쉐도잉 연습: RTÉ DG says reclassification of Derek Mooney's role as a producer "justifiable" | RTÉ News - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기
C1
Now as you've been hearing,
357 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
Now as you've been hearing,
2
another pay controversy has emerged for RTE.
3
The broadcaster has revised its top 10 highest earning presenters for 2024 to include Derek Mooney,
4
presenter of Mooney Goes Wild,
5
after it said it reconsidered what constitutes a presenter.
6
RTE says Derek Mooney was designated by RTE as a producer and not as a presenter from 2020 to 2024.
7
And then this year, it said it made the decision to consider all personnel holding dual roles
8
for inclusion in the top 10 presenters list.
9
That meant that Derek Mooney,
10
who earned over €200,000 last year, made the list.
11
Well, to talk about this and some other issues,
12
we're joined now by RT Director General Kevin Backhurst.
13
Kevin, you're very welcome.
14
Morning, Sarah.
15
Hi.
16
Anyone in the country, I think,
17
who's familiar with RT and if they were asked what Derek Mooney's job is,
18
they'd say he's a presenter.
19
So can you explain why RT decided in 2020 to classify him as a producer?
20
Yeah, absolutely.
21
I mean, Derek's been a member of staff for nearly three decades with RTE,
22
and he's actually been on a radio producer and then an executive producer contract with RTE for a couple of decades now.
23
And there was a view taken around 2020 that when they considered whether to put him on the top ten,
24
whether he should be classified as a presenter or a producer.
25
Now, they took the view that he should be classified as a producer, not a presenter.
26
You know, that view, and he's classified in our account system as a producer.
27
But when we came to look at it again,
28
and we're constantly ratcheting up our efforts to be transparent and as thorough as possible,
29
when we came to look at it again,
30
we took your view, which is although the majority of Derek's work is actually producing,
31
he's best known as presenter,
32
and therefore we've now decided that people in hybrid roles where they're producing and presenting
33
if they qualify for top 10 should be included as a presenter.
34
So are you saying
35
when this decision was made in 2020 it was made in
36
the context of a discussion as to who should be included in the top 10 list?
37
Yes, that's my understanding of it.
38
Obviously that was made some time ago by people who are not there anymore.
39
But we actually took independent legal advice
40
when the issue arose in the last few weeks about the decision that was taken in 2020.
41
And the legal advice was that it was a perfectly justifiable decision given that Derek's contract is as an executive producer.
42
But we take a different view.
43
We think transparency is really important and most people know Derek as a presenter
44
and I think we'd expect him to be classified as a presenter even though,
45
as I say, I think the majority of his work is as an executive producer.
46
Who made the decision?
47
A decision was made by me and the leadership team.
48
No, sorry, to reclassify him in 2020.
49
Oh, well, it would have been made by the then executive team.
50
And is anybody who made that decision still working in the organisation or on the leadership team?
51
No, no one was aware of the decision and there's only a couple of people left.
52
But as has been the case with a few things,
53
decisions that were made then were not fully discussed at the executive in some cases.
54
I don't know about this one,
55
but certainly no one was aware of the decision until we looked into it
56
when it arose in the last few weeks as part of the process.
57
So no one on the current leadership team was involved in the decision in 2020 to reclassify Derek Minney?
58
Okay, you're talking about his role,
59
the max salary for a producer in 2021 on the RT pay scale was €90,000.
60
So it looks to me like even if he was being paid the absolute maximum for a producer of €90,000,
61
the majority of his salary must have still been coming from his presenting role.
62
Yeah, look, it's, you know,
63
with someone like Derek Way,
64
he's had a number of roles,
65
and I think as you alluded to earlier on the programme,
66
you know, he was an afternoon presenter five days a week on Radio 1,
67
for a long time.
68
His roles changed over the years.
69
Now when people's roles change quite often their salaries change with them.
70
I mean certainly during that period where he was on the five days a week on Radio One.
71
You know I would say the majority of his work was as was presenting and he's on the staff.
72
He's on the staff contract so you know the salary is agreed at the time
73
and yes you know but as I say now.
74
Sorry Kevin I'll just be clear the question can you confirm
75
that when he was reclassified as a producer the majority of his salary was coming from his presenting role?
76
No I can't because his salary always covered both those things
77
and his role changed over the years and changed
78
when he came off the weekday slot on RT1
79
and it changes at the moment when he's doing a bit more TV and in the coming days.
80
But say he was getting paid the maximum of £90,000 for a producer
81
and we don't know exactly what he was on in 2021
82
but it would have been close to £200,000 given what it is now.
83
Then most of his salary,
84
the presenting role must have taken off most of his salary.
85
Yeah, but as I say,
86
that probably was a historic salary from
87
when most of his role was as a presenter
88
because his salary would have gone up when he was moved into doing five days a week on Radio 1,
89
which was a long time ago now.
90
Let's go back to the why of this because 2020 was the same year that a number of presenters,
91
including Ryan Turbidey, were asked to take a pay cut.
92
And we know now that the management at the time did side deals to ensure
93
that Ryan Turbidey's pay was actually higher than was revealed to the public.
94
Was this another side deal?
95
No, I don't think it was.
96
As I say, we've taken independent legal advice on the facts that we know that were available at the time.
97
The legal advice is that it was actually a very,
98
it was a perfectly rational decision to take at the time.
99
As I say, we take a different view because we want maximum transparency for the audience,
100
for politicians, you know, who pay for RT.
101
We want maximum transparency.
102
We want to do what we think appears correct.
103
And as you'll have seen yesterday when we published details around the top 10 for 2025,
104
First of all, we've done it early because it's emerged.
105
We wanted to get it out into the public domain so that people could say, sorry.
106
It's very important to say that there was...
107
I do want to get back to the timing of all this
108
and what has been published and what might be published in the future.
109
But if I can just stick on why this decision was made,
110
because I think people are really trying to get their heads around that.
111
You're saying it was rational and you're saying it was legal.
112
I still don't really understand why all of a sudden in 2020 it's decided
113
that presenter Derek Mooney should be reclassified as producer Derek Mooney.
114
At the time, RT had promised the government to cut presenter pay by 15%.
115
So, by reclassifying Derek Mooney as a producer in 2020,
116
did that mean he didn't get a presenter pay cut?
117
I don't think he got a pay cut,
118
but he was on a staff salary.
119
He was on an executive producer role already by that stage.
120
So, you know, they had been clarified as a presenter when he was doing more presenter than Radio 1.
121
All I can say is his contract,
122
and I've seen his contract, is as a producer.
123
And, you know, that is,
124
I'm sure that is at the root of it.
125
Okay, I'm just going to try and lay out,
126
because it's very complicated for listeners.
127
Okay, I'm just going to try and lay out the situation as may have happened, right?
128
So we're entering into 2020,
129
and it looks like, and maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong,
130
but it looks like Derek Mooney is going to be in the top 10 presenters' paylist in 2020.
131
Unless he's changed.
132
And suddenly, a decision is made to reclassify him as producer.
133
We're being told that's rational and legal,
134
but we're not being told why the decision was made to reclassify him as producer.
135
I suspect, Sarah.
136
And as a result, sorry, I'll just keep going.
137
As a result of being reclassified as producer,
138
he doesn't get a 15% pay cut.
139
Is that right?
140
No, I don't think that is.
141
I think that's a very unfair gloss to put on it.
142
And people are looking for unfair ways to portray this.
143
And believe me, like, you know,
144
when I've seen things, I've called them out.
145
I think the rationale was he fell out of the top 10 presenters in the few years up to 2020.
146
As I understand it, in 2020 he would have been back in to the top 10
147
and they would have had to take a decision at
148
that stage whether he was working majority of the time as a presenter or as a producer.
149
And clearly they looked at the balance of his work as we have done recently and the majority of it is producing.
150
And you know that was as I say,
151
the advice is that was a rational decision to take.
152
We just have taken a very different decision because we want a higher degree of transparency for the organisation.
153
Okay and just to be very clear then,
154
are you saying that that decision didn't affect either way whether
155
or not Derek Mooney got the 15% pay cut that would have been handed out to other presenters in the top 10.
156
I can't say definitively I wasn't there at the time but I've seen no evidence to show that it did.
157
Okay, in terms of the publication of all of this then,
158
RT chair Terence O'Rourke said last night that this came to light
159
when it was decided to do an extensive check to make
160
sure the people who should be in the top 10 list were actually there.
161
A lot of people scratching their heads this morning,
162
I think Kevin wondering how was this not done three years ago when the first payment scandal hit,
163
how do people in the organisation who are in the organisation now not say do we have this right now?
164
Do we have everyone who should be in the list on the right salary out in the public?
165
Well I think so.
166
I mean I think the first thing to say is the last couple of years the focus has been as you'd expect,
167
on making sure that those presenters who are in the top ten,
168
their salaries are absolutely correctly declared.
169
And, you know, because that was where the issue arose before.
170
You know, as I started to say to you before,
171
we've put a lot more guidelines now
172
and we've released them publicly around what qualifies you to be in the top ten and what is included and what isn't.
173
And as that work was being done,
174
only in the last few weeks,
175
someone raised the question of Derek Mooney,
176
someone in finance, and we said we need to look into it properly to see,
177
you know, how much is he earning,
178
would he be in the top ten,
179
and if so, is he correctly classified,
180
because they said he's classified as a producer.
181
So we looked at that.
182
The answer was he would be in the top ten.
183
Our view was people know him largely as a presenter,
184
even though he does a lot of production work,
185
and we think he should be in the top ten.
186
So what prompted this search to make sure everything was right with someone in finance spotted it a couple of weeks ago.
187
Yeah, well, it was a part of all the work that's been going on for the end of year accounts,
188
you know, and there's a lot of rigorous work going on,
189
not just around the top 10,
190
but also around the accounts generally for the organisation.
191
This is partly in, this is part of the process to prepare for the annual accounts,
192
which are not due to be published until the summer.
193
But as I say, as part of that work,
194
you know, the top, we,
195
you know, we, since I've come in,
196
the top 10 salaries are now included in the accounts
197
and therefore they have to be verified and agreed by our auditors
198
and there's a very rigorous process around it and it was during that process that someone raised that question.
199
Have you spoken to Derek Mooney?
200
I haven't but my colleagues spoke to him yesterday
201
and I think it's important to say Derek played no role in this at all.
202
I mean he's you know we told him this was happening
203
and he agreed that that was our decision
204
but he's played no no role in this at all you know he's just just carrying on with his work really.
205
Can you assure the public that this finally is the right information, all of it?
206
Well as I said previously,
207
it's the very best information that we have available,
208
but you know we're working through a lot of information all the time
209
and I think the really important thing is if we discover something like this,
210
that we're very open and we say we've discovered it,
211
we come out quickly.
212
I mean literally this was discovered in the last three or four weeks,
213
so we put it into public domain yesterday straight after the board meeting.
214
Will revised salary lists for the last five years be published,
215
the correct salary lists?
216
Well they were correct, the previous ones.
217
We've revised last year because it's a comparator to this year which is the regular way of doing things in the accounts.
218
As I say for the previous years you know there was a judgment made at
219
that time which was you know the judgment was justifiable correct at
220
that time but we don't we don't agree with the judgment we think there should be different
221
So we can't go back and rewrite it because we changed the rules.
222
Yeah, I know I understand what you're saying,
223
but if you've changed the judgment as to who should be in the top 10 list,
224
should you not then change the top 10 list if
225
that person was in the top 10 list for the last five years?
226
No, as I say, I mean, we've changed it.
227
We can't go back retrospective every time we change something,
228
go back and rewrite history.
229
You know, it is it is there.
230
We change what's what's the comparator in the last in the last
231
so people can look back to last year for the top 10
232
and that's the way that these things are normally done
233
but it's not like there was a mistake um at the time
234
that we've identified as i say there was a decision we've just taken a different decision
235
because we want to be more transparent i want to move on to a separate issue
236
because it also emerged yesterday that orti continued to pay claire burn
237
and ray darcy after they ceased to work for the organization
238
claire burn stopped presenting on rt at the end of october but she was paid 47 000 euro after that
239
Ray Darcy stopped presenting on October 9th.
240
He was paid €50,000 after that date,
241
so it was nearly €100,000 in total.
242
This is what RTD Chair Terence O'Rourke had to say about all of this on Prime Time last night.
243
Well, their contract said that they were contracted to present until the end of the year,
244
and there were different decisions made about when they would stop presenting.
245
But if we had, for example,
246
if we ceased to pay them,
247
I think we would have had some interesting solicitor's letters and all the rest.
248
So I think it was a wise,
249
right thing for the organisation.
250
You paid two people for a couple of months 100,000 euro and you got nothing out of them?
251
I didn't do that.
252
Management did that and I'm happy to...
253
But the organisation did and you were the chair of the organisation.
254
Yes, I know.
255
And I know the organisation that the management made the decision.
256
We questioned the ceiling and challenged the decision.
257
I'm happy they made the right decision.
258
You're happy that the organisation paid two people 100 grand to do nothing for a couple of months?
259
They weren't doing nothing.
260
They were available.
261
If anything had happened, they would have still been under contract to present.
262
So it wasn't that they were doing nothing.
263
They were available kevin are you happy
264
that management made the right decision oh yeah it was totally the right decision
265
and terence is totally right about um presenters although they paid
266
a lot of money they also have contracts like like anyone who has employment rights in ireland
267
and if they have a contract we need to respect
268
that contract you know
269
so you know obviously we made the decision in both cases
270
um you know they were for different reasons claire was leaving
271
and She stayed on after she told us she was leaving for a period.
272
But we wanted to take her off there to launch the new Radio 1 schedule,
273
so that was our decision.
274
And in the case of Ray,
275
this was effectively his notice period.
276
And I think anyone would appreciate that people have notice periods.
277
So if you had decided to wait to launch the new schedule until January,
278
you'd have been able to get the services from both Claire and Ray, wouldn't you?
279
Well, they were available to work until then,
280
but we took a decision.
281
We wanted to launch the new schedule.
282
It was important.
283
The work had been going on.
284
And Claire had told us she was leaving anyway.
285
So we wanted to get ahead and launch that.
286
And it's launched very successfully.
287
And there's been very positive feedback about it.
288
But people have contractual rights if they've paid a lot of money.
289
I mean, the only thing I would say overall is that,
290
you know, across the Radio 1 schedule,
291
you know, we are now paying less for the total of all the presenters than we were with the old schedule.
292
So, you know, we are constantly trying to drive costs down.
293
Yeah, a lot of people find that a bitter pill to swallow,
294
won't they, looking at 100,000 euro pay to two presenters who weren't working for two months
295
because it was made to launch the schedule?
296
Well, I think they will if you want to dress it up in that way, Sarah.
297
But I think on the other hand,
298
everyone, including you, has employment rights.
299
And, you know, if we decide that we're going to stop someone working for RTE,
300
you can't just chop off their salary that people have notice periods
301
and you have to abide by that and
302
if people are paid a lot of money unfortunately it costs money
303
but you know we have to abide by employment rights and
304
if we hadn't by the way
305
and we got into a legal fight it would cost us a shed load more money than it did.
306
You said the Radio One schedule has been very well received
307
there's plenty of coverage in the papers today about the listenership figures
308
that were released yesterday they show almost every Radio One show has lost listeners since the new schedule was launched.
309
Now I know management have said
310
that they expect a fluctuation in listenership given all the changes but was this level of listenership last expected?
311
You never know what to expect with Gen Lars
312
because the numbers go up and down with each quarter
313
so you know we've had a few very strong quarters you
314
know the recent figures for Radio 1 were less strong
315
but I think you know I think we're right
316
that you know new schedules are not the only factor sometimes it can be the news agenda
317
or or what else is going on in the world.
318
And sometimes, you know, if there's a lot of miserable news,
319
people choose not to listen to a lot of news on radio stations.
320
So there's a lot of different factors.
321
If it continues as a trend,
322
say in August, if listenership figures are down again,
323
will RT consider changing tack?
324
We were very confident in the new schedule.
325
And we think, you know,
326
we certainly know the feedback is very good.
327
We're extremely pleased with how the new presenter lineup is performing on air.
328
So, of course, you know,
329
you always review things over time.
330
But, you know, for now,
331
you know, you need to hold your nerve when you make these kind of changes.
332
And, you know, I and the leadership team and Radio 1 team are very confident in the changes we've made.
333
And as I say, the feedback from listeners,
334
which is really important, has been extremely positive.
335
Can I ask you finally,
336
Ireland won't be taking part in the Eurovision at the final due to air,
337
of course, tomorrow night.
338
And I know you explained
339
that decision last December you said this is on the basis of the massive civilian casualties
340
that had taken place in Gaza and also the 200 journalists that were targeted and killed in Gaza.
341
So if we look at where we are now,
342
there do continue to be significant civilian casualties in Gaza,
343
but of course it's a much smaller number than it was before the ceasefire.
344
Israel has killed more journalists this year,
345
but again, a much smaller number than previously.
346
So does that change your calculation for Ireland's participation next year?
347
We haven't started to think about it next year and there's a long way to go.
348
So, you know, our rationale still holds and civilians are still dying in smaller numbers,
349
but they're still dying in significant numbers,
350
you know, in Gaza and also in Lebanon.
351
And journalists are still being targeted and they still have been up to recently.
352
And, you know, for us as a public service broadcaster who believes in the importance of protecting journalists
353
and believes in human rights,
354
you know, there's no reason at the moment to change our decision,
355
but we'll review it in the coming months.
356
Kevin Backhurst, I appreciate your time this morning.
357
Thank you very much.
앱 다운로드
당신이 말하는 모든 문장을 AI가 채점
TRENDING
인기 동영상
왜 이 비디오로 말하기 연습을 해야 할까요?
이 비디오는 RTÉ의 기자가 출연하는 상황에서 벌어진 연봉 재분류에 관한 내용을 다루고 있습니다. 이렇게 실제 뉴스 프로그램에서 말하는 내용은 영어 발음 교정과 영어 쉐도잉 연습에 매우 효과적입니다. 실생활에서 자주 사용되는 표현과 억양을 학습할 수 있으며, 뉴스 아나운서처럼 명확하게 말하는 것이 얼마나 중요한지를 이해하게 됩니다. 이러한 내용은 IELTS 스피킹 준비에도 유용합니다. 뉴스 보도 형식을 통해 문맥 속에서 자연스럽게 대화를 나누는 스킬을 향상시킬 수 있습니다.
문법 및 표현 분석
이 비디오에서는 몇 가지 중요한 문법 구조와 표현이 사용됩니다:
- “was designated by”: 이 구문은 수동태로, 누군가에 의해 무엇인가가 지정되었음을 나타냅니다. 이는 직무할당을 설명할 때 자주 사용됩니다.
- “has emerged”: 현재완료형으로, 과거의 사건이 현재까지 영향을 미치는 상황을 설명합니다. 이로 인해 발생한 위기나 사건의 여파를 강조할 수 있습니다.
- “it was a perfectly justifiable decision”: 이 표현은 결정의 타당성을 암시하며, 논리적이고 합리적인 주장을 하는 데 사용됩니다.
- “the majority of”: ‘대부분’이라는 뜻으로, 그룹의 전체를 논할 때 흔히 사용합니다. 이는 비교나 대조 설명에 유용합니다.
이러한 문법 구조를 이해하면 shadow speech 연습에 도움이 되며, 상대방과의 대화에서 더 자연스럽고 유창하게 이야기할 수 있게 됩니다.
자주 틀리는 발음 함정
영상에서 나타나는 몇 가지 발음이 어렵거나 헷갈릴 수 있습니다. 특히 다음과 같은 단어에 주의해야 합니다:
- “presenter”: 이 단어는 '프리젠터'가 아닌 '프리젠타'로 발음되어야 합니다. 영어 발음 교정 연습에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
- “producer”: '프로듀서'로 흔히 발음되지만, 강세를 지키면 '프러듀서'로 발음합니다.
자주 나오는 표현과 단어들을 영어 쉐도잉 방식으로 연습하면 더욱 자연스러운 발음을 돕습니다. shadow speak 기법을 활용해보세요.
쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법
쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.
☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기
ShadowingEnglish는 여러분의 지원 덕분에 100% 무료로 운영됩니다. 서버 및 AI 유지 비용이 많이 듭니다. 여러분의 커피 한 잔이 큰 힘이 됩니다! ��