Shadowing-Übung: White holes and wormholes are probably real. Here's why. - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Übungsmodus wählen

Jeder Modus öffnet einen Übungsraum im Vollbild.

440 Sätze
Wenn Sätze zu kurz oder zu lang sind, klicke auf Edit, um sie anzupassen.
1
You can never see anything enter a black hole.
2
Imagine you trap your nemesis in a rocket ship and blast him off towards a black hole.
3
He looks back at you, shaking his fist at a constant rate.
4
As he zooms in, gravity gets stronger, so you'd expect him to speed up.
5
But that is not what you see.
6
Instead, the rocket ship appears to be slowing down.
7
Not only that, he also appears to be shaking his fist slower and slower.
8
That's because, from your perspective, his time is slowing down.
9
At the very instant when he should cross the event horizon, the point beyond which not even light can escape,
10
he and his rocket ship do not disappear.
11
Instead, they seem to stop, frozen in time.
12
The light from the spaceship gets dimmer and redder until it completely fades from view.
13
This is how any object would look crossing the event horizon.
14
Light is still coming from the point where he crossed, it's just too redshifted to see.
15
But if you could see that light, then in theory you would see everything that has ever fallen into the black hole frozen on its horizon,
16
including the star that formed it.
17
But in practice, photons are emitted at discrete intervals,
18
so there will be a last photon emitted outside the horizon and therefore these images will fade after some time.
19
This is just one of the strange results that comes out of the general theory of relativity, our current best theory of gravity.
20
The first solution of Einstein's equations predicted not only black holes but also their opposite, white holes.
21
It also implied the existence of parallel universes and even possibly a way to travel between them.
22
This is a video about the real science of black holes, white holes, and wormholes.
23
The general theory of relativity arose at least in part due to a fundamental flaw in Newtonian gravity.
24
In the 1600s, Isaac Newton contemplated how an apple falls to the ground, how the moon orbits the earth and earth orbits the sun,
25
and he concluded that every object with mass must attract every other.
26
But Newton was troubled by his own theory.
27
How could masses separated by such vast distances apply a force on each other.
28
He wrote
29
that one body may act upon another at a distance through
30
a vacuum without the mediation of anything else is to me
31
so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has a competent faculty of thinking could ever fall into it.
32
One man who definitely had a competent faculty of thinking was Albert Einstein, and over 200 years later, he figured out how gravity is mediated.
33
Bodies do not exert forces on each other directly.
34
Instead, a mass like the sun curves the spacetime in its immediate vicinity.
35
This then curves the spacetime around it and so on all the way to the Earth.
36
So the Earth orbits the sun because the spacetime
37
Earth is passing through is curved.
38
Masses are affected by the local curvature of spacetime, so no action at a distance is required.
39
Mathematically, this is described by Einstein's field equations.
40
Can you write down the Einstein field equation?
41
This was the result of Einstein's decade of hard work after special relativity.
42
And essentially what we've got in the field equations, on one side it says, tell me about the distribution of matter and energy.
43
The other side tells you what the resultant curvature of space -time is from that distribution of matter and energy.
44
And it's a single line, it looks like, oh, this is a simple equation, right?
45
But it's not really one equation, it's a family of equations.
46
And to make life more difficult, they are coupled equations, so they depend upon each other.
47
And they are differential equations, so it means that there are integrals that have to be done, da -da -da.
48
So there's a whole bunch of steps that you need to do to solve the field equations.
49
To see what a solution to these equations would look like, we need a tool to understand spacetime.
50
So imagine you're floating around in empty space.
51
A flash of light goes off above your head and spreads out in all directions.
52
Now your entire future, anything that can and will ever happen to you, will occur within this bubble.
53
Because the only way to get out of it would be to travel faster than light.
54
In two dimensions, this bubble is just a growing circle.
55
If we allow time to run up the screen and take snapshots at regular intervals,
56
then this light bubble traces out a cone, your future light cone.
57
By convention, the axes are scaled so that light rays always travel at 45 degrees.
58
This cone reveals the only region of space -time that you can ever hope to explore and influence.
59
Now imagine that instead of a flash of light above your head, those photons were actually traveling in from all corners of the universe,
60
and they met at that instant and then continued traveling on in their separate directions.
61
Well, in that case, then into the past, these photons also reveal a light cone, your past light cone.
62
Only events that happened inside this cone could have affected you up to the present moment.
63
We can simplify this diagram even further by plotting just one spatial and one time dimension.
64
This is the spacetime diagram of empty space.
65
If you want to measure how far part two events are in spacetime, you use something called the spacetime interval.
66
The interval squared is equal to minus dt squared plus dx squared.
67
Since spacetime is flat, the geometry is the same everywhere, and so this formula holds throughout the entire diagram,
68
which makes it really easy to measure the separation between any two events.
69
But around a mass, spacetime is curved, and therefore you need to modify the equation to take into account the geometry.
70
This is what solutions to Einstein's equations are like.
71
They tell you how spacetime curves and how to measure the separation between two events in that curved geometry.
72
Einstein published his equations in 1915 during the First World War, but he couldn't find an exact solution.
73
Luckily, a copy of his paper made its way to the Eastern Front, where Germany was fighting Russia.
74
Stationed there was one of the best astrophysicists of the time, Carl Schwarzschild.
75
Despite being 41 years old, he had volunteered to calculate artillery trajectories for the German army.
76
At least until a greater challenge caught his attention.
77
How to solve Einstein's field equations.
78
Schwarzschild did the standard physicist thing and imagined the simplest possible scenario.
79
An eternal static universe with nothing in it except a single, spherically symmetric point mass.
80
This mass was electrically neutral and not rotating.
81
Since this was the only feature of his universe, he measured everything using spherical coordinates relative to the center of this mass,
82
so r is the radius and theta and phi give the angles.
83
For his time coordinate, he chose time as being measured by someone far away from the mass, where spacetime is essentially flat.
84
Using this approach, Schwarzschild found the first non -trivial solution to Einstein's equations, which nowadays we write like this.
85
This Schwarzschild metric describes how spacetime curves outside of the mass.
86
It's pretty simple and makes intuitive sense.
87
Far away from the mass, spacetime is nearly flat, but as you get closer and closer to it, spacetime becomes more and more curved,
88
it attracts objects in, and time runs slower.
89
Schwarzschild sent his solution to Einstein, concluding with, The war treated me kindly enough, in spite of the heavy gunfire,
90
to allow me to get away from it all and take this walk in the land of your ideas.
91
Einstein replied, I have read your paper with the utmost interest.
92
I had not expected that one could formulate the exact solution to the problem in such a simple way.
93
But what seemed at first quite simple soon became more complicated.
94
Shortly after Schwarzschild's solution was published, people noticed two problem spots.
95
At the center of the mass, at r equals zero, this term is divided by zero, so it blows up to infinity,
96
and therefore this equation breaks down and it can no longer describe what's physically happening.
97
This is what's called a singularity.
98
Maybe that point could be excused because it's in the middle of the mass, but there's another problem spot outside of it.
99
At a special distance from the center, known as the Schwarzschild radius, this term blows up.
100
So there is a second singularity.
101
What is going on here?
102
Well, at the Schwarzschild radius, the spacetime curvature becomes so steep that the escape velocity, the speed that anything would need to leave there,
103
is the speed of light.
104
And that would mean that inside the Schwarzschild radius, nothing, not even light, would be able to escape.
105
So you'd have this dark object that swallows up matter and light.
106
A black hole, if you will.
107
But most scientists doubted that such an object could exist, because it would require a lot of mass to collapse down into a tiny space.
108
How could that possibly ever happen?
109
Astronomers at the time were studying what happens at the end of a star's life.
110
During its lifetime, the inward force of gravity is balanced by the outward radiation pressure created by the energy released through nuclear fusion.
111
But when the fuel runs out, the radiation pressure drops, so gravity pulls all the star material inwards.
112
But how far?
113
Most astronomers believed some physical process would hold it up.
114
And in 1926, Ralph Fowler came up with a possible mechanism.
115
Pauli's exclusion principle states that fermions, like electrons, cannot occupy the same state.
116
So as matter gets pushed closer and closer together, the electrons each occupy their own tiny volumes.
117
But Heisenberg's uncertainty principle says that you can't know the position and momentum of a particle with absolute certainty.
118
So as the particles become more and more constrained in space, the uncertainty in their momentum, and hence their velocity, must go up.
119
So, the more a star is compressed, the faster electrons will wiggle around and that creates an outward pressure.
120
This electron degeneracy pressure would prevent the star from collapsing completely.
121
Instead, it would form a white dwarf with a density much higher than a normal star.
122
And remarkably enough, astronomers had observed stars that fit this description.
123
One of them was Sirius B.
124
But the relief from this discovery was short -lived.
125
Four years later, 19 -year -old Subramanian Chandrasekhar traveled by boat to England to study with Fowler and Arthur Eddington,
126
one of the most revered scientists of the time.
127
During his voyage, Chandrasekhar realized that electron degeneracy pressure has its limits.
128
Electrons can wiggle faster and faster, but only up to the speed of light.
129
That means this effect can only support stars up to a certain mass, the Chandrasekhar limit.
130
Beyond this, Chandrasekhar believed not even electron degeneracy pressure could prevent a star from collapsing.
131
But Eddington was not impressed.
132
He publicly blasted Chandrasekhar, saying, there should be a law of nature to prevent a star from behaving in this absurd way.
133
And indeed, scientists did discover a way that stars heavier than the Chandrasekhar limit could support themselves.
134
When a star collapses beyond a white dwarf, electrons and protons fuse together to form neutrinos and neutrons.
135
These neutrons are also fermions, but with nearly 2 ,000 times the mass of an electron, their degeneracy pressure is even stronger.
136
So this is what holds up neutron stars.
137
There was this conviction among scientists that
138
But even if we didn't know the mechanism, something would prevent a star from collapsing into a single point and forming a black hole.
139
Because black holes were just too preposterous to be real.
140
The big blow to this belief came in the late 1930s, when J.
141
Robert Oppenheimer and George Volkoff found that neutron stars also have a maximum mass.
142
Shortly after, Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder showed that for the heaviest stars, there is nothing left to save them when their fuel runs out.
143
They wrote, this contraction will continue indefinitely.
144
But Einstein still couldn't believe it.
145
Oppenheimer was saying that stars can collapse indefinitely, but when Einstein looked at the math,
146
he found that time freezes on the horizon so it seemed like nothing could ever enter, which suggested that either there's something we don't understand,
147
or that black holes can't exist.
148
But Oppenheimer offered a solution to the problem.
149
He said to an outside observer, you could never see anything go in, but if you were traveling across the event horizon,
150
you wouldn't notice anything unusual, and you'd go right past it without even knowing it.
151
So, how is this possible?
152
We need a spacetime diagram of a black hole.
153
On the left is the singularity at r equals zero.
154
The dotted line at r equals 2m is the event horizon.
155
Since the black hole doesn't move, these lines go straight up in time.
156
Now, let's see how ingoing and outgoing light rays travel in this curved geometry.
157
When you're really far away, the future light cones are at the usual 45 degrees.
158
But as you get closer to the horizon, the light cones get narrower and narrower.
159
Until right at the event horizon, they're so narrow that they point straight up.
160
And inside the horizon, the light cones tip to the left.
161
But something strange happens with ingoing light rays.
162
They fall in, but they don't get to r equals 2m.
163
They actually asymptote to that value as time goes to infinity.
164
But they don't end at infinity, right?
165
Mathematically, they are connected and come back in, and they're traveling in this direction.
166
And this bothered a lot of people.
167
It's bothered people like Einstein, because he looked at these equations and went, well, if nothing can cross this sort of boundary,
168
then how could there be black holes?
169
How could black holes even form?
170
So what is going on here?
171
Well, what's important to recognize is that this diagram is a projection.
172
It's basically a 2D map of four -dimensional curved spacetime.
173
It's just like projecting the 3D Earth onto a 2D map.
174
When you do that, you always get distortions.
175
There is no perfectly accurate way to map the Earth onto a 2D surface, but different maps can be useful for different purposes.
176
For example, if you want to keep angles and shapes the same, like if you're sailing across the ocean and you need to find your bearings,
177
you can use the Mercator projection.
178
That's the one Google Maps uses.
179
A downside is that it misrepresents sizes.
180
Africa and Greenland look about the same size, but Africa is actually around 14 times larger.
181
The Gall -Peters projection keeps relative sizes accurate, but as a result, angles and shapes are distorted.
182
In a similar way, we can make different projections of 4D space -time to study different properties of it.
183
Physical reality doesn't change, but the way the map describes it does.
184
He had chosen to put a particular coordinate system over space and have a time coordinate, and off you go.
185
It's the most sensible thing to do, right?
186
People realized that if you choose a different coordinate system by doing a coordinate substitution, then the singularity at the event horizon disappears.
187
It goes away.
188
That problem goes away.
189
And things can actually cross into the black hole.
190
What this tells us is that there is no real physical singularity at the event horizon.
191
It just resulted from a poor choice of coordinate system.
192
Another way to visualize what's going on is by describing space as flowing in towards the black hole, like a waterfall.
193
As you get closer, space starts flowing in faster and faster.
194
Photons emitted by the spaceship have to swim against this flow.
195
And this becomes harder and harder the closer you get.
196
Photons emitted just outside the horizon can barely make it out, but it takes longer and longer.
197
At the horizon, space falls in as fast as the photons are swimming.
198
So if the horizon had a finite width, then photons would get stuck here.
199
Photons from everything that ever fell in.
200
But the horizon is infinitely thin, so in reality, photons either eventually escape or fall in.
201
Inside the horizon, space falls faster than the speed of light, and so everything falls into the singularity.
202
So Oppenheimer was right.
203
Someone outside a black hole can never see anything enter, because the last photons they can see will always be from just outside the horizon.
204
But if you yourself go, you will fall right across the event horizon and into the singularity.
205
Now, you can extend the waterfall model to cover all three spatial dimensions, and that gives you this.
206
A real simulation of space flowing into a static black hole, made by my friend Alessandro from Science Click.
207
Later, we'll use this model to see what it's like falling into a rotating black hole.
208
Now, I've never been sucked into a black hole, but sometimes it feels like it when I'm stuck on the phone with a spam caller.
209
Fortunately, today's sponsor, Incogni, can help.
210
You know, I used to get several spam calls a day,
211
and they frustrated me so much that I wrote a letter to the Do Not Call Registry to get my number removed.
212
But that didn't work, and so I wanted to go on the offensive.
213
I even contemplated making a video where I just mess with
214
spam callers to get some revenge for all the frustration and lost time.
215
But I no longer have to do that thanks to Incogni.
216
There are a lot of data brokers out there that suck up information about you a bit like a black hole.
217
They collect things like your name, phone number, email address, and even your social security number.
218
And then they sell this information on the open market.
219
Which is why we often get calls from people that we've never even given our number to.
220
Incogni battles these data brokers.
221
You simply give them permission and they figure out who out there has your data, which laws apply,
222
and then they send them the right letter with the correct
223
legal terms to each data broker with the request to remove your information.
224
Now, you could do this yourself, but it's a super tedious process that would take days,
225
weeks, even months, and then you'd have to keep doing it forever.
226
So that's something I definitely don't have the time and energy for.
227
But Incogni makes this really easy.
228
Just sign up and they'll give you a list of companies that have your data, the severity of each claim, and the status of each request.
229
So far they have filed 126 requests for me, 83 of which have been completed, saving me over 62 hours of work.
230
But the best part is since I signed up, I've hardly gotten any more spam calls.
231
So to try Incogni and fight against the data brokers, visit incogni .com.
232
You can click that link down in the description or scan the QR code right here.
233
And make sure to use the code VERITASIUM to get 60 % off.
234
So head over to incogni .com slash VERITASIUM to get started.
235
I want to thank Incogni for sponsoring this part of the video.
236
And now, back to Spacetime Maps.
237
If you take this map and transform it so that incoming
238
and outgoing light rays all travel at 45 degrees like we're used to, then something fascinating happens.
239
The black hole singularity on the left transforms into a curved line at the top.
240
And since the future always points up in this map, it tells us that the singularity is not actually a place in space.
241
Instead, it's a moment in time.
242
The very last moment in time for anything that enters a black hole.
243
The map we've just created is a Kruskal -Zecher's diagram, but this only represents a portion of the universe,
244
the part inside the black holes of Enthorizon and the part of the universe closest to it.
245
But what we can do is contract the whole universe, the infinite past, infinite distance, and infinite future, and morph it into a single map.
246
It's like using the universe's best fisheye lens.
247
That gives us this Henrose diagram.
248
Again, light rays still always go at 45 degrees, so the future always points up.
249
The infinite past is in the bottom of the diagram, the infinite future at the top, and the sides on the right are infinitely far away.
250
The black hole singularity is now a straight line at the top, a final moment in time.
251
These lines are all at the same distance from the black hole.
252
So the singularity is at r equals zero, the horizon is at r equals 2m, this line is at r equals 4m,
253
and this is infinitely far away.
254
All of these lines are at the same time.
255
What's great about this map is
256
that it's very easy to see where you can still go and what could have affected you.
257
For example, when you're here, you've got a lot of freedom.
258
You can enter the black hole or fly off to infinity.
259
And you can see and receive information from this area.
260
But if you go beyond the horizon, your only possible future is to meet the singularity.
261
You can still, however, see and receive information from the universe.
262
You just can't send any back out.
263
Now, think about being at this point in the map.
264
This is at the event horizon, and now your entire future is within the black hole.
265
But what is the past of this moment?
266
Well, you can draw the past light cone, and it reveals this new region.
267
If you're inside this region, you can send signals to the universe, but no matter where you are in the universe,
268
nothing can ever enter this region, because it will never be inside your light cone so things can come out but never go in.
269
This is the opposite of a black hole, a white hole.
270
What color is a white hole?
271
I mean, it's going to be the...
272
It's not going to have a color, right?
273
It's going to be whatever's being spat out of it.
274
It depends what's in there and gets thrown out.
275
That's what you are going to see.
276
So if it's got light in there, it's got mass in there, it's all going to be ejected.
277
So the white hole kind of picture is the time reverse picture of a black hole.
278
Instead of things falling in, things get expelled outwards.
279
And so whilst a black hole has a membrane, the schwarze horizon, which once you cross you can't get back out,
280
the white hole has the opposite.
281
If you're inside the event horizon you have to be ejected.
282
So it kicks you out kind of thing, right?
283
Relativity doesn't tell you which way time flows.
284
There's nothing in there that says that that is the future and that is the past.
285
When you're doing your mathematics
286
and you're working out the behavior of objects you make a choice about
287
which direction is the future but mathematically you could have chosen the other way, right?
288
You could have had time point in the opposite direction.
289
Any solution that you find in relativity mathematically you can just flip it
290
and get a time reverse solution and that's also a solution to the equations.
291
Now, we've been showing things being ejected to the right, but they could just as well be ejected to the left.
292
So what's over there?
293
This line is not at infinity, so there should be something beyond it.
294
If we eject things in this direction, you find that they enter a whole new universe.
295
One parallel to our own.
296
We can fall into this black hole
297
and somebody in this universe here could fall into this black hole in their universe
298
and we would find ourselves in the same black hole.
299
The only downside is that we'd both soon end up in the singularity.
300
I guess I'm just trying to understand where
301
that universe appears in the mathematical part of the solution like can you point to the part of the equation
302
and be like so that's that's our universe and then
303
these terms here that's the other universe
304
or do you know what i mean like well
305
it's it's coordinates right imagine somebody right came up with a coordinate system for the earth
306
but only the northern hemisphere and you looked at
307
that coordinate system right and you looked at it
308
and you said ah i can see the coordinate system it looks fine but mathematically latitudes can be negative, right?
309
You've only got positive latitudes in your solution.
310
What about the negative ones?
311
And they say to you, negative ones?
312
No southern hemisphere, right?
313
And you've got to go, well, the mathematics says that you can have negative latitudes.
314
Maybe we should go and look over the equator to see if there is something down there.
315
And I know that's a kind of extreme example, because we know we live on a globe,
316
but we don't know the full geometry of what's going on here in the sense
317
that Schwarzschild laid down coordinates over part of the solution.
318
It was like him only laying down coordinates on the Northern Hemisphere.
319
And other people have come along and said, hey, there's a Southern Hemisphere.
320
And more than that, there's two Earths.
321
That's why it's called maximal extension.
322
It's like, if I have this mathematical structure, then what is the extent of the coordinates that I can consider?
323
and with the Schwarzschild black hole you get a second universe that has its own independent set of coordinates from our universe.
324
I want to emphasize, right, this is the simplest solution to the Einstein field equations and it already contains a black hole,
325
white hole and two universes.
326
That's what you get when you push this map to its limits so that every edge ends at a singularity or infinity.
327
And in fact there's another little feature in here which is that that little point there where they cross.
328
That is an Einstein -Rosen bridge.
329
To see it, we need to change coordinates.
330
Now, this line is at constant Kruskal time, and it connects the space of both universes.
331
You can see what the spacetime is like by following this line from right to left.
332
Far away from the event horizon, spacetime is basically flat, but as you get closer to the event horizon, spacetime starts to curve more and more.
333
At this cross you're at the event horizon and if you go beyond it you end up in the parallel universe.
334
That gives you a wormhole that looks like this.
335
So that is hypothetically how we could use a black hole to travel from one universe to another.
336
Hypothetically because these wormholes aren't actually stable in time.
337
It's a bit like a bridge, but it's a bridge that is long and then becomes shorter and then becomes long again.
338
And if you try to traverse this bridge, at some point the bridge is only very short, right?
339
And you say, well, let me just cross this bridge.
340
But as you start crossing the bridge and start running, your speed is finite, right?
341
The speed of light roughing.
342
And then the bridge starts becoming stretching and you never come out the other side.
343
This pinching off always happens too fast for anything to travel through.
344
You can also see this if you look at the Penrose diagram, because when you're inside one universe,
345
there isn't a light cone that can take you to the other universe.
346
The only way to do that would be to travel faster than light.
347
But there might be another way.
348
Schwarzschild's solution describes a black hole that doesn't rotate.
349
Yet every star does rotate, and since angular momentum must be conserved, every black hole must also be rotating.
350
While Schwarzschild found his solution within weeks after Einstein published his equations, solving them for a spinning mass turned out to be much harder.
351
Physicists tried, but 10 years after Schwarzschild's solution, they still hadn't solved it.
352
10 years turned into 20, which turned into 40.
353
And then in 1963, Roy Kerr found the solution to Einstein's equations for a spinning black hole,
354
which is far more complicated than Schwarzschild's solution.
355
And this comes with a few dramatic changes.
356
The first is that the structure is completely different.
357
The black hole now consists of several layers.
358
It's also not spherically symmetric anymore.
359
This happens because the rotation causes it to bulge around the equator, so it's only symmetric about its axis of spin.
360
Alessandro from Science Click simulated what happens around this spinning black hole.
361
Space gets.. dragged around with the black hole, taking you and the particles along with it.
362
When you get closer, space gets dragged around faster and faster, until it goes around faster than the speed of light.
363
You've now entered into the first new region, the ergosphere.
364
No matter how hard you fire your rockets here, it's impossible to stay still relative to distant stars.
365
But because space doesn't flow directly inward, you can still escape the black hole.
366
When you travel in further, you go through the next layer, the outer horizon, the point of no return.
367
Here you can only go inwards.
368
But as you get dragged in deeper and deeper, something crazy happens.
369
You enter another region, one where you can move around freely again.
370
So you're not doomed to the singularity.
371
You're now inside the inner event horizon.
372
Here you can actually see the singularity.
373
In a normal black hole it's a point, but in a rotating black hole it actually expands out to be a ring.
374
And there are weird things that happen with spacetime inside the center of a black hole,
375
a rotating black hole, but it's thought that you can actually fly through the singularity.
376
We need a Penrose diagram of a spinning black hole.
377
Where before, the singularity was a horizontal line at the top, here the singularity lifts up and moves to the sides,
378
revealing this new region inside the inner horizon.
379
Here, we can move around freely and avoid the singularity.
380
But these edges aren't at infinity or a singularity, so there must be something beyond them.
381
Well, when you venture further, you could find yourself in a white hole, which would push you out into a whole nother universe.
382
You can have these pictures whereby you're in one universe, you fall into a rotating black hole, you fly through the singularity,
383
and you pop out into a new universe from a white hole.
384
And then you can just continue playing this game.
385
Extending this diagram infinitely far.
386
But there is still one thing we haven't done, brave the singularity.
387
So you aim straight towards the center of the ring and head off towards it.
388
But rather than time ending, you now find yourself in another universe.
389
A strange universe, one where gravity pushes instead of pulls.
390
This is known as an antiverse.
391
If that's too weird, you can always jump back across the singularity and return to a universe with normal gravity.
392
And I know this is basically science fiction, right?
393
But if you take the solutions of relativity at, you know, essentially at face value and add on a little bit,
394
which is what Penrose does here, says, oh look, these shapes are very similar, I can just stick these together,
395
then this is the conclusion that you get.
396
Now we have effectively an infinite number of universes all connected with black hole, white holes all the way through and you often go to explore.
397
But it'll be a very brave person who's the first one
398
who's going to leap into a rotating black hole to find out if this is correct.
399
Yeah, I would not sign up for that.
400
So could these maximally extended Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions actually exist in nature?
401
Well there are some issues.
402
Both the extended Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions are solutions of eternal black holes in an empty universe.
403
As you say it's an eternal solution.
404
So it stretches infinitely far into the past and infinitely far into the future.
405
And so there's no formation mechanism in there, it's just a static solution.
406
And I think that is part of the reason why black holes are realized in our universe and white holes aren't.
407
Or might not be.
408
Or might not be.
409
Well, I'm reasonably confident that they don't exist, right?
410
For the maximally extended
411
Kerr solution, there's also another problem.
412
If you're an immortal astronaut inside the universe, you can send light into the black hole.
413
But because there's infinite time compressed in this top corner, you can pile up light along this edge,
414
which creates an infinite flux of energy along the inner horizon.
415
This concentration of energy then creates its own singularity, sealing off the ring singularity and beyond.
416
My suspicion, and the suspicion of some other people in the field,
417
is that this inner horizon will become singular and you will not be able to go through these second copies.
418
So all the white holes, wormholes, other universes and anti -universes disappear.
419
Does that mean that real wormholes are impossible?
420
In 1987, Michael Morris and Kip Thorne looked at wormholes that an advanced civilization could use for interstellar travel.
421
Ones that have no horizons so you can travel back and forth,
422
are stable in time, and have some other properties like being able to construct them.
423
They found several geometries that are allowed by Einstein's general relativity.
424
In theory, these could connect different parts of the universe, making a sort of interstellar highway.
425
They might even be able to connect to different universes.
426
The only problem is
427
that all these geometries require an exotic kind of matter with a negative energy density to prevent the wormhole from collapsing.
428
This exotic kind of matter is really against the laws of physics, so it's...
429
I have the prejudice that it will not exist.
430
I'm bothered by the fact that we say that the science fiction wormholes are mathematically possible.
431
It's true it's mathematically possible in the sense that there's some geometry that can exist, but Einstein's theory is not just geometries.
432
It's geometries plus field equations.
433
If you use the kinds of properties of matter that matter actually has, then they are not possible.
434
So I feel that the reason they are not possible is very strong.
435
So according to our current best understanding it seems likely that white holes, traversable wormholes, and these parallel universes don't exist.
436
But we also used to think that black holes didn't exist, so maybe we'll be surprised again.
437
I mean, we have one universe, right?
438
Good.
439
Why can't we have two?
440
Thank you.

App herunterladen

Alles, was du zum fließenden Sprechen brauchst

KI-AussprachebewertungJeder Satz bewertet
IPA-TrainingJeden Laut meistern
WortschatzBaue deinen Wortschatz auf
VokabelspielSpielend lernen

Gleicher Kanal

FOR YOU

Empfohlenes Video

Wortschatz und Sprechhinweise zu dieser Lektion

Diese Sprechübung basiert auf dem Video „White holes and wormholes are probably real. Here's why“. Diese Wörter kommen am häufigsten vor: hole, universe, horizon, solution, singularity. Dieses Video enthält 440 Sätze und 5851 Wörter zum Nachsprechen. Der gesprochene Teil dauert 37:00. Der Sprecher spricht in natürlichem Tempo, etwa 158 Wörter pro Minute, ähnlich wie im Alltagsgespräch. Nur 81 % der Wörter gehören zu den 3.000 häufigsten im Englischen, der Wortschatz ist also anspruchsvoll.

Wichtiger Wortschatz in diesem Video

15 lernenswerte Wörter aus dem Video, mit Aussprache und Bedeutung:

WortAusspracheBedeutung
horizon Substantiv/həˈɹaɪ.zən/Horizont, Kimm
equation Substantiv/ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/Ausgleich, Gleichgewicht
coordinate Verb/koʊˈɔɹ.dəˌneɪt/koordinieren, abstimmen
cone Substantiv/ˈkoʊn/Kegel, Kegelmantel
curve Substantiv/kɚv/Kurve
diagram Substantiv/ˈdaɪ.ə.ɡɹæm/Diagramm
geometry Substantiv/d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/Geometrie, Raumlehre
rotate Verb/ˈɹoʊ.teɪt/sich drehen, rotieren
gravity Substantiv/ˈɡɹævɪti/Bedenklichkeit, Ernst
infinite Adjektiv/ˈɪnfɪnɪt/unendlich, endlos
infinity Substantiv/ɪnˈfɪnɪti/Unendlichkeit
collapse Verb/kəˈlæps/einstürzen, kollabieren
spin Verb/spɪn/rotieren, schleudern
parallel Adjektiv/ˈpæ.ɹəˌlɛl/parallel
spam Substantiv/spæm/Spam

Phrasal Verbs, die du hören wirst

WortAusspracheBedeutung
come out Verb/ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/herauskommen
come up with Verbausdenken
figure out Verbherausfinden
go away Verbweggehen, fortgehen
run out Verbausgehen
slow down Verbverlangsamen
back out Verbsich zurückziehen, aussteigen
blow up Verbsprengen, explodieren

Sätze zum Wiederholen

Kurze, vollständige Sätze aus dem Video, die du im Alltag wiederverwenden kannst:

  • You just can't send any back out.
  • I mean, it's going to be the...
  • That's what you are going to see.
  • Relativity doesn't tell you which way time flows.
  • Why can't we have two?

Grammatik in diesem Video

Die Strukturen, die der Sprecher am häufigsten verwendet, mit den genauen Worten aus dem Video:

StrukturIm Video
Bedingungssätze if + Satz, will/would + Verb – eine Bedingung und ihre Folgeif you yourself go, you will fall
„Used to“ used to + Verb – eine frühere Gewohnheit oder ein Zustand, der nicht mehr giltused to get · used to think
Passiv be + Partizip Perfekt – wichtig ist, was geschieht, nicht wer es tutare emitted · was troubled · is mediated
Present Perfect have/has + Partizip Perfekt – eine vergangene Handlung, die jetzt noch wichtig isthas ever fallen · have read · I've never been sucked

Aussprache, auf die du achten solltest

Der Sprecher verwendet 69 Kurzformen und abgeschwächte Formen, zum Beispiel you're, don't, can't. Sprich sie in der kurzen Form, so wie du sie hörst.

  • Die „th“-Laute: bother /ˈbɑðɚ/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, thin /ˈθɪn/
  • Die Laute „sh“ und „zh“: equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, essentially /ɪˈsɛnʃəli/, projection /pɹəˈd͡ʒɛkʃən/, shortly /ˈʃɔɹtli/, flash /flæʃ/
  • Lange Wörter – auf die Betonung achten: coordinate /koʊˈɔɹ.dəˌneɪt/, geometry /d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/, infinity /ɪnˈfɪnɪti/, infinitely /ˈɪnfɪnɪtli/, essentially /ɪˈsɛnʃəli/

Laute, die Deutschsprachigen schwerfallen:

  • /w/ — mit runden Lippen, nicht wie das deutsche „w“ (/v/): equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, waterfall /ˈwɔːtəfɔːl/, outward /ˈaʊt.wɚd/, whilst /waɪlst/, swim /swɪm/
  • Stimmhafter Auslaut — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ am Wortende nicht verhärten: curve /kɚv/, relative /ˈɹɛl.ə.tɪv/, drag /dɹæɡ/, latitude /ˈlætɪtud/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/
  • /æ/ — offener als „ä“: diagram /ˈdaɪ.ə.ɡɹæm/, gravity /ˈɡɹævɪti/, collapse /kəˈlæps/, parallel /ˈpæ.ɹəˌlɛl/, spam /spæm/

So übst du mit diesem Video

  1. Höre dir das ganze Video einmal an, ohne zu sprechen, und notiere die Wörter, die du nicht kennst.
  2. Beginne mit 0,75-facher Geschwindigkeit, sprich Satz für Satz nach und wechsle zur normalen Geschwindigkeit, sobald es leichtfällt.
  3. Nimm dich auf und vergleiche mit dem Original; achte dabei auf Wörter wie horizon, equation, coordinate.

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.

Shadowing-Technik: die vollständige Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung lesen →