Shadowing Practice: Investigating MrBeast - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
360 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
I investigated Mr. Beast, who was recently accused of making $23 million with insider trading and scams.
2
I wanted to know the full story, so I reached out to everyone, from researchers to crypto projects, even to Mr. Beast himself.
3
And let me say, the story is more complicated than you think.
4
I want to be clear, what Mr. Beast did, what his team did, is shady.
5
But what we care about is, did he cross that bright red line from shady to illegal scam?
6
And contrary to what
7
Twitter says, I don't think that's an easy answer.
8
Instead, I think the answer will depend on you.
9
If you love Mr. Beast, there will be an explanation at every turn and a scapegoat.
10
But if you hate Mr. Beast, what I'm about to show you will seem unethical and like a clear abuse of fame for money.
11
So already this story is difficult, but I want to make you aware of two more things which matter.
12
First, I have gone to Mr. Beast's team to try to fact check this story extensively,
13
and they declined to fact check or comment on my many questions.
14
Instead, they gave me a statement, which we will get to.
15
Secondly, I have a bit of history with Mr. Beast.
16
I interviewed and spoke positively about him in the past,
17
but also his new co -founder is suing me and his other co -founder threatened to sue me.
18
So you can make of that what you will.
19
As always, I just want to let you know where I'm coming from
20
and I've tried to get all sides of the story.
21
We're going to start with the major allegations against Mr. Beast and build on those.
22
They come from two sources.
23
Firstly, an investigation by Soma XBT, which claims Mr. Beast made $10 million by backing low cap crypto tokens, which are down 90%.
24
And the second investigation comes from a group of five people who investigated Mr. Beast and found $23 million in profits from,
25
quote, scams, shady deals, and his network.
26
Now, there are a lot of crypto projects they go over.
27
And I want to be clear.
28
Some of these allegations I agree are bad.
29
Others I think are actually worse than have been reported.
30
And still other allegations I simply disagree with them on.
31
So we're going to start with what I don't agree with.
32
According to the report, Polychain Monsters, or PMON, is a project which KSI promoted heavily.
33
Mr. Beast did not.
34
But Mr. Beast did get in the presale and make a lot of money.
35
And thus, the conclusion is made, it's highly likely Mr. Beast made an investment from that insider information of KSI's promotional deal.
36
But there's simply no evidence provided of this.
37
I have the same thoughts about Jigstack, another coin which KSI promoted.
38
And the conclusion is, though Mr. Beast did not officially follow Jigstack,
39
in his network, KSI was involved in promoting Jigstack from this information Mr. Beast invested and made a large return.
40
Here again, there isn't concrete proof.
41
Now I asked the team who wrote this piece and the lead author, Casper Vandalook, told me, quote,
42
having known Mr. Beast's having a very strong connection with KSI, it's basically highly probable he was vested as a result of KSI.
43
No concrete evidence, just going off probabilities.
44
But I'm going to say I don't agree with that and I'm going to toss those probabilities aside.
45
I think they reached too far.
46
Instead, I'm going to stick with what we can prove happened.
47
Luckily, the biggest claims in this report, the biggest moneymakers, are much better supported by evidence.
48
Starting with Super.
49
This is the project Mr. Beast is alleged to have made the most amount of money on,
50
over $10 million based on a pre -sale of $100 ,000.
51
As for evidence, we have leaked screenshots showing Mr. Beast telling
52
Super's founder that he can do $100K.
53
Then we have a wallet that both investigations trace to Mr. Beast sending $100K to the pre -sale wallet.
54
And then we have the same wallets getting millions of these
55
Super tokens in a period of unlocks, which were almost all sold aggressively.
56
Now, why is this bad?
57
Well, Mr. Beast is obviously hugely influential, and he publicly associated himself with the project twice.
58
Once on March 3rd, 2021, he responded to a tweet with eyeball emojis, and then he interacted a second time on May 12th, 2021.
59
This is much worse.
60
The founder, Elio Trades, had tweeted,
61
there's a gym sitting there on the market at eye -watering prices set to explode during the DeFi Summer 2 .0.
62
Mr. Beast responds, super.
63
But what he doesn't say is that he'd already purchased a huge stake in super at this point.
64
And on the day that he's tweeting, he was selling tokens, allegedly.
65
Not only that, he had been selling tokens and continued to sell tokens.
66
In the 72 hours after the May 12th tweet, Mr. Beast sold about $200 ,000 worth of these tokens.
67
And remember the context.
68
He's responding to the founder of the coin discussing a gym at eye -watering prices that's going to explode during the summer.
69
And Mr. Beast's response is the coin he's selling.
70
So publicly, it's signaling, hey, Super is this undervalued coin, and privately, Mr. Beast allegedly sold.
71
Now, I ran these wallets by Mr. Beast, as well as the accusation, but I didn't get a reply.
72
Instead, I got a heavily lawyered statement.
73
from a spokesman who I'm going to warn you is about to complicate things.
74
Quote, these investments were made and managed in consultation with industry experts to ensure full compliance with all appropriate rules and regulations.
75
The wallet is not owned or managed by Jimmy, but rather a fund led by respected and sophisticated managers.
76
The fund closely evaluated and scrutinized hundreds and hundreds of opportunities, which resulted in several investments.
77
Some have been more successful, others less, and others still works in progress.
78
The fund's investment strategies apply the same rigorous standards as many other experienced investors in the field.
79
Now, I have a lot of questions,
80
but the big thing is Jimmy denies doing any of the trading or managing the trading and blames it on a fund.
81
So I asked some obvious follow -up questions.
82
What is the name of this fund?
83
Who are the industry experts?
84
And what rules and regulations were followed that allowed you to tweet about a coin while your fund is selling.
85
I didn't get a response.
86
It's worth mentioning the spokesman is Matthew Hiltzik, a well -known crisis management consultant.
87
Thankfully, online, there still are a number of clues we can follow to try to find the right person for this fund.
88
The reason most people link Mr. Beast to this wallet
89
we've been tracking is mostly based on a tweet by Mr. Beast saying he bought a specific CryptoPunk,
90
which belonged to an account which goes by Wu -Tang Clan.
91
People assumed, understandably, that this was Mr. Beast's wallet.
92
But what is lesser known is that another account has also tweeted about CryptoPunks
93
and has the same ties back to Wu -Tang Clan, a guy named Jason Williams.
94
He's followed by Mr. Beast on Twitter, and he's the author of a book on Bitcoin.
95
So he's a crypto guy.
96
And I found Jason tweeting about another CryptoPunks saying, I hope you enjoy your new home sold for 100 ETH.
97
That sale he's talking about links back to the same address Mr. Beast does, Wu -Tang Clan.
98
On YouTube, there's even more clues.
99
Jason can be seen surfing wearing a Wu -Tang Clan shirt, and his brand name, Going Parabolic,
100
happens to be owned by the same Mr. Beast wallet, goingparabolic .eth.
101
So there's very good evidence that Jason Williams was also involved in this same wallet,
102
which means that it might be true that Mr. Beast wasn't the guy buying or selling,
103
which would be good for Mr. Beast and bad for these investigations.
104
But just when I thought Mr. Beast might have no say in what this wallet did, I saw this podcast with Logan Paul,
105
where Jimmy discusses crypto punks once again, and things get complicated.
106
p .m just out of nowhere just calls me
107
and he's like yo
108
i got like 30 people to call hop in i'm like
109
i don't give i don't care he's like it'll be the
110
best decision of your life just get in yeah okay yeah
111
and so i just joined the call and i just see like logan
112
and i i don't even know these other people
113
i don't put them on blast every heavy hitter
114
you can imagine who's worth a billion dollars was on this one call
115
and gary v is in the little corner the little square he's he's going crypto punks
116
It's gonna be huge.
117
It's gonna be the next Facebook.
118
All of us were like, okay, Gary.
119
I'm texting Logan.
120
Is this legit?
121
For all of us, we're like, yo, Gary's nuts.
122
Yo, Gary was right again.
123
I bought a bunch.
124
Wait, wait, wait.
125
Yeah, I bought quite a few.
126
How many?
127
I don't want to say, but I bought multiple ones.
128
Well, bro, are you double digits, punks?
129
Double, just shy.
130
Huh.
131
Well, this clip is very interesting
132
because Jimmy said he made the decision to get CryptoPunks based on a call with Gary V.
133
But those punks are owned by the wallet we just said was controlled by Jason.
134
So it appears sometimes Mr. Beast is telling Jason what to buy for this fund.
135
Mr. Beast then later talks about selling these CryptoPunks and rolling the money into a new project.
136
And once again, it sounds like he's in charge.
137
Well, I've already sold quite a few of them.
138
What?
139
I bought a bunch of, so that I'm rolled the money into VFriends.
140
Cause I, Gary, same thing called me.
141
He's like VFriends.
142
I was like, I don't know, but last time I made money.
143
Sure, sure.
144
I'll be honest.
145
These clips to me make it difficult to assume Mr. Beast had no idea what's going on.
146
He talks about CryptoPunks and VFriends like personal investments.
147
And on Twitter, he says that not only he bought CryptoPunks, he also tweets about loading up on VFriends.
148
But again, I have to say, it is also abundantly clear Jason Williams was involved.
149
He says, hey, Gary, thanks for the VFriends gift goat.
150
It was a gift from Gary to MrBeast.
151
I'm very thankful for it.
152
He didn't have to send anything.
153
So once again, Jason Williams appears to be involved
154
and have something to do with the trading or management of MrBeast's crypto wallet.
155
But we know MrBeast made some of the decisions.
156
So of course, I asked MrBeast to explain himself.
157
if he had any say over the trading.
158
But once again, there's no response.
159
So now I want to turn back to Super.
160
We know from leaked DMs that MrBeast and not Jason set up this presale, and we know that MrBeast made the tweet.
161
So now we have to guess.
162
Here's what we know.
163
We know MrBeast set up the presale according to leaked screenshots.
164
We know MrBeast made the tweet, but we don't know whether it was Jason doing the trading of Super or if he was doing the trading,
165
did Mr. Beast know about it?
166
Did Jason know about the tweet?
167
These are the questions that ultimately matter.
168
And yes, I reached out to Jason Williams for a comment.
169
He didn't reply.
170
I did, however, get a hold of Elio Trades, who is the founder of Super,
171
and he insisted that Mr. Beast's tweet was not a part of a deal for promotion.
172
But you should know he also mentions how upset he was with how pre -sale investors sold their tokens,
173
saying most of them sold, including Mr. Beast.
174
So those are the facts.
175
Mr. Beast gets involved in a pre -sale, for some reason tweets at this project twice, one time on the day his fund is selling tokens,
176
where he seems to imply that they're undervalued.
177
In total, he's alleged to have made $11 million with this deal, according to the report.
178
So yeah, that's really bad.
179
Now we're going to turn to another allegation, which is about EARN or ETHERNITY chain.
180
There are some facts which are the same.
181
There are others that are different.
182
For example, instead of Mr. Beast setting up the deal directly, the team at EARN claims they never spoke to Mr. Beast.
183
Quote, we were speaking to his fund manager.
184
And when I asked about these wallets selling allegedly over $4 million in tokens,
185
they say, quote, Mr. Beast's fund was an early investor in our pre -sale.
186
He had the same unlock schedule as everyone else.
187
Were we happy with the way he sold?
188
Definitely not.
189
But legally, there was nothing we could have done.
190
And then, just like with Super, they claim they didn't ask for a promotion of the project,
191
but that Mr. Beast decided to comment once himself anyways.
192
On March 9th, 2021, Mr. Beast responds to Eternity Chain saying, this one will be hype.
193
It's worth noting, once again, about 24 hours before saying this, This fund wallet purchased over $100 ,000 of Earn tokens in addition to the presale.
194
Now, what is different about Super is that Mr. Beast's name was put publicly on the Eternity Chain website.
195
On their investors and partners page, you might be asking, well, which is it?
196
Is he an investor or a partner?
197
And the answer is both.
198
He got into the presale and the Earn team also claims that he partnered with them for an NFT drop drop.
199
Supposedly, it was a charity drop and a normal NFT drop.
200
Now, the charity drop specifically did happen in association with one of Mr. Beast's projects,
201
Team Seas, saying, quote, all proceeds will go towards cleaning up the seas around the world.
202
This was early November 2021.
203
Then the official
204
Team Seas account posted on November 3rd, 2021, quote, what an awesome crypto collaboration in support of the team.
205
Then the CEO of Athernity chain
206
Nick Rose confirms in Telegram that the drop is supported by Mr. Beast, saying Earn and ETH tokens will be accepted for the charity auction,
207
which was slated to last two months.
208
Now, the reason I'm sharing all of this is because one month into this two month charity auction on November 30th,
209
2021, the Rocket Fund or Beast Fund or whatever you want to call it, start selling huge amounts of this Earn token.
210
Allegedly, they sold over $2 million, while the charity itself was still going on.
211
Now, I know that sounds horrible.
212
It looks horrible.
213
It is horrible.
214
Although I have to tell you, personally, I don't think this was a master plan to pump a coin with a charity auction.
215
If it was the plan, it was a bad one because the NFT auction was ultimately a flop.
216
But do I also think it doesn't matter because regardless of your intentions,
217
selling tokens within a month of your two -month charity auction is wrong, stupid, and unethical?
218
Yes, yes, I think that as well.
219
Because in case you forgot, Mr. Beast is the charity guy whose name is on the website.
220
It isn't a fund.
221
It isn't a crypto rocket fund.
222
It's Mr. Beast's branding.
223
I even asked the Earn team about this saying, quote, why did y 'all list Mr. Beast instead of rocket fund in your partner's investors.
224
Was that discussed?
225
They say, quote, we listed him, Mr. Beast, as a partner and, quote, yes, they accepted that.
226
So according to the earned team, Mr. Beast knew or should have known that his name was on the line for this investment and partnership.
227
And yet this fund, his fund, whatever you want to call it, sold tokens one month.
228
after starting a two -month NFT auction for charity.
229
To be fair again, though, it's hard to oversell how bad this NFT auction did.
230
I have found only one NFT that appears to have sold here, but the bids were made in the Earn token, which the fund was selling,
231
and the actual sale of the NFT didn't happen until after the fund sold in November 30th.
232
The transfer happened in December 23rd.
233
So of course, I went to MrBeast directly to answer this and see if there was some more context they could provide.
234
There was no response other than the statement we've already read from Mr. Beast that he did not control the trading.
235
Although again, that isn't a really satisfying answer
236
because we've established Mr. Beast would sometimes direct what to buy and sell to this fund like CryptoPunks.
237
Personally, like I said, I don't think this was a pre -planned scheme, but regardless of intentions, if you're the charity guy,
238
you support a charity, it flops while your fund makes millions of dollars in profits
239
because it's selling the same earned token people could bid on the charity with?
240
That just is awful.
241
And you should feel awful about it.
242
Look, now I want to move on from that to talking about our final token, XCAD.
243
This is a token you may remember from our investigation into MrBeast's business partner, KSI.
244
But unlike KSI, MrBeast was not promoting it a lot on Twitter.
245
In fact, the only reason we know Mr. Beast was in the presale is
246
that there were several articles about it bragging about that fact.
247
Once again, Mr. Beast's name was used to promote this instead of the fund itself.
248
And internally to investors, I have to say this built up a lot of excitement, not just because Mr. Beast is a huge name,
249
but because XCAD had what's called creator tokens.
250
So the idea to some investors is that, well, if they're investing, MrBeast and KSI, what if they were ever to launch greater tokens?
251
That would be massive.
252
And I bring this up because some people might ask, like, what do these affiliations, how do they impact people buying these projects?
253
And the answer from what I've seen is they actually do impact it quite a lot
254
because people are anticipating like further involvement and also the ideas like they must not be investing unless they're long -term holders.
255
You can see this in the telegram chat, it became so common that in the XCAD community, one of the admins says,
256
here we go again, another community member asking if there's any possibility of a Mr. Beast KSI token.
257
And meanwhile, by the way, as that's happening, as the investors are hoping for these creator tokens and that they're imminent behind the scenes,
258
something entirely different had been happening.
259
Like with Super and Earn, Mr. Beast's fund sold a lot of their XCAD early in 2021 rather than holding their tokens.
260
And this was surprising to even the founder of XCAD himself, Oliver Bell, who said they told him they were going to do the opposite.
261
He tells me, quote, hey, so Mr. Beast reached out to me during our pre -sale raise.
262
A group was set up with his team
263
and we had a call with his team and they said they liked the concept.
264
There was no strings attached to the investment.
265
They did, however, want a lot bigger ticket than what I offered them, which I'm glad I did not fulfill.
266
We discussed not just flipping this token as this can damage projects if people have decent sized tickets.
267
It was my understanding we were aligned on this.
268
However, after listing to which XCAD performed well, there was heavy dumping from a wallet linked to Mr. Beast's team.
269
I got in contact with them immediately and asked them why they were selling like this.
270
Now, Oliver later claims this discussion about flipping tokens and them being aligned about the in fact,
271
they're not going to flip these tokens so quickly was with Jason.
272
And apparently Oliver was so upset about what happened.
273
He DMed Jimmy directly, quote, explaining his team will ruin his reputation.
274
And look, sorry to be a broken record.
275
But yes, I reached out to Jimmy about this, too.
276
And once again, there was no reply besides the statement we read earlier.
277
It's worth mentioning that I asked Oliver for proof of this message about ruining relationships
278
and he said the message had been deleted on Telegram.
279
So who you believe here is up to you.
280
Oliver also says, quote, I don't think
281
Jimmy has a bad heart or is a bad person.
282
I think he has genuine interest in the crypto space, but I think the team that handles his crypto is completely clueless.
283
And here on this last point, I have to disagree with Oliver.
284
I don't think that
285
Jimmy's crypto team is clueless.
286
I think they saw an opportunity to make millions of dollars with Mr. Beast's valuable brand
287
and they took it and they did make millions of dollars.
288
And along the way, they did some things that were shady.
289
Whether or not you think they were also illegal is probably going to be shaped by our unanswered questions
290
and where you fill in those gaps.
291
For example, do you think Mr. Beast knew about the selling that was going on May 12th for the super token?
292
Why did he make that tweet?
293
And then do you think Mr. Beast knew about the charity auction and the selling that was happening on November 30th?
294
And do you think Oliver Bell DM'd Mr. Beast and told him his crypto team would ruin his reputation?
295
And if so, was that ignored?
296
I hate to leave so many unanswered questions here, but I warned you, this was a complicated story.
297
And a big part of the problem is the guy at the center of this story cannot
298
or will not give more than a heavily lawyered statement through a spokesman who's a crisis management consultant.
299
And let me just say, it's also frustrating that this statement takes zero accountability.
300
Despite the fact Mr. Beast's team knew every major allegation that we're laying out here today,
301
there is no mention of selling while Mr. Beast was tweeting about Supertoken.
302
There's no mention of them selling tokens a month after they partnered with a two -month charity auction.
303
And because of that, this statement feels very hollow.
304
I think to Mr. Beast and probably to his fund, maybe this is just business.
305
You know, they set out to make a lot of money and they made a lot of money.
306
What's the problem, right?
307
This is America.
308
They might think this is the biggest Mr. Beast nothing burger since Mr. Beast burger.
309
But look, honestly, I'd agree with them if they had done this crypto stuff without using Mr. Beast's name.
310
But they want to have their cake and eat it too.
311
This fund trades on Mr. Beast's name.
312
As we've seen, they get in pre -sales based on his name.
313
He tweets from his public account.
314
And they're putting his name publicly on projects websites instead of a fund.
315
But when things go south, suddenly, oh, Mr. Beast, what?
316
No, no liability just because he's not sitting there physically pressing the buttons.
317
I don't think that's the way it works.
318
Look, I want to close with the final part of this CryptoPunks podcast we showed you earlier,
319
because in many ways, I think it's a microcosm of this story.
320
Obviously, I have to say I'm not making any comments or judgments about the guy who's suing me, who's also in this clip.
321
That's just coincidence.
322
I am only talking about Mr. Beast's reaction because as Mr. Beast is talking about Gary V's great CryptoPunks call.
323
There's a moment when the co -host says, hey, maybe instead of Gary V being a genius,
324
maybe it's just the call itself that makes the market.
325
And Mr. Beast kind of defends it.
326
He says, no, that was in February.
327
CryptoPunks didn't pop until the summer.
328
And I never talked about CryptoPunks until this very moment.
329
Can I ask you guys a question?
330
When Gary does that call with all these billionaires and eight months or a year later, everybody's like, Gary was right again.
331
Yeah.
332
Is it possible that he's right because of the call?
333
Do you know what I'm saying?
334
I think about that a lot.
335
Like, dude, he has all these billionaire market makers in the thing.
336
He makes the call, makes the market.
337
By the way, you look around at all the punk owners a year later and you're like,
338
damn, it's all the same mother because they were on the call.
339
No, because, bro, there's 10 ,000 punks and there's only like 30 of us in the call.
340
We can only own and do so much.
341
There's still an entire market that's going to happen regardless.
342
I can tell you I don't think why, because that was all back like early February.
343
But like the things didn't pop off till later and every like NFT project was popping off, not just punks.
344
I mean, I mean, make no mistake, like having such influential people involved in projects,
345
it's not, it can't hurt the ability for the project to work.
346
95 % of those people didn't even mention it.
347
You know what I mean?
348
I've never talked about it publicly.
349
Yeah, but that last part isn't quite true.
350
The reason we're all here is Mr. Beast tweeted about CryptoPunks the same day he bought them back in February of 2021.
351
That's how we found his wallet, even though we now know someone else was involved too.
352
And I would apply the same level of scrutiny to many of the investments we've talked about.
353
Was it the genius of Jason Williams, Mr. Beast, or this fund that made them tens of millions of dollars?
354
Maybe.
355
Or was it the fact that the name they brought to the table was Mr. Beast,
356
one of the most influential and valuable brands in the world?
357
And that's what got them the great deals.
358
That's what got them a bunch of eyeballs.
359
That's what made it so valuable to have his name on these websites and maybe that's what made the market.
360
Ultimately, I think it's for you to decide.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
B21
186 zinnen
Furry Scams Are Getting WAY Too Good
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B2192 zinnen
Trump & Jared Kushner Corruption EXPOSED With MASSIVE Conflict Of Interest!
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
5 zinnen
What is MrBeast doing 😭
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
97 zinnen
GTA 6: Why Is Netflix Getting The Gameplay Reveal First?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
131 zinnen
The Worst Sponsorships in YouTube History
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
187 zinnen
Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson Address Viral "Muslim" Comment and Attacks Over Opinions on Islam
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
372 zinnen
I Made $35,000 Trading Meme Coins... In a BEAR MARKET
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
526 zinnen
Remember That Vegan Teacher? Her Life Is Ruined Now.
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
47 zinnen
In search of monsters
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
393 zinnen
I Secretly Lived In MrBeast's Theme Park
TeensDaily ConversationWorking Adults
B2253 zinnen
MAGA Conspiracy About James Talarico BACKFIRES MASSIVELY, Will He Sue For Defamation?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Investigating MrBeast”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: Beast, token, fund. Deze video bevat 360 zinnen en 4402 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 24:00. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 183 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. Slechts 79% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| token zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈtoʊkən/ | teken |
| tweet zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈtwiːt/ | twiet |
| wallet zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈwɑl.ət/ | portemonnee, portefeuille |
| charity zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈtʃæɹɪti/ | liefdadigheidsinstelling, goed doel |
| auction zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɔkʃən/ | veiling |
| investor zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/ | investeerder, belegger |
| founder zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈfaʊ̯n.dəː/ | stichter, grondlegger |
| coin zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkoɪ̯n/ | munt, muntstuk |
| allegation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/ | bewering, aantijging |
| allegedly bijwoord | /əˈlɛdʒ.ɪd.li/ | vermoedelijk |
| regardless bijwoord | /ɹɪˈɡɑɹd.lɪs/ | desondanks, niettemin |
| complicated bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/ | ingewikkeld, gecompliceerd |
| horrible bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈhɔɹ.ɪ.bəl/ | verschrikkelijk |
| rocket zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹɑk.ɪt/ | raket, vuurpijl |
| ruin zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹuː.ɪn/ | ruïne, bouwval |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| set up werkwoord | /ˌsɛt ˈʌp/ | bereiden, voorbereiden |
| build up werkwoord | opstapelen | |
| clean up werkwoord | schoonmaken | |
| go off werkwoord | afgaan |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- Twitter says, I don't think that's an easy answer.
- Were we happy with the way he sold?
- Can I ask you guys a question?
- Do you know what I'm saying?
- You know what I mean?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have gone · I've tried · have been reported |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | have been reported · is made · was involved |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | tokens, which are · people who investigated · unlocks, which were |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 78 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, I'm, didn't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: threaten /ˈθɹɛt.n̩/, thankful /ˈθæŋkfəl/, unethical /ʌnˈɛθɪkəl/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: auction /ˈɔkʃən/, allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/, shady /ˈʃeɪdi/, influential /ɪnflʊˈɛnʃəl/, reputation /ˌɹɛpjʊˈteɪʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/, allegedly /əˈlɛdʒ.ɪd.li/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, influential /ɪnflʊˈɛnʃəl/, reputation /ˌɹɛpjʊˈteɪʃən/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, intentions /ɪnˈtɛnʃənz/, explode /ɪkˈsploʊd/, defend /dɪˈfɪnd/, bid /bɪd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: charity /ˈtʃæɹɪti/, allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/, scam /ˈskæm/, telegram /ˈtɛləˌɡɹæm/, podcast /ˈpɑdˌkæst/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/, regardless /ɹɪˈɡɑɹd.lɪs/, telegram /ˈtɛləˌɡɹæm/, investigate /ɪnˈvɛs.tə.ɡeɪt/, disagree /dɪsəˈɡɹi/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als token, tweet, wallet.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.