跟读练习: Why having a vision isn’t enough to be an effective leader | Suzy Welch for Big Think+ - 通过视频学习英语口语

If you're a manager or a leader

and all you do is dream big dreams and think and talk about the future in lofty, visionary terms and you don't actually get anything done,

everyone is going to hate you.

And meanwhile, if you're a person who's in the trenches and all you do is sort of the logistical, tactical, this is what we do tomorrow,

grunty stuff, and you never go up to the mountaintop and say, here's our vision, everybody is going to hate you.

When I teach managerial skills, I refuse to use the word manager or leader, and I've created this very unattractive word, lanager, which of course is a blend of those two words,

because it's only academics who debate what leaders do versus what managers do.

And I actually believe from living in the real world of business

that there's really a blend of those two jobs in real life.

And it doesn't make any difference if you're managing three people or 300,000 people, the The very best people at the top of teams

or organizations are doing a little bit of managing and a little bit of leading.

Hi, I'm Suzy Welch.

I'm a professor of management practice at NYU Stern School of Business.

You can't execute or you can't ask people to do what you're asking them to

if you don't explain to them why you're asking them to do it.

One of my favorite lines, and I use it over and over again when I'm teaching, is you have to tell the drummer what the words of the song are about.

You can't just give the drummer the music and tell him to hit it.

He's not going to be half as good

or she's not going to be half as good as

if they know what the song is about so they can put their whole selves into it.

This is what managers and leaders should be doing, okay?

Telling the drummer and all the other musicians on stage what the words of the song mean, why you're doing the work.

And then, this is the how.

Now we're gonna execute.

And the job of the manager

and the leader at the same time is to be going back and forth between the why and the how, and the why and the how,

sometimes in one conversation and certainly always in the same day.

Part of what makes you very good as a person running

a team in the Lanager role is to be the simultaneous translator between your team and the people up there.

When I see simultaneous translators at the UN

and I see them going back

and forth translating a conversation between say the Chinese delegation and the Bulgarian delegation and you can see how exhausting this is,

I think yeah, that's the work of a good Lanager.

That takes diplomacy.

It takes courage.

It's more than being a messenger, because when you're a messenger, you sort of drop the bomb.

You know, you say, this is what they're saying up there, and you just sort of keep your poker face about it.

Or you go up to the top and you say, everybody really wants to work from home two days, you know, blah, blah, blah.

And then you just sort of stand there and you act like Switzerland.

You're neutral.

really good Lanager, they are not just doing that.

They are explaining both groups to each other, and they're taking a stand.

I mean, the worst thing in the world is a fingerprintless Lanager.

Leave no sign of what you really believe, okay?

Everybody comes to resent that.

You sort of agree with the last person in the room.

You've got to have conviction.

It may shorten your career in some places, but at least you stood on your principle, and your reputation for integrity will follow you.

People hate making hard calls because when you have put your name with the decision and then it bombs, your name's on it.

And nobody wants to be exposed to failure because generally people want to keep their jobs.

But you have to develop this, otherwise you will get a reputation for a person who cannot be a leader.

You can't move an organization forward if you don't make decisions.

You have to decide about pricing, market segmentation, branding.

I mean, you just have to make one decision after another.

The hardest decisions, of course, are people decisions.

Who goes into what job and what they actually do.

Don't get me started.

That's very, very hard.

But once you've failed a few times in business, you realize, oh, life will generally go on.

And I'll be able to say to my team, look, we did that once.

It didn't work.

I own it.

This is what I've learned.

And the respect you get for saying, I made that mistake.

I own it what we learned is unbelievable.

And I think you sort of have to do that once before you realize, oh wow, that's actually so much more effective than actually not even being associated with the mistake.

Everybody makes mistakes and once you sort of say, I made a mistake, I really learned from it.

People are like, oh, I really respect that person.

Sometimes I finish the semester teaching about managerial skills and about half the class is like, we're out, it's hard.

It's very easy by comparison to be an individual contributor or to be, for instance, on a board where you're just big picture.

Okay, those two different things are quite simple compared to what a Lanager has to do, which is both of those things at once.

Get smarter, faster with videos from the world's biggest thinkers.

To learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think Plus for your business.

什么是跟读法？

跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧，最初开发用于专业口译员的培训，并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大：您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同，跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性，语调，节奏，连读，听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。

跟读练习: Why having a vision isn’t enough to be an effective leader | Suzy Welch for Big Think+ - 通过视频学习英语口语

为什么通过这个视频来练习口语？

语法与表达在语境中的应用

常见发音陷阱

什么是跟读法？