쉐도잉 연습: Can the Tech Surge Continue? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

This is The Markets.

⏸ 일시 정지

재생 속도:

146 문장

문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.

This is The Markets.

I'm Chris Hussey, and today is Thursday, May 28th, and I'm here on the Goldman Sachs trading floor with Pete Callahan, who is the U.S tech,

media, and telecom sector specialist within global banking and markets.

Pete, thanks again for taking the time.

Thanks for having me, Chris.

Okay, let's start with The Markets, Pete, because we've had an almost historic run in tech off the March 30th lows.

Hasn't been as MAG-70 as we've seen in the past.

What do you make of the rally?

Yeah, I'd say three things stand out to me.

One, narrow breadth.

Two, high velocity.

And three, anchored by earnings growth and earnings revisions.

So what do I mean by that?

If I look back over the last three months, the Nasdaq is up 20 percent.

But when you look under the hood, only about half of the stocks in the Nasdaq are even up at all over that stretch.

So you have narrow breadth, again, led by semiconductors, which are up nearly 80 percent this year.

Best year since 1999.

Second, high velocity.

The Nasdaq is off to its second best start to a year in over 25 years.

And so we've really had a really rapid rise this year in tech stock prices.

And finally, in terms of earnings growth, if you looked at sort of AI stocks within the S&P 500, that group was about 30 up about 30 percent this year.

Incidentally, their earnings have also risen about 30 percent this year.

So you are seeing multiples kept in check driven by strong earnings revisions in tech this year.

All right.

So, you know, you pointed to those earnings.

Let's talk about them a little bit here first quarter results

what'd you make of it yeah it's good earnings from tech

i think the standouts were capex right you had another big

wave of capex revisions i think capex estimates for calendar 27 went up to 20

so you're now looking at something like north of 900 billion dollars of capex in 2027

so that story is still intact

and still pushing higher i think secondly within software i would

say results were mixed we may talk about software later

but some good some not good but but the nice thing is you're actually starting to see some dispersion in that space, and that's been a welcome sign for investors.

And think finally perhaps tied to

that first point on CapEx you are still seeing relatively tight capacity across compute and in the AI supply chain.

And in turn you're hearing companies starting to talk about visibility extending out into calendar 27 where semiconductor

and AI infrastructure companies are starting to get orders pushing out that far given the shortages we're seeing today.

Let me drill down to that software point because you pointed we were going to talk about it.

I do want to talk about it

because the software troubles even bled over into the credit markets where private credits go through a problem

because people were worried that they had too much software exposure.

But lately you're starting to see the software stocks working again.

What's going on?

Yeah, listen, the the arts have been tough this year in software, no doubt about it.

But you are seeing dispersion in the group.

And I think that's something that all investors, whether long-only or hedge funds, are happy to see.

It's all about dispersion, trying to pick leaders and laggards within the group.

So there are still debates from here.

Investors are curious about how you think about subscription

and seat models versus consumption models and where we may be headed over the next couple of years.

Investors are trying to figure out

if software is able to deploy AI at the point of sale

or you have this sort of incumbent versus startup debate from here.

And then, of course, the environment's been a little bit choppy to start the year.

You have new AI budget that's getting spent across enterprises.

We obviously had the conflict that is still ongoing.

And so it's been a little bit of a noisy stretch, but at least investors are saying, I can pick winners and losers.

And that's a change from what you'd seen over the last couple of years.

It was sort of correlation one type of pressure across the group.

And does that winner or losers in software just come down to your ability to employ AI versus your not ability?

Frankly, yes.

At the moment, it's whether you are able to indicate that AI is helping your business and driving faster revenue growth.

And if it is, the market is very happy to re-rate shares.

Yeah, it was interesting because everybody wanted to sell software because they thought they would get disintermediated by AI, which is software.

That's exactly right.

So the argument here is, hey, we are the companies that are actually at

that point with all this context in an enterprise and customers will lean on us to help deploy AI for them.

So you mentioned semiconductors having their best year since 1999.

On the one hand, 1999 is, you know, enthusiastic as a Knicks fan.

We're partying like it's 1999.

On the other hand, 1999 didn't end well, even for Knicks fans.

We're hoping for something better this year.

Talk to us about positioning.

Are we over our skis?

Where are we?

Yeah, it's a good question.

I think for semiconductors, listen, it's been a great start to the year.

I think any time a group's up 80% like it is in five months, there's, of course, you have sort of these momentum dynamics.

You have too far, too fast.

You have all that type of stuff that kind of matters over the short term.

But I think over the medium term, what really matters is earnings revisions, right?

And as long as you are getting earnings revisions for this group, which helps keep multiples in track, I think investors will be comfortable adding to this group on pullbacks

or momentum unwinds or different pockets of positioning pressures that can show up, of course, when you have moves like this.

So I think at the end of the day, just keep tracking the earnings growth, and I'll do my best to keep this group informed.

Please, we're going to be tapping into you.

All right, what's the trade?

Yeah, one group we haven't talked about yet is U.S.

Internet.

The group, the way I cut the data, is about lagged software on the air, which is probably surprising to people.

There's ongoing debates about sources of funds, about ongoing investment cycles, about the health of the consumer,

and, of course, where AI in the consumer world goes over the next couple of years.

But as of late, you're starting to see a little bit more innovation from the product side on U.S.

Internet companies tied to AI.

The temperature on the consumer seems to be coming down as oil prices have reset off the highs.

And so given that backdrop and cleaner positioning, I'll be watching the U.S.

Internet sector from here.

All right.

We're going to go into June, believe it or not, next week.

100

What are you watching for?

101

Yeah, I mean, just two things really, right?

102

It's macro data.

103

So you're going to get the sort of new monthly data, NFP data, and then mid-month CPI.

104

And so we're just looking for the mix of jobs, data, and then of course what the inflation story is given the geopolitical conflict.

105

And then otherwise in tech, we have a bunch of user conferences and things like that across software and semiconductors.

106

And so I'll be looking to see how that sets the temperature and the tone on generative AI into the summer months.

107

You mentioned inflation.

108

Historically, tech has been correlated with rates.

109

Do rates matter to tech anymore?

110

They could matter.

111

At the moment, the market's OK with that.

112

Candidly, there's been so many cost inflation inputs into tech

113

when you think about what the sort of AI supply chains had to weather in terms of input costs.

114

So I think the market looks at and says in the context of everything we're dealing with to deliver this infrastructure, it's something to keep an eye on.

115

But at these levels, it has not been a primary concern.

116

No, it really hasn't been.

117

All right.

118

I'm not looking at any of those things.

119

I'm just looking at Wednesday night.

120

We start the NBA finals.

121

So last question.

122

Can the Knicks win the championship?

123

Why not?

124

Why not?

125

All right.

126

I'll take that as a rave.

127

Pete, thanks so much for joining us.

128

Thanks for having me.

129

That does it for this week's episode of The Markets.

130

I'm Chris Hussey.

131

Thanks for joining us.

132

The opinions and views expressed herein are as of the date of publication, subject to change without notice, and may not necessarily reflect the institutional views of Goldman Sachs or its affiliates.

133

The material provided is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation from any Goldman Sachs entity to take any particular action,

134

or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any securities or financial products.

135

This material may contain forward-looking statements.

136

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

137

Neither Goldman Sachs nor any of its affiliates make any representations

138

or warranties expressed or implied as to the accuracy

139

or completeness of the statements or information contained herein and disclaim any liability whatsoever for reliance on such information for any purpose.

140

Each name of a third-party organization mentioned is the property of the company to which it relates, is used here strictly for informational and identification purposes only,

141

and is not used to imply any ownership or license rights between any such company and Goldman Sachs.

142

A transcript is provided for convenience and may differ from the original video or audio content.

143

Goldman Sachs is not responsible for any errors in the transcript.

144

This material should not be copied, distributed, published, or reproduced in whole or in part, or disclosed by any recipient to any other person without the express written consent of Goldman Sachs.

145

146

TRENDING

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기

ShadowingEnglish는 여러분의 지원 덕분에 100% 무료로 운영됩니다. 서버 및 AI 유지 비용이 많이 듭니다. 여러분의 커피 한 잔이 큰 힘이 됩니다! ��

PayPal로 기부하기

ShadowingEnglish.com – 영어 쉐도잉 연습

쉐도잉(Shadowing)으로 원어민처럼 영어를 말하세요. YouTube 영상을 한 문장씩 듣고 따라 말하며, 진짜 발음과 유창성을 키우세요. IELTS 학습자들이 선택한 방법.

쉐도잉 연습: Can the Tech Surge Continue? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

인기 동영상

이 수업에 대하여

주요 어휘 및 구문

연습 팁

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉 연습: Can the Tech Surge Continue? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

앱 다운로드

이 수업에 대하여

주요 어휘 및 구문

연습 팁

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법