Shadowing Practice: The Ticketmaster monopoly is over, now what? - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
In 2022, outrage around predatory concert ticket pricing came to a head when tickets went on sale for Taylor Swift's Errors Tour.
2
Tears and anger as ticket sites crash for millions of Taylor Swift fans.
3
Extensive wait times, steep fees, and glitches.
4
Tickets were going for as much as $499 before fees.
5
And though it's not the first time fans and artists have complained about Ticketmaster, that moment became a turning point.
6
Congress even held hearings and quoted song lyrics.
7
I think it's a nightmare dressed like a daydream.
8
The meltdown around the Arrows tour exposed how Ticketmaster and Live Nation had become the gatekeepers to most major live music experiences.
9
And in April 2026, a federal jury ruled against this ticketing monopoly.
10
Breaking news, a verdict has been reached in the antitrust trial against entertainment giant Live Nation.
11
A federal jury has found Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, have been operating as a monopoly.
12
And the story is far from over.
13
So there will be a whole other round of litigation now.
14
And there's really only one question anyone cares about.
15
Will tickets get cheaper?
16
Ticketmaster and Live Nation first merged in 2010.
17
The DOJ allowed it to go through with what's called a consent decree, which is like a contract between the government and the merging parties.
18
One of the important things they promised not to do was to condition Live Nation concerts
19
and tours on a venue taking Ticketmaster for its whole season.
20
Basically, they can't say, if you want our concerts, you have to use Ticketmaster.
21
But it wasn't until 2024 when the government stepped in.
22
The DOJ, under former President Biden and 40 states, sued Live Nation.
23
The allegation?
24
Live Nation used its power across concerts, venues, and ticketing to shut out competitors, locking venues into exclusive deals with Ticketmaster.
25
They were claiming that Ticketmaster and Live Nation were violating this part of the consent decree, that they were sort of, in some cases, coercing explicitly,
26
sometimes implicitly, these venues into using Ticketmaster if they wanted any of the concerts that Live Nation promotes.
27
But by the time the case is ready to go to trial, the politics change.
28
Donald Trump is elected in 2024, and when the trial begins in New York in March 2026, the federal government settles.
29
The settlement that is not yet final is a few what I would call sort of band -aids over the competitive problems.
30
Under the settlement, Live Nation would divest interests in 13 venues, allow venues to use competing ticket services without retaliation,
31
and cap certain Ticketmaster service fees at about 15 % at venues it controls.
32
A lot of people have been coming out against the settlement and saying, it's really kind of a slap on the wrist.
33
32 states and the District of Columbia reject the settlement and bring the case to trial themselves.
34
And they won.
35
After a five -week trial, the verdict came down and the jury sided with the states.
36
The jury found that they monopolized two markets.
37
One was the market for ticketing platforms.
38
This is the Ticketmaster product.
39
They also monopolized the market for amphitheaters And they even found a number,
40
$1 .72, upcharges that resulted from this maintained monopoly power.
41
Next, the judge needs to decide what the punishment is.
42
And Live Nation has said they will appeal.
43
The states are expected to ask for a breakup, but Live Nation will probably ask for something similar to the deal they already worked out with the DOJ.
44
Live Nation could be expected to argue, look, we're already in this agreement with the DOJ.
45
This covers it.
46
I think that if there's a good remedy here, and that's a big if, then I think consumers can expect over time to see a lot more benefits than just $1 .72.
47
I think they can see better innovation in ticketing platforms, which we know has been a problem.
48
I think they can see lower fees even than that number.
49
But one thing that's not going to happen, it is these hundreds and sometimes thousands of dollars paid for these big, extravagant, once -in -a -lifetime type of concerts.
50
I think they're still going to be very expensive.
51
The cost of concerts keep going up, and not just for fans, for promoters, for the venues that put on these shows, and most notably for the artists.
52
That's because over the last two decades, the music industry completely changed how artists make money.
53
Streaming made music cheap and touring became the business.
54
On a $100 ticket, including fees, you're looking at the artists getting 75 to 80 % of that ticket price.
55
The artist portion is going to pay for the tour bus, to going to pay for gas, flights, the crew.
56
A portion of the ticket, approximately 10%, goes to the venue.
57
And then it goes to the ticketing company.
58
They get paid on every single ticket sold.
59
Even if Live Nation and Ticketmaster are forced to split, a breakup isn't a price cut.
60
Which raises the question, how does this ruling change things for the fans?
61
Ultimately, what is this going to mean for fans right now? not much.
62
However, I think it's important to note there are other things that are better for fans, even if it doesn't mean a dramatic decrease in prices.
63
More competition is a good thing.
64
If you have five ticketing platforms instead of one, they have to compete on the fees.
65
That could trim the service charges and the processing fees, the stuff that turns your $89 ticket into $130.
66
Still, this doesn't mean people are going to see huge price cuts for tickets to large shows.
67
And despite the cost, concert attendance is at an all time high.
68
Gen Z has spent an average of $2 ,100 on concert tickets over the past two years.
69
And they're even going into debt choosing buy now, pay later options to buy tickets.
70
Most of the drive behind those really big expensive concerts is just people's willingness to pay.
71
You know, boomers will pay anything to see Bruce Springsteen one more time.
72
Millennials will pay anything to see Taylor Swift.
73
It's just the nature of people having money to spend, the importance of these experiences that have driven prices really high.
74
That doesn't mean that there's some amount of that that is from ticketing and the promotion services, but it's not maybe the big ticket item, so to speak.
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
B21
Why is everything getting so expensive?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Sen. Murphy vs. Trump's corruption | Today, Explained
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
White, pink, and brown noise, explained #shorts
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B26
Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms | America, Actually
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B24
Why are weddings so damn expensive?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Are headphones destroying our hearing?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
How to be less neurotic | The Gray Area
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
We’re already using AI more than we realize
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The biggest peach myth in America
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B28
How to solve problems like a designer
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The origin of the '80s aesthetic
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B217
Why “Buy one, get one free” isn’t a great deal
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
How F1 drivers survive their own cars
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B210
Why 350°F is the magic number for baking
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B26
How did pink become a girly color?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Food waste is the world's dumbest problem
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
Why AI art struggles with hands
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
How the rich avoid paying taxes
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
How Vladimir Putin won Republicans' approval
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
✨ Aanbevolen Video
B21
98 zinnen
Jane’s Addiction Members Sue Perry Farrell After Onstage Brawl
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
131 zinnen
Inside Gap Inc.’s Plan To Rewrite Its Story for Gen Z | Behind The Business
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
369 zinnen
Taylor Swift - Sourdough, Space, Stadiums, Scott Mills and The Life Of A Showgirl.
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B27
23 zinnen
Real estate agents to disclose property prices as new laws come into effect | 9 News Australia
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
430 zinnen
Scam Fest The Treasure Of Casa De La Madre Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K Williams
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
187 zinnen
How Greed is Destroying FIFA
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B23
229 zinnen
Spirit Airlines GOES BUST After Jet Fuel $$ Doubles
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
77 zinnen
The Hidden War Against Steam
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B23
49 zinnen
Did Red Bull Cost Verstappen the F1 Title?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B2144 zinnen
Disney Just Admitted the Problem
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “The Ticketmaster monopoly is over, now what?”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: ticket, Nation, Ticketmaster, concert, venue. Deze video bevat 74 zinnen en 1057 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 6:03. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 175 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 82% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| monopoly zelfstandig naamwoord | /məˈnɑpəli/ | monopolie |
| compete werkwoord | /kəmˈpiːt/ | wedijveren |
| consent werkwoord | /kənˈsɛnt/ | toestemmen, instemmen |
| verdict zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈvɜː.dɪkt/ | uitspraak, oordeel |
| merge werkwoord | /mɝd͡ʒ/ | samenvoegen, fuseren |
| breakup zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈbɹeɪk.ʌp/ | relatiebreuk |
| argue werkwoord | /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/ | redetwisten |
| anger zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈæŋɡə/ | boosheid, woede |
| dramatic bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /dɹəˈmætɪk/ | dramatisch |
| promotion zelfstandig naamwoord | /pɹəˈmoʊʃn̩/ | promotie, bevordering |
| lifetime zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈlaɪf.taɪm/ | mensenleven, levensduur |
| lyrics zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈlɪɹ.ɪks/ | songtekst, liedtekst |
| tear werkwoord | /tɛɹ/ | scheuren |
| punishment zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpʌnɪʃmənt/ | bestraffing, straf |
| innovation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/ | innovatie, vernieuwing |
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is | have been operating · have been coming |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have complained · has been reached · has found |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | has been reached · is elected · are expected |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 10 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals doesn't, they're, can't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: promotion /pɹəˈmoʊʃn̩/, punishment /ˈpʌnɪʃmənt/, innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, litigation /ˌlɪtɪˈɡeɪ̯ʃən/, retaliation /ɹɪˌtæl.iˈeɪ.ʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: monopoly /məˈnɑpəli/, innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, litigation /ˌlɪtɪˈɡeɪ̯ʃən/, subsidiary /sʌbˈsɪ.di.əɹ.i/, competitor /kəmˈpɛt.ɪ.tɚ/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: merge /mɝd͡ʒ/, expose /ɪkˈspoʊz/, outrage /ˈaʊt.ɹeɪd͡ʒ/, bind /ˈbaɪ̯nd/, monopolize /məˈnɒpəlʌɪz/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: anger /ˈæŋɡə/, dramatic /dɹəˈmætɪk/, slap /slæp/, retaliation /ɹɪˌtæl.iˈeɪ.ʃən/, allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: argue /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/, anger /ˈæŋɡə/, litigation /ˌlɪtɪˈɡeɪ̯ʃən/, allegation /ˌæl.ɪˈɡeɪ.ʃən/, extravagant /ɪkˈstɹævəɡənt/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als monopoly, compete, consent.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.