Shadowing Practice: Ridge vs Lasso Regression, Visualized!!! - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

86 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Ridge, regression versus lasso regression, which one will survive?
2
StatQuest.
3
Hello, I'm Josh Starmer and welcome to StatQuest.
4
Today we're going to talk about ridge versus lasso regression and the differences are going to be visualized.
5
Note, this StatQuest assumes that you are already familiar with ridge and lasso regression.
6
If not, check out the quests.
7
To show you the difference between ridge and lasso regression, we're going to use a very simple data set that consists of weight and height measurements.
8
And we'll start by fitting this horizontal line to the data.
9
This horizontal line represents a terrible fit.
10
And we can measure how bad that fit is by calculating residuals, the difference between the observed and predicted values.
11
In order to compare the horizontal line to other lines fit to the data, we will plot the sum of the squared residuals on a graph.
12
The y-axis on this graph is the sum of the squared residuals,
13
and the x-axis represents different slope values for the fitted line.
14
In this case, the slope for the horizontal line is 0.
15
Now let's increase the slope to 0.2, and calculate a new value for the sum of the squared residuals.
16
Now let's increase the slope to 0.4, and calculate a new value for the sum of the squared residuals.
17
We can keep plugging in new values for the slope and plotting the sum of the squared residuals,
18
Or we can just plot the curve for this equation.
19
We can see that the best fitting line is at the bottom of the parabola.
20
In other words, when the slope equals 0.45, we get the lowest sum of the squared residuals.
21
In this example, we simply calculated the sum of the squared residuals for different slopes.
22
Now let's add the ridge regression penalty, aka the L2 norm.
23
if you asked me, it should be called the squared penalty, since that's what it is, and, for me, way easier to remember.
24
The thick blue line that we just drew represents lambda equals zero.
25
This is because when lambda equals zero, the penalty is equal to zero,
26
regardless of the slope, and we are left with the original sum of squared residuals.
27
Now let's see what happens when we set lambda equal to 10.
28
And just like before, we'll start with a horizontal line, only this time, the line is orange.
29
Just like before, we can calculate the residuals.
30
And we can calculate the sum of the squared residuals plus lambda times the slope squared.
31
In this case, lambda equals 10.
32
And the slope of the horizontal line is 0.
33
So the penalty is 0.
34
So we plot the sum of the squared residuals here.
35
Now let's increase the slope to 0.2.
36
Note, the residuals are smaller than before, so the sum of squared residuals is smaller than before.
37
But now the penalty is 0.4.
38
And that gives us this point on the graph.
39
Now let's increase the slope to 0.4.
40
And the residuals are even smaller.
41
But now the penalty is 1.6.
42
And that gives us this point on the graph.
43
And like we did before, we can keep plugging in new values for the slope and plotting the sum of the squared residuals plus the penalty,
44
or we can just plot the curve with a thick orange line that represents lambda equals 10.
45
The bottom of the parabola is where the slope gives us the lowest sum of squared residuals plus penalty,
46
and that corresponds to this specific line.
47
And when we compare that to the optimal slope when lambda equals zero,
48
we see that setting lambda equal to 10 results in a smaller optimal slope.
49
Note, we can also see that when lambda equals 10, the lowest point in the parabola is closer to zero than when lambda equals zero.
50
So, either way we look at it, we see that the larger value for lambda shrunk the optimal value for the slope.
51
Likewise, the thick green line represents lambda equals 20.
52
We see that the minimum value is closer to zero, and the optimal slope has shrunk some more.
53
The purple lines represent lambda equals 40, and it shrinks the slope even more.
54
In other words, as we increase lambda for the ridge regression penalty, a.k.a the L2 penalty, a.k.a the square penalty,
55
The optimal slope gets closer and closer to zero, but it does not equal zero.
56
Bam!
57
Now let's see what happens if we use the lasso penalty, a.k.a the L1 norm, or, if you asked me,
58
I'd call it the absolute value penalty.
59
Unfortunately, no one asked me.
60
Again, the thick blue line represents lambda equals zero, so there is no extra penalty.
61
This is because when we plug lambda equals zero into the equation, the penalty becomes zero.
62
And we are left with the original sum of the squared residuals.
63
Note, just like before, we'll keep track of the best fitting line plus penalty in this graph on the left.
64
The thick orange line represents lambda equals 10, so now we are turning on the penalty and shrinking the slope.
65
When lambda equals 10, we start to see a kink in the curve where the slope is 0.
66
The thick green line represents lambda equals 20, and this kink at zero is becoming more prominent.
67
Lastly, the thick purple line represents lambda equals 40.
68
And now the kink at zero is super obvious.
69
Now the lowest point in the purple curve,
70
aka the optimal slope given the absolute value penalty when lambda equals 40, is zero.
71
And that means the slope of the optimal line is 0.
72
And that means when lambda equals 40, we ignore weight as a variable when predicting height.
73
Double bam!
74
In summary, when we increase the ridge regression penalty, a.k.a the L2 penalty, a.k.a the square penalty,
75
the optimal slopes shift towards zero, but we retain a nice parabola shape.
76
And even when we set lambda to something crazy high like 400, we still end up with an optimal value greater than zero.
77
In contrast, when we increase the lasso penalty, a.k.a the L1 penalty, a.k.a the absolute value penalty,
78
The optimal value shifts towards zero, but since we have a kink at zero, zero ends up being the optimal slope.
79
Bam!
80
Hooray!
81
We've made it to the end of another exciting StatQuest.
82
If you like this StatQuest and want to see more, please subscribe.
83
And if you want to support StatQuest, consider contributing to my Patreon campaign,
84
becoming a channel member, buying one or two of my original songs or a t-shirt or a hoodie or just donate.
85
The links are in the description below.
86
All right, until next time, quest on!

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Ridge vs Lasso Regression, Visualized!!!”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: slope, penalty, lambda, equal, zero. Deze video bevat 86 zinnen en 1111 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 9:04. De spreker praat in een gelijkmatig tempo van ongeveer 122 woorden per minuut, prettig om te shadowen. Slechts 70% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
slope zelfstandig naamwoord/sloʊp/helling
penalty zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈpɛn.əl.ti/straf
residual bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ɹɪˈzɪd͡ʒ.u.əl/overgebleven, residuair
thick bijvoeglijk naamwoord/θɪk/dik, dikke
horizontal bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˌhoɹəˈzɑn.təl/horizontaal
calculate werkwoord/ˈkælkjʊleɪt/berekenen, uitwerken
graph zelfstandig naamwoord/ɡɹæf/grafiek
curve zelfstandig naamwoord/kɚv/curve, kromming
purple zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈpɝ.pl̩/paars, purper
plug zelfstandig naamwoord/plʌɡ/stekker
compare werkwoord/kəmˈpɛɚ/vergelijken
versus/ˈvɝsəs/tegen
quest zelfstandig naamwoord/kwɛst/queeste, zoektocht
predict werkwoord/pɹɪˈdɪkt/voorspellen
axis zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈæksɪs/as

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
check out werkwoordonderzoeken
end up werkwoordbelanden, terechtkomen

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doetbe visualized · should be called · are left
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telthas shrunk · We've made

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 8 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals we'll, we're, I'd. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, contrast /kənˈt(ʃ)ɹæst/, measurement /ˈmɛʒ.ə.mənt/, regression /ɹiːˈɡɹɛʃ.ən/, visualize /ˈvɪʒuəˌlaɪz/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: residual /ɹɪˈzɪd͡ʒ.u.əl/, horizontal /ˌhoɹəˈzɑn.təl/, parabola /pəˈɹæb.ə.lə/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

  • Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: ridge /ɹɪd͡ʒ/, curve /kɚv/, plug /plʌɡ/, observe /əbˈzɜːv/, likewise /ˈlaɪkˌwaɪz/
  • /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: calculate /ˈkælkjʊleɪt/, graph /ɡɹæf/, axis /ˈæksɪs/, contrast /kənˈt(ʃ)ɹæst/, variable [ˈvæɹ.i.ə.bl̩]
  • /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: graph /ɡɹæf/, plug /plʌɡ/, ignore /ɪɡˈnɔː/, regardless /ɹɪˈɡɑɹd.lɪs/, regression /ɹiːˈɡɹɛʃ.ən/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Spreek zin voor zin na op normale snelheid en herhaal elke zin tot je ritme gelijk is aan dat van de spreker.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als slope, penalty, residual.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →