シャドーイング練習: True Love Debate | Alex Yeandle | Opposition (2/6) - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ
練習モードを選ぶ
各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。
113 文
文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。
1
I now look to Alex Yeendall, St Hugh's College, to open the case for the opposition.
2
Mr President, thank you very much.
3
Thank you very much
4
and it of course goes without saying how honoured I am
5
to have been given the opportunity to speak in this debate and I'm incredibly grateful to yourself, I'm incredibly grateful to our guests,
6
but primarily I'm incredibly grateful to the members in the chamber tonight for giving me an audience to talk to.
7
The motion before us this evening is one that can be explored through a wide variety of academic disciplines.
8
We could consider the neuroscience of what love is in a materialist sense we could, if you like, recognise the slight irony that we would be analysing chemistry with chemistry.
9
We could consider psychological explanations of why we love the people we do, and what qualities it is that makes them attractive to us.
10
Finally, perhaps, we might consider the sociological and philosophical questions, whether we all love in the same way,
11
whether love is something that actually has a sense of intrinsic value, value or instead whether the relationships we hold with others are nothing more than an expression of the society in
12
which we live.
13
Now as a PPE student you will probably expect me to stand here
14
and talk a lot about a lot of different subject areas each of which I don't really know anything about.
15
Um...
16
But of course that in itself would not be doing our motion any justice.
17
For instead I wish to speak of why true love is something that we can reform,
18
of why it is something that we of course need to tweak and clarify and make sure that we understand, but it is something
19
that has the genuine power to be one of the greatest prizes of our short existence on this planet.
20
And of course, as Freya mentioned, I am not going to make any attempts to skirt over the fact that true love, in the way that perhaps we intuitively understand it,
21
perhaps in the way we have been taught as children or in Disney films, is a perfect conception of what true love is.
22
Instead, I want to argue why an amended true love, a true love that is fit for the 21st century, fit for modern consumption, is one that can be a benefit to the entire world.
23
As an idea in our minds and as a predicate of our entire worldview,
24
I wish to demonstrate to you tonight why abandoning the ideal of true love would be deeply damaging to humanity's progress, its well-being and its future.
25
Firstly, however, it falls upon me to introduce the proposition speakers for tonight's debate.
26
You've already heard from Freya Dixon van Dijk, a second year human sciences student from St John's College.
27
And as you will have discovered listening to her, Freya is a very eloquent public speaker.
28
What you might not know, however, is that for all her talk about true love, Freya was in fact an avid reader of Stephanie Meyer's Twilight series.
29
And I have it on good authority from one of Freya's close friends that, and I quote, she used to skip through the books to get to the kissing scenes.
30
Now if you find yourself talking to Freya at some point after this debate, you may well end up talking about the topic of her gap year.
31
And all I will say is this, I'm not sure if there are any romantic tales within that one gap here, but to draw upon a very old meme, I'm sure it would still be a better love story than Twilight.
32
So, secondly, you will hear from Professor Amy Webb, a seasoned writer and speaker in the field of love and data.
33
Amy has written award-winning books and currently lectures at New York University, but she is equally well known for her fascinating TED talk entitled How I Hacked Online Dating,
34
explaining her transition from a lack of dates and romantic interest, relatable, to her eventual success in finding a partner.
35
Now I must confess, Mr President, that as I was researching Professor Webb in preparation for tonight's debate, I came across this TED talk and I thought that sounds interesting,
36
I'm going to start watching it only to realise it was a talk I was very familiar with already.
37
Lastly you will hear from Professor Simon Blackburn, is a world-renowned emeritus professor of philosophy at the other place.
38
Simon has spoken at events across the globe,
39
he has written influential books and has been published in some of the most prestigious journals in his field.
40
And whilst of course my knowledge of philosophy as a subject area is as nothing compared to his,
41
we do perhaps have one more surprising activity in common.
42
You see in 2014 before starting an interview with OXTEW, the Oxford University student newspaper.
43
Professor Blackburn remarked, could we do it over some wine?
44
There is nothing like a drink after the adrenaline rush of giving a talk.
45
Professor, I will see you for President's drinks in the Gladstone Room later tonight.
46
Mr President, these are your speakers and they are indeed most welcome.
47
So, to move on to the crux of my argument itself, the first point that I wish to make this evening is
48
that if we are to blindly follow the proposition's case and to abandon the ideal of true love altogether, we need to be crystal clear about exactly what it is that we are abandoning.
49
And here we run into perhaps a slightly interesting notion, in that the proposition was more than happy to point out the problems with one interpretation of true love,
50
but seemed to take this one interpretation as being static or unchanging or rigid.
51
And this is something that I wish to challenge.
52
You see, I think old-fashioned conceptions of true love, even of love in general, can of course run into problems when confronted with a modern, progressive society.
53
I'm not here to defend a clichéd, patriarchal, heteronormative, impossible illusion of love.
54
And you see, the notion that true love is about a man marrying a woman, you know, they buy a nice house, they go and live in the suburbs, the man works, the wife stays at home,
55
they retire, they get a nice pension, they live in a home, they die.
56
That is not what I am talking about here this evening.
57
This is not at all valid with the lives that we leave today, and and neither should it be.
58
And we can progress on a deeper level.
59
There's this constant implicit assumption that true love has to be this one person, that once you meet your one true love,
60
you'll be completely perfect for each other for the rest of time until the day you die.
61
No, the person who is perfect for me today is by
62
no means necessarily the same person who's going to be perfect for me in 50 years time.
63
The short 20 years that I have been on this planet has taught me that people change.
64
Indeed, the short few terms I have been on Oxford Union Committee has taught me that people change.
65
So I appreciate that so far I have spent a lot of time giving you broad, general arguments, and I haven't actually given you my own definition of true love.
66
But I will, of course, get onto this now.
67
So for me, we have to start from here.
68
that true love is about recognition that nobody, absolutely nobody, is perfect.
69
Perfect with somebody else or perfect by themselves.
70
Nobody is perfect.
71
It's about the idea that there is somebody who can improve us.
72
It doesn't have to be one person, but there has to be somebody existing on this planet Earth who can make us a better person, somebody who can make us happier.
73
True love is about the idea that this can be reciprocated, that both parties can end up benefiting from each other whilst perceiving one of the greatest emotional feelings known to mankind.
74
And again, critics will say, as the proposition already has, that our perception of love is perhaps nothing more than a selection of hormones drowning our brains.
75
Hormones that can be fabricated in a laboratory and fed to us down dark alleyways in brightly coloured little pills.
76
But this is, I believe, quite frankly besides the point.
77
It is, you know, a feeling of true love is a symptom of something else that is going on.
78
It is a necessary but not sufficient condition.
79
It is one part of a far greater human puzzle.
80
You know, it is Aristotle who says love is composed of a single soul inhabiting two bodies.
81
And whilst maybe two as a numerical value could be questioned, the general point here is, I think, quite beautiful.
82
Humans are quite clearly social animals by the way that we see and we think,
83
and by ourselves we can only understand a tiny fraction of what we could with somebody else.
84
True love has this remarkable ability to open our eyes to the world in a way that nothing else can.
85
To put this another way, we must build our conception of true love around our lives rather than building our lives around our conception of true love. Of course.
86
We must be brave, bold, unafraid, radical in constructing a true love that is fit for the 21st century.
87
But be in no doubts that voting with the proposition this evening does not allow you to do that.
88
Voting with the proposition this evening is saying, that's it.
89
We give up.
90
We are abandoning it as an ideal because we do not want to try and fix and reform.
91
We do not want to make our lives better.
92
We simply want to pretend the problem doesn't exist, brush it under the carpet and go on being miserable.
93
So you may ask, what is the point of fixing this concept if there are problems with it already?
94
And the point is this, walking away from one of the most powerful emotions known to man
95
and the implicit norm that we ought to embrace it is, I believe, akin to abandoning a core tenet of the imperfect perfection of being human.
96
Quite simply, abandoning one of the most fundamental things about being ourselves.
97
A belief in true love is not just about how we view our potential partners, but about how we view our existence as human beings and the worldview that subsequently defines it.
98
We have the power to shape not just our own happiness, but to shape the driving forces and inspiration between cultures and people the world over.
99
So that said, whether you view yourself as the deepest and the deepest of romantics,
100
or whether you view yourself as the most rational of economic agents, whether you think with your heart, whether you think with your head, whether you think with some other organ of your body,
101
the ideal of true love has practical purposes
102
that I think make it an irrefutable goal for every human being on this planet.
103
If you walk through the nose door and vote with the opposition at the end of tonight's debate, let me be absolutely clear
104
that you are not signing up to committing the rest of your days searching for a Disney princess style happily ever after, nor you committing yourself to scrolling through thousands upon thousands upon
105
thousands of oxloves desperately searching for the faintest whiff of your name.
106
You are instead making a gesture, a strong, bold gesture that in a world teetering with misery, with pain, with suffering, with rampant nationalism,
107
with climate change, with Brexit, with Donald Trump.
108
There is something that we can hope for, that we can salvage and that we can hold onto.
109
Mr President, if I may, I would like to finish with a quote tonight.
110
Of all people, it is Friedrich Nietzsche, the philosopher, who says, There is always some madness in love,
111
but there is also always some reason in madness.
112
In echoing these sentiments, honourable members, I would urge you to vote with the opposition this evening.
113
Thank you very much.
アプリをダウンロード
流暢に話すために必要なすべて
AI発音採点文ごとに採点
IPA練習すべての音をマスター
単語学習自分の単語帳を作る
単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える
同じチャンネル
C11
Silvan Bennett-Schar explains the threat posed by AI to jobs, democracy & social cohesion (5/8)
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
THB the English Flag Has Become a Symbol of Division - Patrick Christys - Opp
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
Toby Young | Woke Culture HAS Gone Too Far - 3/8 | Oxford Union
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
Tommy Nguyen: Woke Culture HAS Gone Too Far - 5/8 | Oxford Union
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
Climate Change Debate | Kriti Joshi | Opposition
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
Social Media Does NOT Corrupt Human Interactions | Liam Hackett | Part 4 of 6
TeensDaily ConversationHigh School Students
C12
Dr Maszlee Malik argues Islam is like democracy: it is not perfect - but they are compatible 6/8
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
THB that the Monarchy Died with the Queen - Hugo Vickers - Opp
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
Nishad Sanzagiri | Technology Empires Debate | Proposition (1/6)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
Melissa Hinkley | Social Media & Journalism Debate | Opposition (2/6)
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
THB the English Flag Has Become a Symbol of Division - Femi Oluwole - Prop
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
THB Israel Never Truly Wanted Peace with Palestine - Avi Mayer - Opp
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
THB Reform is Fit to Govern - Rachel Millward - Opp
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
Faking it gives you the best chance possible of making it argues Joel Buckley 1/6
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
Katie Hopkins | We Should NOT Support No Platforming (6/8) | Oxford Union
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
Climate Change Debate | Natalie Bennett | Opposition (8/8)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C18
Climate Change Debate | Barry Gardiner MP | Proposition (3/8)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
Ahmad Nawaz | We Should Do Whatever Necessary (1/8) | Oxford Union Debate
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C265
Mehdi Hasan | Islam Is A Peaceful Religion | Oxford Union
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
Social Media Corrupts Human Interactions | Emma Gannon | Part 3 of 6
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU
おすすめ動画
C176 文
V.O. Love at first sight: what does science say? Helen Fisher, neurobiologist and anthropologist
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
30 文
"I loved every minute of it, however hard it had been"
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
251 文
Two Astrophysicists Debate Free Will
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C1527
14 文
Tanya’s opinion on humans
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C1252 文
Mes arguments philosophiques préférés
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C16
99 文
ENGLISH SPEECH | ANNE HATHAWAY: Authentic Equality (English Subtitles)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C113
84 文
“But you did it first!”: A defense of the whataboutism
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
122 文
God is a Delusion | Oxford Union Speech - Alex O'Connor
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
297 文
Effortless English - Longtime Affair - Commentary
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
147 文
Liam Byrne's speech on Fresh Ideas
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
このレッスンについて
このレッスンでは、ディベート形式の英語スピーチを通じて、論理的な発言力と自然な発音を練習します。ビデオでは「真の愛」についての議論が展開され、豊かな語彙や修辞的な表現が使われています。IELTS スピーキング対策や日常の英語スピーキング練習に役立つ、論理的な語り口とパーソナリティのある発音を身につけることが目標です。
重要な語彙とフレーズ
- intrinsic value：内在的価値。物事自体が持つ本質的な価値を指します。
- predicate：基礎、根幹。ある考えや世界観の土台となるもの。
- skirt over：避ける、ごまかす。難しい問題を表面的に扱うこと。
- avid reader：熱心な読者。特定の本やジャンルを愛読する人。
- crux of the argument：議論の核心。最も重要なポイント。
練習のヒント
ビデオのスピーチは比較的速いペースですが、抑揚がはっきりしており、論理的な流れが追いやすいです。shadowspeak（シャドースピーク）の練習では、まず1文ずつ聞き取り、その直後に同じ速さとイントネーションで繰り返しましょう。特に「I am incredibly grateful to...」のような丁寧な表現や、ユーモアを含んだ「a better love story than Twilight」のようなフレーズは、自然な発音を意識して練習します。
論理的な展開を学ぶため、「firstly, however」「so, to move on to」などの接続詞をマークし、自分の言葉でまとめる練習も有効です。これはIELTS スピーキング対策でも重要なスキルで、話す際の構成力を高めます。また、スピーカーのパーソナリティが滲む発音を真似ることで、英語スピーキング練習において「生きた英語」を使う感覚が養えます。
この動画の文法
話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。
| 文型 | 動画での表現 |
|---|---|
| 条件文 if + 節, will/would + 動詞 — 条件とその結果 | if I may, I would like |
| 現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している | have been taught · You've already heard · has written |
| 受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる | have been given · can be explored · have been taught |
| 関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加える | one that can · person who is · somebody who can |
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。