쉐도잉 연습: A conversation with Sergio Rial: New trends in leadership - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

어려움

YouTube

쉐도잉 컨트롤

0% 완료 (0/71 문장)

Let's talk about culture.

⏸ 일시 정지

재생 속도:

반복 횟수:

대기 모드:

자막 동기:0ms

모든 문장

71 문장

Let's talk about culture.

0:12.02 – 0:13.62 (1.6s)

What are the components of a high performing culture?

0:14.42 – 0:18.40 (4.0s)

And when you're involved in a culture that you want to move and change and tweak in a different direction, how do you do that as a leader?

0:18.86 – 0:29.40 (10.5s)

Ambition.

0:30.64 – 0:31.20 (0.6s)

It's such an important, such an important aspect of anyone's life and any company's intent.

0:31.20 – 0:38.46 (7.3s)

I think you've got to have a realistic ambition for your company.

0:38.46 – 0:42.24 (3.8s)

The second one is risk.

0:41.74 – 0:44.46 (2.7s)

There's not going to be reward without risk and I think you've got to understand, size it, price it and pursue it.

0:44.46 – 0:50.22 (5.8s)

So I think you should not shy away from risk, you should actually embrace it.

0:50.22 – 0:53.74 (3.5s)

So I think a lot of companies, what they spend a lot of time, they're risking all the time, which I can understand and I think it's part of any company's fiduciary roles and duties.

0:53.74 – 1:04.38 (10.6s)

But I think at the same time, facing and defining risk and embracing it to a degree that you can actually understand and as long as you understand it, you should really embrace.

1:04.38 – 1:14.26 (9.9s)

When you have a culture that is ambitious, when you have a culture that looks at risk with a mind to play to win as opposed to play not to lose, you certainly start having a culture that wants to accomplish things.

1:14.26 – 1:28.00 (13.7s)

Yeah, that's a great statement, playing to win as opposed to playing not to lose.

1:28.56 – 1:33.52 (5.0s)

You may have noticed that there are now three fewer global American food companies and there are now three new global Brazilian food companies.

1:33.52 – 1:43.60 (10.1s)

There must be some nationalistic pride.

1:43.60 – 1:46.20 (2.6s)

Tell Tell me, what have the Brazilians brought to these companies from their global perspectives that seemingly, and not to overgeneralize, that the previous managements of those great global companies were missing?

1:46.20 – 2:00.18 (14.0s)

I think complacency was pretty much ingrained in many of those companies.

2:00.94 – 2:04.76 (3.8s)

And I think that's a challenge for large companies.

2:05.20 – 2:06.88 (1.7s)

I don't think it's a question of the Brazilians.

2:05.90 – 2:08.88 (3.0s)

I mean, what I think this culture of this particular investor has basically focused on is performance.

2:07.90 – 2:14.88 (7.0s)

performance and high performing teams and having compensation completely aligned to very few targets and being absolutely relentless around what needs to happen from a productivity point of view.

2:14.40 – 2:28.58 (14.2s)

Big companies in big countries, particularly when they've been successful for so many years, complacency gets ingrained in the DNA.

2:28.34 – 2:35.88 (7.5s)

And what you have is a disruptive new owner who comes and basically says, well, I think we can do better.

2:35.88 – 2:43.58 (7.7s)

So I think at the root cause, ambition and an ability to take risks.

2:43.98 – 2:48.02 (4.0s)

I go back to that sort of thing about high performing teams.

2:47.68 – 2:51.02 (3.3s)

Ambition and risk are very, very closely correlated.

2:50.92 – 2:54.12 (3.2s)

And these people, these new investors come with a lot of ambition.

2:53.72 – 2:57.04 (3.3s)

They're taking a lot of risk.

2:57.78 – 2:59.20 (1.4s)

In some cases, they're doing that with debt.

2:58.98 – 3:01.18 (2.2s)

So they've got to make sure that in a couple of years, they're going to be able to bring the company to an optimal capital structure.

3:01.60 – 3:07.28 (5.7s)

But they don't get confused with the real task, which is performance.

3:07.42 – 3:13.06 (5.6s)

You've lived in Europe, you've lived in Asia, you've lived in the United States, and although you're a Brazilian, you've spent most of your time everywhere else, but more recently now in Brazil.

3:13.36 – 3:23.40 (10.0s)

How do you define diversity?

3:23.42 – 3:25.22 (1.8s)

I don't think I can define.

3:25.88 – 3:27.52 (1.6s)

What I think it is people with very significant different backgrounds that can very much enrich the dialogue that is taking place in the company.

3:27.48 – 3:39.40 (11.9s)

I think what you don't want to have in a boardroom or with your management team is just a bunch of people who just came from the same school, from the same community, with the same values it's very comfortable but it's not necessarily very conducive to disruptive thought process I mean we are living in a world going back to the digital threat I mean many business models are being disrupted as we speak constantly we've got to have people with not only different cultural backgrounds but academic backgrounds I think you may very well be as I've been in many companies in the agro space, agricultural space, strong marketing background, strong digital background.

3:39.96 – 4:19.24 (39.3s)

You don't necessarily have to go through just, you know, agronomics to be a good and effective leader.

4:19.24 – 4:25.70 (6.5s)

And the same applies to the financial industry.

4:25.70 – 4:27.84 (2.1s)

The same applies to any industry for that matter.

4:27.84 – 4:30.60 (2.8s)

I think diverse academic and cultural backgrounds are absolutely vital in a world that is changing so fast.

4:30.60 – 4:37.18 (6.6s)

Yes, so you have a very broad and expansive definition of diversity.

4:37.50 – 4:42.54 (5.0s)

I do.

4:43.28 – 4:43.52 (0.2s)

And if I may just expand on that one, Pat, for example, if you look at the U.S.

4:43.52 – 4:48.58 (5.1s)

food companies in general, or if you look at some American firms, this has been and continues to be the most important market in the world, in the world scene, and that's not going to change for the foreseeable future.

4:48.58 – 5:01.22 (12.6s)

But what that has created is the, in some cases, the inability to have devoted time and resources to create the skill set, to look at the world and seize opportunities somewhere else.

5:01.92 – 5:13.94 (12.0s)

How many U.S.

5:14.26 – 5:15.08 (0.8s)

food companies have actually become truly international?

5:15.08 – 5:17.54 (2.5s)

It wasn't because they didn't have the resources, the capital, or even the right boards to steer them in that sort of thinking process, but they weren't able to create the cultural fabric and the skill set with people that would be able to give them so many different perspectives in analyzing the Asian opportunity, the South American opportunities last challenge, depending which sectors you are operating.

5:18.38 – 5:40.62 (22.2s)

So people really failed.

5:40.62 – 5:42.56 (1.9s)

Look at the U.S.

5:42.02 – 5:43.54 (1.5s)

airlines for that matter.

5:43.54 – 5:44.70 (1.2s)

I mean, is the world scene going to be defined for US airline in the US?

5:44.70 – 5:49.10 (4.4s)

Definitely not.

5:49.26 – 5:50.38 (1.1s)

Look what's happening with the Middle East carriers.

5:50.20 – 5:52.30 (2.1s)

So the world is becoming also not very much interchangeable and the so-called developed world has developed a sort of a, or has maintained a culture that it's of doing the same, better each and every year without necessarily challenging and adding other skills, incubating very vital skills to play in different markets in an effective manner.

5:52.38 – 6:18.40 (26.0s)

It's learning how to crack the cold in markets where you are completely uncomfortable, but still be able to do business in a way that you are comfortable.

6:18.72 – 6:26.42 (7.7s)

So let's talk about sort of the next generation of talent.

6:26.66 – 6:30.86 (4.2s)

We call them millennials.

6:30.44 – 6:32.08 (1.6s)

What are your thoughts on leading this new group of young people into this brave new global climate?

6:32.04 – 6:38.12 (6.1s)

Not so sure.

6:38.12 – 6:39.42 (1.3s)

I'm totally equipped to give you that answer.

6:39.42 – 6:41.36 (1.9s)

I think people are geared and driven towards accomplishments.

6:41.36 – 6:46.44 (5.1s)

They may not be necessarily financial accomplishments, but I think the millennials working today in Apple, I'm sure they're pretty proud.

6:46.44 – 6:52.90 (6.5s)

I mean, Apple has basically redesigned the way human beings communicate with one another.

6:52.90 – 6:59.20 (6.3s)

How much more profound could that be besides performance just follows.

6:59.12 – 7:03.00 (3.9s)

Financial performance is a consequence of a really true phenomenal intent.

7:03.00 – 7:07.68 (4.7s)

I think where they can actually help companies is finding answers to problems that we do not even see.

7:07.46 – 7:14.98 (7.5s)

I mean, human beings are attracted by problem solving.

7:14.52 – 7:18.38 (3.9s)

And I think millennials probably will help us in finding problems that we don't even realize we have them.

7:18.56 – 7:24.72 (6.2s)

And I think Apple has been a classic case of showing human, you know, mankind that we actually had some problems we never realized we had those problems and they came with a solutions and guess what happens to the response.

7:24.78 – 7:35.66 (10.9s)

So I think they're going to help us to find problems we haven't really figured out we have them.

7:35.66 – 7:39.90 (4.2s)

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

ShadowingEnglish에서 효과적으로 학습하는 방법

영상 선택: 자연스럽고 명확한 영어가 사용된 YouTube 영상을 선택하세요. TED Talks, BBC 뉴스, 영화 장면, 팟캐스트, IELTS 모범 답변 영상이 좋습니다. URL을 복사해서 검색창에 붙여넣으세요. 짧은 영상(5분 이내)과 실제로 관심 있는 주제부터 시작하는 것이 동기 유지에 효과적입니다.
먼저 듣고 내용 이해하기: 처음에는 1배속으로 그냥 듣기만 하세요. 아직 따라 말할 필요는 없습니다. 문장의 의미를 파악하고, 화자가 어떻게 단어를 강조하고, 소리를 연결하고, 쉬어 가는지 주목하세요. 내용을 이해한 후 쉐도잉 연습을 하면 효과가 훨씬 좋아집니다.
쉐도잉 모드 설정:
- Wait Mode (대기 모드): +3s 또는 +5s를 선택하면 한 문장이 재생된 후 자동으로 잠시 멈춰서 따라 말할 시간을 줍니다. 직접 컨트롤하고 싶다면 Manual을 선택해서 Next를 눌러 진행하세요.
- Sub Sync (자막 동기화): YouTube 자막이 오디오와 맞지 않을 수 있습니다. ±100ms로 조정해서 정확한 타이밍에 따라갈 수 있도록 맞추세요.
소리 내어 쉐도잉하기 (핵심 연습): 이것이 연습의 핵심입니다. 문장이 재생되는 순간——또는 일시정지 중에——크고 자신감 있게 소리 내어 따라 하세요. 단순히 단어를 읽는 것이 아니라, 화자의 리듬, 강세, 음의 높낮이, 연음 방식을 그대로 흉내 내는 것이 중요합니다. 목표는 화자의 '그림자'처럼 들리는 것입니다. Repeat 기능으로 같은 문장을 여러 번 반복해서 자연스럽게 입에 붙을 때까지 연습하세요.
난이도 높이며 꾸준히 연습: 한 구절이 편해지면 더 도전적인 수준으로 올리세요. 속도를 <code>1.25x</code> 또는 <code>1.5x</code>로 높여 빠른 언어 반사 신경을 훈련하세요. Wait Mode를 <code>Off</code>로 설정해서 연속 쉐도잉을 하는 것이 가장 고급스럽고 효과적인 모드입니다. 매일 15~30분씩 꾸준히 연습하면 몇 주 안에 눈에 띄는 변화를 느낄 수 있습니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기

ShadowingEnglish는 여러분의 지원 덕분에 100% 무료로 운영됩니다. 서버 및 AI 유지 비용이 많이 듭니다. 여러분의 커피 한 잔이 큰 힘이 됩니다! ��

PayPal로 기부하기

ShadowingEnglish.com – 영어 쉐도잉 연습

쉐도잉(Shadowing)으로 원어민처럼 영어를 말하세요. YouTube 영상을 한 문장씩 듣고 따라 말하며, 진짜 발음과 유창성을 키우세요. IELTS 학습자들이 선택한 방법.

쉐도잉 연습: A conversation with Sergio Rial: New trends in leadership - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

이 수업에 대해

주요 어휘 및 표현

연습 팁

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

ShadowingEnglish에서 효과적으로 학습하는 방법