Shadowing Practice: How To Research ANY Topic - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
Deep research is easy if you have a good system for it
2
and it's also more important than ever in this age of internet noise and misinformation and hearsay talking points.
3
Good research not only makes you a better thinker but it also makes the entire world a better more honest place.
4
The problem is most people see it as something exclusive, something reserved for just the academics or you know this elite clique of researchers but that couldn't be further from the truth.
5
All you need are the right tools and the right principles.
6
I mean sure a college workshop here and there it's going to help you
7
but most of it i had to learn maybe the hard way through trial
8
and error through rage quitting google scholar through jumping between note systems it's not easy
9
so i want to give you the strongest start possible
10
and you know help you avoid all
11
that crap research can actually feel rewarding as well it shouldn't
12
feel like a chore it should be almost like a game for your curiosity
13
and that's what i want you to learn by the end of this video
14
so we'll look at how to narrow down on a topic
15
where to find resources how to manage of time realistically
16
and how to think critically along the way
17
and a final disclaimer i approach this more as a hobbyist
18
or as an undergrad student because that's what i am
19
or was i'm not a decorated researcher i don't have a phd i haven't gone knee deep into
20
that stuff but i trust
21
that these ideas will be relevant to everyone no matter the
22
level i just have to be you know honest there first you have to choose your topic
23
because without direction your time
24
and your energy will go to waste now there's two opposite ways to approach this
25
but before we get to
26
that there is something critical you need either way research needs curiosity
27
and i mean genuine interest you know this is dumb to admit
28
but in the past i would write down a list of things
29
that i thought i should know and i went out to study them
30
and i forced myself i didn't even really want to do half of these
31
but it felt like i should be aware of these i
32
should research them it was based on my idea of what was good not what I actually enjoyed.
33
I treated learning like a fucking Ubisoft game, something that I had to 100 % complete for some reason, and that just completely killed my motivation.
34
I based topics on what I thought I should like, not what I actually liked, not what I had a genuine interest for.
35
Instead, listen to your curiosity, that natural sort of urge from within, the things you think about, the things you care about, the things you want to talk about to people,
36
and that should pull you along naturally.
37
It's like swimming with the current in a way.
38
It doesn't matter what's on your feed.
39
It doesn't matter what people are LARPing as online or what your parents want you to do or this or that.
40
It should come from within.
41
Now we can look at two different ways to choose a topic.
42
We have the top -down approach or the bottom -up approach.
43
The top -down approach is more traditional.
44
You're probably familiar with it.
45
You choose your title, you choose your focus and then you base your research off of that.
46
You know where to go.
47
It's quicker.
48
It's more intuitive, you know exactly what you need to fulfill this goal.
49
Now, you might also begin with a general idea of what you want to research.
50
And then as you learn more, as you find interesting questions and avenues to explore, you can narrow that down until you have something precise.
51
Because, you know, you can't always research something that you don't know exists yet.
52
However, the top -down approach can inject what we call confirmation bias in your research.
53
But we'll get to that later.
54
The bottom -up approach completely flips this.
55
So instead of starting with the title you start with the research
56
but I mean how would that work here your research is looser
57
and I like to think of it I don't know
58
if it makes sense
59
but I like to think of it like foraging you go out into the world
60
and you read things that interest you and you find ideas that
61
stand out that you know make you think that make you ask questions
62
and of course these will be related
63
because they are interests once you build up a knowledge base of your interests you will start to see questions appear, or conversations to be had,
64
or avenues to explore, or interesting observations.
65
Of course, not all ideas will be relevant in the end.
66
That's not the point.
67
The point is that the topic emerges from the research, and it will give you something linear to pursue.
68
And from there, you can narrow down, you can focus, you can, you know, find more direct sources that answer the question precisely.
69
That's the idea.
70
In a way, you can start with bottom -up approach
71
and then switch to the top -down where you have a
72
goal now you can fill in the gaps you can give
73
it some more linear structure that's another way to see it it is more time consuming
74
but it's also good if you don't really know what you want to focus on
75
and you just research stuff
76
and let a hypothesis kind of naturally appear just from what
77
you feel i mean this is what modern researchers do they just notice things
78
and those those observations give them a a new thing to explore in an actual experiment or research project.
79
If you are a true high IQ patriot of the channel, you will also notice this looks familiar to something.
80
The next major decision is how general or specific are you going to go?
81
Because you can't just research philosophy or chemistry.
82
You need a biblical lifespan to just scratch the surface and there's no way to realistically do that.
83
You need to refine the topic so that you can make progress in the little time you have, realistically.
84
And look, a topic can branch out in more and more specific subtopics.
85
And your job is to find a kind of balance between both, a compromise between depth and breadth.
86
Let me introduce you to my matrix, which you can also see as the cross -section of a lake with literal depth and breadth.
87
On the left is depth.
88
How far will you take the research it can be anything
89
from a high school level all the way up to a phd
90
and beyond a very you know ultra specific ultra technical focus
91
on the right is breadth how wide is your scope is it super general
92
or is it ultra niche and precise i'm simplifying a lot here
93
but you generally cannot have both on the one end you can have a shallow
94
but wide snapshot of a topic a general idea you're getting the feel getting the gist understanding the core ideas
95
but not going into too much depth.
96
At the opposite extreme, you can do a deep
97
but narrow dive with a very precise research goal or in a super niche field,
98
like for example, a history of intersectional feminism in Warhammer 40k's hive cities.
99
I would say modern research leans the latter.
100
You are asking very precise questions that will advance the conversation, even just a little bit, even if it's just a tiny corner of a vast topic.
101
If you're doing it as a hobbyist, you know, for your self -education, for pleasure you may be able to compromise a bit more
102
but balancing range with depth
103
and you're not constrained by anything you know you're not trying to get published
104
so that's up to you to decide
105
and remember this isn't locked in I mean you're locked in
106
but your topic isn't locked in you can change this over
107
time you can narrow it down you can branch off whatever the next step is to gather literature
108
and you know do you have to prepare an entire catalog before you even begin your research.
109
No. I think that's a mistake actually.
110
I think it's the easiest way to kill your motivation before the research begins, just through sheer boredom.
111
I like to start with just one, just a few, and then I see as I go.
112
And chances are the source you're reading will point you to the next source, through the citations, through further reading, bibliography.
113
There's no need to be crazy about it.
114
Another issue though is that, you know, scrolling through Google Scholar and looking at these walls of chunky books, it's intimidating.
115
It feels like walking into a room and you don't belong there and everyone gives you dirty looks.
116
Where do you begin?
117
What does any of this mean?
118
What are these terms?
119
What am I reading?
120
Now you could brute force it, but chances are you'll get frustrated.
121
So what I like to do instead is approach a new topic through what I call shallow media.
122
And this refers to anything more digestible
123
or easy to consume things like videos articles blogs the popular editions
124
or even wikipedia articles and i know this might sound outrageous it might sound insane to people
125
but why there's no shame in using these as an entry point into the topic
126
and just being able to build a mental map of what is what now for example
127
and keep in mind i'm a philosophy noob i haven't done much reading on anything yet really
128
but I recently encountered the idea of moral anti -realism in an interview I was watching shout out Andrew Wilson
129
and it interested me
130
but I didn't think I was ready to dive into the books into the papers
131
because I'm just a beginner there's all these strange terms
132
and background concepts and references that I just don't get
133
so instead I opted for an article a wiki page a video here
134
and there and
135
that just gave me the sort of map of what was
136
coming it identified some key terms it gave me an understanding
137
of the different schools of thought roughly at least it gave
138
me some case studies some examples some basic building blocks to
139
understand this term this you know complicated thing maybe now
140
or at least soon i'll be ready to approach the deeper
141
research the papers the books the longer essays the more technical stuff
142
that i just couldn't handle before and for
143
that stuff you can use google scholar you can use jstor science direct research gates semantic scholar
144
and one of my absolute favorites not sponsored though consensus now
145
the problem is a lot of these papers have brutal paywalls and i mean brutal it's just completely unaffordable
146
but there are some legal and you know maybe not
147
so legal ways to get around this first at the end your search you can add file type colon pdf
148
and that will give you only pdfs which you can access
149
if you are enrolled in college or university check to see
150
if you have institutional access because you know you might there's also anna's archive there's scihub
151
or you just look up the title of the paper
152
and maybe find it for free elsewhere you could also just email the author and ask for the paper.
153
i know it's long sometimes but at the end of the day these are regular people
154
and they're proud of their work and they would happily share it now
155
when it comes to books you should research
156
and see what are the big dogs of your topic the
157
ones with authority with the you know a big steer in the conversation
158
which everyone else recommends
159
and of course with books you have the advantage where you
160
can inspect them you can find them in libraries in bookshops
161
and you can see if they're relevant to you
162
if they are in line with a topic
163
if they have something to offer if they're at a level you're happy with do
164
that and by the way don't force yourself to read entire books you can flick through
165
and just stick to the sections that are relevant
166
if you're pressed for time of course in papers or articles
167
that will mean flicking through reading the abstract looking at the
168
conclusion looking at the maybe parts of the discussion you don't have to sit there
169
and grind through everything it's just too time consuming obviously
170
if it is relevant then maybe it's worth a proper reading
171
but don't invest all of your energy immediately see
172
if it's relevant first now one big question remains how can
173
you trust a source it's a good question i will answer
174
it later in the critical thinking section another point is you
175
absolutely need multiple sources you cannot call yourself well read on anything
176
or well researched if you've only you know been through two or three books, a couple of articles, it's not possible.
177
You need multiple sources to be able to cross -reference things, to create some sort of consensus,
178
to spot any disagreements or conflicts or questions that need resolving.
179
And that only happens when you read a lot.
180
Of course you can't read everything, so you will have to compromise with a nice chunk of balanced strong sources that are representative, hopefully, of the whole conversation.
181
If relevant, you should also consider translations.
182
Who are you reading?
183
Translations are not 100 % literal copies of the original that preserve all the meaning, no. They change the tone, the reading experience, they take liberties,
184
they might inject their personal views into it.
185
It's a filter, it's an interpretation in some ways.
186
So, I don't know, you can see that if I compare these, if I put these odyssey translations on screen it's just
187
so different now that's its own rabbit hole
188
but i just want you to be aware of it for now translations can make a big difference
189
and my final tip
190
or obligation really this you kind of have to do this please use a reference manager like zotero
191
or i think research rabbit or consensus there is nothing worse than writing something down
192
and forgetting where it came from
193
or just not having anything to reference it back to it's a nightmare
194
so please write them down link them everywhere you can everywhere you've mentioned it
195
and keep them safe back them up do whatever don't lose them next up we have schedule
196
and if you are doing this as part of your college
197
or a phd you have to study or you get evicted
198
so arguably time management is easier there the real question is
199
how do you find the motivation to do it optionally in
200
your spare time as someone who's just teaching themself this advice
201
applies to both groups number one is to have a repeated
202
habitual pattern of study i mean wow shocker right atomic habits we get it
203
but in all fairness james clear's quote has stuck with me
204
here you do not rise to the level of your goals
205
but fall to the level of your systems and that's
206
so true it's like if you got a usb drive plugged it in your head
207
and ran a script you know good study is a repeated sequence of events
208
that can keep you consistent over the months and the years and so on.
209
You know exactly what to do, when, and for how long.
210
Good studies should never feel like a diversion from ordinary life, but a part of it.
211
You know, for example, in my case, every single morning, every day, for one, maybe two hours, I will study something.
212
I'll read, I'll write, I'll start something new, I'll visit something old.
213
It's up to me what I feel like in that moment, but those one or two hours, non -negotiable.
214
I don't have to think about it, I just do it now that's just me
215
but you might choose to read you know a daily paper
216
you have write a daily mini essay do a daily hour
217
of learning a daily chapter a daily you know whatever some
218
sort of fixed repeatable system number two is to have an associated time
219
and space for study so
220
that you mentally tune yourself to it you know this is why I love to put
221
so much effort into my desk setup this should be a place where I'm comfortable where I feel productive
222
and feel motivated to work
223
and of course i have a video on this you can check that out
224
but it could be anything you know some people like to
225
go out to a cafe they like to i don't know
226
get a beer get a coffee they like to make an adventure out of study in a way
227
and if that works for you do it you can also just invade a college library even
228
if you're not enrolled i mean no one's checking just walk in
229
allegedly in minecraft i also recommend to document the process somehow
230
and i don't mean like a vlog day in the life
231
sort of thing just a personal note to yourself how's it
232
going what are you doing what did you learn where do
233
you want to go what questions do you have what problems are you facing
234
and this just means that when life inevitably trolls you
235
which it will you now have some sort of uh reference you can come back to a week later
236
and think oh i remember now this is what I was doing.
237
Otherwise, there are gaps, there are obstacles, and if you have no idea where you were or where you were going or what you were studying,
238
you'll get demotivated and you just won't bother to, you know, catch yourself up and carry on.
239
A quick little journal just puts you back on track and you can get started again, even if there's breaks.
240
You also want a planning tool that works for you, not the other way around, where you spend hours filling it with tasks
241
that you'll never do by design today's video partner is
242
that smart scheduling tool not only can it help you plan a study course
243
or a particular goal
244
but it does the boring work of scheduling it around your
245
life all you have to do is show up by design's
246
canvas view is also a fresh take on time management like your own personal jarvis it runs entirely on voice
247
and can help you intelligently view and reorganize your schedule to get around life's mishaps
248
and delays like a real personal assistant would you know pricey
249
by the way by design's auto scheduler gets smarter over time
250
and whether the grind is grinding
251
or i don't know you want to take it chill
252
that week maybe you can keep talking until your plan is perfect
253
if you need to arrange a chat
254
or send an invite you can do just
255
that without ever leaving the app and
256
that means you know more time spent on what matters not the busy work
257
that no one cares about so for smoother study
258
and life in general you can try out by design for yourself with a link in description
259
and if you use code odysseus20 at checkout you'll get a nice 20 % off discount
260
so thank you to by design
261
and i hope you enjoy next up you need a proper workflow
262
because your research can be perfect but
263
if you don't have a way to organize ideas it will
264
descend into a chaotic mess you must take these scattered ideas from many different sources
265
and then give them some sort of linear order you need to make sense of them.
266
You do this through some kind of funnel
267
and each layer of this funnel processes and organizes
268
and refines the information a little bit more to help you make sense of it
269
and to make the ideas more useful essentially.
270
For example on the first level you might have inspection
271
and this includes anything potentially relevant just at a glance from the blurb or the abstract maybe.
272
The second layer can be your to read section.
273
These are sources maybe worth a deeper a look, either partially or in whole.
274
Next, you might have insights.
275
These are the select ideas that are most relevant or most interesting to your aims.
276
And at the bottom of the funnel, you might have order, which is the story that these notes tell together, the connections they make.
277
Because the thing is, most new knowledge is not new at all.
278
It's not this original creation, it's actually a synthesis of old ideas, such that you have a unique perspective,
279
a unique angle, some fresh injection into the topic.
280
And this is exactly what modern researchers do.
281
They build on old conversations and add their own input.
282
Now your job is to promote the synthesis I was talking about earlier.
283
You need to create a place where ideas can meet each other, they can mingle, they can form connections,
284
you can see problems and disagreements and questions that other people might have missed.
285
And this will almost always happen at the bottom of the funnel, which is where your commonplace book will be your obsidian your
286
notes program your mind maps a place where ideas come together
287
you know in my case of course i use obsidian i've made a hundred videos on it
288
but for you this can look like anything
289
and it can be as simple as i guess your notes app on your phone
290
or as complex as well i don't know whatever now you
291
might be wondering what precisely should you do with sources okay
292
i have my paper here i have my book what do i do with it well you read it,
293
of course, but there are a few things that will help you extract information and make it useful for you.
294
First, you should clip out any relevant insights or key points and please
295
rephrase them in your own words such that you actually comprehend what they're saying and you can make sense of them.
296
Sure, you can just copy paste, but then do you really understand what they're saying or are you just collecting things that sound important?
297
Second thing you should do is try to identify problems try
298
to find what researchers struggle with what they are limited by
299
what they disagree on these things can reveal a lot about
300
where your topic might go things you might end up answering hopefully number three is to try
301
and connect concepts try and see how things relate to each other even
302
if there's no immediate you know obvious connection being made by the author in question.
303
Maybe you are the one to create a novel take on something because you brought together two very different papers that
304
somehow are relevant to each other sometimes the most interesting ideas come from completely unexpected random links
305
that you would never have seen coming
306
but of course this is why you have a system to let them mingle finally
307
and i don't always do this
308
but i like to create an index of the topic
309
and this is basically a contents page i write it myself i arrange the topic any notes
310
that are appearing i give them some sort of structure
311
and it just helps me create a map in a way
312
so i see you know okay this is what's going on you can also use the canvas feature
313
or really anything else
314
that makes sense to you some way to have an overview this next section is critical literally it's critical thinking
315
and this is what separates the reality from the bullshit the fools from the wise now earlier i promised
316
that i would talk about how to find trustworthy sources
317
and this matters more than ever because we have the internet
318
and it's a gift in many ways we can access whatever we want wherever we are
319
but it's also a curse because the peasant masses are literate now
320
and anyone can upload
321
and it's hard to discern what is you know real substance versus what is just e -noise and internet bullshit.
322
So how do you separate the gems from the mud?
323
I stole this pretty simple framework from the internet called the crap test and it's pretty good.
324
C stands for current?
325
Is the source recent?
326
Is it still valid?
327
Is it old enough that it's become obsolete and not worth your time at all?
328
And of course this matters more for emerging fields,
329
things where you know ideas have to change quickly and where information is not necessarily future -proof.
330
R stands for relevance.
331
Is the source relevant to your topic?
332
And I know this sounds obvious, in most cases it will be, you just read the title, but it's not always.
333
And you have to flick through the abstract and see truly if this is contributing to your conversation.
334
Is it answering some question?
335
Does it have anything for you?
336
Because yes, it might be the same topic, but that is not to say it's dealing with the same problems or approaching it from the same angle.
337
In general, it's good to find the most important studies for your respective goal.
338
The ones that are heavily cited, the ones that have a lot of weight in the conversation.
339
A is for authority is the journal they're publishing in respected
340
is it a real you know institution with a system of peer review
341
and you know self -regulation is the author an expert do
342
they have a history in their field who are they are
343
they cited by other serious people have they passed a sort
344
of a social proof test now you don't necessarily need someone to have credentials to answer a question
345
or you know for them to come from a respected institution
346
but in general that's what you're looking for at least some
347
proof of their authority where it's relevant the second a stands for accuracy are they making logical arguments
348
and you know giving enough evidence to justify them are they
349
self -aware do they understand their limitations do they point out those limitations
350
which is a good sign by the way p stands for
351
purpose what is the author's goal where are they doing this research?
352
Why are they doing it?
353
Who is funding it?
354
What is the context surrounding it?
355
Now, these are just general pointers.
356
You have to use your discretion for each individual source and decide whether it's worth your time.
357
Now, in keeping on with critical thinking, I'm going to dump some tips here in no particular order, but these are just good bits of advice.
358
First, and I'll be brief here because I mentioned it earlier, you have to read multiple sources.
359
Seriously.
360
I need to stress that because if you read a single book or a single author's take, that's all it is one book one person they are not
361
impartial they are not infallible they make mistakes they leave things out they lack access to some information
362
that someone else might have
363
and that's why we read multiple sources to build a clearer
364
picture where one misses out on something the other will cover
365
where one maybe lies about something the others will audit
366
and you know fact check them in a way prove them wrong every single source has errors biases limitations
367
and the more you read the less each one has a
368
overall impact on your idea you get a clearer more accurate more balanced picture second
369
and this is good advice in general always hesitate to make
370
judgments do not rush to believe things do not try
371
and be certain of yourself so quickly doubt yourself you don't want to trust yourself when
372
when I'm researching I almost feel like I'm an enemy to
373
myself I don't want to believe my mind I don't want to jump to conclusions
374
and believe things
375
that will screw me over in the end I want to be proven wrong I want to meet things
376
that challenge me I want to
377
slowly and cautiously arrive at a conclusion so that
378
when I do arrive at that conclusion I can be more confident in it.
379
I wrote a newsletter on this but do not believe you are open -minded because you are not.
380
and the first step to critical thinking is accepting
381
that you're not open -minded and
382
that you can fall for any of these errors just as anyone else can
383
but that gives you again a good foundation to work from
384
and say okay fine I'm limited I'm flawed but I have a good
385
I have a proper frame of mind to approach this now
386
and speaking of yeah the newsletter's back I'm writing pretty consistently again
387
so sign up down below it's free it's not spammy I think you enjoy it third is to seek things
388
that you disagree with because if you only read sources
389
that confirm your existing beliefs confirmation bias well you're just jerking
390
yourself off you are afraid of being challenged you're afraid of changing your mind
391
and ultimately you're blocking out what is potentially the truth
392
so you need to put yourself out there challenge yourself read everything read things
393
that are scary or controversial
394
or maybe challenging to your worldview it's not a defeat to change your mind it's a strength number four
395
and maybe this is just me but i like to take paragraphs
396
and sort of split them up logically i try to look out for points
397
and the arguments that follow any qualifiers
398
and i see what does this stack up do these points of evidence
399
and the explanations do they back up the original point do
400
they provide arguments is the evidence satisfying uh have they made
401
assumptions have they accepted these assumptions have they pointed out any
402
limits they might have had look after these things number five is to understand your limits especially with new topics
403
or anything super technical because sometimes you know we want to laugh a bit we open up a paper
404
it's babble it's jargon we don't get it we brute force
405
it sometimes just to say we have read it it's a waste of time
406
and you know chances are trying to understand it is doing you a worse favor than
407
if you just accepted defeat and you know maybe moved to something else
408
or went to something easier
409
and you must remember a lot of these researchers don't care about you you're a layman you're an npc pleb
410
and they are writing to other researchers who are in the club who know what they are talking about
411
and who don't need any background explanation
412
and look this isn't prose club this is not a writer's competition they're not trying to make it interesting
413
or readable they just want to deliver the idea
414
and yeah much of the time
415
that is to our dismay it's horrible to read it's uh you know clumsy
416
and convoluted but what can you do it's for this reason
417
that we have popular editions of science and history
418
and whatever we have commentaries we have again that shallow media i was talking about and these are essentially
419
simplifications of the cutting edge research
420
that we don't understand these can be totally valid of course
421
but remember like with translations they can also act as a
422
filter the person writing the commentary can choose what to omit
423
they can choose how to explain it what to leave out
424
what to include you know it's just something to consider the final step
425
and this is maybe optional but i think it's very important, the final step is some sort of output.
426
Because to me at least, study can feel meaningless unless it serves some grand driving purpose.
427
You know, in university, people are motivated by money, by a career, by the hopes of an internship at General Dynamics or something.
428
But if you're doing this in your bedroom just for your own pleasure, yes, it's fun and motivating, but at the same time, it can feel like you're drifting,
429
like there's nothing you're going towards.
430
If you rely purely on intrinsic motivation, then, you know, when the going gets tough, which it will, there's nothing to stop you from just quitting.
431
Literally, you can just stop and that's it.
432
Everything I read and write is ultimately ordered towards something I'm going to produce in the future, whether that's a video, an article, a book,
433
something I can call mine and obviously not everything is going to end up being public
434
or being you know fleshed out and written up into something nice
435
but that principle just makes my writing feel valuable if
436
that makes sense i feel like i'm doing this for something
437
because it's going to eventually be something tangible in the future
438
it also forces you to take scattered jumbled sometimes you know terribly written ideas
439
and polish them up give them some structure give them some flow give them an order
440
that makes sense to someone else reading not just you it's like a accountability system i suggest writing essays
441
or blogs or videos or making a sub stack even
442
if no one's listening
443
and you're just typing to the void you know like an
444
insane person do it anyway yes it can grow into something bigger than what you thought it would be
445
but that form of accountability helps you write
446
and think better it really does every successful youtuber or author
447
or substack writer or you know twitter anon is just someone with a passion who talked about their passion publicly.
448
That's it.
449
And eventually it took off and they got paid to do these things.
450
It's crazy.
451
There's no secret source to it.
452
So you may as well take your passion and your interest
453
and your effort and convert it into something that people want to see.
454
And that will do you and them a favor.
455
And speaking of, if you want to know how to convert your research into a decent essay, I'll link a video to that on screen.
456
And as always, I want to hear your thoughts.
457
Tell me your best research tips, how you've experienced it through college and stuff and thank you so much for watching
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
✨ Aanbevolen Video
B22
35 zinnen
Research Foundations: How to Turn Business Problems into Actionable Data
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
217 zinnen
If You’re Creative But Lazy, Please Watch This
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
159 zinnen
How to Know What You Really Want...And Why That's So Important
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
202 zinnen
How to Learn Anything FASTER
British AccentBusiness EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
265 zinnen
How I Would Start Cybersecurity in 2026 (If Starting From Zero)
Business EnglishInterview EnglishUniversity Students
B22
177 zinnen
How to Start a Podcast in 2026 (Start to Finish)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
200 zinnen
Give Me 15 Minutes. I'll Teach You 80% of Obsidian
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
125 zinnen
Practical Advice for Creative Projects - Extra Credits Gaming
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
162 zinnen
If I started a YouTube channel from scratch, I’d do this
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
33 zinnen
The Psychology of Discipline: How to Make Your Brain Want to Start
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
90 zinnen
How to Journal (Like a Philosopher)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “How To Research ANY Topic”. Deze video bevat 457 zinnen en 5831 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 30:45. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 190 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. 85% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| topic zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈtɑpɪk/ | onderwerp, thema |
| researcher zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/ | onderzoeker |
| narrow bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈnæɹəʊ/ | nauw, smal |
| translation zelfstandig naamwoord | /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/ | vertaling, transmissie |
| essay zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɛs.eɪ/ | essay, opstel |
| motivation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmoʊ.tə.veɪ.ʃən/ | motivatie |
| precise bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /pɹɪˈsaɪs/ | nauwkeurig, precies |
| scholar zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈskɑlɚ/ | geleerde |
| passion zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpæʃən/ | passie, hartstocht |
| conclusion zelfstandig naamwoord | /kənˈkluːʒən/ | conclusie, einde |
| explore werkwoord | /ɪkˈsploɹ/ | onderzoeken, bestuderen |
| compromise zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkɑmpɹəˌmaɪz/ | compromis |
| abstract zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈæbˌstɹækt/ | samenvatting, korte inhoud |
| linear bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈlɪn.i.əɹ/ | lineair |
| consensus zelfstandig naamwoord | /kənˈsɛnsəs/ | consensus, eensgezindheid |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| end up werkwoord | belanden, terechtkomen | |
| point out werkwoord | aanwijzen, aanduiden | |
| back up werkwoord | teruggaan | |
| branch off werkwoord | afbuigen | |
| build up werkwoord | opstapelen | |
| come together werkwoord | /ˈkʌm tʊˈɡɛðɚ/ | bijeenkomen, samenkomen |
| look up werkwoord | /ˌlʊk ˈʌp/ | opkijken |
| show up werkwoord | tentoonstellen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- It doesn't matter what's on your feed.
- You're probably familiar with it.
- Because you can't just research philosophy or chemistry.
- Is the source relevant to your topic?
- Does it have anything for you?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | was based · will be related · isn't locked |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | haven't gone · haven't done · you've mentioned |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | order, which is · funnel, which is |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 100 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, you're, I'm. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: synthesis /ˈsɪnθəsɪs/, bother /ˈbɑðɚ/, gather /ˈɡæðɚ/, breadth /bɹɛdθ/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/, motivation /ˈmoʊ.tə.veɪ.ʃən/, passion /ˈpæʃən/, conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, shallow /ˈʃæloʊ/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: motivation /ˈmoʊ.tə.veɪ.ʃən/, curiosity /ˌkjʊɹ.iˈɑ.sə.ti/, limitation /lɪmɪˈteɪʃən/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/, necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: compromise /ˈkɑmpɹəˌmaɪz/, arrive /əˈɹaɪv/, valid /ˈvælɪd/, dive /daɪv/, arrange /əˈɹeɪnd͡ʒ/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: narrow /ˈnæɹəʊ/, translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/, passion /ˈpæʃən/, abstract /ˈæbˌstɹækt/, shallow /ˈʃæloʊ/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: gap /ɡæp/, angle /ˈæŋ.ɡəl/, disagree /dɪsəˈɡɹi/, grind /ˈɡɹaɪnd/, disagreement /dɪsəˈɡɹiːmənt/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als topic, researcher, narrow.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.