シャドーイング練習: F-15 Pilot Breaks Down Iran's SECRET Missile Bunkers - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。

333 文

文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。

having such kind of intimate knowledge and experience with

that procedure now watching it unfold firsthand how well does

that line up and what has surprised you and

and not surprised you yeah well i think there was a there's a big part of me

that has the fomo right like i studied this i wish i was there

but then i step outside of my own ego

and my own desires of like what does ryan want

and i'm like oh maybe my place was to kind of share with the American people what this adversary is

that we're actually going up against and how hard of a challenge this is for our warfighters.

They're totally capable and able to do it, but this is a real problem.

They've gotten to the point where they're really strong.

I started to see that

when I was teaching it was how much of their shadow fleet and shadow orientation for their economy propped up the IRGC.

I was like, why is there so much of a shadow infrastructure to pump money into the IRGC?

And why are they getting 60, 70 % of the revenue going right to these top guys?

I don't get it.

And so I think that it just was kind of like it's the mind of the Ayatollah being represented in the military.

The military hardware they have is all built for proxy warfare, if you really think about it.

I mean, we took out their massive military systems, Blue Water Navy, surface air missile systems for the most part uh some of their headquarters buildings command

and control nodes pretty much in the first couple weeks right

but their whole system was built for proxy warfare and

so what i was most kind of taken aback by was

how resilient their systems are to once the war starts like

it's like they kind of know they see the writing on the wall

that their whole their main military force is going to be crushed

and so then they immediately have second third fourth fifth sixth uh ways of fighting back right

and a lot of it's dispersed ballistic missile bunkers you know

if people come to my live streams you can see

that like we'll go on a live stream

and we'll just look across one little chunk of the country

and there'll be five different uh areas where there's 50 plus

ballistic missile bunkers where they just pull out a missile launch it

and go back in and i started to see too how like north korea

and iran the the tactics iran was kind of taking from

north korea north korea seemed to kind of have perfected it with triple a

and so it was really cool to be able to take the different war plans

and kind of war game them against each other like okay

how are these people going to learn from each other

because you know birds of a feather flock together right and

so in north korea they have AAA pieces that pull out of a hill and they can launch at Seoul.

Estimates are 500 ,000 people would be dead in the first 72 hours in that conflict, right?

Because they're going to launch so much artillery at Seoul and it's right there.

So Iran's version of that is the ballistic missiles where they have done the same exact technique, but not as many pieces, not as many AAA pieces as North Korea,

but their ballistic missiles are doing the same thing, at least in their minds.

That's what they hope for is to hit their neighbors hard enough, hit our bases hard enough that everybody just backs off

and this was light this was a light

and it wasn't nothing right we still see them launching ballistic missiles

but their goal their stated goal is 10 000 plus ballistic

missiles people can back me up on the exact numbers i

i want to say they started the conflict with like 2 000 something like

that but their goal is 10 000 and 100 000 plus drones

but the numbers i saw was they started with 2 000 ballistic missiles and maybe close to 50 000 drones.

Yeah.

From what you planned and kind of what was anticipated versus what's actually happening, does that line up pretty well?

Or are there some things, I mean, I know you mentioned their resiliency surprised you, but was that not anticipated in the planning?

Like, I guess from

somebody in your position or the higher up who's going to be putting

that package on the president or Joint Chief's desk and saying, here's what day one, two, five, six months looks like.

Do you think that it was predicted accurately, or are we pretty surprised where things are at right now?

I think it was predicted pretty accurately, but I think there were surprises in certain places.

So the Section 2 or whatever of that O plan is the proxy warfare phase.

So Section 1, you know, here's the force on force.

Section 2 is like way thicker, and it's this.

So I think the plan that was put on the president's desk was like, POTUS, this is going to wind down in like three to four weeks for the main military force.

But then this is going to kick up and hockey stick when it comes to the proxy warfare.

But maybe POTUS at that point was like, well, we're going to make a deal with them anyways.

So, you know, but then it turns out the IRGC is fully embedded like a mafia.

Right.

And so maybe that was a little more surprising where a lot of their front facing.

And I even kind of felt this with seeing a lot of their front -facing leaders.

They're convincing.

They're relatively good at gaslighting, right, where they seem like normal politicians.

But they're all IRGC guys that are all skilled in IOs, information operations.

So maybe that the - So politicians.

Yeah, I guess you're right.

Yeah, I guess we nailed it.

But yeah, I think that might have been maybe the inability to negotiate with them maybe didn't get communicated as well.

Maybe it did.

I don't know but i think the proxy warfare was definitely communicated

but the one thing i would say is what's changed for me

when i was in to now was the drones

because there were drones right as we studied their plans

but a lot of it was more fast attack boats

that would be remote control uh they would be more of

a fast attack boat drone focus where they would launch 500

or whatever of these fast attack boats with explosives

and try to take out the carrier uh so

that was kind of the main thing

that i saw with some drone stuff definitely ballistic missiles was a part of it

but also at the time the ballistic missiles that

that we studied weren't as accurate because they weren't i don't know

if we were understanding at the time

that they were going to get some advanced technology from russia

and china with electro -optical seekers and different things like that

and so i think just like the enemy always does right the enemy has a vote they're going to adapt and

so that's what i think they've done over the last five

ten years is get more accurate with their ballistic missiles and their drones, and they've taken money that's been given to them for decades,

and they've just consistently increased their military capability.

So this can has been kicked down the road so long

100

that now you're fighting a much more resilient Iran proxy warfare -wise than I think we would have

101

if this would have been done 10, 15 years ago.

102

Yeah.

103

Yeah, I don't doubt that.

104

I'm curious if there's anything

105

that you learned about the IRGC in the planning phase of your career that maybe the public still doesn't know?

106

Yeah, I've talked about it quite a bit on the channel, but I think the big thing is they are using a information operation

107

that is straight out of the book called Rules for Radicals.

108

And so there's a book out there called Rules for Radicals written by Alinsky.

109

And the whole focus of that was actually the left, the political left in the United States used that in the 70s

110

and it's basically a way to triangulate a group of people against a specific threat for your own gain

111

and so you can see it especially being used by people like AOC

112

or Gavin Newsom

113

or a lot of people on the left who will say

114

we're all against Trump we're anti -Trump we hate Trump right

115

because that's all they have to say they don't talk about any achievements that's being done by the Democratic Party

116

because they're using that book, which is specifically meant to triangulate people against a certain person.

117

And the book specifically says, don't triangulate against a large group of people, triangulate against one or two, and don't triangulate against a whole system.

118

So you basically find something that people are interested in, you create an enemy, and then you tell them why that enemy is keeping them down.

119

And you just do that over and over and over again. And

120

so that's what the the left in the united states had

121

done for a long time the right uses it now too by the way

122

so it's a bipartisan thing in certain ways

123

because the only way to fight against

124

that is using the same tactic against itself it's

125

so powerful it's such a powerful thing it's like this this weird cheat code of the human mind

126

which is unfortunate

127

but it's been used by both political parties started with the

128

left now the right's having to use it as well

129

and then the irgc uses it against the west as well

130

that's why they call america the great satan they call israel the little Satan,

131

because they're using the same playbook to try to triangulate the world against a specific thing.

132

And then when you see the IRGC being interviewed, they've even come out and said, this is right out of the book as well.

133

They'll say, we're not against the American people with just the leaders.

134

Yeah.

135

Okay.

136

Great.

137

Yeah.

138

I'm sure if we were walking through the streets of Tehran, you'd just be like, oh yeah, yeah.

139

Americans.

140

Great.

141

So again, it's an information operation.

142

And so I see the left kind of being a little bit swooned by the IRGC

143

and that whole tactic because it's the same tactic and playbook

144

that they've actually been using themselves

145

so it works yeah yeah do you have any idea how much of the planning

146

that you did would have actually been used or implemented or

147

or how does that work like because obviously the plans are already

148

made how much are you augmenting or adding to them in

149

that planning phase i think the way

150

that my planning would have been done would have been more on the tactical level

151

because at the time i was just very focused on that tactical application of the F -15E.

152

So we got really good at strafing boats and I found a lot of different tactics to strafe boats.

153

And I did a lot of research with people from three -letter agencies to determine, you know, what exactly are these boats going to do?

154

Tell me exactly the maneuver.

155

I want to see, and how far does a diesel bass boat...

156

turn if he goes full full right wheel like i want to know all those things

157

so i basically went to like the the gnats asked details of

158

that uh and

159

and the different styles of boats they have like all all

160

different classes you know 15 different classes of boats i want

161

to know exactly how fast they are uh are they going

162

to see me up above them are they going to try

163

to stop what are they going to try to do and

164

so that's the kind of stuff that i more put into the plan

165

is there been a i guess an understanding

166

or was there an understanding then maybe anticipation is a better word for the assistance

167

that china specifically china and

168

or maybe even russia has given iran as far as intelligence drones technology etc was

169

that anticipated or is

170

that kind of a surprise i think i think it was

171

always kind of an option you know i think we always have seen you know iran uh i actually thought

172

that they would have more russian systems than they do to be honest with you

173

so they've i don't know if it's a pride thing

174

but they have they do have the ability to indigenously build surface -to -air missiles rockets

175

and things like that

176

so i'm actually surprised there's not more russian equipment i suspect

177

the ukraine thing probably has a lot to do with

178

that there you go is it i mean russia is

179

so strapped with that is that they have far far less to contribute maybe yeah

180

and they have a little operation going through the Caspian right

181

both ways where you know actually Iran will send small arms

182

I don't know Iran sending small arms to Russia Russia's sending explosive packs for drones to Iran

183

so they have a little shadow network there in the Caspian as well yeah

184

so are you aware of how much help China has given I mean I've seen a lot of reports

185

that aren't maybe particularly definitive But certain aerial imagery, satellite imagery and stuff of, you know, what what was anticipated

186

that Iran would have versus what China has given them in disparity of how much better the Chinese intelligence is.

187

Does any of that ring true or strike a chord with any of the work you did?

188

Yeah, I think the thing that we saw with China is, again, China is really good at building cameras, listening devices.

189

I mean, look what they do to their own population.

190

Right.

191

So they've just taken that and magnified it.

192

Again, like I talked about earlier, no limits on the Chinese military.

193

They're like, oh, sweet, we can build a thousand megapixel camera

194

and put it on a fighter jet and test it right now.

195

And it's gonna be able to see everybody's home that we fly over and it's gonna absorb all that information.

196

We don't care, cool.

197

The US military might have some things where you can't even, if you're coming in to land at a base, you can't even have your targeting pod on because of privacy issues and all kinds of things,

198

which I love, it's good.

199

But again, China is going to just go to the max level when it comes to any type of capability, especially intelligence, surveillance or reconnaissance.

200

That's what they're good at.

201

I mean, there's a reason why, you know, they're like the Huawei phones, right, that we aren't allowed to have in the US or government officials can't have them.

202

Definitely.

203

So I think the thing that was going on with China

204

that is hard to counter is even if Xi and Trump have a good relationship and, you know, they're face to face like, hey, we're not going to share any information.

205

uh they're shadow companies that are operating all over the place and again

206

if they have access to a they've bought off a general in the plaf people's liberation army air force

207

and they're able to get some sort of new technology to iran

208

and that general is going to make 100 million dollars dude they're going to do it every time right

209

because corruption is going to rule a lot more

210

when it comes to china

211

so i i think there could be some things going on behind the scenes

212

But as far as like the hard military power being transferred to China, I don't, from China to Iran, I don't see that being a factor.

213

Where do you see it?

214

Or I guess before you explain or predict where you see it going, how do you think it's going now?

215

I think it's going longer than everybody would have hoped.

216

I'm not surprised that it's taken this long.

217

I mean, I could say here an armchair admiral the thing all day long, right?

218

because I'm sitting in my nice comfy studio on YouTube and enjoying the freedoms that everybody's out there fighting for.

219

So I think there's, there could have been some better messaging perhaps early on.

220

I remember releasing a video, uh, in, I think it was March or April.

221

And I was like, I think we need to get ready for six to 10 months of, of this.

222

And someone, someone that was close to me was like, dude, you shouldn't say that.

223

Like people, people aren't going to think you're credible.

224

Like they're not going to think you're credible because that's way too long.

225

And I was just thinking, no, I think we need a lot of time to see if some sort of a change could happen on the ground.

226

Because if we're not going to do an invasion, which I don't know, I'm curious your thoughts too, maybe an invasion is the way to go,

227

but not the US, not US troops on the ground.

228

Is that even possible?

229

Is that feasible?

230

When you look at what happened with Japan, the reason why they surrendered, people think it's a nuclear bomb.

231

I don't think it's just a nuclear bomb.

232

I think it was a nuclear bombs

233

and the credible threat of an invasion right off their coast

234

so they're seeing the nuclear bombs hit

235

and then they're seeing these fleets of naval vessels packed with american infantrymen ready to invade you know so i think

236

that to me i was always curious early on

237

if the regime is going to fall can the people be armed who's going to be on the ground even

238

when we took out hitler we own the air

239

but we own the ground too and

240

that the hitler regime had nowhere to go uh so this regime right now has a lot of places to go.

241

So I think that's why the president's doing the off -ramps thing.

242

So I did think the off -ramps were going to be the end of it.

243

That's just my thought.

244

I was like, well, IRGC lost a lot here.

245

The off -ramps will be the end of it.

246

And that would have been, what, a five -month conflict at that point if they took the off -ramps.

247

And so I was even a little bit surprised that the IRGC didn't just try to fully protect themselves, not the IRGC specifically, but the mullahs,

248

the people that weren't maybe as radical as some of the top leaders in the IRGC, we're able to get some sort of a deal brokered

249

and wrap the thing up in five months

250

and i think that's that's what i originally predicted

251

and now i think we're just seeing

252

that this regime is is way more cancerous than we ever

253

thought yeah i uh i mean i first learned about you

254

right around the time kind of the the air campaign started i remember watching uh one of your early videos

255

and just thinking like pass is super entertaining

256

and just was uh really impressed with the job

257

that you did i love love your content i've watched a

258

ton of it um it's such a i think a useful

259

position and perspective you have between your flying experience your planning experience

260

and and and the window of time

261

that you spent doing it being pretty relevant and

262

and relative to what's going on now with the iran conflict being

263

so overwhelmingly air dominant and almost entirely you know airstrike

264

or air campaign focused um is there anything that surprised you from

265

that kind of specific aspect of the actual air campaign standpoint

266

and uh is do you have any kind of ballpark percentage

267

on what airframes have been used in the campaign percentage wise hmm yeah

268

so i think something that's surprising me now is there's not strikes happening at places like pickaxe mountain yeah

269

and who knows maybe they just just happened i mean it's a fast movement ball game uh

270

but i think early on they they well 2025 they targeted a lot of the nuclear infrastructure

271

and then after that the campaign focused more on on other things and now it's shifted to the straight of Hormuz.

272

But yeah, I think while we're, the one thing that's surprising to me is if we're in there doing all these operations, tag Pickaxe Mountain, make sure they can't use it, you know?

273

But I think that, so that was a little surprising to me and that, who knows, that could happen at any moment.

274

I think the sheer number of sorties was surprising to me.

275

The numbers I saw was like 13 ,000 sorties between the U .S and Israel.

276

So, I mean, just the repetition of that and the folks

277

that are getting those jets launched you know the people blasting the jets off the carriers the the bases

278

that are right there getting shot at with missiles

279

like the the ops tempo is insane so i think that's something

280

that you just can't understate how amazing that is

281

and i i think everybody out there should know how hard

282

that is to do for the people on the ground getting

283

the jets airborne 13 000 flights i mean we're talking refueling

284

them maintaining them loading weapons you know all those things are just hats off to everybody doing

285

that do you know how many aircraft would contribute to those 13 000 like what is

286

that average per aircraft wow yeah that's a that's a good question i think there were

287

so the the publicly released numbers

288

that i saw was somewhere around 200 to 300 fighter aircraft i'd say it's on the higher end of

289

that to do that and then uh that probably

290

that number probably includes drones but remember drone operators are sitting in there operating

291

that drone as well you know they're operating it from creature air force base

292

or wherever so i'm asserting i'm sure it includes drones

293

but again the workhorse jets are the ones

294

that are flying most of the mission

295

so f -15es f -16s a -10s these fourth generation fighters

296

that you know maybe they're not the sexiest thing on the block now with the f -22

297

and the f -35 but they get the job done right

298

if you got a if you got a phillips head screw you need a phillips head screwdriver

299

and that's what these jets are yeah yeah the uh Is

300

that something that that level of sorties in the op plan stuff, is that something that you would get

301

that far in the weeds on where you would anticipate this many sorties per month

302

or in this phase you would anticipate X number of sorties to accomplish phase one or whatever?

303

Is it that detailed?

304

Yeah, I think it is, but it's broken down by squadron, like roughly.

305

Like, hey, this is how much your squadron is going to have to be ready to go.

306

And so this many rotations, the jets are going to need to fly this many times a day.

307

and this is the battle rhythm that we're going to consistently get

308

and then everything else is built from that right so they're like okay with that battle rhythm

309

We're going to need this many WIZOs, this many fighter pilots, this many bombs, because we assume we're going to drop this many.

310

I mean, the planning is just completely dialed in all the way down to, like, the last 20 -millimeter bullet that you're going to bring.

311

Yeah, wow.

312

Yeah.

313

You mentioned A -10s, F -15s, F -16s.

314

I'm sure F -18s on the Navy side is a huge component.

315

Far more of a percentage of the sorties flown by those aircraft than the fifth -gen stuff, the F -22, F -35.

316

I would think so, yeah.

317

Yeah, just because there's more of them, there's sheer numbers, right?

318

And, yeah, thanks for catching the F -18.

319

My F -18 bros are going to give me a hard time for that one.

320

Yeah, the Super Hornet's amazing.

321

But, yeah, I think the big thing is a lot of these stealth jets are incredible for what they do.

322

But even to make them stealthy, you have to put everything inside of them.

323

So it means a little less weapons load out.

324

Now, the F -35, probably not as concerned about being stealth right now, but still maneuverability -wise, controllability -wise,

325

i've never really seen bombs hung on the outside of the f -35 i'm sure it can be done

326

but maybe more of like an air -to -air missile loadout would be on those

327

so if you want to go in

328

and pummel targets you got to find a big truck of a jet

329

which is f -15e primarily that's the number one number two would be probably the super hornet

330

and the f -16 right around about the same and

331

And then obviously the A10 is kind of in a class of its own, right?

332

Built for a little bit different of a purpose.

333

Yeah.

アプリをダウンロード

流暢に話すために必要なすべて

AI発音採点文ごとに採点

IPA練習すべての音をマスター

単語学習自分の単語帳を作る

単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える

QRをスキャン

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同じチャンネル

They HATED Me in MARSOC Assessment & Selection… But THIS Saved Me

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

FOR YOU

このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント

このB2レベルのスピーキングレッスンは、動画「F-15 Pilot Breaks Down Iran's SECRET Missile Bunkers」を教材にしています。この動画には、シャドーイング用の文が333文、単語が4242語あります。音声の長さは21:26です。話す速さは速く、1分あたり約198語です。音のつながりや弱く発音される音が多くなります。単語の84%は英語の頻出3,000語に含まれます。残りは練習の前に確認しておきましょう。

この動画の重要語彙

動画の中で特に難しい単語15語を、発音と意味つきで紹介します。

単語	発音	意味
missile 名詞	/ˈmɪs.aɪl/	弾丸
drone 名詞	/dɹoʊn/	雄蜂
ballistic 形容詞	/bəˈlɪs.tɪk/	弾道の
sortie 名詞	/ˈsɔɹti/	出撃
proxy 名詞	/ˈpɹɑk.si/	代理
anticipate 動詞	/ænˈtɪs.ɪ.peɪt/	予想する
predict 動詞	/pɹɪˈdɪkt/	予言する
tactic 名詞	/ˈtæktɪk/	戦術, 戦法
pickaxe 名詞	/ˈpɪkˌæks/	つるはし, 鶴嘴
satin 名詞	/ˈsæt.ɪn/	本繻子, 繻子
stealth 名詞	/stɛlθ/	ステルス
bunker 名詞	/ˈbʌŋ.kə/	バンカー, 掩蔽壕
squadron 名詞	/ˈskwɒd.ɹən/	戦隊
imagery 名詞	/ˈɪmɪd͡ʒɹi/	画像
accurately 副詞	/ˈæk.jə.ɹɪt.li/	正確に

動画に出てくる句動詞

単語	発音	意味
take out 動詞		取り出す
come out 動詞	/ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/	出る
fight back 動詞	/faɪt bæk/	巻き返す

繰り返し練習したい文

動画に出てくる短く完結した文です。日常会話でそのまま使えます。

Where do you see it?
I'm not surprised that it's taken this long.
I don't think it's just a nuclear bomb.

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型	動画での表現
現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している	has surprised · They've gotten · have perfected
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる	being represented · was built · be crushed

注意したい発音

話し手はthey're, we're, don'tなど、短縮形や弱形を105回使っています。聞こえたとおりの短い形で発音しましょう。

「th」の音: stealth /stɛlθ/, rhythm /ˈɹɪð.əm/, feather /ˈfɛðə/
「sh」と「zh」の音: sheer /ʃɪɚ/, anticipation /ænˌtɪs.əˈpeɪ.ʃən/, liberation /ˌlɪbəˈɹeɪʃən/, negotiate /nəˈɡəʊ.ʃi.eɪt/, orientation /ˌɔː.ɹi.ənˈteɪ.ʃən/
長い単語（アクセントの位置に注意）: triangulate /tɹaɪˈæŋɡjəleɪt/, anticipate /ænˈtɪs.ɪ.peɪt/, accurately /ˈæk.jə.ɹɪt.li/, capability /ˌkeɪ.pəˈbɪl.ɪ.ti/, adversary /ˈæd.vəɹˌsɛɹi/

日本語話者が苦手な音：

/r/ と /l/ の区別 — /l/ は舌先を歯茎につけ、/r/ はどこにもつけない: triangulate /tɹaɪˈæŋɡjəleɪt/, credible /ˈkɹɛdəbl̩/, resilient /ɹɪˈzɪl.jənt/, accurately /ˈæk.jə.ɹɪt.li/, ballpark /ˈbɔl(ˌ)pɑɹk/
/v/ — /b/ にならないように、上の歯を下唇に当てる: explosive /ɛkˈspləʊsɪv/, adversary /ˈæd.vəɹˌsɛɹi/, maneuver /məˈnuvɚ/, overwhelmingly /ˌəʊ.vəˈwɛl.mɪŋ.lɪ/, invade /ɪnˈveɪd/
/f/ — 「フ」ではなく、上の歯と下唇で出す: warfare /ˈwɔɹfɛɹ/, airframe /ˈɛɹ.fɹe(ɪ)m/, firsthand /ˈfɜːstˌhænd/, magnify /ˈmæɡnɪfaɪ/, comfy /ˈkʌm.fi/

この動画での練習方法

まず声を出さずに動画を最後まで聞き、知らない単語をメモします。
まず0.75倍速で一文ずつシャドーイングし、慣れてきたら通常の速度に戻します。
自分の声を録音して元の音声と比べます。missile, drone, ballisticなどの単語に特に注意しましょう。

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →

シャドーイング練習: F-15 Pilot Breaks Down Iran's SECRET Missile Bunkers - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

アプリをダウンロード

同じチャンネル

They HATED Me in MARSOC Assessment & Selection… But THIS Saved Me

おすすめ動画

Iran War Explained Like You're 5

Single Engine Static Fire? Huh. | SpaceX Starbase

The SECRET WEAPON UK Just Used Against Protesters | Palestine Action Co-Founder EXPOSES All

Flying the Air Force's $320M Supersonic B-1 Bomber

At North Korea’s Border

Can Humanity Stop A Planet-Killing Asteroid?

The CIA's new tech doesn't make sense

"أنت فاشل".. سيناتور ديمقراطي يهاجم وزير الحرب الأمريكي

When M1 Abrams Fought T-72s

“You Support A Country That Hates Us!” - Patrick Bet-David In HEATED DEBATE With Reza Aslan

Prince Reza Pahlavi on Fox News with Martha MacCallum | 22 September 2026

“They Control Many Things” - Did the Jewish Lobby or the CIA Cause The Fall of Iran?

このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント

この動画の重要語彙

動画に出てくる句動詞

繰り返し練習したい文

この動画の文法

注意したい発音

この動画での練習方法

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由