跟讀練習: Are GMOs Good or Bad? Genetic Engineering & Our Food - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。

96 句

如果句子過短或過長，請點選 Edit 進行調整。

GMOs are one of the most controversial areas of science.

Genetic engineering is used in many fields, but even though medical applications like GM insulin are widely accepted, The debate heats up when it comes to food and agriculture.

Why is that?

Why is the same thing treated so differently?

Let's try to get to the bottom of this and explore the facts, the fears, and the future of GMOs.

Humans have been genetically modifing plants and animals for thousands of years.

Maybe a few of your crops had very good yields.

Maybe one of your wolves was especially loyal.

So you did the smart thing, and bred the plants and animals that had traits beneficial to you.

Traits suggest an expression of genes.

So with each generation, those genes got more pronounced.

After thousands of years, almost every single plant and animal around us is vastly different from its pre-domesticated state.

If humans have been changing genes for millennia, what makes a so called "Genetically Modified Organism", or GMO, different?

Selective breeding is basically hoping for lucky hits.

Genetic engineering eliminates this factor. We can choose the traits we want.

Make fruit grow bigger, immune to pests, and so on.

So, why are people concerned about them ?

Let's start with one of the most common objections to GMOs.

Gene flow, meaning GM crops could mix with traditional crops and introduce unwanted new characteristics into them.

There is a method that might guarantee complete prevention, but is a big anti-GMO argument by itself.

Terminator seeds.

The idea is that they could produce sterile plants, requiring farmers to buy new seeds every year.

The very concept of this, however, caused a public outcry, stopping the technology being put to use.

This brings us back to the unintentional spreading of engineered DNA.

There have been cases of GMOs growing where they weren't planted, and traces of modified genes found in foreign crops.

But GM plants can't run wild entirely.

Many crops pollinate themselves, and all crops have to be related to mingle.

There are also cultural methods like buffer zones, to keep unintentional crossing at a minimum.

But if it's possible in principle that a GMO could unintentionally cross with a non-GMO, there's actually a more important question.

Is food that comes from GM crops different to food from non-GM crops?

This question has been a major concern from the very beginning.

GM plants that are destined to be eaten are checked for possible dangers, and the results are evaluated by multiple agencies.

After more than 30 years and thousands of studies, the science is in.

Eating GMO plants is no more risky than their non-GMO equivalent.

But don't just take it our word for it, the sources for this and other claims are in the video description.

But what about plants that have been engineered to be toxic?

For example, BT crops.

A gene borrowed from the bacterium Bacillus Thuringiensis, lets engineered plants produce a protein that destroys the digestive system of specific insect pests.

The plant makes its own pesticide.

Insects that eat it die.

That sounds alarming!

Pesticide sprays could be washed off.

While the poison in BT crops is inside the plant.

But actually, it's not a big deal.

Poison is really just a question of different perspectives.

What's harmless to one species, might kill another.

Coffee, for example, is a poison that kills insects but is harmless to us.

Or take chocolate, it's dangerous for dogs but a pleasure for humans.

BT crops produce a protein that is tailored to the specific design of the digestive tract of certain insects; it's completely harmless for us.

There's also the opposite approach.

Plants that are engineered to be resistant to certain weed killers.

This way, farmers can use them widely, killing the other plants competing for resources without harming the crop.

Here, we get to the dark underbelly of GMOs.

For the pesticide industry, they are big business.

Over 90% of all cash crops in the US are herbicide resistant, mostly to glyphosate.

As a result, the use of glyphosate has increased greatly.

That isn't only bad, glyphosate is much less harmful to humans than many other herbicides.

Still, this means famers have a strong incentive to rely on this one method only, casting more balanced ways of managing weeds aside.

That's one of the most fundamental problems with the GMO debate.

Much of the criticism of this technology is actually criticism of modern agriculture and a business practice of the huge corporations that control our food supply.

This criticism is not only valid, it's also important.

We need to change agriculture to a more sustainable model.

GMOs as a technology are actually an ally and not a enemy in that fight, helping to save and protect nature and minimize our impact on the environment.

Let's look at some positive examples.

Eggplant is an important crop in Bangladesh but often, whole harvests are destroyed by pests.

Farmers had to rely heavily on pesticides.

Not only was this very expensive, Farmers also frequently got sick.

The introduction of a new GM eggplant in 2013 stopped this.

The same BT protein we talked about before, an effective killer of insects but harmless to humans, was engineered into them.

This reduced insecticide use on eggplants by more than 80%. The health of farmers improved, and their income rose dramatically.

And sometimes, the GM approach is the only option.

In the 1990s, the papaya industry in Hawaii was under attack from the ringspot virus which threatened to wipe out Hawaiian papaya.

The solution was a papaya genetically modified to be vaccinated against the virus. Without it, the state's papaya industry would have collapsed.

All these stories show a very narrow application. 99% of all GMOs we use right now produce pesticides, or are resistant against them.

There is so much more we could do. The scientists are working on GMOs that could improve our diet.

Plants that produce more or different nutrients, like fruit with higher antioxidant levels that help to fight diseases or rice with additional vitamins.

On a larger scale, we're trying to engineer plants more resilient to climate change, plants that can better adapt to erratic weather and adverse soil conditions, making them resistant to droughts or floods.

GMOs could also not only reduce agriculture's impact on the environment, but actively help to protect it.

Scientists are working on crops that can draw nitrogen from the air, like microbes.

Nitrogen is a common fertilizer, but its build-up pollutes the ground water and speeds up climate change.

Plants that collect their own nitrogen could fix two problems at once.

The over use of fertilizers in the developed world, as well as the shortage of it in developing countries.

We could even modify plants to become super-effective carbon collectors, like the American chestnut tree, to mitigate and actually reverse climate change.

With the tools we have today, our imagination is the limit.

The world eats 11 million pounds of food every day.

A UN estimate suggests we'll need 70% more by 2050.

We could grow that food by clearing more and more forests to create fields and pastures and by using more pesticides.

Or we find a way to do it on the land we've got right now, with more effective methods like GM crops.

Intensifying farming instead of expanding it means GMOs could become the new organic.

In a nutshell, GMOs have the potential to not only drastically change agriculture but to also dampen the effects of our own irresponsible behavior.

GMOs could be our most powerful weapon to save our biosphere.

This video took more than 600 hours to make, which would be impossible without viewer support on Patreon.com.

If you'd like to support carefully researched content made with love, it's really very helpful!

And you can get your own bird as a reward.

If you want to learn more about genetic modification, we have more videos explaining the opportunities and risks of the technology and how it could impact our future.

Caption credits are in the description.

下載應用

流利口語所需的一切

AI 發音評分逐句打分

音標練習掌握每個音

詞彙學習建立你的詞庫

詞彙遊戲邊玩邊學

掃碼

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同頻道

FOR YOU

為什麼要通過這個影片練習口語？

這段關於轉基因生物（GMO）的討論是深入瞭解科學爭議的好機會，並能幫助你鍛鍊英語口語技巧。通過觀看這段影片並跟隨練習，你能在探討複雜話題時提高思維的靈活性。同時，這也為提高你的詞彙量和表達能力提供了很好的環境。通過這種方式，你可以同時提升雅思口語練習的能力，並熟練掌握在不同語境中使用英語的技巧。

語法和表達方式分析

在影片中，演講者使用了幾種重要的表達結構，這些結構在你進行口語練習時非常有用：

“What makes ... different?” - 這種提問方式非常直接，常用於引入比較和對比，可以幫助你在討論中更加清晰。
“There have been cases of...” - 使用現在完成時，強調過去到現在的相關性，非常適合討論研究結果和持續的爭議。
“It’s completely harmless for us.” - 使用絕對詞彙的否定表達，能夠在說話時更有效地傳達觀點。

在進行shadow speech練習時，可以嘗試重複這些句型，增強自己的流利度和語感。

常見發音陷阱

在觀看影片時，你可能會注意到一些比較困難的發音，比如“genetically modified”和“Bacillus Thuringiensis”。這些詞彙的發音可能會對許多學習者造成挑戰，特別是對於非母語人士。建議在練習時，可以暫停影片，慢慢重複這些詞，確保掌握準確的發音，同時注意不同單詞的重音位置。通過看YouTube學英語的方式，這些發音練習可以讓你在說英語時更加自信。

此外，確保你的語調和重音與演講者的一致，這樣可以幫助你在進行shadowspeaks練習時更好地融入英語的語音韻律。

影片中的語法

說話人最常用的結構，並附上影片中的原話：

結構	影片中的用法
被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼，而不是誰做的	being put · weren't planted · are destined
現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事	have been · has been · have been engineered

什麼是跟讀法？

跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧，最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓，並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大：您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同，跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性，語調，節奏，連讀，聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟讀法: 閱讀完整分步指南 →

跟讀練習: Are GMOs Good or Bad? Genetic Engineering & Our Food - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

下載應用

Queen Ant Clones Another Species

How Caffeine Works

Your Skeleton Is Electric

The Beginning of Everything -- The Big Bang

Could Humans Evolve Flight?

You Will Only Like Half of This Video

Would You Upload Your Mind?

Your Brain on Magic Mushrooms

Why Ebola Keeps Coming Back

Let’s Steal a New Moon

What Happens AFTER Nuclear War?

3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Awesome! 3/3

What Falling in Love Does to You

YOU Own the Moon. And Mars. And Venus.

What Is Life? Is Death Real?

How I Survived Late-Stage Cancer (A Fun Story)

How Antidepressants Work

Your Brain Peaked at Birth

We Won’t Explore the Galaxy...

Dozens of Nukes Are Missing. Why? HOW?

Genetic Engineering Will Change Everything Forever – CRISPR

Why Meat is the Best Worst Thing in the World 🍔

The banana is under threat

Part 4 organic farming

How Did Humans Domesticate Corn?

TOEFL Listening Practice | Lecture | The Warrior Gene (M.A.O.A.)

Cambridge Ielts 16 Reading test 2 Passage 2

Learning English with BBC Stories Practice Listening&Reading Story #4 Purple Tomatoes

Nanotechnology: technology on a small scale | IELTS LISTENING TEST | SECTION-4

What Happens When Science Clashes with the Public?: Crash Course Scientific Thinking #7

Are We Eating Better – C1 English Listening Test

Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Leak Shocking Bioweapon Truth!

為什麼要通過這個影片練習口語？

語法和表達方式分析

常見發音陷阱

影片中的語法

什麼是跟讀法？