Prática de Shadowing: My 17 Minute AI Workflow To Stand Out At Work - Aprenda a falar inglês com vídeo

Escolha um modo de prática

Cada modo abre uma sala de prática em tela cheia.

215 frases

Se as frases estiverem muito curtas ou longas, clique em Edit para ajustá-las.

In 2025, it will take you longer to read something and comprehend it than the amount of time it took to create it.

So if you think finding the signal within all

that noise is only going to get worse with all

that AI generated regurgitation of posts on LinkedIn and all that SEO optimized blog posts that don't actually contain anything good.

So we have to move up the knowledge work value chain and luckily we can do it with AI as well.

So let's come back to the fundamentals of knowledge work and find where we can get leverage.

Knowledge work can be broken down into four steps.

We have our input, the data, the knowledge, the information that we get,

and then we process it to get some sort of output.

right and then from the feedback of the output we then improve our input right

and over time we're going to spiral upwards we're going to

improve the quality of our knowledge work now most people spend

the majority of their time thinking about how can i outsource my thinking process to ai

and so we're using claude we're using chat to pt or say okay you write this for me, you do that for me.

But we realize the results are not really fantastic.

And why is that?

It's because the input that LLMs have are pretty average, right?

We're averaging down to the level of the internet.

It's got some gold in it, but the majority is pretty average.

So what we want to do instead of focusing on process, we want to focus on using AI to improve our inputs.

Even if nothing changes in the way that we process information, our outputs will be better because we won't have this garbage in garbage out problem.

So let's focus our effort on using AI to help us improve our inputs.

And the 8020 we're going to do here is to add academic papers and research into our input.

Now you might think, okay, first of all, boring.

Second of all, this is practical work, right?

This is not some sort of academic research that we're conducting.

We need practical things to happen.

But think about it.

Do you read Harvard Business Review or McKinsey Quarterly or the MIT Sloan Review?

All of these are aimed to take boring, hard, complex academic papers, make it relevant to working professionals

and deliver it in a way

that we can get something actionable out of them we got

to realize now we don't want to be readers of hbr right we read

so slowly but if you just feed the entire archive to chat gpt immediately it will know

so much more than you right

and we don't want to even be the writer for hbr

because people spend their entire life writing a few insights you know you can just leverage those insights

if you don't want to why spend

that time researching instead what you want to be is hbr itself for your team for your organization meaning

that you are going through trusted resources that are complex

that are nuanced take that translate it into the context

that you're in create frameworks that make that theoretical knowledge

and insight into something that's actionable

and be able to share it deliver it in a way

that busy people can understand so we gotta move up the value chain

and look at the things that used to be reserved to academics scientists authors

that had the resources had the time had the brain power

to sit through long -winded papers now you can too

and let's take an example and let me show you the three tools

that i use to make sure i become hbr for my

team for my organization all right let's use an example say one of the biggest things

that managers face which is the problem of team underperform they are bright people

but they seem like they don't want to do anything they're

always complaining about stuff how do i improve team performance okay

so usually if you get average input you might go to chat gpt

and ask it this question

which will give you some average results you might go to

google it might give you some average inputs let's give it a try

so you know how to improve team performance at work common

question right oh gosh it tells you focus on goals focus

on open communication i mean these are just such empty broad recommendations

that is not going to lead to great output

so what i like to do instead is to use the first tool of today elicit

so this helps you find academic papers

on the question that you ask so let's just copy

and paste this

and see what kind of results we get in elicit it's free you just have to sign up and you'll get

something like this you get the summary of the top four papers that's for free

and then you get a list of the papers

that is relevant now what i like to do is just to make sure what i'm reading is

well cited is peer -reviewed

and not some random thing i like to sort by most

cited i take a look for example team design features

and team performance there seems to be a relationship let's take

a look at this one all right what you can do is then click into semantic scholar

which will usually lead you to the actual paper itself

and in this case it is locked so

if you don't have access you know to a university subscription

or something you might not be able to see this

but no problem we'll just copy and paste the paper name and go into google and see

if we can find a pdf version okay here we go

here's the pdf published by sage let's just double check

that seems to be the right one okay so we'll download this

and then we'll use the second tool of today

which is notebook lm by google

so it this tool unlike chat gpt unlike claude is not using ai on the internet's knowledge

but it's only on the sources that you upload

so you have less likely likelihood of hallucination sign up with your google account

and you'll see something like this so you want to create a notebook

and essentially that just houses your sources

and since we downloaded a pdf we are going to just

upload it here now we haven't even read the paper we don't really know what's in there

so what i like to do is to use it as a table of content first, and this is automatically generated by Notebook LN.

All right.

So now we have a table of contents.

Okay.

Groups is important.

There's classification theory.

Looks like we have to look at characteristics, some team size, team level task design, leadership.

100

Okay.

101

Interesting.

102

Now I don't want to read this yet it's a lot of text

103

and really poorly formatted but you know notebook lm is still pretty much experimental

104

so we will give them some time to figure this out but now we have a general idea

105

let's click back on notebook guide

106

and let's look at the suggested questions since we haven't read it

107

but ai has processed it i usually like to use one

108

of the questions just to give me the basic gist

109

so here we go how to team design feature impact overall

110

team performance let's see what it says all right well looks like there are about three components

111

and we saw that in the table content as well right

112

so there's team composition there's task design and then there's leadership

113

and i love this val notebook lm

114

which is you can click into this to find the actual

115

place in the source where it talks about this idea

116

so even though this giant paper is probably you know tens

117

of thousands of words what i can do is figure out

118

which parts are most relevant to me and actually find the citation of it

119

so i can better understand what is it that they say

120

and let's say you know i find i can't change the

121

team composition i'm not going to fire anyone i'm not going to hire anyone new

122

but i want to change task design and leadership i can focus on these cited areas first.

123

Okay.

124

So that's the first cool part about the Elicit to Notebook LM workflow, but this is only one paper, right?

125

So what I would do again is go back to Elicit and now see if there's any other papers that are interesting.

126

Well, leaders can learn about teamwork developing high -performance teams.

127

That seems interesting.

128

Let's take a look, see if we can find the paper oh here is pdf fantastic

129

so now we don't have to oh no

130

okay bad request that's all right it happens let's go back and let's see a via the publisher

131

oh it's a wiley paper let's see

132

if we can get the pdf all right we can't

133

if you're at work i mean surely your work will help you subsidize getting this paper

134

but even if they don't let's see if we can find it somewhere else

135

let's see if this is the right one fantastic all right here's the second pdf we got

136

We will head back to notebook .lm.

137

and this time we're going to press on the plus sign

138

and again upload it here once that's done processing you'll see down here

139

that now you can chat with both sources but before we do

140

that actually i want to uncheck the previous one

141

because i just want to understand what this new paper is about

142

so let me do a table of content for this one source

143

and i will see that it's generating a new note let's wait for

144

that all right here we go there are five essentials to building high performance teams leadership capable

145

and committed members norms a team structure that has clear mission responsibility goal

146

and framework to get results see this is already

147

so much more clear and specific compared to the Google search results

148

which just got diluted over time of everyone maybe one person starting from the source

149

but eventually secondary sources just dilute the message okay a way to manage team processes

150

and that's the fifth one okay great now let's select both and ask it to what are the key character components,

151

key changes a leader can make in a team to improve performance.

152

Now it will look through both sources and give us an answer.

153

All right. So, okay.

154

Focus on member selection.

155

Let's say that's not relevant to us.

156

Promote task meaningfulness.

157

And this was mentioned in the first source, right?

158

Empower the team with autonomy.

159

I don't know if we've seen this.

160

Okay.

161

So this was in the first document.

162

Great.

163

And it gives us the exact things that we should be doing.

164

Cultivate intra -team coordination.

165

All right.

166

Provide effective leadership, which means guiding

167

motivating

168

and supporting the team let's see details now let's say out

169

of all of this i think for my team the thing

170

that makes sense the most is to promote task meaningfulness i want to empower the team

171

and i want to facilitate team development and of course provide effective leadership so

172

give me a detailed plan with three changes each

173

so we can improve team performance now you have a high level plan of how to do this

174

but it still feels somewhat vague even though we know

175

that the input is good

176

and we're focusing on what academics have found out now we want to do the next part

177

which is we're going to copy this and i'm going to go into claude and say help me create a detailed

178

plan to improve team performance using

179

and i'm going to copy in what notebook lm has shared

180

with me now two seconds we got a 12 month three phase like four module plan to improve team performance

181

So just think about if you were HR or you were a team lead and you share this plan with management, they will be blown out of their socks,

182

but that's not all we need.

183

Let's say out of all of this still sounds like really a lot of complications.

184

So let's ask it, what are the 80,

185

20 changes I can make to my team to drive performance

186

that is dependent on leaders and not the team members to make a change and refer to,

187

and I'm going to ask it to refer to these two studies, which is called a meta -analytic review

188

And now, Claude has a better idea of where I'm getting these things from.

189

And so based on details that Ian knows about these two sources, it gave me the core leader action plan okay

190

so task design optimization seems to be one of them authority distribution second highest impact

191

and contextual support so now from 12 months we're down to three months And it gives us some expected results.

192

If that's true or not, we can wait to see, but it helps us list out things like key successful factors, measurement frameworks.

193

So let's say, help me create a matrix to better design tasks with clear goals

194

and interdependence structures.

195

Here we go.

196

Now we've got a framework that we can use to assess goals, clarity level, we can use interdependence level, we can see where they intersect.

197

And we can even show the team, hey, this is what I'm thinking about for changing how we think about tasks.

198

What do you think and get feedback on it, right?

199

Now, if we simply ask Claude, help me with what I need to improve my team's performance.

200

let's see what we get.

201

Alright, it's asking me a few questions that's actually already improvement since previous GPTS.

202

So let's say work team with teams underperforming and unmotivated.

203

Alright, and see, the plan it gives me is so much more vague, right?

204

Communicate and feedback like I know this right having clear goals I know this I know all of this

205

but it doesn't help help me help me create a framework to set goals let's say

206

and yes smart is good monitoring is good but

207

but as you can see

208

because the input quality is not there we're stuck with these buzzwords that we hear all the time.

209

I am excited and optimistic about the changes coming to knowledge work.

210

We can critically think more.

211

We can actually be more creative and associative and generalist.

212

I think we'll have a great time in this era of AI.

213

Let me know how you feel about it.

214

Check out this video on how I use AI to create McKinsey style visuals and I'll see you in the next video.

215

Bye!

Baixar aplicativo

Tudo o que você precisa para falar fluentemente

Pronúncia com IANota em cada frase

Prática de IPADomine cada som

VocabulárioMonte seu banco de palavras

Jogo de vocabulárioAprenda brincando

Escaneie o QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Mesmo canal

How to Think Fast Before You Speak: Framework Thinking

Business EnglishWorking Adults

FOR YOU

Vídeo recomendado

317 frases

How to keep people’s attention in work presentations as an expert in your domain

Business EnglishWorking Adults

Vocabulário e dicas de fala para esta lição

Esta aula de conversação de nível B2 usa o vídeo “My 17 Minute AI Workflow To Stand Out At Work”. As palavras que mais se repetem: paper, performance, improve, input, source. Este vídeo tem 215 frases e 2511 palavras para praticar shadowing. A fala dura 17:29. O falante mantém um ritmo estável de cerca de 144 palavras por minuto, confortável para o shadowing. 88% das palavras estão entre as 3.000 mais comuns do inglês, por isso o vocabulário é fácil de acompanhar.

Vocabulário principal deste vídeo

As 15 palavras mais avançadas do vídeo, com pronúncia e significado:

Palavra	Pronúncia	Significado
notebook substantivo	/ˈnoʊtˌbʊk/	caderno
elicit verbo	/ɪˈlɪsɪt/	provocar
upload verbo	/ˈʌpˌloʊd/	carregar, fazer upload
insight substantivo	/ˈɪnsaɪ̯t/	introspecção
dilute verbo	/daɪˈljuːt/	diluir
empower verbo	/ɪmˈpaʊ.ə/	dar poderes a, permitir
vague adjetivo	/veɪɡ/	vago
leverage substantivo	/ˈlɛv.(ə.)ɹɪd͡ʒ/	alavancagem
pasta substantivo	/ˈpɑ.stə/	massa, macarrão
bore verbo	/boɹ/	chatear, aborrecer
garbage substantivo	/ˈɡɑɹ.bɪd͡ʒ/	lixo
analytic adjetivo	/ˌænəˈlɪtɪk/	analítico
associative adjetivo	/əˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/	associativo
contextual adjetivo		contextual
cultivate verbo	/ˈkʌltɪveɪt/	cultivar, plantar

Phrasal verbs que você vai ouvir

Palavra	Significado
check out verbo	verificar, sacar só
figure out verbo	descobrir, deduzir
find out verbo	descobrir
go back verbo	voltar
sign up verbo	subscrever

Frases que vale a pena repetir

Frases curtas e completas do vídeo que você pode usar na conversa do dia a dia:

We're averaging down to the level of the internet.
Let's say that's not relevant to us.
I don't know if we've seen this.

Gramática neste vídeo

As estruturas que o falante mais usa, com as palavras exatas do vídeo:

Estrutura	No vídeo
Voz passiva be + particípio passado — o foco está no que acontece, não em quem faz	can be broken · are aimed · are nuanced
Present perfect have/has + particípio passado — uma ação passada que ainda importa agora	haven't even read · haven't read · has processed
Orações relativas who / which + oração — informação extra sobre uma pessoa ou coisa	face which is · leadership, which means · studies, which is

Pronúncia para ficar de olho

O falante usa 51 contrações e formas reduzidas, como we're, don't, I'm. Diga-as na forma curta, do jeito que você ouve.

Os sons de “sh” e “zh”: actionable /ˈæk.ʃə.nə.bəl/, associative /əˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/, complication /ˌkɑm.pləˈkeɪ.ʃən/, hallucination /həˌluːsɪˈneɪʃən/, optimization /ˌɑptəmaɪˈzeɪʃən/
Palavras longas — acerte a sílaba tônica: actionable /ˈæk.ʃə.nə.bəl/, analytic /ˌænəˈlɪtɪk/, associative /əˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/, complication /ˌkɑm.pləˈkeɪ.ʃən/, generalist /ˈd͡ʒɛn.(ə.)ɹə.lɪst/

Sons difíceis para falantes de português:

Consoante final — sem acrescentar um “i” depois: notebook /ˈnoʊtˌbʊk/, elicit /ɪˈlɪsɪt/, cite /saɪt/, upload /ˈʌpˌloʊd/, insight /ˈɪnsaɪ̯t/
/l/ final — a língua toca o céu da boca, não vira “u”: actionable /ˈæk.ʃə.nə.bəl/, spiral /ˈspaɪɹəl/, module /ˈmɑd͡ʒul/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/
/h/ — um sopro suave, diferente do “r”: hallucination /həˌluːsɪˈneɪʃən/, comprehend /ˌkɑmpɹɪˈhɛnd/, likelihood /ˈlaɪklihʊd/

Como praticar com este vídeo

Ouça o vídeo inteiro uma vez sem falar e anote as palavras que você não conhece.
Faça shadowing frase por frase na velocidade normal, repetindo cada uma até o seu ritmo ficar igual ao do falante.
Grave a sua voz e compare com o original, prestando atenção a palavras como notebook, elicit, upload.

O que é a Técnica de Shadowing?

Shadowing é uma técnica de aprendizado de idiomas com base científica, originalmente desenvolvida para o treinamento de intérpretes profissionais. O método é simples, mas poderoso: você ouve áudio em inglês nativo e repete imediatamente em voz alta — como uma sombra seguindo o falante com 1-2 segundos de atraso. Pesquisas mostram melhora significativa na precisão da pronúncia, entonação, ritmo, sons conectados, compreensão auditiva e fluência na fala.

Técnica de shadowing: leia o guia completo passo a passo →

Prática de Shadowing: My 17 Minute AI Workflow To Stand Out At Work - Aprenda a falar inglês com vídeo

Escolha um modo de prática

Baixar aplicativo

How to Think Fast Before You Speak: Framework Thinking

Give Me 18 Minutes and I’ll Make you Dangerously Smart (with AI)

how AI broke the SWE Career Ladder

How AI is Changing Data Scientist's Workflow

AI-First Playbook: Do a Team's Work With AI (2026) | Peter Yang

24 Hours Inside a YC AI Startup

What Should Marketers Do If Social Media Disappears Tomorrow? l Keynote In 5

My Full Claude Cowork Setup (steal my workflows!)

The 7 Skills You Need to Build AI Agents

The importance of continuous upskilling in the workplace

I was wrong about AI replacing VAs. Here's what I actually think in 2026.

P1 机器学习的应用【2024公认最好的 | 吴恩达机器学习 | 教程 | Machine Learning Specialization(超爽中英!)】

How to keep people’s attention in work presentations as an expert in your domain

Vocabulário e dicas de fala para esta lição

Vocabulário principal deste vídeo

Phrasal verbs que você vai ouvir

Frases que vale a pena repetir

Gramática neste vídeo

Pronúncia para ficar de olho

Como praticar com este vídeo

O que é a Técnica de Shadowing?