跟讀練習: The Son Of Beast Roller Coaster Accidents - 通過影片學習英語口語
選擇練習模式
每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。
45 句
如果句子過短或過長,請點選 Edit 進行調整。
1
It’s a beautiful summer’s day during the holiday season in Mason, Ohio. Friends and family have traveled to enjoy the rides and attractions at King’s Island. The amusement park boasts the biggest wooden roller coaster in the world - Son of Beast. But at 4:45 p.m on July 9, 2006, the fun stops. Screams ring out, but not the ones you’d typically expect from a roller coaster.
2
The Son of Beast ride malfunctioned, resulting in a total of 27 people being rushed to the hospital with mostly chest and neck injuries. One of the victims said, “When we hit, immediately it was like hitting a brick wall. You just know, wait a minute, that’s not part of the ride.” She recalled her thoughts going through the loop:‘“I was thinking, oh my god, we’re going to die. We’re going to die.” Thankfully, none of the victims were critically injured, and most of them could leave after five hours. However, this incident was not isolated; It was one of many on this notoriously dangerous roller coaster.
3
Son of Beast was initially a highly ambitious project, costing the owner, Paramount Parks, $20 million for construction. Roller coaster engineer Werner Stengel designed the ride - a legend in the industry. He is credited with creating the first-ever modern looping coaster, Revolution, in 1976. The park announced plans to build the ride in 1999.
4
Stengel was involved in the early design of the ride, but the Roller Coaster Corporation of America undertook most building work. Construction involved 2.5 million board feet of wood, 2,400 concrete footers, and 225,000 21-inch steel bolts.
5
The ride was named after the biggest roller coaster globally, The Beast, and was supposed to continue this legacy. The Son of Beast became the first-ever wooden hypercoaster over 200 feet (60 meters). It also had a 118 foot (36 meters) tall vertical loop and traveled at 78mph (125km/hr). The ride’s size and structure broke seven world records and was characterized by its terrifying speeds and multiple drops.
6
Son of Beast had issues right from the get-go. During its construction, a 50 by 100-foot section of wooden supports collapsed due to strong gusts of wind. Later on, Paramount Parks would fire the Roller Coaster Corporation of America and finish the project themselves.
7
Things didn’t get much better. The ride was first opened on April 28, 2000, but had to be closed the same day to repair a small area of the track.
8
With the opening already delayed, an additional month was an unexpected setback. Son of Beast’s first year went on to have further track and sensor malfunctions. It became notoriously rough and would often jolt. Since the park was now losing money and damaging its reputation, it sued the Roller Coaster Corporation of America for damages but lost the case.
9
Later that year, while in motion, the Son of Beast stopped abruptly. Although there were no injuries, the passengers had descended via the staircase, and the ride was shut for three hours.
10
Inspectors discovered a rough 15-foot section of track.
11
In 2001, two more incidents occurred. One left a rider with a broken vertebra, the other a broken neck. Then in 2003, someone who hurt their back was admitted to hospital.
12
Despite this, no design flaws were reported to be responsible. Instead, the injuries were attributed to the victim’s preexisting conditions. No further information was published about them.
13
However, July the 9th, 2006, was different.
14
Late that afternoon, one of the trains - which was passing through - cracked a support beam. The accident took place in the ‘rose bowl,’ which is halfway through the ride.
15
Although this train made it back safely, this crack would prove problematic for the next train.
16
The lack of support led to sagging in the track, which was further exacerbated when the force of the second carriage passed through. However, the crash didn’t stop the train, and the carriage made its way back to the loading station.
17
A vertical wooden support was simply unable to carry the weight, forcing it to crack as well.
18
The ride jolted abruptly, leaving riders with multiple injuries. Thankfully, nobody died.
19
What separates this incident from other accidents was that the ride’s designers were responsible.
20
A state ride inspector said that the wooden support beams were "cracked and had actually splintered in places." There was also an abrupt bump, which he believes was why people were injured. The Ohio Department of Agriculture, which is also the authority responsible for roller coaster safety, said that the beam caused a "slight dip in the track,” resulting in “a pothole effect, injuring riders." Theme Park Consultant Dennis Spiegel said, "It's not unusual to have timbers break in wooden roller coasters. As coasters have stress placed on them, and as they age, they will have those kinds of situations." Jennifer Wright was among the 27 victims and took Paramount Parks to court. Part of her evidence was a video interview with Rick Schmizze, who the Ohio Department of Agriculture assigned to investigate the incident. The investigator gave quite a damning reflection on what happened.
21
Shmizze claimed that the park should have known that an accident like this could happen since its inception. He testified during the court proceedings, saying, “They would fix them in a Band-Aid style and then wait and see what happened.
22
They never really stopped and said, ‘we’ve got a problem with this ride as a whole.’ ” Additionally, the investigator said there was “excessive lateral motion,” where the track would constantly sway from side to side. This led to loose timber connections, wearing of bolt holes, track misalignment, and unexpected vibration.
23
He explained that fixing issues on one part moved the problems onto another part of the track.
24
Jonathan Yanik also took the park to court after suffering a shoulder injury that required surgery.
25
The lawsuit asked for $500,000 in compensatory damages and more than $350,000 in punitive damages.
26
Other lawsuits were filed, but most of them reached settlements.
27
Both Jennifer Wright and Jonathan Yanik wanted to bring this to trial, so it would be made public, and nothing like this would be allowed to happen again.
28
The victims said that when individuals agree to settlements instead of going to court, the public often assumes that the claimant was simply looking for money. The pair were confident that there was wrong-doing, feeling unthreatened by the multi-million dollar company’s high-paid lawyers.
29
Wright said, “All I ever wanted was the truth to come out and no one to ever be hurt again.“I am still fighting, and I would love to offer any help or evidence. I feel their pain and suffering.” Eventually, Wright accepted damages on the basis that Shmizze’s testimony was made public.
30
She said, “I would feel like garbage if I held on to this information and then a year from now somebody was really hurt bad.” After the incident, the general consensus was that the most sensible option would be to close the ride forever.
31
The editor of Theme Park Insider, Robert Niles, said, ‘A broken main support beam on a roller coaster is like a broken leg on a racehorse.
32
Sure, you could spend many millions to repair it. But in most cases, you just put 'er down.’’ But the park didn’t ‘put ‘er down’. Instead, the ride continued after a number of changes.
33
Most notably, removing its vertical loop, which they denied was related to the incident.
34
Kings Island spokesperson Don Helbig said, “The removal of loop was a decision the park made so we could use different trains.
35
The trains the ride now uses are lighter and more comfortable than the original trains.” This decision to not retire the ride would come back to haunt the park in 2009 with yet another accident. According to Dayton Daily News, Jill Tavella said she “felt dizzy and had a bad headache” after riding the roller coaster on May 31 and was later diagnosed with “a broken blood vessel in her head.” However, an investigation into the incident cleared the park of any wrongdoing. Nonetheless, the park was still reluctant to reopen the ride.
36
Speaking at the time, Kings Island General Manager Greg Scheid said, “Eight days after I took over, the accident occurred. We have struggled with it ever since. We have smoothed out the ride.
37
Most people will say they are comfortable with the ride, but I am not comfortable with the ride.” Subsequently, the Son of Beast never ran again.
38
The park never announced its retirement; instead, the ride just faded out of existence.
39
In 2010, the ride had disappeared from the park’s website. Then, in 2012, the ride was demolished, and all of those years of building and maintaining the ride was now reduced to rubble on the ground. The park was left with a ten-million-dollar loss.
40
Paramount Parks wanted to sue the Roller Coaster Corporation of America, but that company went bankrupt in 2005. King’s Island then shifted its focus on suing the now-defunct company’s insurance provider. In 2008, they lost the case, costing the company even more in legal fees. This was on top of the settlements paid to the dozens of people who were injured by the roller coaster.
41
It’s hard to look back at the Son of Beast ride as anything but a complete disaster, both in terms of how it put people’s lives at risk and was a colossal waste of money.
42
Hopefully, the park (and the industry as a whole) will learn lessons from it.
43
In the Son of Beast’s place at King’s Island is an entirely different ride and a commemorative tombstone to it where riders queue. The new attractions’ name is aptly called The Banshee, a wailing ghost in Irish mythology while the ghost of the Son of Beast lives on.
44
Watch this episode next if you found this video interesting.
45
Please add a like and leave a comment if you want to support the channel.
FOR YOU
推薦影片
為什麼要通過這個影片練習口語?
在學習英語的過程中,口語的練習至關重要。觀看有關“Son of Beast過山車事故”的影片,不僅可以幫助你培養對英語表達的理解,還能讓你在真實的情境中練習口語。講述者用生動的語言描述了一個真實的事故,聽眾能感受到他們的緊張與情緒。通過模仿他們的說法,你能有效提高英語發音和表達能力。通過這種方式,你不僅是在學習語言,更是在練習shadow speech,提升自己的英語口語交流能力。此外,通過類似的內容,學習者能夠更加深刻地理解事故發生的經過,這會激勵他們在討論相關話題時更加流利自如。
語法和表達在上下文中的運用
在影片中,講述者使用了多種語法結構和表達方式,使得敘述生動而引人入勝。以下是幾個關鍵的語法結構供學習者注意:
- 直接引語:影片中引用受害者的話,如“我一直在想,我們要死了”。這種表達方式生動地傳達了事故的緊迫感。
- 條件句:如“如果我們知道這個過山車會有問題,我們就不會去坐”。這種句型可以幫助你在討論假設情況時更清晰地表達觀點。
- 被動語態:影片提到“木材支撐梁被發現有裂縫”,這種結構有助於把重點放在動作的承受者上,使表達更加客觀。
常見發音陷阱
在觀看並聽取講述時,有一些單詞和短語可能會對學習者造成發音上的困擾。例如:
- “roller coaster”:這個詞的發音中包含了多個音節,注意母音的變化以提高英語發音。
- “accident” :注意重音和音節分割,以避免發音不清的問題。
- “injured” :此單詞的發音常常令非母語者混淆,尤其是在快速的對話中。
通過模仿這些句子的發音,你能夠加強自己的語言流利度,並有效地運用shadowspeak的技巧,提升聽說能力。觀看這個影片時,建議積極參與並儘量複述你所理解的內容,以便更好地使用對於口語交流至關重要的技能。
影片中的語法
說話人最常用的結構,並附上影片中的原話:
| 結構 | 影片中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼,而不是誰做的 | being rushed · is credited · was involved |
| 定語從句 who / which + 從句 — 補充說明人或事物 | someone who hurt · track, which was · Agriculture, which is |
| 現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事 | have traveled · have struggled |
什麼是跟讀法?
跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧,最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓,並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大:您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同,跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性,語調,節奏,連讀,聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。












