跟读练习: The Gig Economy is Full - 通过视频学习英语口语

选择练习模式

每种模式都会打开全屏练习室。

183 句

如果句子过短或过长，请点击 Edit 进行调整。

The gig economy has never exactly been flawless, but some recent trends are throwing off a delicate balancing act between workers and customers that might,

accidentally, be exposing some much deeper underlying problems.

On the surface, our unemployment rate looks really good right now.

Sure, it has trended up slightly in the wake of a long string of mass layoffs, but by zooming out, we can see it is still hovering around all-time lows.

Sounds great, right?

Well, it's no secret anymore that jobs data has had some reliability problems in recent years.

And one of the biggest blind spots is people moving into the gig economy instead of becoming formally unemployed.

For a lot of people who have lost their jobs, it's quicker and often easier to register as an Uber driver than it is to register as unemployed.

And you only really need to look at the numbers to see this is happening.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, over the last five years, the total number of people classified as unemployed has fallen by about 3 million,

which sounds good, but over that same time frame, the number of active Uber drivers has increased by roughly 3 million people, according to company financials.

Now, to play devil's advocate, even if these jobs aren't the best, having readily available and highly flexible work with low barriers to entry could actually be a good thing

when the alternative is people going straight onto unemployment, and we will get to that.

But the problem right now for the workers entering the gig economy is

that there is a rapidly growing roster of drivers looking to chauffeur around a $50 burrito

and a shrinking pool of customers that are still willing to pay for it.

A lot of the data surrounding gig work and even just regular employment is disjointed, vague, and often downright counterintuitive.

Even something as simple as what it means to be employed

is probably going to be different for you than it is to the statisticians putting all of these numbers together.

On top of that, when you think of gig work, you are probably thinking about people delivering food or driving people around in their fake taxis.

But depending on which organization is collecting the data, it can also extend to renting out Airbnb properties or even people like little old me here running a YouTube channel.

When a metric becomes a goal, it's no longer a useful measure, because the groups involved will try to influence it in a way that benefits them.

The gig platform companies want to report

that they have lots of people working for them to show how important they are to their stakeholders.

The media wants big changes in job numbers one way or another to make for good headlines, and politicians want to ignore the industry altogether so that they can keep on pretending the job market is great.

This just adds additional murkiness to an already very messy collection of numbers, which can make it really hard to see what is happening to a majority of the workers in these jobs,

which is, let's be honest, mostly people who couldn't find a better job elsewhere.

So to unravel this all, there are really three components that need to be understood.

The fundamental platform economics that have facilitated the growth of the gig economy, what these services have covered up in the job market, and what happens when they can't cover it up anymore.

Now that first point is really just about a balancing act.

A platform like Uber Eats or DoorDash coordinates transactions between a service provider, the delivery driver, a goods provider, the restaurant, and a consumer,

which is you poking at pictures of cheeseburgers on your phone at 11pm.

If Uber Eats wants to make more money, it either needs to charge you more, pay their delivery drivers less, take a larger cut from the restaurant making the food, or just do more transactions in total.

In the early days of these services, they were almost exclusively focused on that last point, expanding their user base.

This meant that on any given transaction, they would actually pay more to the restaurant

and delivery driver than they were taking off the customer just

to attract as many of these three onto their platform as possible.

Back around six years ago, when these businesses were still blitzscaling, customers would get subsidized food that was often cheaper than ordering in person, restaurants would get generous revenue splits,

and drivers were paid well above minimum wage even after accounting for their hidden costs.

But these good times were all financed by burning venture capital dollars.

to play devil's advocate again, this is actually not that unusual when building out a marketplace.

Customers won't spend money on the app if there are no restaurants to buy from, restaurants won't register on a platform that has no customers, and drivers won't make any money if there is no food to be delivered.

So to get things started, the market maker usually does need to sweeten the deal in every direction.

Nowadays, their mission has changed from growing the number of transactions to growing how much they make from those transactions,

but how much they can push on each participant really depends on how hard they are to replace.

All of these groups are still growing, but while total revenue from customers increased by around 35% in the last two years,

the total number of active gig workers on the platform increased by around 80% over the same time period.

This would mean that even if there were no changes in how this revenue was divided up, there is simply less money per driver even without considering inflation.

But the real point here is that drivers have become the easiest group in this triangle to replace, So it's easier for Uber to cut costs from them without destabilizing their market.

Now I know that this is a lot of numbers to confirm what you probably already knew.

Pay and conditions for the most common type of gig work is getting worse.

But by understanding these numbers you can see how this can very quickly become a dangerous feedback loop.

Especially if these customers can no longer justify spending twice as much on their food to have it hand delivered across town.

Now maybe this could be written off as pure speculation from

people who have spent too long looking at company financials except for the fact

that in a lot of markets it's already happening

and the results have not been pretty

so it's time to learn how many works to find out what happens

when there is no room left in the gig economy this

video is sponsored by cape the privacy first mobile carrier rethinking

what secure phone service should look like cape gives you premium nationwide coverage without tracking profiling

or selling your data it was built by telecom

and cyber security experts who wanted a carrier designed around privacy from the ground up most carriers collect personal information

and hold on to your metadata for years cape doesn't ask for your name

or address and it automatically deletes call logs after 60 days

and because they run their own cloud-based 4g

and 5g core network your data stays under their control instead

of being pushed through legacy systems full of vulnerabilities the feature

that really stands out is their sim swap protection instead of relying on customer service reps

or pins your number is secured with a 24 word recovery phrase

that only you control there's no insider risk

and no easy way for someone to hijack your number it

works more like protecting a digital asset wallet than dealing with

a phone plan every plan also includes enhanced signaling protection to block surveillance attempts encrypted voicemail

and the option to bundle proton vpn plus

or proton unlimited for just a dollar

which rounds out a genuinely strong privacy setup cape is still in beta

but if you want to lock down your number

and your privacy visit cape.co forward slash get cape

and use code how money works 33 for 33 off your first six months okay

so as the gig economy platforms are playing this little game

the perfect outcome for the company in the middle here trying

to maximize their own bottom line would be a large group

of people with a lot of disposable cash who are not very price sensitive

and an even bigger group of people over here without much negotiating power who just need whatever money they can get.

And oh, would you look at that?

It's a statistic you are probably all getting sick of hearing me repeat.

The top 10% of households are now doing a record 50% of the spending, while the bottom 60% of households are doing a record low of just 20%.

This growing divide is not great.

But for a company like Uber, it's been a golden opportunity to squeeze more money for a worse service out of customers

while simultaneously squeezing more service for less money out of its contractors.

Also, let's be honest with ourselves, a lot of that gap is being bridged by pushing for tips harder as well.

For the first three years of company they didn't even have a direct tipping option

because the company itself called the practice tacky.

Today it's the expectation, and it's pushed very hard.

First-hand reports from drivers and restaurants have backed up what the big picture numbers are suggesting.

A lot of locations are doing record volumes of deliveries, but individual drivers are finding it increasingly hard to find consistent deliveries

or rides which means they can spend hours a day just waiting for an opportunity to work.

When they do get jobs, it's clear that the platform is taking a larger share of the pie,

100

like this example of a $64 ride here in LA paying out just $12.43 to the driver.

101

Of course, this is just one example, but it is a pretty damning one.

102

Another factor that has allowed these companies to squeeze harder from every direction is interest rates.

103

For a while, competition was actually quite fierce in the delivery gig workspace

104

as dozens of regional startups tried to take market share away from the primary players.

105

Today, most of them have either become the incumbents, been acquired by the incumbents, or they have gone out of business.

106

The blitzscaling business model of burning billions of investor dollars until

107

cementing market share only really worked in a low interest rate

108

environment where it didn't cost much to just keep on piling in more cash.

109

If a competitor wanted to enter the market today to offer a better service or pay gig workers more competitively, they would not only need to cover their operating costs while taking market share,

110

they would also need to cover interest payments

111

that would be three times higher than they were back when a lot of today's incumbents were doing the same thing.

112

Now where this could get really bad is what could happen if job losses continue.

113

If even more people are forced into the gig economy, that would mean that even more people would end up competing for the same gigs,

114

and that's without even considering that if people lose their regular jobs and end up delivering for Uber Eats, they won't have as much money to spend on Uber Eats.

115

Now this process alone is actually not that unusual.

116

It's basically how every demand-side economic downturn ever happens.

117

Businesses lay off people, so households spend less money, so revenue falls, so businesses lay people off.

118

If anything, it could almost be argued

119

that gig work like this offers an additional layer of protection to people who lose their jobs, which is kind of what is happening right now.

120

The problem is that if this becomes widespread enough, it can cover up the problem for a lot longer than it would otherwise take to realize something might be going wrong.

121

And if things do go very wrong, the gig economy offers far less friction for this loop to spin.

122

Typically, businesses need to fill out a lot of paperwork to lay people off.

123

It makes them look bad to investors, and they will also need to rework internal processes to operate with fewer staff.

124

Yeah, sure, they still do it.

125

But it's not an instantaneous or painless process.

126

This means we at least have time to see something going wrong before it's a full-blown crisis.

127

For gig workers, all of this can happen instantaneously and automatically through the algorithms.

128

If the apps are getting fewer orders, drivers get fewer jobs and less surge pricing.

129

The automated nature of their employment throws a bottle of baby oil into the mix anytime the economy loses its footing.

130

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and companies like it are now collectively some of the largest employers in America.

131

And if Uber drivers were counted as actual employees, it would individually be the largest employer in the world,

132

easily beating out the largest defense departments and more traditional employers like Walmart.

133

This is also just counting the people working in the largest and most obvious sectors of the gig economy.

134

We have covered the story before, but starting around 5 years ago, there was a massive increase in the number of new businesses being registered in America.

135

Now spoiler alert, this was not because people suddenly became more entrepreneurial.

136

It was mostly because people had lost their regular employment and were registering a company to do gig work.

137

Fiverr, Etsy, Amazon Flex, and the naughtier platforms also saw a massive uptick in people selling their services.

138

Even the number of videos uploaded to YouTube expanded significantly at

139

this time according to research published in the Journal of Quantitative Description, as people were looking for new ways to make money.

140

And yes, this was just counting long-form content, as short-form would have skewed the results.

141

The challenges faced by individuals working at the mercy of the gig economy are now well understood and well documented.

142

But what we may soon figure out is that even for the people who never individually have to experience those conditions, they could still become a big problem for all of us.

143

In fact, it's kind of already happened.

144

China's gig economy might represent a glimpse into our own future, and that future is bleak.

145

As a result of various factors like headwinds from the real estate

146

and financial industries as well as a glutton recent graduates the youth unemployment rate in china got

147

so bad that the government simply stopped posting

148

that data uh yeah two years ago

149

when they did this we were actually in a position to judge them for it

150

but anyway these young workers with few other options have flooded

151

into the gig economy completely oversupplying the system with drivers today

152

according to estimates from the economist compiled from available company financials there are 200 million gig workers in China, representing as much as 40% of their total urban workforce.

153

This massive number is even scarier when you realize that just 15 years ago, these platforms didn't really exist at all.

154

This has become a real problem in the last three years in particular, as already frugal Chinese households are cutting back on service spending due to faltering economic conditions.

155

The end result is

156

that gig workers have reported spending 10 hours a day waiting

157

to earn as much money as what would have taken them just three hours in the past.

158

groups of brightly colored riders waiting outside shopping malls have become

159

a very visible sign of bigger issues impacting average people in an economy that, by the headline numbers, still looks like it's doing very well.

160

Even workers who are active for 10 hours a day, 7 days a week, are still not earning enough to afford a dignified lifestyle in

161

the country's major urban centers where most of this work is available.

162

In some cases, competition for work has become so fierce

163

that groups from opposing apps have gotten into altercations with one another on the street, and that is clearly not a sign of things going well.

164

Now, we are still a little ways behind a similar situation in most western countries, but there are not major structural differences that mean we couldn't.

165

The point is that this should be a scary story with a lot of things that sound very familiar, which is not great.

166

But it gets worse.

167

So far, all of this has been ignoring the big push to automate gig work as quickly as possible.

168

Drivers replaced by robotaxis, delivery drivers replaced with little fridges on wheels, and Etsy creatives replaced with an avalanche of AI-generated slop.

169

Unfortunately, as this technology progresses, there is really no way it ends well for the most

170

vulnerable workers depending on these kinds of gigs to pay their bills.

171

If the AI bubble collapses, then it's going to take a lot of the economy down with it, and the first thing that people are going to sacrifice are expensive Uber Eats orders.

172

If the AI bubble doesn't collapse, it will most likely be

173

because the technology gets to a point where it is completely able to replace workers in labor-heavy industries, like food delivery.

174

No matter which way this all goes, it's probably not going to end well for people who are already not doing well.

175

Now, I will actually be making an entire video next week about this dismal endgame, so make sure to subscribe for that.

176

But shameless plug aside, the point is

177

that these platforms know the best way to get the most

178

out of this game is to remove this piece entirely and just hope it doesn't take this one out with it.

179

It's a dangerous gambit that might not pay off, but even if it doesn't, it won't really matter.

180

181

and watch this video next to find out why the the

182

stock market is still booming even in a terrible economy to find out how.

183

And don't forget to like and subscribe to keep on learning how money works.

下载应用

流利口语所需的一切

AI 发音评分逐句打分

音标练习掌握每个音

词汇学习建立你的词库

词汇游戏边玩边学

扫码

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同频道

FOR YOU

本课的词汇与口语要点

这节 B2 级别的口语课以视频“The Gig Economy is Full”为素材。视频中反复出现的词有：gig, driver, economy, workers。这段视频共有 183 个句子、3045 个单词可供跟读。讲话部分时长为 15:22。说话人语速较快，每分钟约 198 个词，会出现较多连读和弱读。 84% 的单词属于英语最常用的 3,000 词，其余的词建议在练习前先学一下。

视频中的重点词汇

视频中最难的 15 个单词，附发音和释义：

单词	发音	释义
financials 名词		財務報表 /财务报表
unemployed 形容词	/ˌʌnɪmˈplɔɪd/	失業的 /失业的
proton 名词	/ˈpɹoʊ.tɑn/	質子 /质子
fierce 形容词	/fɪɹs/	殘忍 /残忍, 兇猛 /凶猛
squeeze 动词	/skwiːz/	壓榨, 擠壓 /挤压
investor 名词	/ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/	投資者 /投资者, 投資家 /投资家
gig 名词	/ɡɪɡ/	演出, 音樂會 /音乐会
subscribe 动词	/səbˈskɹaɪb/	簽署 /签署
headline 名词	/ˈhɛd.laɪn/	標題 /标题
divide 动词	/dɪˈvaɪd/	分, 分裂
bubble 名词	/ˈbʌbəl/	泡, 氣泡 /气泡
automate 动词	/ˈɔ.təˌmeɪt/	自動化 /自动化
classify 动词	/ˈklæs.əˌfaɪ/	分類 /分类, 分等
compile 动词	/kəmˈpaɪl/	編撰, 彙編 /汇编
friction 名词	/ˈfɹɪkʃən/	摩擦

视频中出现的短语动词

单词	发音	释义
find out 动词		找出, 查明
end up 动词		到达
cover up 动词		掩蓋 /掩盖, 掩飾 /掩饰
figure out 动词		弄清楚
fill out 动词	/fɪl ˈaʊt/	填, 填寫 /填写
take off 动词		脫 /脱
zoom out 动词	/ˌzuːm ˈaʊt/	縮小 /缩小

视频中的语法

说话人最常用的结构，并附上视频中的原话：

结构	视频中的用法
条件句 if + 从句，will/would + 动词 — 条件及其结果	if it doesn't, it won't really
现在完成时 have/has + 过去分词 — 过去发生但与现在仍有关联的事	has trended · has had · have lost
被动语态 be + 过去分词 — 强调发生了什么，而不是谁做的	is disjointed · be employed · be understood
定语从句 who / which + 从句 — 补充说明人或事物	people who have · numbers, which can · people who couldn

需要注意的发音

说话人用了 17 次缩略和弱读形式，例如 won't, doesn't, didn't。请按听到的简短形式来说。

“th” 音: algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, altogether /ɔl.tuˈɡɛð.ɚ/
“sh” 和 “zh” 音: friction /ˈfɹɪkʃən/, speculation /ˌspɛk.jəˈleɪ.ʃən/, negotiate /nəˈɡəʊ.ʃi.eɪt/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, nationwide /ˌneɪ.ʃənˈwaɪd/
长单词——注意重音位置: individually /ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒ(u)əli/, participant /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/, competitor /kəmˈpɛt.ɪ.tɚ/, coordinate /koʊˈɔɹ.dəˌneɪt/, economist /iˈkɑ.nə.mɪst/

中文母语者容易读错的音：

/v/ — 不要读成 /w/，上齿轻触下唇: individually /ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒ(u)əli/, investor /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/, provider /pɹəˈvaɪ.də(ɹ)/, divide /dɪˈvaɪd/, vague /veɪɡ/
词尾辅音 — 要读清楚，后面不要加元音: incumbent /ɪnˈkʌmbənt/, unemployed /ˌʌnɪmˈplɔɪd/, fierce /fɪɹs/, squeeze /skwiːz/, gig /ɡɪɡ/
/r/ 和 /l/ 的区别: triangle /ˈtɹaɪˌæŋɡəl/, readily /ˈɹɛdɪli/, algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/

如何用这段视频练习

先完整听一遍视频，不要开口，记下不认识的单词。
先用 0.75 倍速逐句跟读，熟练之后再回到正常速度。
录下自己的声音并与原声对比，特别注意 financials, unemployed, proton 这类单词。

什么是跟读法？

跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧，最初开发用于专业口译员的培训，并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大：您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同，跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性，语调，节奏，连读，听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟读法: 阅读完整分步指南 →

跟读练习: The Gig Economy is Full - 通过视频学习英语口语

选择练习模式

下载应用

同频道

If Companies Are Desperate For Workers... Why Can Nobody Find A Job?

How America Got So Good At Buying Sh*t

Is The Collapsing Relevance of a College Degree... A Good Thing?

WTF Is Happening To The Video Game Industry?

The End Of Budget Tourism

Have We Made The World Too Convenient?

The 40 Year Career Is Dead... And That's a Good Thing

推荐视频

What Happens When Capitalism Doesn't Need Workers Anymore?

China-youth unemployment

How The Economic Machine Works by Ray Dalio

The Illusion of Africa's Economic Boom

Is Hustle Culture Dead? Gen Z's Smartest Money Move | Networth & Chill

The Recession's Already Here… Open Your Eyes

The Liberalism to Fascism Pipeline (Neoliberalism Explained)

Is Amazon Too Big?

How Money & Banking Work (& why they're broken today) - Lyn Alden

Does Rent Control ACTUALLY Work? Obama’s Chief Economist Breaks it Down | The Brief

Great Moments in Unintended Consequences: Obscenity Blocks, Cooking Oil, DC's Tipped Wage (Vol. 19)