跟读练习: A Gentle Introduction to Machine Learning - 通过视频学习英语口语

Gonna start this StatQuest with a silly song.

But if you don't like silly songs, that's okay.

StatQuest.

Hello, I'm Josh Starmer and welcome to StatQuest.

Today we're going to do a gentle introduction to machine learning.

Note, this StatQuest was originally prepared for and presented at the Society for Scientific Advancement's annual conference.

One of the things that SOSA does is promote science and technology in Jamaica.

Let's start with a silly example.

Do you like silly songs?

If you like silly songs, are you interested in machine learning?

If you like silly songs and machine learning, then you'll love StatQuest.

If you like silly songs but not machine learning, are you interested in statistics?

If you like silly songs and statistics but not machine learning, then you'll still love StatQuest.

Otherwise, you might not like StatQuest.

If you don't like silly songs, are you interested in machine learning?

If you don't like silly songs but you like machine learning, then you'll love StatQuest.

If you don't like silly songs or machine learning, are you interested in statistics?

If you don't like silly songs or machine learning, but you're interested in statistics, then you will love StatQuest.

Otherwise, you might not like StatQuest.

Wah wah.

This is a silly example, but it illustrates a decision tree, a simple machine learning method.

The purpose of this particular decision tree is to predict whether or not someone will love StatQuest.

Alternatively, we could say that this decision tree classifies a person as either someone who loves StatQuest or someone who doesn't.

Since decision trees are a type of machine learning, then if you understand how we use this tree to predict or classify if someone would love StatQuest,

you are well on your way to understanding machine learning.

Bam!

Here's another silly example of machine learning.

Imagine we measured how quickly someone could run 100 meters.

And how much yam they ate.

This is me.

I'm not very fast, and I don't eat much yam.

These are some other people.

And this is Usain Bolt.

Usain Bolt is very fast, and he eats a lot of yam.

Given this pretend data, we see that the more yam someone eats, the faster they run the 100 meter dash.

We can fit a black line to the data to show the trend.

but we can also use the black line to make predictions.

For example, if someone told us they ate this much yam, then we could use the black line to predict how fast that person might run.

This is the predicted speed.

The black line is a type of machine learning because we can use it to make predictions.

In general, machine learning is all about making predictions and classifications.

Bam!

Now that we can make predictions and classifications, let's talk about some of the main ideas in machine learning.

First of all, in machine learning lingo, the original data is called training data.

So the black line is fit to training data.

Alternatively, we could have fit a green squiggle to the training data.

The green squiggle fits the training data better than the black line, but remember, the goal of machine learning is to make predictions.

So we need a way to decide if the green squiggle is better or worse than the black line at making predictions.

So we find a new person and measure how fast they run and how much yam they eat.

And then we find another, and another, and another.

All together, the blue dots represent testing data.

We use the testing data to compare the predictions made by the black line to the predictions made by the green squiggle.

Let's start by seeing how well the black line predicts the speed of each person in the testing data.

Here's the first person in the testing data.

They ate this much yam.

And they ran this fast.

However, the black line predicts that someone who ate this much yam should run a little slower.

So let's measure the distance between the actual speed and the predicted speed,

and save the distance on the right while we focus on the other people in the testing data.

Here's the second person in the testing data.

They ate this much yam, and they ran this fast.

but the black line predicts that they will run a little faster.

So we measure the distance between the actual speed and the predicted speed, and add it to the one we measured for the first person in the testing data.

Then we measure the distance between the real and the predicted speed for the third person in the testing data,

and add it to our running total of distances between the real and predicted speeds for the black line.

Then we do the same thing for the fourth person in the testing data.

And add that distance to our running total for the black line.

This is the sum of all the distances between the real and predicted speeds for the black line.

Now let's calculate the distances between the real and predicted speeds using the green squiggle.

Remember, the green squiggle did a great job fitting the training data.

But when we are doing machine learning, we are more interested in how well the green squiggle can make predictions with new data.

So, just like before, we determine this person's real speed and their predicted speed and measure the distance between them.

And just like we did for the black line, We'll keep track of the distances for the green squiggle over here.

Then we do the same thing for the second person in the testing data. And the third person. And the fourth person.

This is the sum of the distances between the real and predicted speeds for the green squiggle.

The sum of the distances is larger for the green squiggle than the black line.

In other words, even though the green squiggle fit the training data way better than the black line,

the black line did a better job predicting speeds with the testing data.

So if we had to choose between using the black line or the green squiggle to make predictions, we would choose the black line.

Bam!

This example teaches two main ideas about machine learning.

First, we use testing data to evaluate machine learning methods.

Second, don't be fooled by how well a machine learning method fits the training data.

Fitting the training data well but making poor predictions is called the bias-variance trade-off.

Oh no!

A shameless self-promotion!

If you want to learn more about the bias-variance trade-off, there's a stat quest that will walk you through it one step at a time.

Before we move on, you may be wondering why we used a simple black line

in a silly green squiggle instead of a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network.

Or, Insert newest, bestest, most fancy machine learning method here.

There are tons of fancy-sounding machine learning methods.

And each year, something new and exciting comes on the scene.

But regardless of what you use, the most important thing isn't how fancy it is, but how it performs with testing data.

Double bam!

Now let's go back to the decision tree that we started with.

Remember, we wanted to classify if someone loves StatQuest based on a few questions.

To create the decision tree, we collected data from people who love StatQuest, and from people who did not love StatQuest.

Altogether, this was the training data, and we used it to build the decision tree.

Then we got data from a few more people who love StatQuest, and a few more people who did not love StatQuest.

100

Altogether, this forms the testing data.

101

We can use the testing data to see how well our decision tree predicts if someone will love StatQuest.

102

The first person in the testing data did not like silly songs, so we go to the right side of the decision tree.

103

They didn't like machine learning, either.

104

So we just keep on going down the right side of the decision tree.

105

They didn't like statistics either.

106

So the decision tree predicts that this person will not love StatQuest.

107

However, this person loves StatQuest, so the decision tree made a mistake.

108

Wah wah.

109

The second person in the testing data liked silly songs.

110

And that takes us down the left side of the decision tree.

111

They were also interested in machine learning.

112

So we predict that that person loves StatQuest.

113

And since this person actually loves StatQuest, the decision tree did a good job.

114

Hooray!

115

Now we just run all of the other people in the testing data down the decision tree

116

and compare the predictions to reality.

117

Then we can compare this decision tree to the latest greatest machine learning method.

118

Ultimately, we pick the method that does the best job predicting if someone will love StatQuest or not.

119

Triple Bam!

120

In summary, machine learning is all about making predictions and classifications.

121

There are tons of fancy machine learning methods, but the most important thing to know about them isn't what makes them so fancy.

122

It's that we decide which method fits our needs the best by using testing data.

123

One last thing before we go.

124

You may be wondering how we decide which data go into the training set and which data go into the testing set.

125

Earlier, we just arbitrarily decided that these red dots were the training data.

126

But the blue dots could have, just as easily, been the training data.

127

The good news is that there are ways to determine

128

which samples should be used for training data and which samples should be used for testing data.

129

And if you're interested in learning more about this, check out the StatQuest.

130

And there are lots more StatQuests that walk you through machine learning concepts step by step, so check them out.

131

Hooray!

132

We've made it to the end of another exciting StatQuest.

133

If you like this StatQuest and want to see more, please subscribe.

134

And if you want to support StatQuest, well, consider buying one or two of my original songs, or getting a t-shirt or a hoodie or some other slick merchandise.

135

There's links on the screen and there's links in the description below.

136

Alright, until next time, quest on!

什么是跟读法？

跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧，最初开发用于专业口译员的培训，并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大：您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同，跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性，语调，节奏，连读，听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。

跟读练习: A Gentle Introduction to Machine Learning - 通过视频学习英语口语

为什么要通过这个视频练习口语？

语法与表达的语境

常见的发音陷阱

什么是跟读法？