ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: Why Impact First Deep Tech is our future | Philipp Buddemeier | TEDxESMTBerlin

The last 25 years I had the opportunity to work at NGOs and in consulting,

⏸ หยุดชั่วคราว

ความเร็ว:

ประโยคทั้งหมด205 ประโยค

หากประโยคสั้นหรือยาวเกินไป กดที่ Edit เพื่อปรับแก้

The last 25 years I had the opportunity to work at NGOs and in consulting,

safety children and McKinsey.

And of course you will never guess which way to start.

But additionally I had the opportunity to set up a circular economy incubator,

launched with urban finance startup growing mushrooms on coffee waste,

set up a sustainability-focused boutique advisory firm,

co-authored two books on sustainability,

and most recently, set up an investment firm.

Now across these 25 years,

I've known two main things.

The first, business as usual is from farmstruck to environmental collapse,

and that's to resolve the tide,

you need a new paradigm paradigm,

and that new paradigm is impact first.

And that second, incremental innovation is going nowhere,

and that to turn the tide we need a radically different solution,

and that's the opportunity for DICTEC.

So today I want to talk about impact first and DICTEC,

or more specifically how impact first DICTEC is our future.

And if you're wondering what DICTEC is, we'll get to that.

But first, let me start where my journey began.

It was unbelievably almost 40 years ago when I went to a Greenpeace exhibition board,

and what may seem absurd today was still common practice back then.

Racy states would dump their nuclear waste into the ocean,

and companies, indeed, would dump their untreated toxic waste into the ocean as well.

So that did not seem to make any sense,

but what did seem to make sense was the Greenpeace pipeline

that said our oceans don't have a dream to start polluting them.

So I didn't expect in my journey to find different answers to that.

But at university, I did not get any new answers.

In fact, we were taught the very classic doctrine that nobody put more succinctly than Milton Friedman,

who said the one and only social responsibility of business is to increase its pressures.

Now, on my first job of management consulting,

I did not get the nuances ahead.

Incept, talking from the core was the mantra of today.

So I took the first opportunity for a career break and went to business school.

And besides the more classical curriculum,

I started to get fresh perspectives.

I think the lecturers, as you say in the building,

have a lot of them.

It's national team and theater.

And I was just one of those peers,

contributors and off-campers, not really stay with me,

which is Steve Jobs, very famous commensurate address at Stanford,

where he said, you've got to find what you like.

And if you haven't found it yet, keep looking and setting.

And so there's no reason to keep looking and to not setting.

Don't set him.

That must really stay with me.

But one of the figuring things out,

the environmental crisis, went from that to terrible.

And in 2009, the planetary boundaries framework came out to scientifically assess the state of nature.

And in 2009, seed out of the Earth,

the systems were in the orange,

in the back, and by today,

in fact, 6.9 boundaries have been fixed.

In fact, all realms of nature,

climate, sexual, and allergies, all are in jeopardy.

And these are just scientific data points.

They have real-world implications.

In our land system, we agree that we don't have enough to grow food.

If fresh water is depleted,

we don't have enough to irrigate our crops and drink.

So this has real-world implications.

For us, perhaps ten years ago,

there was an opportunity to think that policymakers would fix it for us.

With a Paris Agreement, set in motion,

there was this window of hope.

And yet the 1.5 degree country that was mentioned reached after that last year already.

And current policy is on track for a 2.7 degree future world.

And so, Wilha is reading,

the news might agree that pining our hopes on enlightened policy makers does not seem a promising proposition.

It's actually perhaps hope that business is fixing it for us,

business as usual, incrementally improving what it does,

when I think that's what gets here in the first place.

And so I think it's a very new paradigm,

and yet new paradigm is impact force.

Instead of the traditional notion of maximizing profits now and relying on others to fix issues later,

impact force flips that notion on its head,

and it starts at the very opposite end.

It starts with the question,

does the economic activity I pursue,

does that align with a future worth living,

with a futuristic economy thriving within monetary boundaries to the benefits of all?

And once that question is then addressed,

then which afterwards makes an activity more economically accessible?

Now of course this is very difficult for incumbent businesses embedded in a business-as-usual mode to pursue.

But perhaps there are other companies who can do this.

And one great example is Keith Stemper and Echodia,

who planted with that very notion and vision of regenerating nature and planting trees.

And to do so, he set up a search engine,

Echodia, now the eighth-nest search engine in the world,

to generate projects in order to plant tree and regenerate nature.

And by now, it's planted well over 200 million trees.

And so it demonstrates that the notion of impact source on the scalable business model came to exist.

And so, mostly working in a permanent business,

I noticed how difficult it is to change an existing system.

And at the same time,

I was starting to work with early-stage venture capital investors who were much more interested in disrupting a status quo.

100

And so I started to wonder whether it wouldn't be exciting to apply an impact-first mindset to early-stage investing.

101

And coincidentally, I met a serial entrepreneur and investor who was excited about this very same question.

102

And so together, we set up an impact-first investment firm.

103

But to just start, we took the time,

104

took the step back to think about and synthesize our learnings across innovation, entrepreneurship and investing.

105

And we both engulfed down into two core beliefs.

106

The first, that we want to align everything,

107

everything we invest into with our vision for a future fit economy that within planetary boundaries to the benefits of all.

108

And second, that we want to fast-track deep-pick disruption,

109

so not implementing innovation, but deep-pick disruption to build radically new solutions.

110

And then you can think about first investors who also ask the question what deep-pick of course is,

111

and this is something I want to briefly answer now.

112

And Deep Deep is the result of scientific breakthroughs requiring intensive R&D.

113

But I think most importantly is the question, what can it do?

114

And when I think about what it can do,

115

I really think about a metaphor that was shared with me by William McDonough,

116

the co-founder of Co-Dip Trader,

117

that I had the pleasure to interview for my first book on research here, Equinomy.

118

And he said, if you go to Mexico,

119

but you're heading towards Canada,

120

slowing down is not enough.

121

You have to turn around.

122

And so incremental innovation is exactly that, slowing down.

123

It lessens the destruction.

124

It lessens the damage from business as usual.

125

That's what incremental innovation, energy is making things less bad.

126

However, if you build something new,

127

like Ecosia, like deep-text solution,

128

new materials, waste-custaining, If you build something new,

129

you have the opportunity to come on now.

130

Now, the deep-pack first, investors,

131

we then ask, where should we apply deep-pack?

132

The fluxing.

133

Now, we started with a familiar perspective from which bacteria data is available, CO2 emissions.

134

We very clearly provide this a two-plus of all emissions arise from energy use.

135

We for good reasons, investors set 4 caliums into the new world.

136

We wanted to address the ecological crisis,

137

not just climate, but hedge funds and planet for this which we learned you to ocean health.

138

And surprisingly, there weren't any data explaining which sector did destroy the most and which solutions,

139

accordingly to help us, could carry the tide.

140

So we did to that and analyzed which sector is drawing environmental destruction and what we found it was tight.

141

It's amazing.

142

In fact, we found that almost 50% of all environmental destruction is caused by the food system, but agriculture.

143

So it really matters what we eat.

144

And next is industry and construction.

145

So if you think, every part of the world cuts or we're eating,

146

that's not just climate impacts,

147

it's water, dangers, driving biodiversity loss.

148

Equally, if you think about forestry,

149

to look for action in the structure of paper and other industrial applications.

150

And that's starting not just private impacts,

151

but fresh water and land use and biodiversity.

152

Yes, the reduced key sector really became the focus of our investigation.

153

And of course the next question then was,

154

are there any exciting deep tech phenomena?

155

By now, we've made our first investment,

156

and I'm excited to share that we started with the construction industry thinking about how to reinvent insulation.

157

In fact, we invested in a Cambridge spinner that touches the problem of today's insulation repair,

158

which is not just thick and heavy,

159

it's also poor performance of molecular producers, toxic, non-desitable waste waste.

160

Whereas instead, the biobased algaes that produce out of biological waste stream underbodies chemo,

161

the acid can sound better,

162

and of course, they buy bad grade and can safely be returned to a biosecid after use.

163

We are now looking into other issues that will impact the agricultural survey chain,

164

and now we're screening an up-told spin on it that turns agricultural waste into a power substitute.

165

And as you know, that power is the most damaging a cultural commodity after me and Gary,

166

you would be as excited as we are to produce a substitute of potato tea.

167

And so this is the opportunity to take waste, turn that into value.

168

Similarly, sewage sludge, something that today is decilibrated,

169

and instead what is the component into fertile soil?

170

If you can produce fumig matter that we bring in our fields to improve soil health,

171

improve water retention, and as result, boost agricultural yield.

172

There are really interesting opportunities to speak that today they're not available in cost-compositive yet.

173

They're not available at scale.

174

But it does take upon us that we take low-valued waste streams,

175

unwanted waste streams, and we can only do high-value desirable solutions.

176

Now, the question then for investors,

177

of course, is can we escape,

178

can we grow the prices, can we achieve prosperity?

179

And the cost very clearly is yes.

180

We do have the playbook.

181

Of course, we know there is a storage.

182

We've seen 90% or more costecreens over the last 50 years.

183

And by now, solar is one-third cheaper than any other fossil fuel anywhere globally,

184

globally, and to that we do that class,

185

we should achieve prosperity and petropower comes.

186

Now, solutions exist at night,

187

but we need investment to scale it.

188

And to be in the market,

189

I think I've no better quote than what Bookman Stachiller said.

190

He said, you never change something by fighting to existing reality.

191

You change something by a a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.

192

So impact first is that new model,

193

and it will make today's business as usual system of pay, make, waste, obsolete.

194

We know that solutions exist at last day,

195

and we know what it takes to scale them,

196

it takes investment, but we also know that our opportunities,

197

the time to carry it, is rapidly diminishing.

198

Business as usual is on a fast track to environmental disruption,

199

And now is the time to turn the tide to invest and scale impact solutions for global impact.

200

So this, I believe, is at the moment.

201

Let's not waste it.

202

Let's not check it.

203

Let's innovate, let's celebrate impact,

204

and let's together to create a future worth again.

205

Thank you.

TRENDING

ยอดนิยม

4.9/5 บน App Store และ Google Play

Shadowing English
บนมือถือ

เรียนภาษาอังกฤษได้ทุกที่ทุกเวลาด้วยแอป Shadowing English พัฒนาทักษะการสื่อสารของคุณวันนี้!

ติดตามความคืบหน้าในการเรียนรู้ของคุณ

การให้คะแนน AI และการแก้ไขข้อผิดพลาด

คลังวิดีโอที่หลากหลาย

สแกนเพื่อดาวน์โหลด

Download on theApp Store

GET IT ONGoogle Play

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

Shadowing เป็นเทคนิคการเรียนรู้ภาษาที่ได้รับการรับรองทางวิทยาศาสตร์ พัฒนาขึ้นสำหรับการฝึกนักแปลมืออาชีพ วิธีการนี้เรียบง่ายแต่ทรงพลัง: คุณฟังเสียงภาษาอังกฤษจากเจ้าของภาษาและพูดตามทันที — เหมือนเงาที่ตามผู้พูดด้วยช่วงเวลาห่าง 1-2 วินาที การวิจัยแสดงว่าเทคนิคนี้ปรับปรุงความแม่นยำในการออกเสียง ทำนองเสียง จังหวะ การเชื่อมเสียง การฟังเข้าใจ และความคล่องแคล่วในการพูดได้อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ

☕ เลี้ยงกาแฟเราสักแก้ว

ShadowingEnglish ยังคงเปิดให้ใช้งาน ฟรี 100% ได้ด้วยการสนับสนุนจากคุณ ค่าใช้จ่ายสำหรับเซิร์ฟเวอร์และ AI นั้นสูงมาก — กาแฟของคุณช่วยให้เราเดินหน้าต่อไปได้! 🙏

บริจาคผ่าน PayPal

ShadowingEnglish.com – ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษแบบ Shadowing

ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: Why Impact First Deep Tech is our future | Philipp Buddemeier | TEDxESMTBerlin

ยอดนิยม

Shadowing English
บนมือถือ

ทำไมต้องฝึกพูดกับวิดีโอนี้?

ไวยากรณ์และวลีในบริบท

กับดักการออกเสียงที่พบบ่อย

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: Why Impact First Deep Tech is our future | Philipp Buddemeier | TEDxESMTBerlin

ดาวน์โหลดแอป

Shadowing English บนมือถือ

ทำไมต้องฝึกพูดกับวิดีโอนี้?

ไวยากรณ์และวลีในบริบท

กับดักการออกเสียงที่พบบ่อย

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

Shadowing English
บนมือถือ