Shadowing-Übung: Hillary Clinton Reveals Why She Believes Vladimir Putin Wanted Donald Trump in the White House | APT - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Lektion wird erstellt...
1
We have such a sense of ourselves as Americans, as freedom-loving people, and we would defend it to the last.
2
I don't see that that's a universal.
3
Well, I'm afraid you're right in terms of the acquiescence.
4
And, you know, I was in the Senate very proudly representing New York for eight years.
5
There are still people on the Republican side I served with there.
6
I don't talk to them, but my former Democratic colleagues report to me.
7
They go into the cloakroom.
8
They're in the hallway.
9
But aren't you sick about hearing about what they say in the cloakrooms?
10
I am really sick of it.
11
I'm very sick of it because they are betraying the kind of weakness that is, you know,
12
undermining of a great country and our institutions because they won't stand up to them unless they're on their way out.
13
Why not?
14
Are these jobs so great that you can't?
15
For some people, they are.
16
For some people, it's simply staying in power, being able to feel like they are important.
17
For some people, it's literal threats.
18
You know, the only person I know who spoke publicly about this was Lisa Murkowski.
19
And basically, if you are threatened the way some of these people are threatened and their families are threatened,
20
and you think you can, you may be rationalizing, but you think, well, I can try to rein in more if I stay on the inside.
21
So I can be against, but I can't be against too much.
22
That's one thing.
23
But the people who are in positions of great economic power, like the tech companies and other,
24
you know, large businesses, have been so disappointing in the way that they have,
25
you know, basically aligned themselves with Trump, Trump policies.
26
And in large measure, I guess, because they think, quote, it's good for their business.
27
And what I have said privately and publicly is you are making a grave mistake
28
because you may think it's good for your business today, but somebody who offers a bigger bribe,
29
because make no mistake, these transactional deals they're making are nothing but bribes.
30
You support me or you don't get this contract.
31
You do support me, you're going to get that contract.
32
These are bribes.
33
That is in the Constitution as an impeachable offense.
34
And so part of what I see happening is men, and they're all men, basically convincing themselves they have to do this for the business,
35
but what they're not appreciating is that this kind of unchecked,
36
unaccountable power can turn and bite them just as easily.
37
You saw it, you saw it in Russia.
38
You saw the transition from the collapse of the Soviet Union.
39
And you saw the oligarchs being formed, the privatization.
40
But then when Putin came along, it was, I want 5%.
41
No, I now want 25%.
42
I want 50%.
43
And that's why people say he's the richest man in the world, because he's basically...
44
I must say, he loves you.
45
I have never seen somebody speak so harshly of anyone as to watch Putin speaking about Hillary Clinton.
46
Well, I wear it as a badge of honor, but it did help...
47
You know, contrary to what you hear from Donald Trump, he did help Donald Trump win,
48
and partly because he knew what kind of leader I would be compared to Donald, whom he knew would not.
49
You have a question from the audience.
50
Would you still defend the Democratic Party strategy of trying to capture the center
51
when it has failed to repel Donald Trump two separate times?
52
It feels as though the only thing Democrats agree on is being anti-Trump.
53
Well, I think this year anti-Trump may work.
54
So I'm not sure this year is the right time to try to answer that question.
55
But also, if you look at where we have to win,
56
the Electoral College is not our friend.
57
And it certainly is not the Democratic Party's friend.
58
And so when you are planning a national campaign, as opposed to a congressional or state-by-state Senate campaign,
59
You have to try to figure out how you're going to win those independent voters, or you're not going to win.
60
You're not going to win the electoral college.
61
You can run up your margins.
62
Remember, I beat them by nearly three million votes because I ran up my margins in New York and Illinois and California.
63
It was great.
64
So I won the popular vote and lost the election.
65
And so when people say to me, you don't need to try to appeal.
66
Well, go to Wisconsin, go to Michigan,
67
go to Pennsylvania, and try to look at how Josh Shapiro wins or Gretchen Whitmer wins.
68
They win by appealing broadly, not narrowly.
69
And so it's frustrating, and I know it's frustrating
70
because all of this is so self-evident to us about what kind of government we should have, what kind of leaders we should have,
71
what kind of candidates we should elect.
72
but it's a big country out there.
73
I want to ask you two quick questions about the law, and this is a beautifully crafted one.
74
On a scale of 1 to ten, how worried are you about being locked up?
75
Well, it's not for lack of trying that I'm not,
76
that they, you know, they continue to, you know, not only go after me, but go after all kinds of,
77
you know, people that Trump considers his, quote, enemies.
78
You know, I'm not worried about it if the law matters and if the facts matter.
79
I have nothing to worry about.
80
And what I've been slightly reassured about in the last couple
81
of months is the way the courts are actually enforcing their orders.
82
So the name is off the Kennedy Center.
83
The, you know, $1.776 billion fund is enjoined.
84
And so there is finally the pushback.
85
Our big problem has been the Supreme Court.
86
And the Supreme Court has enabled and approved so much of what he's done on the so-called shadow docket.
87
And that is what has given him the permission to go forward with a lot of the things
88
that he has pursued without there being yet any kind of final adjudication.
89
So when I think about the law, personally, you know, I'm not that worried for myself,
90
but I do see him continuing to unleash his private law firm, which used to be called the Justice Department,
91
against people and forcing them to be, you know, investigated, spend money,
92
everything to just put them, you know, at risk.
93
So, yeah, I do think that he is going to continue to do that, and we, unfortunately, are going to have to continue to fight back.
94
Has John Roberts, in particular, as chief justice, failed the law?
95
I voted against him as a senator.
96
I met with him.
97
I voted against Alito, and Alito was a much more obvious movement conservative, a results-oriented judge.
98
and so I had no doubt about what he would do and I gave a speech on the floor.
99
John Roberts though as I looked into his past
100
when he clerked for Justice Rehnquist he wrote a memo about reversing the Voting Rights Act back in the 1980s.
101
So he has been a known commodity to some of us who paid attention for some time,
102
but he comes across as more affable,
103
you know, a kind of country club person that you would have a nice dinner with.
104
But make no mistake about it, he led the charge against the Voting Rights Act.
105
He led the charge against campaign finance reform.
106
He has been on the side of the, you know, sort of federalist agenda since he was a young lawyer,
107
a young law clerk.
108
And this is his court.
109
And I think they have concluded, led by him, you know,
110
the majority certainly, that their job is to turn the clock back as much as possible on the 20th century.
111
You know, they believe in, you know, almost the height of corporate power.
112
They believe in, you know,
113
the role that corporations should play in our politics and basically undisclosed, unlimited money.
114
plus then things like the Voting Rights Act, which they view as, in the way they describe it,
115
unnecessary in a, quote, colorblind society that's gotten beyond race.
116
I don't know where they live.
117
I don't know who they talk to.
118
I don't understand it.
119
But that is their stated view.
120
But it's really, you know, I went to law school with Clarence Thomas. And so.
121
Did you know him?
122
What?
123
Did you know him?
124
Of course I did.
125
And what was he like then?
126
He was kind of a guy with a grudge.
127
He had a grudge.
128
Did you ever figure out what the grudge was?
129
I think he, again, I can't tell you all the reasons why I think that, because I don't know enough about him.
130
But I think he had a view that he was being treated unfairly in life.
131
And, you know, when he got out of law school, he couldn't really get a great job.
132
And I just feel like for some reason, you know, he began to think that life would have been better.
133
I don't know how he believes this without all of these laws and regulations.
134
And so he is what he is.
135
And he just gave a speech about, for the 250th commemoration, I think at Texas or somewhere, he gave a speech basically saying that,
136
you know, the progressive movement had destroyed America and it needed to be reined in.
137
Secretary Clinton, thank you so much.
138
Thank you, David.
139
Thank you.

Über diese Lektion

In dieser Lektion werden wir wichtige Konzepte aus dem Bereich der politischen Kommunikation und Machtverhältnisse diskutieren, die Hillary Clinton in einem Interview über die Beziehungen zwischen den USA und Russland anspricht. Diese Themen bieten eine hervorragende Gelegenheit, um das Hörverständnis und die Sprechfähigkeiten zu verbessern. Die Lernenden werden durch das shadowing – die Technik des Nachsprechens – ihr Englisch verbessern, während sie gleichzeitig tiefere Einblicke in die politische Rhetorik und Argumentation erhalten.

Schlüsselvokabeln & Phrasen

  • Acquiescence – Zustimmung
  • Undermine – untergraben
  • Impeachable offense – Anklagegrund
  • Transactional deals – transaktionale Geschäfte
  • Economic power – wirtschaftliche Macht
  • Oligarchs – Oligarchen
  • Privatization – Privatisierung
  • Defend – verteidigen

Übungstipps

Um das Beste aus dieser Lektion herauszuholen, empfehlen wir, das shadowing zu nutzen, um sowohl das Hörverständnis als auch die Aussprache zu trainieren. Beginnen Sie, indem Sie das Video in einem langsamen Tempo abspielen und wiederholen Sie die Sätze, während Sie Clintons Stimme nachahmen. Beachten Sie den Ton und das Tempo ihrer Sprache, da Clinton oft mit Nachdruck spricht, besonders wenn sie emotionale Themen anspricht. Versuchen Sie, auch die Pausen und Betonungen zu berücksichtigen, um den natürlichen Stil ihrer Rede zu erfassen.

Nehmen Sie sich die Zeit, um die Schlüsselvokabeln aus der Liste laut auszusprechen. Verknüpfen Sie diese mit den entsprechenden Kontexten aus dem Video. Indem Sie die Informationen und Ausdrücke aus dem Interview aktiv verwenden, werden Sie nicht nur Ihr Vokabular erweitern, sondern auch Ihre Fähigkeit verbessern, in Diskussionen über komplexe Themen zu sprechen. Diese Methoden können besonders effektiv sein, um Ihre Englischkenntnisse weiterzuentwickeln und ein besseres Verständnis für politische Konversationen zu erlangen.

Nutzen Sie gemeinsam mit shadow speeches und shadow speak die Vorteile von Englisch lernen mit YouTube, um Ihre Fähigkeiten kontinuierlich zu verbessern.

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.