Shadowing-Übung: We Fell For The Oldest Lie On The Internet - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Übungsmodus wählen

Jeder Modus öffnet einen Übungsraum im Vollbild.

50 Sätze

Wenn Sätze zu kurz oder zu lang sind, klicke auf Edit, um sie anzupassen.

Look at this fun fact: Did you know that YOUR blood vessels taken together add up to 100,000 kilometers, enough to wrap them around the planet twice? One of our favourite fun facts, used in our book and app and a video and… wait… 100,000 kilometers is like... like a lot. We’ve used it so often but where did we get this number from? And how do we know it's true?

Welcome to an epic RESEARCH RIDDLE that took us well over a year to figure out and led us on a strange and baffling journey. It began extremely innocently.

We always collect interesting and fun facts to make our stories more colorful. And this one was just perfect! All of your blood vessels, twice around the world! Small thing, big number: wow!

But one day someone asked where this number was actually from. Did it really matter though, because it had to be true. If you google variations of “how long are your blood vessels put together” you’ll find the same numbers over and over: 100,000 kilometers or 60,000 miles.

You find it in books, blogs, webpages of educational institutions or lecture notes, reviews, scientific papers and articles. We ourselves have used it multiple times.

So it couldn't be that hard to find the source, right? RIGHT?

The first perplexing thing we noticed was that not a single one of the many, many websites, books or articles quoted the original source. Most didn’t give a source at all, some linked to each other. It seemed like the number was just accepted as a truism.

Very weird. Even worse and more suspicious was that the number was used inconsistently: some said it’s the total length of capillaries, some said it’s just veins plus arteries, and others cited it as the length of everything put together. Hm.

Something wasn't right. We couldn't let this go. Getting our facts straight is critical for what we do here and since we’ve used this fact ourselves a few times this now felt personal. We needed to find the original source and solve this research riddle.

There HAD to be an ORIGINAL source!

Random googling just turned up thousands of sites that quoted the number, no lead to the original. So we moved on to PUBMED, a search engine for biomedical science papers.

0 results. Ok weird. Maybe if we tried a few different key word combinations.

Nothing. Hm.

Hm. Ok finally, we found a bunch of scientific papers! But still, not a single one referenced the original source.

The number also showed up in two different biology textbooks. We contacted the authors but they told us that the number has been circulating for decades and they'd also be curious to know where it comes from.

Maybe we needed to go back to the olden days – so we narrowed our search to the last few decades, starting with the 1990s. And would you look at that…. we found two books!

“Vital Circuits” by Steven Vogel. And “Looking at the Body” by David Suzuki.

And it turned out Dr Suzuki is an OG science communicator with a PHD in Zoology, who started doing popular programming in the 1970s on Canadian television. He has 29 honorary degrees and has written 52 books. Impressive! He may either be the original source or at least know what it is!

So we ordered “Looking at the Body” to look for it… And here it is: “… If all the body’s blood vessels were laid end to end, they would stretch 96,000 km (60,000 miles). That’s about two and a half times around the world. … ” But again. No source. It turned out he’s still around doing things in his late 80s – so we thought maybe if we ask Dr. Suzuki personally, he might know where the number is from. He had no public email but ”A personal inquiry is possible by writing a letter to Dr. Suzuki.” Very old school, very respectable. So we wrote a letter!

Dear Dr. Suzuki, we are writing to you on a matter of grave importance. What is the original source for the 100,000 km? Our internet video and our sanity depend on it. Pretty please.

Respectfully yours, kurzgesagt fact checkers.

Three weeks later we actually got a reply: “Dear weird internet people, unfortunately Dr. Suzuki does not recall the source of this data. And since the book was written over 30 years ago, he doesn't have files that old available to look it up. Good luck with your project, you are going to need it.

Kind regards, Public Information Coordinator” Ok they didn't quite use these words and were actually really nice! But still: bummer.

Maybe the 1992 popular-science book by Steven Vogel, a Duke University biomechanics professor would be more helpful. It has this sentence: “Combined length of pipes: 100,000 kilometers (60,000 miles)—more than twice around the earth at the equator.” So the book talks about this on one of its 300 pages. But where is the source?

Unfortunately there's only a list of 93 references and sources with no indication where in the book they're pointing to. Our original source may be in one of the papers, books and articles in this list.

Ouch. Reading all of those would take weeks. Was this really worth it? Or had we gotten lost in the forest of human knowledge, looking for answers to questions nobody is asking and nobody cares about? But we’d wasted so much time already, so we decided to just do that one by one.

And now for a change we just got stupidly lucky. For no particular reason we decided to check the sources from last to first. And it turned out the very source we checked first, was what we were looking for! A Scientific American article from 1959: “The Microcirculation of the Blood”.

So we got a scan of this 65 year old science magazine and there it was – but this was still not the original source. But it did reference where it got the number from. “The Anatomy and Physiology of Capillaries” – a 1922 book by August Krogh, winner of a Nobel Prize for Medicine. He probably knew what he was talking about. So we ordered his book and bingo: we got the original source.

The book is a collection of Krogh’s lectures and was highly praised by experts at the time. It summarises his research and adds new experiments, ideas and hypotheses.

So here it was. The original source, used thousands of times for over a century: Supposing a man's muscles to weigh 50 kg and his capillaries to number 2000 per sq. mm., the total length of all these tubes put together must be something like 100,000 kilometers or 2 ½ times round the globe and their total surface 6300 sq. meters.

While other scientists had speculated on the length of all the capillaries before, Krogh was the first to make a real estimate, based on real experiments. Something very solid.

Ok. And now that we were here – was it correct?

Krogh’s book includes this rather cryptic table, without calculations or explanations. It seems to have been obvious to him but not to us looking at it a century later. We needed to actually read the book.

Book reading montage (maybe Zeitraffer) In a very breakthrough sciency kind of way, Krogh just winged it. In a nutshell, he cut muscle samples from different animals, started counting and made some rule of thumb assumptions. Today we know that his assumptions about the density of capillaries in humans was quite off. On top of that, he used a kind of idealised body builder human, weighing 143 kg with 50 kg of pure muscle mass. And this finally gave him the very pleasing number of 100,000 km.

It would be unfair to blame Krogh – this was just a small ancilliary fact he probably calculated for fun and out of curiosity, not elemental to his body of work. But he was a world expert, so his incorrect number was used in scientific papers, spread and became dogma, eventually entirely detached from the original source.

At this point in our research, over a year had passed. So just to be sure, we did another google search and… While we were caught up in our personal mission to find the source, up to the neck in old books, writing letters to Canada – scientists quietly published a paper, not really getting a lot of attention from anybody. They calculated a new number, a way more accurate estimate. If we had just waited another year, we could have saved doing all that work.

The deepest of sighs So now, here it is: According to the newest science, the length of all the capillaries in a human is somewhere between 9000 and 19,000 km. Very impressive but not enough to go around the world.

A Sort of Conclusion If you look up the question today, you'll likely still not find the real answer but thousands of sources, among them one kurzgesagt video, using the wrong number. And it will probably stay like that for a while.

In all this time, why did nobody bother to double check this? Well because the reality is, it’s extremely hard and time consuming. As we mentioned before it took us a year and a great deal of luck to get to the bottom of this on our own. Investing this time and effort while you’re writing a paper is just not feasible for most scientists or science communicators. If a number seems safe and is used by credible sources, most people, including us, end up quoting a secondary source or worse.

Also: it’s just such a nice, round number that will stick with you once you’ve heard it. Facts that seem beautiful tend to survive much longer.

But that is exactly the problem, isn’t it? The most interesting stories survive on the internet and often with each retelling, they get more exciting and memorable. It takes a lot of energy to get to the bottom of things, and a factoid is easily repeated, so misinformation can persist.

When we started this research we didn’t think we’d end up here. You, dear viewer, got a little peek into the kinds of mazes we have to navigate just to tell you our short sciency stories. They are as true as we can possibly make them. We'll run into the same traps as everybody else from time to time. But we are doing our best to correct misinformation, give more context, and to bring you the latest science on any topic we cover. See you next time!

Challenging common wisdom and following the evidence can sometimes lead you to places you don’t expect to end up. If you want to do more good in the world, approaching it like a scientist or a researcher could open up new ideas and career paths you didn’t know existed.

Today's sponsor 80,000 hours can help you on this journey… 80,000 hours is a nonprofit career advice organization that wants to help people find fulfilling careers that also do a lot of good in the world. And their advice is free, without any hidden cost or fee later on.

Like us, they care a lot about making sure their work is based on the best available evidence and consultation with experts. So they’ve spent the last decade compiling and conducting research into topics like "how much impact can one person actually have" and "what are the best ways to make a positive difference on important global issues". Turns out, following a well-known career path isn’t your only option to achieve that goal. In fact, there may be many paths that make an even bigger difference in the world that you may not have even heard of.

The time you’ll spend on your career is probably your biggest opportunity to have an impact. If you want to make the most of it, join the newsletter now and get a free copy of their in-depth career guide sent to your inbox - just sign up at 80000hours.org/inanutshell We love going down rabbit holes.

And while we try to navigate through all the misinformation growing rampant in our way, we follow a few core principles: We are not just copying what has been said by others before. We do not accept the first answer.

We’re always annoyingly persistent and look really, really, REALLY thoroughly.

But we are only able to pour this kind of time and effort into our work thanks to the continuous support of our patrons. They are a huge safety net for us and allow us to work on our videos until they are perfect. If you also want to support us in our mission of creating factful and reliable content that makes you go woah, come join our patreon flock. In return, you’ll receive perks like your own kurzgesagt birb, exclusive behind-the-scenes insights into our work or sneak peeks of our next topics.

Become a Patron – become a part of kurzgesagt and help us provide trustworthy science content on the internet.

App herunterladen

Alles, was du zum fließenden Sprechen brauchst

KI-AussprachebewertungJeder Satz bewertet

IPA-TrainingJeden Laut meistern

WortschatzBaue deinen Wortschatz auf

VokabelspielSpielend lernen

QR scannen

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

📺 Gleicher Kanal

✨ Empfohlenes Video

427 Sätze

The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

271 Sätze

Why Even Fit People Are At Risk of a Heart Attack

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

149 Sätze

The Bloody Origins of the Number Zero

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

215 Sätze

This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

710 Sätze

The truth about peptides, NAD, & other longevity treatments | Rachele Pojednic, Ph.D.

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

582 Sätze

You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

179 Sätze

Cicada 3301: An Internet Mystery

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

51 Sätze

What's Under Your Feet in New York City?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

54 Sätze

Traceroute: You're Probably Reading the Results Wrong

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

336 Sätze

Why Michael Jackson’s Death was 25 Years in the Making

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

47 Sätze

We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

80 Sätze

FINALLY: A Proof that Particles Take All Paths At Once?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

Über diese Lektion

In dieser Lektion werden Sie durch die Analyse eines interessanten Themas, das in dem Video "We Fell For The Oldest Lie On The Internet" behandelt wird, Ihre Englischkenntnisse verbessern. Der Fokus liegt auf der Erweiterung Ihres Wortschatzes und der Verbesserung Ihrer Englischen Aussprache. Es wird gezeigt, wie Fakten verbreitet und manchmal fehlerhaft zitiert werden. Durch das Üben mit diesem spannenden Inhalt können Sie Ihre Fähigkeiten im shadow speak stärken und die Ausdrücke in einem natürlichen Kontext anwenden.

Schlüsselvokabular & Phrasen

Fakten (facts)
Blutgefäße (blood vessels)
Ursprungsquelle (original source)
Forschung (research)
Schätzung (estimate)
Korrespondenz (correspondence)
Wissenschaftskommunikation (science communication)
Missinformation (misinformation)

Übungstipps

Um das meiste aus der Übung herauszuholen, verwenden Sie die Methode des shadowspeak. Hören Sie sich zunächst einen Abschnitt des Videos an, und wiederholen Sie dann sofort jede Zeile laut nach. Diese Technik hilft Ihnen, die richtige Betonung und Intonation zu erfassen. Achten Sie darauf, den Tonfall der Sprecher zu imitieren, da dieser oft die Bedeutung und den Ausdruck einer Aussage stark beeinflussen kann. Da das Video in einem leicht verständlichen Tempo präsentiert wird, ist es ideal für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene, die ihre Englische Aussprache verbessern möchten.

Zusätzlich können Sie das Video mehrmals ansehen, während Sie sich Notizen zu unbekannten Wörtern und Phrasen machen. Versuchen Sie, diese neuen Ausdrücke in Ihren eigenen Sätzen zu verwenden. Auf diese Weise können Sie aktiv mit dem Material arbeiten und sich gleichzeitig auf die Verbesserung Ihrer Sprechfähigkeit konzentrieren. Nutzen Sie unsere shadowing site für weitere Übungen, um Ihre Fähigkeiten im shadow speech weiter zu vertiefen.

Grammatik in diesem Video

Die Strukturen, die der Sprecher am häufigsten verwendet, mit den genauen Worten aus dem Video:

Struktur	Im Video
Passiv be + Partizip Perfekt – wichtig ist, was geschieht, nicht wer es tut	was just accepted · were laid · was written
Present Perfect have/has + Partizip Perfekt – eine vergangene Handlung, die jetzt noch wichtig ist	has written · you've heard · they've spent

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.

Shadowing-Technik: die vollständige Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung lesen →

Shadowing-Übung: We Fell For The Oldest Lie On The Internet - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Übungsmodus wählen

App herunterladen

Your Skeleton Is Electric

Why Ebola Keeps Coming Back

Your Brain Peaked at Birth

Could Humans Evolve Flight?

Would You Upload Your Mind?

Can Earth Run Out of Water?

What If You Never Slept?

The Beginning of Everything -- The Big Bang

The Rise of the Machines – Why Automation is Different this Time

Your Brain on Magic Mushrooms

The Most Complex Language in the World

Let’s Steal a New Moon

How Stress Changes Your Brain

What Happens AFTER Nuclear War?

3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Awesome! 3/3

Can We Stop the Extinction?

YOU Own the Moon. And Mars. And Venus.

The True Cost of War

What Is Life? Is Death Real?

How Antidepressants Work

The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet

Why Even Fit People Are At Risk of a Heart Attack

The Bloody Origins of the Number Zero

This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence

The truth about peptides, NAD, & other longevity treatments | Rachele Pojednic, Ph.D.

You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong

Cicada 3301: An Internet Mystery

What's Under Your Feet in New York City?

Traceroute: You're Probably Reading the Results Wrong

Why Michael Jackson’s Death was 25 Years in the Making

We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe

FINALLY: A Proof that Particles Take All Paths At Once?

Über diese Lektion

Schlüsselvokabular & Phrasen

Übungstipps

Grammatik in diesem Video

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?