Shadowing Practice: Can AI Replace UX Designers? Claude Ultracode Wins! - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
151 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
So let's say you have a working app that solves a real problem, but users are struggling with it.
2
What do you do?
3
You either hire a UX designer or you try to fix it yourself with AI.
4
So you decide to give it a shot with AI.
5
Now where do you start?
6
You can't just tell AI to fix the UX and let it figure everything out, right?
7
Well, I just realized that with Claude, you can actually do that.
8
Just last week, I made a video where I shared my simplified professional UX process into prompts
9
that will get your AI to follow the correct methods to identify UX problems and to fix them.
10
And I specifically said that you can't just tell AI to fix your UX
11
and expect it to create a coherent user -friendly product.
12
Well, I was wrong.
13
The problem with my assumption is that I only tested it with Codex, and I assumed that Codex and Claude were somewhat at the same level,
14
since that's what the benchmarks are saying.
15
But that's not the case.
16
Claude just reached a level where I honestly didn't think would be possible this soon.
17
And after this video, I'm not going to be using Codex for coding and UI UX anymore.
18
My name is Jad.
19
I've been UI UX designer for over 10 years, but now everything is changing
20
if you want to stay updated on how ai is changing my work make sure
21
you turn on the notification bell and
22
if you need any help with ui ux
23
or coding you can submit your project on ai tooltip .com the example
24
i'm going to show you is a marketing platform
25
that i built in a recent video it's for my wife to manage her own marketing clients
26
and she's been adding features to it based on her usage requirements
27
so of course now it has a lot of usability issues and it's my turn to improve the UX.
28
I made two copies of the same platform.
29
I put one through my own AI UX workflow with the prompts
30
that I shared in my last video and I gave the other to Claude to fix all on its own.
31
Then I'll show you how Claude compares to Codex just for fun.
32
I think you know where this is going, but keep watching till the end because it all comes together.
33
And I'm going to tell you how I'm going to be approaching UX projects from now on.
34
Now, for my workflow, I gave AI multiple consecutive prompts to identify UX issues.
35
And it found 26 problems.
36
And then I fixed them by priority.
37
Now, this is not manual UX work.
38
I'm still using AI to identify the problems and to fix them.
39
But I'm guiding the AI based on my own process to identify user context issues,
40
to make sure the user journey is optimized and to fix consistency issues
41
and states issues and to make sure everything is considered.
42
Now for the other copy of the platform, I simply gave it to Claude and I said, you are a UX expert,
43
analyze and optimize the whole platform.
44
I put it on Opus 5 .5 in UltraCode, which is the maximum effort on the latest model.
45
It worked for a while on its own.
46
It ran multiple agent tests and many, many commands.
47
It found 40 problems and it fixed everything just with that one prompt.
48
Now I went through the two improved platforms and I compared them.
49
There's noticeable differences and I'm gonna say it up front.
50
I liked what Claude did on its own more than what my own workflow produced and that's why I'm making this video.
51
Now that doesn't mean we don't need you ex -designers anymore.
52
I'm just comparing AI with AI here.
53
Whether we need to know how to prompt it or if anyone can just say fix the UX.
54
Let me show you the results side by side and then I'll show you an analysis of how the two results compare.
55
On the left side is the result of my own workflow
56
and on the right side is what Claude did all on its own.
57
The first thing I noticed here is how Claude moved the client selector to the top bar
58
and made that bar sticky so it doesn't move when I scroll.
59
That means I always know which client I am working on.
60
This is a very good improvement that my workflow did not identify.
61
Here when you select a client and scroll you won't be able to identify which client you are working on.
62
But here it adds clarity.
63
Very much needed.
64
Claude also consolidated all the text in the top section of the page to have less debt space.
65
That's also very important because this is a high priority real estate.
66
What you see on your screen before scrolling should be the high priority stuff.
67
So more space for content is always better.
68
Another thing I immediately noticed here is how the navigation is organized.
69
Originally I had no groups but now both results are improving on that.
70
They grouped the menu items in different ways and based on my wife's usage she prefers what Claude did.
71
It makes more sense in terms of usability and user journey.
72
It's also visually easier to scan because it's more compact.
73
Even here at the bottom Claude reduced the amount of text and made the whole thing clickable.
74
As opposed to here where you have just a small target to click, it makes sense.
75
Another great improvement from Claude.
76
Now the dashboard itself also got improved in both cases, but Claude is more optimized towards what the user actually needs.
77
Here on the left side, there's a lot of wasted space just to display the status of the client,
78
then a long list of to -do items, then you get to the progress tracking.
79
But what Claude did here on the right side is impressive from my UX perspective.
80
This to -do list is smaller, more compact, and it grouped the important tasks at the top.
81
Here on the left, you have to look all the way down to see a task due today.
82
But Claude surfaced it to the top here.
83
And even the language is much more helpful.
84
Needs attention is better than tasks and this see all button is much better than all reminders.
85
All reminders does not tell me what action I am taking if I click it.
86
It's a little bit confusing because I don't know
87
if these are all my reminders or if I click it I see all my reminders.
88
Cloud also introduced something different here where you can see more items without leaving the page.
89
That way it can make the list smaller.
90
Small things like that improve the usability a lot.
91
Overall much better visibility and interaction in Claude's UX design.
92
And if you want a copy of this improved marketing platform let me know in a comment
93
and I'll be happy to share it.
94
All right let's go deeper and complete a user task.
95
Let's assess this content performance.
96
On the left side I'll click write assessment and here this is a new improvement it's telling me what I'm assessing.
97
It's actually showing me the result here, which is very important info.
98
It does not show me what I'm assessing here.
99
And it does not show me the previous result, which is important info to have.
100
So this one is better in my workflow, because I explicitly told it to analyze user intent and context and goals.
101
So for this feature, I get the win.
102
There's also a lot of improvements
103
that Claude did on its own in the campaign strategies page
104
it decided to move my strategies to the top instead of scrolling down to find them here
105
i can see my strategies then how they are doing my wife also preferred claude here
106
now i won't waste your time too much here analyzing
107
but let me know in the comments
108
if you want a more in -depth analysis for ux for complex platforms like this one i would be happy to share.
109
Here's how the two results compare.
110
This is based on my test result and the report that came out of each AI.
111
Now in terms of UI change, Claude did better by considering these areas that I showed you in my review.
112
But on a deeper level, my workflow actually improved things that Claude did not really catch,
113
like helping the user with relevant context for certain actions and failed save recovery.
114
These are things to avoid user frustration and improve user satisfaction.
115
So if you want max optimization, ask Claude to do its thing, and then follow up by using the prompts from my previous video.
116
And just for fun, let me show you what ChatGPT did with Codex on the latest and strongest model.
117
Here I have sold 6 .1 on UltraEffert, and I gave it the same prompt, and the result is not even close to what Claude did.
118
When I used Codex on the strongest model, I thought it would be close to Claude, but the result here is just not good at all.
119
Here, it did not consider any of the usability changes that Claude did.
120
It kept mostly everything the same as it was.
121
Nothing really changed with the main user flow and the context of the user.
122
Claude is much better.
123
So this tells me that we still need to guide the AI to find deeper usability issues,
124
but AI is only getting more powerful from this point.
125
Who knows, maybe with the next update things can become easy for AI to spot.
126
But what surprised me is that Claude didn't just clean up the interface, it made decisions about what the user needs to see,
127
what needs attention first, and where actions belong.
128
And in many of the flows that I showed you, I preferred Claude's version, And so did my wife, who is actually using the platform.
129
My workflow still helped in specific areas.
130
But what Claude did is real independent UX work from just one prompt.
131
And that changes how I would approach UX next time.
132
I would let Claude do the first pass, then test the important journey with real users who are actually using the product.
133
Where do they hesitate?
134
What information is missing?
135
Real user testing will never be eliminated by AI.
136
A week ago I said you couldn't just ask AI to fix your UX
137
and expect it to do the work we do as designers.
138
This experiment proved me wrong.
139
So I'm changing my opinion.
140
AI can now make good UX improvements without expert guidance.
141
It can still miss some things, but I think it produces good enough UX to launch a product.
142
And considering the rate at which AI is improving, I'm sorry to say this, but soon UI UX jobs won't be needed anymore.
143
We would still need UX research and strategy, yes.
144
We would also need to conduct real user testing and analysis.
145
That still takes human experience.
146
So the most important thing I want to leave you with is that everyone should be using AI.
147
Let me know what you think.
148
Do you agree?
149
Do you disagree?
150
I always answer everything down in the comments.
151
Cheers.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C11
195 zinnen
AI Destroyed My Profession
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
293 zinnen
Is AI Killing Human Fashion Design? Who Will Shape the Future of Design? Fashion Tea #6
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
484 zinnen
How to Build an AI Agent for Every Part of Your Life
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
37 zinnen
How Anthropic uses Claude in Product Management
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C17 zinnen
How AI Empowers Tech Leaders Siwei Shen
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
228 zinnen
The UX Psychology Behind Apps People Can’t Stop Using
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
388 zinnen
How to Edit VIRAL Talking Head Videos Using ONLY Claude! (New Minimal Style)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
182 zinnen
We Let $200 GPT-Pro Think for 7 Days on Unsolved Math
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
182 zinnen
I Tested The Viral Reverse Engineering Repo
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
223 zinnen
9 Insane Claude Mods I Already Can't live Without
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
198 zinnen
Jack Dorsey’s New Dessa AI Voice Sounds Scary Human
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Can AI Replace UX Designers? Claude Ultracode Wins!”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: claude, user, result, fix, workflow. Deze video bevat 151 zinnen en 1903 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 10:46. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 177 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 83% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| prompt werkwoord | /pɹɑmpt/ | aansporen, aanmoedigen |
| compare werkwoord | /kəmˈpɛɚ/ | vergelijken |
| designer zelfstandig naamwoord | /dɪˈzaɪnɚ/ | ontwerper, designer |
| reminder zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɹɪˈmaɪndə(ɹ)/ | geheugensteuntje |
| scroll zelfstandig naamwoord | /skɹoʊl/ | boekrol, schriftrol |
| priority zelfstandig naamwoord | /pɹaɪˈɒɹɪti/ | voorrang, prioriteit |
| assess werkwoord | /əˈsɛs/ | beoordelen, evalueren |
| analyze werkwoord | /ˈæn.əˌlaɪz/ | analyseren |
| usage zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈjuːsɪd͡ʒ/ | gebruik |
| compact bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /kəmˈpækt/ | compact |
| impressive bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ɪmˈpɹɛsɪv/ | indrukwekkend, imposant |
| assessment zelfstandig naamwoord | /əˈsɛsmənt/ | schatting, inschatting |
| cloud zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈklaʊ̯d/ | wolk |
| select werkwoord | /sɪˈlɛkt/ | uitkiezen, selecteer |
| helpful bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈhɛlp.fl̩/ | behulpzaam |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| clean up werkwoord | schoonmaken | |
| come together werkwoord | /ˈkʌm tʊˈɡɛðɚ/ | bijeenkomen, samenkomen |
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | is optimized · is considered · is organized |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | UltraCode, which is · here, which is · result, which is |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | I've been · have sold |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 31 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals I'm, I'll, won't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/, assumption /əˈsʌm(p).ʃ(ə)n/, navigation /nævɪˈɡeɪʃən/, frustration /fɹʌsˈtɹeɪ.ʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: priority /pɹaɪˈɒɹɪti/, experiment /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, consecutive /kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/, satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: analyze /ˈæn.əˌlaɪz/, usage /ˈjuːsɪd͡ʒ/, impressive /ɪmˈpɹɛsɪv/, cloud /ˈklaʊ̯d/, solve /sɒlv/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: analyze /ˈæn.əˌlaɪz/, compact /kəmˈpækt/, manual /ˈmæn.j(u)əl/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: guidance /ˈɡaɪdəns/, disagree /dɪsəˈɡɹi/, navigation /nævɪˈɡeɪʃən/, organize /ˈɔɹɡənaɪz/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als prompt, compare, designer.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.