/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

  • Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: summarize /ˈsʌməˌɹaɪz/, downsize /ˈdaʊnsaɪz/, factoid /ˈfæk.tɔɪd/, generalize /ˈd͡ʒɛn.(ə.)ɹə.laɪz/, generative /ˈd͡ʒɛnəɹətɪv/
  • /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: span /spæn/, attribution /ˌæ.tɹɪˈbju.ʃən/, extrapolate /ɛkˈstɹæp.əˌleɪt/, factoid /ˈfæk.tɔɪd/, freelancer /ˈfɹiˌlæn.səɹ/
  • /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: grim /ɡɹɪm/, neglect /nɪˈɡlɛkt/, disagree /dɪsəˈɡɹi/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als slop, trustworthy, summarize.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →