Shadowing Practice: DEMOCRACY: Ancient vs. Modern - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
This is a painting of life in ancient Greece, specifically in Athens during its political golden age.
2
Its male citizens enjoyed, for the first time in the history of a state, near total control over their own political lives.
3
They called their form of government demokratia.
4
Themos in Greek means people.
5
Kratos means power to do things, which people usually translate as rule.
6
Together, you have demokratia, the rule of the people.
7
After the fall of Athens, the word democracy wouldn't be linked to another state for more
8
than 2,000 years upon the founding of the United States of America.
9
But the United States created a very different form of democracy that, to many, isn't democratic at all.
10
This video is going to explore these two democracies.
11
We're going to talk about where they came from, what their ideas were, how they're democratic, and also how they're undemocratic.
12
At the end, we're going to circle out and ask if the word democracy is appropriate for either society.
13
So this video is designed to give you a better grasp on the concept of democracy, and also how it relates to both societies.
14
So that's the plan, and we're going to begin by looking at Greece.
15
Ancient Greece wasn't a country in the modern sense, with one state and one government.
16
Instead, it was a collection of cities that were their own states, called city-states.
17
These city-states formed over hundreds of years when neighboring families, clans, and tribes joined together for protection.
18
So these city-states were basically just an urban area and the surrounding countryside, all under one sovereign jurisdiction.
19
The most famous city-state, and also the best documented one, was Athens.
20
In 507 BC, the Athenians adopted a system of popular government that lasted nearly two centuries,
21
with a brief interruption in 404 BC when Athens lost to Sparta at the end of the Peloponnesian War.
22
The classical Athenian democracy permanently ended in 321 BC when Athens was defeated and subjugated by another powerful neighbor, Macedonia.
23
The invention of democracy didn't happen in a vacuum.
24
If you look at the position of Greece on a map and consider the prominent civilizations at the time, like the Persians, the Egyptians, and the Phoenicians,
25
you can see how it was positioned to be a sort of focal point among the flourishing civilizations at the time, as they interacted, traded, and even fought with one another.
26
So from that came a sort of swirling mixture of genes, cultures, and challenges that shaped Greek civilization and culture.
27
A similar phenomenon continued throughout the Athenian Golden Age, which made Athens a remarkably alive city in its time.
28
It's hard to definitively say more precisely how it happened, since we're talking about ancient history here,
29
but one thing that came to distinguish this flourishing Greek culture was its respect for wisdom.
30
So the Greeks respected wisdom, similarly to how 19th century Americans respected capitalistic enterprise.
31
So the Greeks made their sages into heroes, and had popular sayings like, Wisdom should be cherished as a means of traveling from youth to old age,
32
for it is more lasting than any other possession.
33
In particular, they were interested in practical wisdom, wisdom that you could make function actively in the world.
34
The Greeks' focus on practical intellectual pursuits led them to develop a new philosophy of rule.
35
You could ask the question of any society, who rules, or where's the highest political authority.
36
The answer to that question for most of history was a person, like a king or a pharaoh.
37
But to the Greeks, these were barbarians.
38
They weren't free-thinking people.
39
The Greeks instead answered the question with law.
40
That, on one hand, was thought to free people.
41
It was thought that getting everyone in society, including its leaders, to be subject to the law gave people a certain amount of protection in their lives from arbitrary uses of power.
42
It was also thought to have a civilizing effect on people.
43
It was thought that getting people to follow the law made people more driven by reason, and less driven by emotional impulses.
44
Here's how Aristotle put it, "...just as man is the best of the animals when completed," which here basically means living in a Greek city-state,
45
"...when separated from law and adjudication, he is the worst of all." So the Greeks believed that they could civilize all of society,
46
including its leaders by making everyone in that society subject to the law.
47
So that concept is called rule of law.
48
You don't have to be a democracy to have rule of law.
49
You can have a king, for example, who's also subject to the law.
50
But it's a fundamental aspect of Athenian democracy, as well as American democracy.
51
It's also thought to be a necessary component of democracy more generally.
52
If you think about it, you probably won't be able to rotate out unwanted people by election who are holding office, if those people in office are not subject to the law.
53
So rule of law is understood to be a western idea
54
because the ancient Greeks are understood to be the people who discovered it.
55
Again we're talking about ancient history here, and the further we go back in time, the less sure we can be about what we know.
56
So we can't say definitively that the Athenians are the ones who invented rule of law.
57
But we are pretty confident that it was a Greek invention, and it certainly paved the way for the Athenian democracy that followed.
58
Another major conceptual development that led to democracy is captured in the Greek word isonomia, which translates to equality for all under the law.
59
So you can think of democracy as a manifested expression of isonomia, an expression of political equality in a state with rule of law.
60
But how did this come about?
61
How did this become a thing?
62
For one, rule of law is naturally somewhat equalizing.
63
It brings people of all classes politically closer together.
64
tumbling towards those at the top and elevating towards those at the bottom.
65
So once you have rule of law, calls for political equality might not be far behind.
66
But we think the main reason why political equality emerged as a popular concept in Greece
67
and in its most extreme form in Athens boils down to Greek military culture.
68
In Greek culture, battle and conquest were glorified.
69
The warriors who won battles brought honor and prestige onto themselves.
70
Since armies were needed to defend every city-state against potentially larger opponents, far more people served in the military than we're used to now.
71
For example, even aristocrats might serve as cavalry, since they were wealthy enough to own horses and the land that was needed to support them.
72
If the cavalry prominently served in a battle and won, they'd bring glory onto themselves, and with that, power.
73
So over time, a link developed between military service and political power, the power to administer the state.
74
So that made the composition of armies in ancient Greece inherently political.
75
The types of people serving in armies were positioned to win power.
76
Athenian citizens were the ones who democratically capitalized on that.
77
If you think about Greece, it's notably characterized by islands and the Aegean Sea.
78
You can think of the Aegean Sea as the heart of Greece.
79
Athens became unique in Greece when it used wealth from a silver mine it controlled to take advantage of the Aegean Sea.
80
Between 507 and 480 BCE, they build up a powerful navy.
81
It was the greatest navy the Greek world had ever seen.
82
And who, overwhelmingly, works in an ancient Greek navy?
83
The answer is oarsmen.
84
The people who literally rowed the boats.
85
So you might see where I'm going with this.
86
The next question should be, what type of person worked as an oarsman in this ancient Athenian navy?
87
The answer was poor Greek men.
88
The Greek word for them was thetes.
89
We don't know how many thetes there were living in ancient Athens, but there were presumably quite a lot of them.
90
Athenian literature sometimes refers to them as the masses.
91
Athens also had a land army that was more standard for the time, consisting mostly of hoplites.
92
Hoplites were heavy infantry.
93
They were basically the middle class of Athens, people who were wealthy enough to own shields and weaponry.
94
The important point here is that between the Thetes and the Hoplites, you have a clear majority of the adult male Athenian population,
95
again in circumstances where war can bring glory and power.
96
In that same period, as you might have guessed, Athens uses its land army and its navy to win a stunning series of victories.
97
Its Hoplite army unexpectedly defeats the much larger Persian army in the Battle of Marathon, making them heroes around all of Greece.
98
They also won a string of battles around Greece in 506.
99
But probably the most important victory of all went to the navy in the Battle of Solomus in 480,
100
again defeating the Persians and effectively saving Athens from subjugation,
101
which was reported to have caused the masses to have gained a newfound confidence in themselves, which was directly linked to the Athenian Democratic Revolution,
102
to the ushering in of Isonomia.
103
That revolution is typically thought to have occurred in three major phases, three major reforms, and each reform is linked to a person.
104
The first reform is linked to a man named Solon.
105
Solon was responding to a class war that was ravaging Athens around 600 BCE.
106
There was a massive wealth disparity between rich and poor, and the government, the army, and the courts were controlled by the wealthy.
107
Many in Athens were deeply in debt and unable to pay it off.
108
So Solon was brought in as a moderate to mediate between the classes and keep Athens from destroying itself.
109
One of his main accomplishments was to convince all Athenians, regardless of class, to obey the law.
110
So he created a new set of laws that were applied, without distinction, to all free men.
111
So he's a good figure to peg the beginning of rule of law on in Athens.
112
Solon also cancelled the debts, but probably more importantly for the long run, he politically reorganized Athens.
113
He broke Athens into four groups depending on their income, which is where we get thetes from.
114
Each group was then given a different amount of political privilege.
115
The thetes were given the fewest political privileges.
116
They were given access to the assembly, which is a voting body which we'll get to, and they were also given access to the courts,
117
so thetes could now litigate and serve in the jury.
118
Under Solon, the most powerful political authority was called the Council of the Areopagus, which only the wealthy could serve on, and whose members served for life.
119
The second reform was through a man named Cleisthenes.
120
Cleisthenes was involved in a power struggle around 508 in Athens.
121
There seemed to be simmering anger against elites at the time, which Cleisthenes used against his opponent.
122
He aroused the people to revolt, sweeping him into power and establishing him as a populist dictator.
123
He wanted to break the hold that powerful aristocratic families had over parts of Athens, So he politically reorganizes Athens into 10 tribes,
124
which were further broken into subgroups down to deems.
125
So these deems are essentially local districts.
126
It was through that infrastructure that Athenian citizens would go on to exercise many of their democratic rights.
127
Each tribe could elect members to a newly created Council of 500, which we'll get to.
128
And they could also elect one of ten generals to lead the military.
129
But under Cleisthenes, you still had the Council of the Areopagus, and Thetes, importantly, couldn't hold public office.
130
The last major reform happened under a man named Pericles.
131
Pericles came from a noble family, which was reported to have descended from Cleisthenes.
132
He lived in the mid-5th century, which was the era of Athenian naval dominance.
133
There were calls for political equality, and Athenian opinion was split into two camps.
134
One side believed that elites should govern Athens, and the other believed that the people, the Deimos, should govern Athens.
135
By allying with the people calling for political equality, Pericles rose to power and became the most influential man in Athens.
136
He then worked with a colleague named Ephialtes to break the power of the Council of the Areopagus, which brought about the golden age of Athenian democracy.
137
So without further delay, here's a description of what that society looked like.
138
You could ask the question of any society, where are policy decisions made?
139
Are they made in a throne room or in a private council somewhere?
140
In democratic Athens, policy decisions were made on a hill not far from the Acropolis called the Pnyx the Pnyx.
141
Ten times a year, the citizens of Athens would come together and meet at the Pnyx.
142
Once there, an issue would be raised and then a debate would occur.
143
Everyone there would have equal right to participate in that debate, which was the Athenian basis of free speech, called Isegoria.
144
Once the issue was sufficiently debated, a vote would be held.
145
The people there would then raise their hands to show their support for a particular position.
146
Whenever side won, a simple majority would become new policy in Athens.
147
What I just described was called, in Athens, the Ekklesia, the Assembly.
148
The issues raised in the Assembly were prepared by the Council of 500, whose members were chosen randomly from the public by lot.
149
Of the two, the Assembly was the far more powerful body.
150
The Assembly could vote down bills drafted by the Council.
151
They could change the bills on the floor.
152
They could send the bill back with instructions for redrafting, or they could replace it with an entirely new one.
153
So the real exercise of sovereign public authority rested directly on the assembly.
154
The citizens gathered on the Pnyx could pass virtually whatever policy they wanted.
155
So the most important policy decisions that had to be made in Athens were made in the assembly, which included foreign policy.
156
So, as you might expect, that led to some dramatic assemblies.
157
In the mid-fourth century, for example, Philip of Macedon was marching on Athens.
158
The assembly then had to vote on whether to fight or to try to negotiate.
159
The wrong decision could have meant the fall of Athens and even the destruction of Athenian culture.
160
So this must have been a deeply political society.
161
And considering how long democratic Athens lasted, this must have been a fairly competent public.
162
Speaking to that competence, there were very few elected public officials in this society.
163
Short of a few exceptions, generals, naval architects, and superintendents of the water supply.
164
All public officials were chosen randomly from the citizenry by lottery.
165
These officials all had their power tightly controlled by the assembly.
166
The highest public officials were the generals.
167
They only served one-year terms and were subject to performance reviews by the public.
168
If their performance was found lacking, they would be dismissed.
169
That being said, they didn't have term limits, so generals like Pericles could be re-elected for life.
170
So the influence of a general over a lifetime could give a sort of continuity of purpose to Athenian politics.
171
But all generals, including Pericles, had no formal power outside of the military.
172
Their only ability to influence public policy rested on their ability to persuade the public.
173
So what we're looking at here is a public that directly and thoroughly has control over its own political affairs,
174
which is what we would now call a direct democracy.
175
The Athenian public also directly expressed their political power through the Dekasteria, the people's courts.
176
I think it's worth spending a moment describing what it looked like, because it didn't really resemble modern courts.
177
For one, there were no lawyers in the system.
178
You could hire a speechwriter, but all cases had to be registered and argued by private citizens.
179
There also were no judges.
180
All cases were decided by the jury, and that jury was massive.
181
The average size was around 500 people, big enough to be unbribable, and also big enough to represent public opinion.
182
The jurors were again chosen randomly from the public by lot.
183
That meant that there weren't really any professionals in the system.
184
You could even call it an amateur law system.
185
So legal outcomes could be unpredictable.
186
Speakers could fool the jury by, for example, incorrectly citing laws or distorting history.
187
So those were the three main institutions, the assembly, the council of 500, and the law courts, all directly controlled and managed by the Athenian public.
188
But who exactly was that public?
189
Who had access to those institutions?
190
Athenians, like all Greeks, saw the world in terms of binaries.
191
You were either man or woman, free or slave, Greek or barbarian, citizen or alien.
192
Within that, the Athenians permitted one half of those binaries into their democracy.
193
They permitted free, male, Greek citizens of Athens.
194
So slaves weren't permitted, women weren't permitted, non-Greeks weren't permitted, and non-Athenian citizens weren't permitted.
195
It's still normal today to exclude non-citizens from your politics.
196
The rest of these exclusions were relatively normal for their time, but I think it's worth spending some time addressing them.
197
The Greeks again believed that their city-states civilized people and freed them, so they believed that they lived as free people in their city-states.
198
They also believed that people elsewhere in the world, the barbarians, lived as subjugated people.
199
They lived as subjects to a ruler.
200
So to them, foreigners and slaves were essentially the same.
201
They both had the psychologies of subordinated people.
202
So to the Greeks, their politics were incompatible with both foreigners and slaves.
203
They saw their free politics as being incompatible with the psychologies of subordinated people.
204
Speaking of slaves, the Athenians had quite a lot of them, probably somewhere between 80 and 100,000 slaves, which was about a third of the total Athenian population.
205
Athenian male citizens wanted to spend their time on things that they thought were valuable, but that don't necessarily create wealth.
206
They wanted to spend their time on things like government, war, literature, or philosophy.
207
But someone has to work to create wealth, and this was before machines were invented, so slaves were the Athenians' answer to that.
208
So the work provided by slaves made it possible for
209
so many Athenian men to spend time in government or to serve in the military.
210
That being said, the Athenians seemed to be relatively generous towards their slaves, in contrast to the United States of America,
211
where slaves and their families were passed down from generation to generation, making their outlook on eventually gaining freedom pretty hopeless.
212
In Athens, it wasn't unusual for well-behaved slaves to be freed as their owners reached the end of their lives.
213
Slaves in Athens also enjoyed some legal protections.
214
If they were badly beaten by their owners, they could flee to a temple, and their owner might be forced to sell them.
215
Slaves were also allowed to participate in business, provided they gave their owners a share of the earnings.
216
And better-off slaves reportedly dressed similarly to free Athenians.
217
The Athenian government also employed a number of slaves.
218
Many of them were given an allowance and were allowed to live where they pleased.
219
Considering the standards of the time, Athenians were known for being mild to their slaves.
220
And it was even common judgment
221
that it was better to be a slave in Athens than a poor free man in an oligarchic state.
222
But I doubt that was of much consolation to the slaves working in the silver mines.
223
It's a bit more controversial how Athenian men regarded Athenian women.
224
Thucydides infamously reported Pericles to have said, at the end of his funeral oration, female excellence meant to be least talked about among the men,
225
whether for good or for bad.
226
In keeping with that, average female citizens were rarely talked about in Athenian literature.
227
Aristotle opened his politics claiming that, while on one hand, men and women need each other for reproduction,
228
on the other hand, some are naturally rulers and others are naturally ruled.
229
Rulers, he says, use their minds, and the ruled use their bodies.
230
Which seems to be implying that men are naturally a ruling class over women.
231
Since women weren't invited into politics, that seems at least fairly representative of Athenian public opinion.
232
So this was a deeply patriarchal society.
233
The woman's place was understood to be not in politics, but in the home, out of sight.
234
As probably the strongest piece of evidence for that, we don't even know the name of Pericles' wife.
235
That being said, not all All male citizens were always allowed into their democracy.
236
Under Kleisthenes, a procedure was introduced that allowed the Athenian public to banish someone from their society.
237
The procedure was called an ostracism.
238
If 6,000 people in the assembly voted in an ostracism, then the person with the most names would be forced to leave Athens for 10 years.
239
So that's something that happened to high-profile people, typically disgraced politicians, and presumably during tense times, considering how many boats needed to be cast.
240
So ostracisms probably worked to relieve domestic pressures.
241
If someone was causing a lot of trouble in Athens, and the Athenian public wanted them gone, they had the means to do it.
242
I think it's worth reflecting on that process, and what it seems to say about Athenian society.
243
When the Athenians wanted someone gone, they didn't kill them, and they didn't throw them in jail, never to be seen again.
244
Instead they just forced them to leave for 10 years, and after that 10 years, they'd be allowed to come back.
245
So it was a fundamentally peaceful process, and I think a civil one.
246
That being said, there is some evidence of fraud during those ostracisms, so the process might have sometimes been manipulated.
247
Illiterate voters, for example, might have been used for political purposes.
248
So what happened to this system?
249
What happened to Athenian democracy?
250
Why do we talk about it in the past tense?
251
Well, democracy in Athens became expensive.
252
The assembly voted to institute pay for more and more public positions, namely in the military and the jury.
253
Money for those positions had to come from somewhere, and Athens found the answer in empire.
254
So democracy in Athens came to depend on empire.
255
They increasingly stretched their power over the rest of Greece.
256
They also sent ambitious campaigns abroad to Egypt and Sicily.
257
Things reached a breaking point.
258
in Greece turned against the Athenians.
259
Resistance to Athenian policy came from nearly every state in Greece.
260
The viability of democracy was also an open question in Athenian time.
261
It was notably rejected by aristocrats and the upper class.
262
That led to divisions at home and a lack of intellectual support from many of the brightest minds at the time, like Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle.
263
By Aristotle's time, the most extreme oligarchs were reported to have sworn the following oath.
264
I will be evil-minded to the demos, and will plot whatever evil I can against them.
265
Athens would go on to suffer a string of defeats that would lead to its fall.
266
The end of the line for the old-style Athenian democracy came in 321, when Athens, subordinated under Macedon,
267
added a wealth criterion for citizenship.
268
Democracy disappeared in Athens and wouldn't reappear for thousands of years, this time in a modern form, influenced by the United States.
269
We're about to turn our attention there, but I'd like to close this section out by reading a speech
270
that Pericles was reported to give to the citizens of Athens.
271
was a dark time in the city, plague had struck, and the tide of the war against Sparta seemed to be turning against Athens.
272
I think it gives a sense of both the intelligence and the grandeur of the time.
273
It reads, Even if we should ever be forced to yield, for everything that grows great also decays.
274
The memory of our greatness will be bequeathed to posterity forever.
275
That we of all the Greeks ruled over more Greeks than anyone,
276
that in the greatest wars we held out against enemies in alliance and individually,
277
and that we lived in a city that was the most ingenious and the greatest.
278
We see the wisdom of Solon's remark that no more good must be attempted than the nation can bear.
279
Thomas Jefferson, corresponding with Walter Jones, 1801.
280
If you think about it, democracy in Athens, as told by its literature, manifested itself as a class struggle, a struggle between the many and the few.
281
Democracy was implemented when the many won that struggle and took control of politics.
282
But the few always resented the many.
283
Democracy in Athens ended with the few reclaiming power and the many losing it.
284
Democracy in America, by contrast, manifested itself as less of a class struggle and more of a moderate compromise,
285
probably most powerfully embodied in the philosophy of James Madison, the principal framer of the Constitution.
286
For that to make sense, we need some context.
287
I think the best place to start is to look at the state of democracy before the founding of the United States.
288
In the mid-1700s, ancient Greece was thousands of years in the rearview mirror of history.
289
Available literature at the time was limited, so people's understandings of ancient Greece at the time were also accordingly limited.
290
So that meant that even though they created what's considered the first modern democratic nation.
291
Only a few of the US founders were at all familiar with ancient Greek history or political thought.
292
What little they knew mostly came from only two sources, Thucydides and the biographer Plutarch, with Plutarch being probably by far the bigger source.
293
That translated into the founders not showing much interest in ancient Athens.
294
They mentioned it sparingly and typically in a passing fashion.
295
But there was an ancient society that they were more interested in.
296
Intellectuals at the time, in both America
297
and Europe showed far more interest in classical Rome and the concept of republicanism that's associated with its society before Caesar.
298
That meant that leading up to the revolution, there were two main political philosophies on the table, republicanism and monarchism.
299
So it was republicanism that ended up replacing monarchism.
300
There's a few things to say about that.
301
For one, the concept of republicanism wasn't precisely understood at the time.
302
For example, Alexander Hamilton said that it was used in a variety of senses.
303
And John Adams said, even after the founding, that he never understood what it was, and thought that no man ever did or will.
304
To further confuse things, the words republic and democracy were
305
so closely associated in the minds of the colonists that they are often used synonymously.
306
We have an understanding now that the word republic is different because it refers to a representative government.
307
But that distinction had only barely begun to exist at the time.
308
It was apparently invented in 1787 for polemical purposes by James Madison,
309
who argued that pure democracies have a small number of citizens who assemble and administer the government in person,
310
while republics have a scheme of representation.
311
But that was a distinction with no basis in prior history.
312
Pretty much all of the earlier republics, including Rome, fit into Madison's definition of a democracy.
313
So throughout history and throughout 18th century America, the words democracy and republic were used interchangeably.
314
They didn't refer to different types of popular government, and instead reflected differences in language.
315
Democracy came from Greek, the rule of the people, and republic came from Latin.
316
Res publicas meant thing of the people.
317
So that was a lot of mental work to basically bring us back to square one.
318
The American founders were setting out to transform America from a monarchy into a republic.
319
But the words republic and democracy were interchangeable at the time.
320
So they were setting out to do something that was closer to the spirit of classical Athens than you might think.
321
Even though understandings of republicanism were messy at the time, there was still a clear enough idea of what it was.
322
As a historian at the time put it, you can think of it as the difference between subjects and citizens.
323
I'm basically
324
describing democratic Athens here.
325
But as you're probably aware, American democracy only partially resembles Athenian democracy.
326
So there's more to the picture here than the American people simply collectively owning sovereignty.
327
I think the best way to explain the particular character of
328
American democracy is to break the story of the creation of American democracy down into two storylines.
329
The first storyline is similar enough to the Athenian one.
330
That's the story of rejecting authoritarian power and spreading the ideas of freedom and equality under the law.
331
Basically the spreading of isonomia in America.
332
Even before the revolution, Americans didn't feel close to the English monarchy.
333
It felt to them like an extraneous, overlaid power, too far across the ocean for its majesty to be felt.
334
They also felt tired of the system it was based in, which was a system of patronage,
335
which is a system where your connection and loyalty to others determines your prospects in life, including your prospects in politics.
336
Americans over time came to see patronage in starkly negative terms.
337
They came to see it as a form of dependency, dependency on the authorities above you.
338
And it became patriotic to free yourself from these dependent connections and influences.
339
There was also, importantly, a sort of proto-industrialization happening at the time, as huge numbers of farmers and artisans started to take up manufacturing and trading.
340
Average Americans were becoming noticeably wealthier and were even starting to engage in luxury.
341
This was a new concept, the idea that anyone could work and become wealthy.
342
Work before then had been thought of as something that you necessarily had to do for bare survival.
343
Basically, the poor worked and stayed poor.
344
So the colonists were enthusiastic about what was happening to them
345
and were simultaneously worried about the possibility of losing their newfound wealth.
346
They saw themselves as being especially vulnerable to the English monarchy.
347
So that led to the development of a new Republican philosophy of property.
348
Americans came to see property as something that makes people equally free and independent property became people's source of personal authority.
349
They thought that anyone could work to own property, and owning it could protect you from the outside world.
350
So as these ideas came together, Americans came to reject monarchism and the old set of values that were associated with it,
351
like loyalty, order, stability, and hierarchies.
352
And they came to support republicanism and the new set of values associated with that, liberty, equality, and independence.
353
A veneration of property came along with it, since property was thought to make independence possible.
354
Equality in particular became a rallying call for those seeking to challenge authority and superiority.
355
By equality, they mostly meant equality of opportunity.
356
They were rejecting patronage and trying to dream up a new world based in merit.
357
A world where all offices lie open to men of merit, of whatever rank or condition.
358
But equality also came to mean something new, something like equality of spirit, the idea that all people are inherently equal inside.
359
Best captured in Thomas Jefferson's statement in the Declaration of Independence, all men are created equal.
360
That was the radical opposite of monarchy.
361
From here, the storyline's familiar.
362
The Americans declared independence, fought a war with England, and won it.
363
They then had an opportunity to form a government, a new government based on principles of their choosing,
364
and the principles on their minds were liberty, equality, and independence.
365
We can call that the end of Storyline 1.
366
You can associate it with thinkers like Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson.
367
But we still have Storyline 2.
368
You can associate this one with John Adams, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton.
369
This storyline is a storyline about skepticism, skepticism towards republicanism and democracy.
370
Part of that skepticism began pretty much right away.
371
The declaration had barely been signed
372
when some of the revolutionary leaders began expressing doubts about the republican virtue of the American people.
373
There were new popular leaders emerging who were far less educated and far less broad-minded than many other revolutionary leaders had expected.
374
These new leaders promoted their own local selfish interests at the expense of what the founders saw as the public good.
375
Jay's rebellion in 1786 likely made things worse when thousands put up armed resistance to paying debt and taxes,
376
which ended in an attempt to overthrow the standing government.
377
Something that added to their skepticism of democracy was their philosophy of the nature of power.
378
They believed that concentrations of power were dangerous and that it had the tendency to grow out of control if object.
379
For example, George Mason said, From the nature of man, we may be sure that those who have power in their hands will always, when they can, increase it.
380
That extended towards the public.
381
They believed if a majority of Americans gained a certain amount of power, they'd use that power to further increase it and oppress everyone else.
382
Here's Hamilton saying it.
383
Give all power to the many, they will oppress the few.
384
Although for what it's worth, it worked in reverse.
385
Give all power to the few, they will oppress the many.
386
The reading materials available to the founders at the time also turned their opinions against democracy.
387
Reading Plutarch, Thucydides, Xenophon, Plato, and Aristotle all made the founders believe that pure forms of democracy,
388
where the people directly control politics, were dangerous.
389
The founders believed, rightly or wrongly, that pure democracies drove themselves into self-destruction over time with their policies.
390
And yes, their language was that dramatic.
391
Here's Madison.
392
Madison.
393
Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention, have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property,
394
and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
395
The state that was most held to that charge was the purest democracy of all, Athens.
396
So they believed that pure democracies like Athens needed to be saved from themselves with institutional safeguards,
397
and the lack of those safeguards is what drove those societies into ruin.
398
So you have these two conflicting storylines, and they don't easily reconcile with one another.
399
How do you make the public sovereign if you don't trust them?
400
But time was ticking.
401
The provisional government was running out of money, and new government had to be made.
402
But what would that government look like?
403
The prospect was overwhelming.
404
No one had ever successfully made a popular government at anything close to the scale of the United States.
405
John Adams, in his frustration, said, The lawgivers of antiquity legislated for single cities.
406
Who can legislate for 20 or 30 states, each of which is greater than Greece or Rome?
407
The answer came more than anyone from James Madison.
408
He said that politics consist of conflicting interests.
409
Any one group that stands behind a particular interest is a faction.
410
He then says, We should expect factions to look out for their own interests, which might be against other people's interests and might be against the community's interests.
411
So in this scheme, there's not a limit on the amount of factions there can be, and factions can be majorities or minorities.
412
He then says, we should design a government where it's difficult for any one faction to gain control over the whole thing.
413
In practice, that meant making three branches of government, each with limited power, and each with the ability to check the power of the others.
414
The legislative branch was further broken into two chambers, One intended to represent the many, and the other intended to represent the few.
415
Only after both chambers approve legislation can it be sent to the president to sign into law.
416
So the complexity of the system makes it difficult for any one faction to grab the reins of government for itself.
417
It'd be much more difficult than, say, persuading a single assembly.
418
A network of further checks was laid in place either at the time or shortly after, guaranteeing individual rights by law, like property rights or free speech.
419
limits the government's power against citizens, but also limits the majority's ability to use the government against other citizens.
420
An independent judiciary places the highest legal decisions outside of public control.
421
Limiting national power against state power is another one, protecting minority populations in states against national majority populations.
422
It was also decided to make America a representative democracy, and they had a few reasons for that.
423
For one, it made practical sense.
424
In a country the size of the United States, it didn't make sense to expect average citizens to commute to wherever decisions were made, or to keep up with the intricacies of politics.
425
The larger a country is and the more connected it is to other countries, the more complicated its politics become.
426
It seemed to make more sense to hire representatives who could travel
427
and spend their time keeping up with the complexity of politics.
428
Representatives were also thought to be a check on what they saw as the emotional excesses of popular crowds.
429
Madison argued
430
that passing the public's views through representatives allowed the cooler wisdom
431
of an elite few to best discern the interests of the country.
432
You can take it or leave it, but that was his logic.
433
He was trying to prevent, for example, the public from voting for short-term policies that would doom the country in the long run.
434
Most of what makes this system democratic is that these representatives are chosen by the citizens, so the representatives have to compete against each other in an election.
435
They have to run for office and convince the public that they're the right person for the job.
436
That also makes this government somewhat accountable to the people, in that these representatives probably want to please the public in order to attain and secure their jobs.
437
So going up to the very highest offices, the citizens choose who they want to represent them.
438
And if they don't like their performance, in the next election cycle, they can peacefully rotate them out of a job.
439
So what they ended up with was a government where the people had control over the very highest officials in charge, like the president and members of Congress,
440
and that the people get to pick who they are and get rid of them if they don't like them.
441
But they also created a government that's difficult and even near impossible to control in its entirety.
442
In short, the American people can only hope for, at best, partial and somewhat indirect control over their government.
443
Exclusions at the time made the initial system even more undemocratic.
444
American politics have in some ways become more democratic over time, and in other ways less democratic.
445
For the sake of not repeating myself, I think the best place to cover that will be in the conclusion.
446
So, let's get to that.
447
I started this video out saying I would end it by squaring the concept of democracy against both societies.
448
So it's time to do that.
449
Let's start with a definition.
450
I'd say democracy is a form of political organization where the people living under political institutions simultaneously exercise control over them.
451
To be transparent, I got that wording by reformulating a statement
452
that Sean Mullins made in The Rise of American Democracy when he said,
453
Democracy appears when some large number of previously excluded ordinary persons, what the 18th century called the many,
454
secure the power not simply to select their governors but to oversee the institutions of government.
455
Virtually all the definitions I've seen center around the same idea.
456
The idea that democracy is government by the people, with the people being understood as broadly as possible.
457
But I prefer definitions that are less abstract and more precise.
458
Another way to say it is that you have democracy when the people living under a government control it.
459
If we can accept that, then the task of figuring out whether a society is democratic or not becomes relatively simple.
460
We have two main factors here, the people and their control.
461
To figure out then how democratic a society is, you have to answer, how broadly realized is this concept of the people?
462
When we're talking about democracy, we're talking about realizing the people in terms of political equality.
463
Are there exclusions?
464
Is there one type of person being privileged over another?
465
That reduces democracy.
466
It makes that society less democratic.
467
The second factor is control.
468
How thorough is the people's control over their institutions?
469
For our purposes today, we're only going to square this against Athens and America, and we're going to start by looking at Athens.
470
The control that Athenian citizens had over their government was incredibly thorough.
471
The citizens directly controlled the three most powerful organs of government, the Assembly, the Council of 500, and the Law Courts.
472
Its few elected officials were heavily constrained in their power, subject to the law and supervised by the people.
473
It's hard to imagine a society where the people have greater control over the institutions of their government.
474
So in that way, Athens was highly democratic, even purely democratic.
475
But who were the people?
476
In Athens, only adult male free citizens had political rights.
477
So that's only around 10 or 20 percent of the population.
478
So that means that between 80 and 90 percent of the Athenian population didn't have access to political privileges.
479
If you could just parse that sentence, that pretty much tells the story.
480
So Athenian democracy was both remarkably thorough and remarkably narrow.
481
It was thorough in the amount of control that the people had over the government, and narrow in the amount of people enjoying those privileges.
482
You also have to remember that those exclusions were normal for the time, so you have to take historical context into account.
483
If that society existed today, it'd be more controversial to call it democratic.
484
But as it stands, it was an ancient society.
485
Since their control over government was so thorough, and their exclusions were normal for the time, I think it's safe to call ancient Athens democratic.
486
America is basically the opposite story.
487
American democracy began as a limited democracy, similar to the democracy under Kleisthenes, if you remember him.
488
As I described over the last third of this video, the control that the American people had over their government from the beginning was partial,
489
mostly just in the form of elections of representatives.
490
The people who held those privileges in the beginning was, like Athens, a narrow band of people, white male property holders.
491
So given that, I think early American democracy was at best a limited democracy.
492
The controls over government were too partial, and there was too much political inequality.
493
There were too many groups being excluded from politics.
494
The limitations on the public's ability to control their government that I described in this video all still exist,
495
so the American public's ability to control their government is still, at best, partial.
496
In some ways, it's become even more limited, for example with the rise of institutions like the CIA and the FBI, which are effectively outside of the public's control.
497
But the scope of people included in American politics has significantly expanded over the last, say, 200 years.
498
Proprietalist people, women and slaves, were all seen as dependents in early America and therefore unworthy of political privileges.
499
After a civil war and a string of civil rights movements, virtually all adult citizens in America now formally have equal political rights.
500
Only a few exclusions still stand, like non-citizens and children and criminals in some circumstances.
501
So the people in America is now realized about as broadly as it's been at anywhere at any time.
502
But their ability to control the government is limited in that it mainly rests on elections.
503
To make a judgment, I think America is a democracy.
504
The ability to hire and dismiss your policymakers and your leaders is a powerful one.
505
It's arguably the most powerful one, short of private citizens directly citing policy themselves.
506
But the power of the public is limited enough to make me roughly agree with the democracy theorist Robert Dahl
507
when he said that he believed
508
that Madison went about as far as it's possible to go while still remaining in the rubric of democracy.
509
Which is to say that American institutions are about as undemocratic as they can be, while still deserving the name.
510
I think many hear that and automatically condemn the United States.
511
But I think it's important to say, as a last note, that that's not necessarily the case.
512
Democracy isn't a concept that has to be maximized at all times and under all circumstances.
513
It's not self-evident that the more democracy we have, the more fully we're able to realize a democracy, the better off we are.
514
So it could be that more democracy would be good for America, but also maybe not.
515
So think for yourself.
516
That's it for me today.
517
Thank you very much for watching, and goodbye.
✨ Aanbevolen Video
C13
140 zinnen
Where Did Democracy Come From, and Does It Still Work?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
127 zinnen
Why the First Cities Might Just Be Fan Clubs - Prof. Jiang Xueqin
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
114 zinnen
Education in America
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
49 zinnen
Why the UK won't return the Parthenon Marbles | Stuff The British Stole | ABC iview
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
305 zinnen
Libya: How To Kill a Nation
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
106 zinnen
What is History? E.H. Carr
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C12
65 zinnen
Is War Over? — A Paradox Explained
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B2260 zinnen
Should America Leave NATO?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
43 zinnen
Why Socrates Hated Democracy
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C122
9 zinnen
A revolution that takes our power? | Yuval Noah Harari
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
5 zinnen
American Beginnings - What is an American? (Crèvecoeur)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
138 zinnen
THB Reform is Fit to Govern - Matt Goodwin - Prop
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “DEMOCRACY: Ancient vs. Modern”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: democracy, Athens, Athenian. Deze video bevat 517 zinnen en 7626 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 44:54. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 170 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 83% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| republicanism zelfstandig naamwoord | republikanisme | |
| storyline zelfstandig naamwoord | verhaallijn | |
| faction zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈfæk.ʃən/ | fractie, factie |
| thorough bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈθʌɹoʊ/ | grondig, diepgaand |
| ostracism zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɒs trəˌsɪz əm/ | ostracisme, schervengericht |
| skepticism zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈskɛp.tɪˌsɪ.zəm/ | twijfelzucht, scepticisme |
| monarchy zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmɑnɚki/ | monarchie |
| incompatible bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌɪŋkəmˈpætɪbəl/ | onverenigbaar |
| monarchism zelfstandig naamwoord | monarchisme | |
| patronage zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpeɪtɹənɪd͡ʒ/ | patronaat, patronage |
| subordinate bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /səˈbɔːdɪnət/ | ondergeschikt |
| undemocratic bijvoeglijk naamwoord | ondemocratisch | |
| invent werkwoord | /ɪnˈvɛnt/ | uitvinden, uitdenken |
| manifest zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmæn.ɪ.fɛst/ | manifest, vrachtbrief |
| remarkably bijwoord | /ɹɪˈmɑɹkəbli/ | opmerkelijk |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| come together werkwoord | /ˈkʌm tʊˈɡɛðɚ/ | bijeenkomen, samenkomen |
| figure out werkwoord | uitvogelen, er achter komen | |
| build up werkwoord | opstapelen | |
| come back werkwoord | terugkomen | |
| end up werkwoord | belanden, terechtkomen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- Why do we talk about it in the past tense?
- How do you make the public sovereign if you don't trust them?
- Let's start with a definition.
- How thorough is the people's control over their institutions?
- That's it for me today.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Voorwaardelijke zinnen if + zin, will/would + werkwoord — een voorwaarde en het gevolg | If that society existed today, it'd be |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | be linked · is designed · was defeated |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | people who discovered · ones who invented · ones who democratically |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have ever been · have been · I've seen |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 63 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals we're, didn't, don't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: exclusion /ɪksˈkluːʒən/, faction /ˈfæk.ʃən/, flourish /ˈflʊ̈ɹ.ɪʃ/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, invention /ɪnˈvɛnʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: ostracism /ˈɒs trəˌsɪz əm/, skepticism /ˈskɛp.tɪˌsɪ.zəm/, incompatible /ˌɪŋkəmˈpætɪbəl/, subordinate /səˈbɔːdɪnət/, remarkably /ɹɪˈmɑɹkəbli/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: patronage /ˈpeɪtɹənɪd͡ʒ/, newfound /ˈnjuː.faʊnd/, safeguard /ˈseɪfɡɑːd/, exclude /ɪksˈkluːd/, surround /səˈɹaʊnd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: faction /ˈfæk.ʃən/, incompatible /ˌɪŋkəmˈpætɪbəl/, manifest /ˈmæn.ɪ.fɛst/, randomly /ˈɹændm̩li/, aristocrat /əˈɹɪstəˌkɹæt/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: subjugate /ˈsʌbd͡ʒəˌɡeɪt/, safeguard /ˈseɪfɡɑːd/, govern /ˈɡʌv.ən/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als republicanism, storyline, faction.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.