Shadowing Practice: Are GMOs Good or Bad? Genetic Engineering & Our Food - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
96 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
GMOs are one of the most controversial areas of science.
2
Genetic engineering is used in many fields, but even though medical applications like GM insulin are widely accepted, The debate heats up when it comes to food and agriculture.
3
Why is that?
4
Why is the same thing treated so differently?
5
Let's try to get to the bottom of this and explore the facts, the fears, and the future of GMOs.
6
Humans have been genetically modifing plants and animals for thousands of years.
7
Maybe a few of your crops had very good yields.
8
Maybe one of your wolves was especially loyal.
9
So you did the smart thing, and bred the plants and animals that had traits beneficial to you.
10
Traits suggest an expression of genes.
11
So with each generation, those genes got more pronounced.
12
After thousands of years, almost every single plant and animal around us is vastly different from its pre-domesticated state.
13
If humans have been changing genes for millennia, what makes a so called "Genetically Modified Organism", or GMO, different?
14
Selective breeding is basically hoping for lucky hits.
15
Genetic engineering eliminates this factor. We can choose the traits we want.
16
Make fruit grow bigger, immune to pests, and so on.
17
So, why are people concerned about them ?
18
Let's start with one of the most common objections to GMOs.
19
Gene flow, meaning GM crops could mix with traditional crops and introduce unwanted new characteristics into them.
20
There is a method that might guarantee complete prevention, but is a big anti-GMO argument by itself.
21
Terminator seeds.
22
The idea is that they could produce sterile plants, requiring farmers to buy new seeds every year.
23
The very concept of this, however, caused a public outcry, stopping the technology being put to use.
24
This brings us back to the unintentional spreading of engineered DNA.
25
There have been cases of GMOs growing where they weren't planted, and traces of modified genes found in foreign crops.
26
But GM plants can't run wild entirely.
27
Many crops pollinate themselves, and all crops have to be related to mingle.
28
There are also cultural methods like buffer zones, to keep unintentional crossing at a minimum.
29
But if it's possible in principle that a GMO could unintentionally cross with a non-GMO, there's actually a more important question.
30
Is food that comes from GM crops different to food from non-GM crops?
31
This question has been a major concern from the very beginning.
32
GM plants that are destined to be eaten are checked for possible dangers, and the results are evaluated by multiple agencies.
33
After more than 30 years and thousands of studies, the science is in.
34
Eating GMO plants is no more risky than their non-GMO equivalent.
35
But don't just take it our word for it, the sources for this and other claims are in the video description.
36
But what about plants that have been engineered to be toxic?
37
For example, BT crops.
38
A gene borrowed from the bacterium Bacillus Thuringiensis, lets engineered plants produce a protein that destroys the digestive system of specific insect pests.
39
The plant makes its own pesticide.
40
Insects that eat it die.
41
That sounds alarming!
42
Pesticide sprays could be washed off.
43
While the poison in BT crops is inside the plant.
44
But actually, it's not a big deal.
45
Poison is really just a question of different perspectives.
46
What's harmless to one species, might kill another.
47
Coffee, for example, is a poison that kills insects but is harmless to us.
48
Or take chocolate, it's dangerous for dogs but a pleasure for humans.
49
BT crops produce a protein that is tailored to the specific design of the digestive tract of certain insects; it's completely harmless for us.
50
There's also the opposite approach.
51
Plants that are engineered to be resistant to certain weed killers.
52
This way, farmers can use them widely, killing the other plants competing for resources without harming the crop.
53
Here, we get to the dark underbelly of GMOs.
54
For the pesticide industry, they are big business.
55
Over 90% of all cash crops in the US are herbicide resistant, mostly to glyphosate.
56
As a result, the use of glyphosate has increased greatly.
57
That isn't only bad, glyphosate is much less harmful to humans than many other herbicides.
58
Still, this means famers have a strong incentive to rely on this one method only, casting more balanced ways of managing weeds aside.
59
That's one of the most fundamental problems with the GMO debate.
60
Much of the criticism of this technology is actually criticism of modern agriculture and a business practice of the huge corporations that control our food supply.
61
This criticism is not only valid, it's also important.
62
We need to change agriculture to a more sustainable model.
63
GMOs as a technology are actually an ally and not a enemy in that fight, helping to save and protect nature and minimize our impact on the environment.
64
Let's look at some positive examples.
65
Eggplant is an important crop in Bangladesh but often, whole harvests are destroyed by pests.
66
Farmers had to rely heavily on pesticides.
67
Not only was this very expensive, Farmers also frequently got sick.
68
The introduction of a new GM eggplant in 2013 stopped this.
69
The same BT protein we talked about before, an effective killer of insects but harmless to humans, was engineered into them.
70
This reduced insecticide use on eggplants by more than 80%. The health of farmers improved, and their income rose dramatically.
71
And sometimes, the GM approach is the only option.
72
In the 1990s, the papaya industry in Hawaii was under attack from the ringspot virus which threatened to wipe out Hawaiian papaya.
73
The solution was a papaya genetically modified to be vaccinated against the virus. Without it, the state's papaya industry would have collapsed.
74
All these stories show a very narrow application. 99% of all GMOs we use right now produce pesticides, or are resistant against them.
75
There is so much more we could do. The scientists are working on GMOs that could improve our diet.
76
Plants that produce more or different nutrients, like fruit with higher antioxidant levels that help to fight diseases or rice with additional vitamins.
77
On a larger scale, we're trying to engineer plants more resilient to climate change, plants that can better adapt to erratic weather and adverse soil conditions, making them resistant to droughts or floods.
78
GMOs could also not only reduce agriculture's impact on the environment, but actively help to protect it.
79
Scientists are working on crops that can draw nitrogen from the air, like microbes.
80
Nitrogen is a common fertilizer, but its build-up pollutes the ground water and speeds up climate change.
81
Plants that collect their own nitrogen could fix two problems at once.
82
The over use of fertilizers in the developed world, as well as the shortage of it in developing countries.
83
We could even modify plants to become super-effective carbon collectors, like the American chestnut tree, to mitigate and actually reverse climate change.
84
With the tools we have today, our imagination is the limit.
85
The world eats 11 million pounds of food every day.
86
A UN estimate suggests we'll need 70% more by 2050.
87
We could grow that food by clearing more and more forests to create fields and pastures and by using more pesticides.
88
Or we find a way to do it on the land we've got right now, with more effective methods like GM crops.
89
Intensifying farming instead of expanding it means GMOs could become the new organic.
90
In a nutshell, GMOs have the potential to not only drastically change agriculture but to also dampen the effects of our own irresponsible behavior.
91
GMOs could be our most powerful weapon to save our biosphere.
92
This video took more than 600 hours to make, which would be impossible without viewer support on Patreon.com.
93
If you'd like to support carefully researched content made with love, it's really very helpful!
94
And you can get your own bird as a reward.
95
If you want to learn more about genetic modification, we have more videos explaining the opportunities and risks of the technology and how it could impact our future.
96
Caption credits are in the description.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
C117
Queen Ant Clones Another Species
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
How Caffeine Works
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C1118
Could Humans Evolve Flight?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
You Will Only Like Half of This Video
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C112
Would You Upload Your Mind?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
Your Brain on Magic Mushrooms
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C136
Why Ebola Keeps Coming Back
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B25
Let’s Steal a New Moon
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
What Happens AFTER Nuclear War?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Awesome! 3/3
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C118
What Falling in Love Does to You
University StudentsWorking Adults
B26
YOU Own the Moon. And Mars. And Venus.
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
What Is Life? Is Death Real?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1149
How Antidepressants Work
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B238
Your Brain Peaked at Birth
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B232
Your Skeleton Is Electric
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C173
We Won’t Explore the Galaxy...
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B26
Dozens of Nukes Are Missing. Why? HOW?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C1153
Something Travels Faster than Light
University StudentsWorking Adults
C264
Nuclear Energy Explained: How does it work? 1/3
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C17
150 zinnen
Genetic Engineering Will Change Everything Forever – CRISPR
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
87 zinnen
Why Meat is the Best Worst Thing in the World 🍔
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
156 zinnen
The banana is under threat
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C16
73 zinnen
Part 4 organic farming
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
83 zinnen
TOEFL Listening Practice | Lecture | The Warrior Gene (M.A.O.A.)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
431 zinnen
How Did Humans Domesticate Corn?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B12
25 zinnen
Learning English with BBC Stories Practice Listening&Reading Story #4 Purple Tomatoes
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C11
59 zinnen
Cambridge Ielts 16 Reading test 2 Passage 2
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C110
55 zinnen
Nanotechnology: technology on a small scale | IELTS LISTENING TEST | SECTION-4
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C112
143 zinnen
What Happens When Science Clashes with the Public?: Crash Course Scientific Thinking #7
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
42 zinnen
Are We Eating Better – C1 English Listening Test
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
25 zinnen
Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Leak Shocking Bioweapon Truth!
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze video bevat 96 zinnen en 1347 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 9:02. De spreker praat in een gelijkmatig tempo van ongeveer 149 woorden per minuut, prettig om te shadowen. Slechts 77% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 minder gangbare woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
- crop /kɹɑp/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — gewas, voedselgewas. A plant, grown for it, or its fruits or seeds, to be harvested as food, livestock fodder, or fuel or for any other economic purpose.
- gene /d͡ʒiːn/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — gen. A theoretical unit of heredity of living organisms which may take several values and (in principle) predetermines a precise trait of an organism's form…
- farmer /ˈfɑɹ.mɚ/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — boer, boerin. A person who works the land and/or who keeps livestock; anyone engaged in agriculture on a farm.
- insect /ˈɪn.sɛkt/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — insect, kerfdier. An arthropod (in the Insecta class) characterized by six legs, up to four wings, and a chitinous exoskeleton.
- agriculture /ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — landbouw, agricultuur. The art or science of cultivating the ground, including the growing and harvesting of crops, and the rearing and management of livestock.
- harmless /ˈhɑɹmləs/ (bijvoeglijk naamwoord) — ongevaarlijk, onschadelijk. Incapable of causing harm or danger; safe.
- modify /ˈmɑ.dɪˌfaɪ/ (werkwoord) — modificeren, veranderen. To change part of.
- genetic /d͡ʒəˈnɛt.ɪk/ (bijvoeglijk naamwoord) — genetisch. Relating to genetics or genes.
- poison /ˈpɔɪ.zən/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — gif, vergif. A substance that is harmful or lethal to a living organism when ingested.
- nitrogen /ˈnaɪ.tɹə.d͡ʒən/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — stikstof. The chemical element (symbol N) with an atomic number of 7 and atomic weight of 14.0067. It is a colorless and odorless gas.
- trait /tɹeɪt/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — karaktereigenschap trek. An identifying characteristic, habit or trend.
- pest /pɛst/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — pest, plaag. Any destructive insect that attacks crops or livestock; an agricultural pest.
- killer /ˈkɪlɚ/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — doder. One who or that which kills.
- virus /ˈvaɪ.ɹəs/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — virus. A submicroscopic, non-cellular structure that consists of a core of DNA or RNA surrounded by a protein coat, that requires a living host cell to replicate, and…
- seed /siːd/ (zelfstandig naamwoord) — zaad. Any propagative portion of a plant which may be sown, such as true seeds, seed-like fruits, tubers, or bulbs.
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
- build up (werkwoord) — opstapelen. To erect; to construct.
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 8 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals can't, don't, isn't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: wash /wɑʃ/, prevention /pɹɪˈvɛnʃən/, controversial /ˌkɑn.tɹəˈvɝ.ʃəl/, imagination /ɪˌmæd͡ʒəˈneɪʃən/, beneficial /ˌbɛn.ɪˈfɪʃ.əl/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: agriculture /ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/, genetically /d͡ʒəˈneɾɪkli/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/, controversial /ˌkɑn.tɹəˈvɝ.ʃəl/, differently /ˈdɪf.ə.ɹənt.li/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Spreek zin voor zin na op normale snelheid en herhaal elke zin tot je ritme gelijk is aan dat van de spreker.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als crop, gene, farmer.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | being put · weren't planted · are destined |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have been · has been · have been engineered |
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.