Shadowing Practice: The Son Of Beast Roller Coaster Accidents - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
It’s a beautiful summer’s day during the holiday season in Mason, Ohio. Friends and family have traveled to enjoy the rides and attractions at King’s Island. The amusement park boasts the biggest wooden roller coaster in the world - Son of Beast. But at 4:45 p.m on July 9, 2006, the fun stops. Screams ring out, but not the ones you’d typically expect from a roller coaster.
2
The Son of Beast ride malfunctioned, resulting in a total of 27 people being rushed to the hospital with mostly chest and neck injuries. One of the victims said, “When we hit, immediately it was like hitting a brick wall. You just know, wait a minute, that’s not part of the ride.” She recalled her thoughts going through the loop:‘“I was thinking, oh my god, we’re going to die. We’re going to die.” Thankfully, none of the victims were critically injured, and most of them could leave after five hours. However, this incident was not isolated; It was one of many on this notoriously dangerous roller coaster.
3
Son of Beast was initially a highly ambitious project, costing the owner, Paramount Parks, $20 million for construction. Roller coaster engineer Werner Stengel designed the ride - a legend in the industry. He is credited with creating the first-ever modern looping coaster, Revolution, in 1976. The park announced plans to build the ride in 1999.
4
Stengel was involved in the early design of the ride, but the Roller Coaster Corporation of America undertook most building work. Construction involved 2.5 million board feet of wood, 2,400 concrete footers, and 225,000 21-inch steel bolts.
5
The ride was named after the biggest roller coaster globally, The Beast, and was supposed to continue this legacy. The Son of Beast became the first-ever wooden hypercoaster over 200 feet (60 meters). It also had a 118 foot (36 meters) tall vertical loop and traveled at 78mph (125km/hr). The ride’s size and structure broke seven world records and was characterized by its terrifying speeds and multiple drops.
6
Son of Beast had issues right from the get-go. During its construction, a 50 by 100-foot section of wooden supports collapsed due to strong gusts of wind. Later on, Paramount Parks would fire the Roller Coaster Corporation of America and finish the project themselves.
7
Things didn’t get much better. The ride was first opened on April 28, 2000, but had to be closed the same day to repair a small area of the track.
8
With the opening already delayed, an additional month was an unexpected setback. Son of Beast’s first year went on to have further track and sensor malfunctions. It became notoriously rough and would often jolt. Since the park was now losing money and damaging its reputation, it sued the Roller Coaster Corporation of America for damages but lost the case.
9
Later that year, while in motion, the Son of Beast stopped abruptly. Although there were no injuries, the passengers had descended via the staircase, and the ride was shut for three hours.
10
Inspectors discovered a rough 15-foot section of track.
11
In 2001, two more incidents occurred. One left a rider with a broken vertebra, the other a broken neck. Then in 2003, someone who hurt their back was admitted to hospital.
12
Despite this, no design flaws were reported to be responsible. Instead, the injuries were attributed to the victim’s preexisting conditions. No further information was published about them.
13
However, July the 9th, 2006, was different.
14
Late that afternoon, one of the trains - which was passing through - cracked a support beam. The accident took place in the ‘rose bowl,’ which is halfway through the ride.
15
Although this train made it back safely, this crack would prove problematic for the next train.
16
The lack of support led to sagging in the track, which was further exacerbated when the force of the second carriage passed through. However, the crash didn’t stop the train, and the carriage made its way back to the loading station.
17
A vertical wooden support was simply unable to carry the weight, forcing it to crack as well.
18
The ride jolted abruptly, leaving riders with multiple injuries. Thankfully, nobody died.
19
What separates this incident from other accidents was that the ride’s designers were responsible.
20
A state ride inspector said that the wooden support beams were "cracked and had actually splintered in places." There was also an abrupt bump, which he believes was why people were injured. The Ohio Department of Agriculture, which is also the authority responsible for roller coaster safety, said that the beam caused a "slight dip in the track,” resulting in “a pothole effect, injuring riders." Theme Park Consultant Dennis Spiegel said, "It's not unusual to have timbers break in wooden roller coasters. As coasters have stress placed on them, and as they age, they will have those kinds of situations." Jennifer Wright was among the 27 victims and took Paramount Parks to court. Part of her evidence was a video interview with Rick Schmizze, who the Ohio Department of Agriculture assigned to investigate the incident. The investigator gave quite a damning reflection on what happened.
21
Shmizze claimed that the park should have known that an accident like this could happen since its inception. He testified during the court proceedings, saying, “They would fix them in a Band-Aid style and then wait and see what happened.
22
They never really stopped and said, ‘we’ve got a problem with this ride as a whole.’ ” Additionally, the investigator said there was “excessive lateral motion,” where the track would constantly sway from side to side. This led to loose timber connections, wearing of bolt holes, track misalignment, and unexpected vibration.
23
He explained that fixing issues on one part moved the problems onto another part of the track.
24
Jonathan Yanik also took the park to court after suffering a shoulder injury that required surgery.
25
The lawsuit asked for $500,000 in compensatory damages and more than $350,000 in punitive damages.
26
Other lawsuits were filed, but most of them reached settlements.
27
Both Jennifer Wright and Jonathan Yanik wanted to bring this to trial, so it would be made public, and nothing like this would be allowed to happen again.
28
The victims said that when individuals agree to settlements instead of going to court, the public often assumes that the claimant was simply looking for money. The pair were confident that there was wrong-doing, feeling unthreatened by the multi-million dollar company’s high-paid lawyers.
29
Wright said, “All I ever wanted was the truth to come out and no one to ever be hurt again.“I am still fighting, and I would love to offer any help or evidence. I feel their pain and suffering.” Eventually, Wright accepted damages on the basis that Shmizze’s testimony was made public.
30
She said, “I would feel like garbage if I held on to this information and then a year from now somebody was really hurt bad.” After the incident, the general consensus was that the most sensible option would be to close the ride forever.
31
The editor of Theme Park Insider, Robert Niles, said, ‘A broken main support beam on a roller coaster is like a broken leg on a racehorse.
32
Sure, you could spend many millions to repair it. But in most cases, you just put 'er down.’’ But the park didn’t ‘put ‘er down’. Instead, the ride continued after a number of changes.
33
Most notably, removing its vertical loop, which they denied was related to the incident.
34
Kings Island spokesperson Don Helbig said, “The removal of loop was a decision the park made so we could use different trains.
35
The trains the ride now uses are lighter and more comfortable than the original trains.” This decision to not retire the ride would come back to haunt the park in 2009 with yet another accident. According to Dayton Daily News, Jill Tavella said she “felt dizzy and had a bad headache” after riding the roller coaster on May 31 and was later diagnosed with “a broken blood vessel in her head.” However, an investigation into the incident cleared the park of any wrongdoing. Nonetheless, the park was still reluctant to reopen the ride.
36
Speaking at the time, Kings Island General Manager Greg Scheid said, “Eight days after I took over, the accident occurred. We have struggled with it ever since. We have smoothed out the ride.
37
Most people will say they are comfortable with the ride, but I am not comfortable with the ride.” Subsequently, the Son of Beast never ran again.
38
The park never announced its retirement; instead, the ride just faded out of existence.
39
In 2010, the ride had disappeared from the park’s website. Then, in 2012, the ride was demolished, and all of those years of building and maintaining the ride was now reduced to rubble on the ground. The park was left with a ten-million-dollar loss.
40
Paramount Parks wanted to sue the Roller Coaster Corporation of America, but that company went bankrupt in 2005. King’s Island then shifted its focus on suing the now-defunct company’s insurance provider. In 2008, they lost the case, costing the company even more in legal fees. This was on top of the settlements paid to the dozens of people who were injured by the roller coaster.
41
It’s hard to look back at the Son of Beast ride as anything but a complete disaster, both in terms of how it put people’s lives at risk and was a colossal waste of money.
42
Hopefully, the park (and the industry as a whole) will learn lessons from it.
43
In the Son of Beast’s place at King’s Island is an entirely different ride and a commemorative tombstone to it where riders queue. The new attractions’ name is aptly called The Banshee, a wailing ghost in Irish mythology while the ghost of the Son of Beast lives on.
44
Watch this episode next if you found this video interesting.
45
Please add a like and leave a comment if you want to support the channel.
✨ Aanbevolen Video
B22
64 zinnen
Damn Nature You Scary | Rare and Scary Animal Encounters
University StudentsWorking Adults
B21
97 zinnen
The Original Plans for Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
151 zinnen
How did ONE missing letter crash this plane? | Dan Air 1008
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
273 zinnen
I Built The World's Most Scientific Gym
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
40 zinnen
The Outlast Trials - Project Boneyard: Prison Farm, Blood Drive, New MKs and more | Dev Logs
University StudentsWorking Adults
B24
183 zinnen
The Real Reason Disney Is So Expensive
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
50 zinnen
6'9" Brilliant Psychopath Who Hunted College Students (America's Most Evil Serial Killers)
University StudentsWorking Adults
B21
116 zinnen
Ben-Hur (1959): 8 Untold Facts You Never Knew
University StudentsWorking Adults
B21
125 zinnen
9 Photos with Terrifying Truths Explained In 12 Minutes
University StudentsWorking Adults
B22
169 zinnen
New York's Buckling Tower: What Happens Now?
British AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B11
89 zinnen
Это Самая Быстрая Машина в Мире - 110 000 лошадиных сил
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
454 zinnen
Most Expensive Mistakes In History
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau B2 is gebaseerd op de video “The Son Of Beast Roller Coaster Accidents”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: ride, park, coaster, roller, Beast. Deze video bevat 45 zinnen en 1637 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 9:52. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 166 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. Slechts 78% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| roller zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹoʊlɚ/ | roller |
| injure werkwoord | /ˈɪn.d͡ʒɚ/ | kwetsen, blesseren |
| rider zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹaɪ̯.dəː/ | ruiter, rijder |
| beam zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈbiːm/ | balk, biels |
| vertical bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈvɝ.tɪ.kəl/ | verticaal |
| jolt werkwoord | /d͡ʒoʊlt/ | schokken, hobbelen |
| malfunction zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌmælˈfʌŋk.ʃən/ | slechte werking |
| abruptly bijwoord | /əˈbɹʌp.li/ | abrupt, bruusk |
| investigator zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪnˈvɛs.tɪˌɡeɪ̯.təː/ | onderzoeker |
| carriage zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkæɹɪd͡ʒ/ | koets |
| timber zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈtɪmbɚ/ | kaphout, hout |
| bolt zelfstandig naamwoord | /boʊlt/ | bout |
| meter zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmitəɹ/ | meter, teller |
| lawsuit zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈlɔˌs(j)ut/ | rechtszaak, zaak |
| attraction zelfstandig naamwoord | /əˈtɹækʃn̩/ | aantrekkingskracht, attractie |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| come out werkwoord | /ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/ | uitkomen |
| take over werkwoord | overnemen |
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | being rushed · is credited · was involved |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | someone who hurt · track, which was · Agriculture, which is |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have traveled · have struggled |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 7 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals didn't, we're, we've. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: malfunction /ˌmælˈfʌŋk.ʃən/, attraction /əˈtɹækʃn̩/, demolish /dɪˈmɒl.ɪʃ/, vibration /vaɪˈbɹeɪʃən/, inception /ɪnˈsɛpʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: notoriously /nə(ʊ)ˈtɔː.ɹɪ.əs.li/, investigator /ɪnˈvɛs.tɪˌɡeɪ̯.təː/, characterize /ˈkɛɹəktəɹaɪz/, compensatory /kəmˈpɛnsəˌtɔɹi/, exacerbate /ɪɡˈzæsɚˌbeɪt/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: carriage /ˈkæɹɪd͡ʒ/, characterize /ˈkɛɹəktəɹaɪz/, punitive /ˈpju.nɪ.tɪv/, descend /dəˈsɛnd/, fade /feɪd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: malfunction /ˌmælˈfʌŋk.ʃən/, carriage /ˈkæɹɪd͡ʒ/, attraction /əˈtɹækʃn̩/, exacerbate /ɪɡˈzæsɚˌbeɪt/, setback /ˈsɛtbæk/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: investigator /ɪnˈvɛs.tɪˌɡeɪ̯.təː/, diagnose /ˈdaɪ.əɡˌnoʊs/, exacerbate /ɪɡˈzæsɚˌbeɪt/, globally /ˈɡloʊbəli/, garbage /ˈɡɑɹ.bɪd͡ʒ/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als roller, injure, rider.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.