Shadowing Practice: Roger Penrose - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered? - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
Roger, I have been fascinated by mathematics my entire life, and it is a pleasure to come to you to discuss two of its fundamental aspects.
2
One, its incredible capacity to describe reality, and then what mathematics really is.
3
So let's start with the first.
4
How accurately does math describe the physical world?
5
Well, it is extraordinarily precise.
6
And in different areas, more precise.
7
In some areas, we know less about it.
8
But I think people often find it puzzling that something abstract like mathematics could really describe reality as we understand it.
9
I mean, reality, you think of something like a chair or something, something made of solid stuff.
10
And then you say, well, what's our best scientific understanding of what that is?
11
Well, you say it's made of fibers and cells and so on.
12
And these are made of molecules, and those molecules are made of atoms.
13
Those atoms are made out of nuclei and electrons going around.
14
And then you say, well, what's a nucleus?
15
And you say, well, it's protons and neutrons.
16
And they're held together by things called gluons.
17
And then neutrons and protons are made of things called quarks and so on.
18
And then you say, well, what is an electron and what's a quark?
19
And at that stage, the best you can do is to describe some mathematical structure.
20
You say, they're things that satisfy the Dirac equation or something like that, which you can't understand what that means without mathematics.
21
I mean, the mathematical description of reality is where we're always led.
22
And these equations are fantastically accurate.
23
The Dirac equation, which describes the electron or quarks, is a very precise equation.
24
And for example, there's a calculation which describes the magnetic moment, that is, electrons behave like little magnets.
25
And the magnetic moment, the strength of that magnet can be described in terms of other parameters.
26
And there's a calculation which gets the accuracy of that.
27
Well, Feynman had a very good description.
28
He said it describes the distance between New York
29
and Los Angeles to an accuracy of less than the thickness of human hair.
30
So that's pretty precise.
31
That's unbelievable.
32
And that's describing the microstructure of atoms and...
33
Yeah, but these are the particles...
34
The electron and the gluons.
35
The electrons...
36
This is specifically electrons and quarks, the things which are called spin-half particles, but don't worry about that.
37
Gluons are slightly different.
38
Now mathematics can also describe things in the ordinary physical world, the gravitational attract, electromagnetic attraction, and with the same kind of descriptive accuracy?
39
Well, there's another, even more in a certain sense, because gravity, according to Einstein's theory, I mean Newton's theory already,
40
had a precision of something like one part in 10 to the 7, so that's 10 million.
41
Wow.
42
One part in that.
43
And then there was discrepancies seen in the behavior of mercury and so on,
44
And that's where you start to see differences with Newton's scheme.
45
And then Einstein comes along and produces a theory
46
which is now known to have a precision something like 10 to the power 14.
47
And that precision is a measure of how accurate.
48
There's a particular system of two stars going around, special kinds of stars, called neutron stars, very dense objects.
49
And these stars, one of them is what's called a pulsar.
50
It emits pulses of signals, which can be timed extremely precisely.
51
And over a period of, well, I suppose it's maybe more than 30 years now, I can't remember, they've been observing this thing.
52
And in that period of time, the accuracy over that length of time is known to something like one part in 10 to the 14.
53
And the agreement between Einstein's theory and the observations.
54
So it's telling you these are very, very precise theories.
55
So whether we're talking about the structure of very large entities, neutron stars over great distances in the universe with gravity,
56
or the structure of an electron, mathematics in both cases is able to describe it with that kind of incredible precision.
57
Exactly.
58
And these are small equations.
59
I mean, they're not giant.
60
That's right.
61
They're relatively small equations.
62
I mean, they're a little difficult to understand and Einstein's theory is certainly subtle.
63
It's not complicated in the sense that the ideas, okay, you have to understand about curved space and that sort of thing,
64
which is not an easy thing to get your mind around.
65
But once you get over that.
66
Once you get over that, it's about the simplest thing you could write down.
67
Wow.
68
In that kind of term.
69
So we have this extraordinary precision between mathematics on the macroscopic level
70
with neutron stars and at the microscopic level with the nature of the electron.
71
And mathematics is incredibly precise in both cases.
72
So what does that now begin to tell us about what mathematics really is?
73
Yes, well, in a sense, this is telling us that our picture of physical reality depends on something in a sense which is more precise, at least in our understanding of it,
74
than how we think about the world.
75
And this precision really dates back to the ancient Greeks, the time of Pythagoras and later,
76
where they developed the mathematical ideas as a field of study, stimulated to some degree by physical reality.
77
Because the geometry of Euclid, which was very much part of the mathematics that was being studied then,
78
which we know now isn't extraordinarily precise, I mean it is extraordinarily precise, but it's not as precise as Einstein's theory.
79
So one has to go a little bit beyond the geometry that they had.
80
I don't think they quite appreciated that they were doing physics, because they didn't realize that the geometry of the world could have been anything else.
81
But they developed this mathematical scheme purely as a study on its own.
82
And so mathematics was studied as a pure intellectual activity,
83
And without necessarily it being related to the structure of the physical world, although geometry clearly was a big input.
84
But then the properties of numbers and how you add and multiply and the notions of prime numbers, the fact there are infinitely many prime numbers, that goes back to Euclid and earlier.
85
And so these things just about numbers were developed very much from the time of the Greeks.
86
And ever since then, mathematics has been a subject which you can study for its own sake.
87
It has its own life, in a sense.
88
And certainly mathematicians view it this way.
89
It's something out there which seems to have a reality independent of the reality, the ordinary kind of reality like things like chairs and
90
so on which which are what we normally think of as real
91
but uh okay the mathematical reality is something different it's sometimes referred to as a platonic world a platonic reality
92
and sometimes people have a lot of trouble thinking
93
that is real i mean philosophers uh worry about that and
94
so on what does that what would
95
that mean a platonic reality well i think uh it's a different kind of reality from the reality of the physical world.
96
I tend to think of there being different ways of looking at reality.
97
There's the reality of our mental experience, which interrelates with the physical reality,
98
but so then does the mathematical reality of this platonic world, which gives reality to these notions.
99
So if you like mathematical facts, like there is no largest prime number, it's something independent of ourselves.
100
It's always been true.
101
It doesn't somehow become true as soon as somebody saw how to prove it.
102
It's always been true.
103
There are wonderful examples like the...
104
And it would have been true if nobody ever...
105
Exactly.
106
Yes.
107
And in a sense that had to be so because if the physical world depended so precisely on these mathematical laws,
108
I couldn't have known what to do in a certain sense if the mathematics hadn't already been there.
109
It's not us that imposes this on the world.
110
It's out there.
111
Sometimes people think
112
that maybe the reason we have good mathematical laws of physics
113
is that's the best way we can come to understand the world.
114
But it's something more than that.
115
It really is out there in the world.
116
Well, that's the argument.
117
Whether mathematics is invented by us, by human beings, trying to impose our way of thinking on the physical world,
118
or whether it is discovered because it's already out there and we're finding it because it's already there.
119
Those are the two polar views.
120
Sometimes people do argue.
121
They say, well, you know, it's just our way of organizing what we see about us.
122
But I really don't think that's good enough, because Newton, for example, the observations probably had about three figures,
123
three decimal places, and he produced this theory which kept on working until about seven figures, you see.
124
Then there were discrepancies seen.
125
Einstein produced his theory mostly out of his head, appealing to things that were known to Galileo and so on.
126
But apart from that, it was not much more empirical evidence.
127
But he produced this theory which extended far beyond anything that the observations at that time told us about.
128
And they keep on agreeing with the observations.
129
So that theory, which is, if you like, a platonic absolute thing,
130
it's a mathematical thing, seems to be inbuilt into the way the world operates.
131
It's not as though you see a new effect and say, OK, we're going to think of a better theory to accommodate that one.
132
Sometimes science is like that.
133
But these really good physical theories are not like that.
134
You're revealing something in the way the world operates, which is there all the time.
135
And I don't think there's any way of understanding
136
that just in terms of our trying to understand what we see around us.
137
A critical fact really seems to be what you said, that when these mathematical theories were discovered,
138
the accuracy that the observation that they had at the time was small compared to the accuracy that those theories then produced.
139
That's right, that's right.
140
I mean, Einstein's case, okay, seven figures of decimal were known perhaps in the planetary motions, but there's another seven out there.
141
The precision is over and above that.
142
It's as much as, yes.
143
10 million, 10 millions.
144
It's 10 million, 10 million, yes, that's right.
145
Yes, yes.
146
I mean, that's unbelievable.
147
Yes, no, it's incredible.
148
So push it further.
149
What does that mean?
150
Because mathematics is almost infinite in terms of all the different relationships and expressions and things that we already know.
151
Yes.
152
What does that mean in terms of how much mathematics is sitting out there?
153
Well, that's a good point, because there's an awful lot of mathematics which doesn't seem to have any clear relation to the physical world.
154
The way I like to picture it is there is this world of mathematics, and only a small part of that, and it's a very fruitful part, it's an extraordinarily fruitful part,
155
has relevance to the physical world.
156
There's an awful lot out there which, as far as we know, has no relation to physical behavior.
157
Well, of course, people said some of that in the past, and then we've been surprised to find some other things that later have.
158
But still, there's so much math out there, and so much bizarre, I don't know how else to put it,
159
structures, that it would seem impossible that that could relate to the physical world.
160
But what does that mean about, if it is out there in some platonic world, what is out there?
161
In other words, all these infinite ideas and structures and possibilities?
162
Yes.
163
Sometimes people think of these as mental creations, you see, but it doesn't really explain...and there's this wonderful example of the Mandelbrot set, extraordinarily complicated.
164
The fractional...
165
Yes, and you can magnify little bits of it and you see all this incredible detail.
166
And that's all there in a very simple mathematical idea, and it's encompassed by this very simple piece of mathematics.
167
How does that give your own sense of what mathematics really is?
168
Well, I think there are two aspects to mathematics, at least how I look at it.
169
Some people are just exploring the mathematics, and that's their real interest.
170
And it's the beauty in the subject often, and that's why they're doing it, because they find it exhilarating, something they find really wonderful to do.
171
But there's the other side of it, which is how it relates to the physical world.
172
And there is this extraordinary precision that we find when you get the mathematics right.
173
It really mirrors the behavior of the physical world to an unbelievable degree.
174
And so there's these two sides to mathematics.
175
It has this reality which you can study quite independently of its role in physics.
176
And the other side, which is how it really does seem to reveal how the real world operates, in a certain sense, what the world is, as far as we can understand it.
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
✨ Aanbevolen Video
C13
119 zinnen
Mathematics and Physics | Lesson 2 | Understanding the Connection
University StudentsWorking Adults
C13
138 zinnen
Does God exist? | J. Krishnamurti
University StudentsWorking Adults
C1133 zinnen
Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C186 zinnen
The End of Human Mathematics? AI's Recent Breakthrough -- And What's Next
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C166
66 zinnen
What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
24 zinnen
This structure feels impossible to move
University StudentsWorking Adults
C13
62 zinnen
A mind-blowing explanation of symmetry | Frank Wilczek for Big Think
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
15 zinnen
Jonathan Blow Recommends His Favourite Books
University StudentsWorking Adults
C15
200 zinnen
Force Your Brain to Think Like a Genius | Richard Feynman
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C110
105 zinnen
The Law of Resonance: You Never Meet Anyone by Chance
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
598 zinnen
Husserl: Phenomenology and the Life World
University StudentsWorking Adults
C16
104 zinnen
How real are the real numbers, really?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “Roger Penrose - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered?”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: mathematics, reality, physical, mathematical, theory. Deze video bevat 176 zinnen en 2190 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 13:47. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 159 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 84% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| mathematical bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/ | wiskundig |
| precision zelfstandig naamwoord | /pɹɪˈsɪʒ.ən/ | precisie |
| equation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/ | vergelijking |
| extraordinarily bijwoord | uitzonderlijk | |
| neutron zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈnu.tɹɑn/ | neutron |
| electron zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪˈlɛk.tɹɑn/ | elektron |
| quark zelfstandig naamwoord | /kwɑɹk/ | quark |
| geometry zelfstandig naamwoord | /d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/ | geometrie, meetkunde |
| atom zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈætəm/ | atoom |
| unbelievable bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌʌnbɪˈliːvəbl̩/ | ongelofelijk |
| decimal zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈdɛs.ɪ.məl/ | decimaalstelsel, tientallig talstelsel |
| discrepancy zelfstandig naamwoord | /dɪˈskɹɛpənsi/ | discrepantie |
| fruitful bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈfɹuːtfl̩/ | vruchtbaar |
| proton zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpɹoʊ.tɑn/ | proton |
| nucleus zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈnuː.kli.əs/ | kern |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| write down werkwoord | opschrijven, neerschrijven |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- And then you say, well, what's a nucleus?
- I mean, they're not giant.
- It's not us that imposes this on the world.
- How does that give your own sense of what mathematics really is?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is | they've been observing · have been anything |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | have been fascinated · are made · can be described |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | things which are · signals, which can · sense which is |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have been fascinated · has been · we've been surprised |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 27 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals they're, don't, we're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, mathematician /ˌmæθ.(ə.)məˈtɪʃ.ən/, thickness /ˈθɪknəs/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: precision /pɹɪˈsɪʒ.ən/, equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, fractional /ˈfɹæk.ʃən.əl/, gravitational /ˌɡɹævɪˈteɪʃənəl/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, geometry /d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/, unbelievable /ˌʌnbɪˈliːvəbl̩/, discrepancy /dɪˈskɹɛpənsi/, gravitational /ˌɡɹævɪˈteɪʃənəl/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: descriptive /dəˈskɹɪptɪv/, organize /ˈɔɹɡənaɪz/, behave /bɪˈheɪv/, observe /əbˈzɜːv/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, atom /ˈætəm/, magnet /ˈmæɡ.nɪt/, calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, fascinate /ˈfæsɪneɪt/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: gluon /ˈɡlu.ɑn/, magnet /ˈmæɡ.nɪt/, gravitational /ˌɡɹævɪˈteɪʃənəl/, magnify /ˈmæɡnɪfaɪ/, electromagnetic /ɪˌlɛk.tɹoʊ.mæɡˈnɛ.tɪk/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als mathematical, precision, equation.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.