Pratique du Shadowing: Joe Rogan's Best Ancient Civilization Podcasts - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

Choisissez un mode d'entraînement

Chaque mode ouvre une salle d'entraînement en plein écran.

455 phrases

Si les phrases sont trop courtes ou trop longues, cliquez sur Edit pour les ajuster.

Because if you look at Europe during the Ice Age, and I'm talking about a lost civilization of the Ice Age,

Northern Europe and North America were absolutely inhospitable wildernesses during the Ice Age.

They were frozen, they were dry, and they were dangerous.

And they were not the places that people would go.

People naturally gravitated south towards the equator, towards the tropics.

That's where I would expect to find traces of a lost civilization, and that's where I do find traces of a lost civilization.

You don't really find – I've never reported anything about the UK, for example, in my books.

We have Stonehenge.

We have Avebury.

We have these stone circles, but they're not old enough.

That was the time when the UK started to get warmer, and it's the same with the rest of northern Europe, and it's the same with the northern part of North America.

You have to go down to the southern part of North America.

You have to go into Mexico.

You have to go into South America to really find an environment during the Ice Age

that would have nurtured a high civilization.

And there's a lot of speculation as to why they weren't able to cross the Bering landmass too, right?

Well, again, this is an area where there has been a narrative that archaeology has sought to impose upon us.

And this was this was called the Clovis first idea that there was a people who archaeologists called the Clovis people.

We don't know what they call themselves in North America and traces of their characteristic tools, particular sort of fluted points,

arrowhead spear points, turn up from about 13 ,400 years ago and end abruptly 12 ,800 years ago.

And for a long time, with the beginning of the Younger Dryas, and for a long time, archaeology maintained that this Clovis culture, so -called Clovis culture, we don't know what they call themselves,

were the first Americans, and that there were no human beings in the Americas before 13 ,400 years ago.

And bit by bit, the New evidence has come in

which has forced archaeologists screaming and tearing out their hair to back away from the Clovis first paradigm and admit that actually, yes, there were people here before that.

But even then, they're reluctant to go very far back.

We've recently had these footprints in White Sands in New Mexico, 23 ,000 years old or so.

That's largely being accepted now.

But there are much earlier dates.

There's 130 ,000 years ago from the Cerruti Mastodon site near San Diego.

So the Sphinx is supposed to have been built 4 ,500 years ago.

But as you know, Robert Shock and I and many others are convinced the Sphinx is much, much older than that, that it goes back 12 ,000 plus years.

And this is based on geological evidence of heavy rainfall, which is another interesting thing about the climate and the environment of that area,

that we think of it as being desert.

But at one point in time, it wasn't.

Well, this is one of the reasons why I'm

so frustrated by archaeologists claiming that they could know there was no lost civilization

when they've done so little work in the Sahara.

When the Sahara was, in a number of occasions during the Ice Age,

incredibly fertile, very, very nurturing environment with huge river systems running through it and lakes.

It's not disputed that that was the case.

It was a kind of environment that would have nurtured human civilization.

And we really can't write off the possibility of a lost civilization until we take a much closer, much more detailed look at the Sahara.

Of course, that's expensive.

And then Egypt itself is in the Sahara.

Didn't they find fossilized whale bones in the Sahara?

Yeah, that would go back a lot further.

That would go back to millions of years to a time when the oceans were different, perhaps even hundreds of millions of years.

So Sahara at one point was an ocean.

As many places were.

Pretty much anywhere where you find limestone was once covered by ocean.

The world has changed.

The world is constantly changing.

It's like it's like one of those magic kids toys

that we pull pull a lever and it wipes out the diagram you just made Yeah

It just keeps on the world keeps on recreating itself

and we human beings make our journey through this through this changing world

And we we try to fix it

and say this is how things were this is how things will be

and it never cooperates with us It's just incredibly fascinating

that the timeline when you go beyond the traditional timeline

And you get back into where you

and Robert Schock have speculated the age of the Sphinx Now

you're talking about a completely different environment of lush rainforests and many many many resources Absolutely, we're talking about a completely different Sahara,

which and Schock's evidence is of a thousand years of heavy rainfall That's what the Sphinx bears witness to

that it was already there When the rains of the Younger Dryas

and the Younger Dryas affected the Sahara with heavy rainfall just as further north it changed the climate

and made it much colder in the Sahara it became much wetter

and it's that period of rains that

that are the most likely culprit for weathering the Sphinx in the way it is

but it could have stood there for thousands of years before

that there's also very clear evidence that the face in the Sphinx is much younger right no doubt about that whatsoever.

The first problem is the ancient Egyptians were masters of proportion.

The ancient Egyptian art is rightly world famous for its quality, and they didn't get things out of proportion.

They wouldn't make that elementary error when they create this giant statue, carving it out of solid bedrock.

But the head of the Sphinx is way too small in relation to the body.

It looks like the head of a pin.

It doesn't fit with that 270 70 foot long, 70 foot high body.

It looks very much as though the Sphinx once had a much larger head.

Can you show us a photo of it, Jamie?

It's also much less weathered, right?

And it's much less weathered.

And this is, again, where Egyptology tries to attach the Sphinx to a particular period.

Egyptology claims that's the face of Khafre, who was the successor to Khufu.

It doesn't look like any statues, known statues of Khafre that I can see, but let's know.

It is called the Nemes headdress.

It's the classic headdress of an Egyptian pharaoh.

Not, in my view, Khafre, but the headdress of an Egyptian pharaoh.

But it's on a head that is way too small by comparison with the body.

And both Shock and I and John Anthony West, Manu Seifzada, who's another excellent researcher in this field,

we all feel that the Sphinx was almost certainly a complete lion at one point.

It was a lion with a huge mane, and that that head sticking up above the plateau got very heavily eroded.

And by the time the ancient Egyptians inherited it, they decided to improve it a little bit, to cut down that heavily eroded head and put the head of a pharaoh on it.

Does it have the same sort of sophisticated proportions where they're perfect left and right as some of the other statues do, which is another incredible mystery?

That when they look at the measurements of these immense statues somehow

or another they're completely symmetrical on both left and right side Completely symmetrical

I'm actually not sure whether that's the case with the Sphinx I wouldn't be surprised

because I have no doubt whatsoever

that the head of the Great Sphinx was carved by the ancient Egyptians Who made those who made those statues?

But the question is what was it carved from?

100

What was it cut down from right?

101

So the geology the the precipitation induced weathering is one of the evidence pieces of evidence for a much older Sphinx.

102

But the other thing is the astronomy, the fact that the Sphinx is an equinoctial marker.

103

You know, if you stand looking due east at Giza or anywhere in the northern hemisphere,

104

on the spring equinox, there's three key moments of the year, four actually.

105

There's the winter and summer solstice, and there's the equinoxes, the spring and fall equinoxes.

106

On the summer solstice, the sun rises far to the north of east.

107

On the winter solstice, It rises far to the south of east, but on the equinoxes it aligns perfectly due east

108

And that's what the sphinx is it's aligned perfectly to due east

109

and it's gazing at the horizon

110

And then we come to this contentious issue of who discovered those zodiacal constellations

111

Because the sphinx twelve

112

and a half thousand years ago was gazing at dawn on

113

the spring equinox at the constellation of Leo In other words

114

this lion monument on the ground was looking at its own celestial counterpart in the sky Egyptologists dismiss

115

that they say the

116

that nobody had any idea of the constellations until the Greeks I just think they're I think they're wrong

117

so astronomy and

118

Geology together

119

Combine to invite us to consider the possibility that the Sphinx may be much older than

120

4500 years old right I mean if you I know you know that oh yeah, that is a crazy theory that sounds so It sounds completely wackadoo

121

But then when you have it laid out to you Christopher, what's his last name done?

122

My podcast a few weeks.

123

I just had him a couple weeks ago.

124

I just had a brain fart the his depiction of

125

The mechanisms that would be involved in turning this

126

Giant structure into some sort of a power plant you hear about you wait a minute.

127

Yeah, whoa Yeah, it makes a lot of sense and him

128

and I have very similar theories on how the power generation occurred

129

and i believe that the nile you know

130

when it used to run up close to the pyramids

131

and the water would run underneath the pyramid and

132

that would create something called physiostatic electricity as it ran underneath

133

that magnetized crystal granite those ions would pour up into the

134

chamber move up the grand gallery where there used to be resonating rods

135

but you can see the slots where the rods used to be they're removed now

136

but the slots are still there then it would be pushed into the king's chamber where it would be amplified

137

and some type of fusion would take place then forced up through the apex, and then the crystal granite obelisks around the region would capture that ambient wireless electricity.

138

And then if you had something called a jet, which looks like a Tesla coil, you can capture that energy and you can transfer it into a device for gold electroplating,

139

for any of the electrical tools you need, like some of the tools they had to have used to create some of these incredible works of art.

140

We can see the tool marks, so we know they had the tools.

141

But they had wireless electricity way back then.

142

The interesting thing about the Amazon, Joe, is it's been.. grievously misunderstood over the years

143

and fortunately archaeology is beginning to come to terms with it

144

there was agriculture in the Amazon going back a very long

145

way going back at least 10 ,000 years maybe maybe further

146

and we we may have discussed this before

147

but there's this there's this curious soil that exists in the Amazon that they call terra preta or Amazonian dark earth

148

recent investigations have shown without doubt that it's man -made

149

and deliberately man -made not an accidental result of refuse tips

150

but a deliberate attempt to make the Amazon fertile

151

and how do they know that it's deliberate

152

because they find in it the same ingredients

153

and amongst the amongst those ingredients are always broken bits of

154

ceramics that's one of the odd things they seem to be

155

part of what makes it work really ceramics ceramics in mixed

156

in there with with dung with with human refuse all deliberately put in there, not an accidental dunk heap,

157

but a place that human beings said, we're going to make this ground fertile.

158

Because rainforest soils are not particularly fertile.

159

The fertility of the Amazon comes entirely from the fall of leaves onto the soil.

160

It re -fertilizes itself.

161

But to grow crops on the Amazon is a very different prospect.

162

And this is where Terra Prata really comes into its own.

163

And I've been standing in a pit with an archaeologist there, a Terra Prata pit, and you You can see this beautiful, rich soil, and it is a mystery.

164

It constantly replenishes itself.

165

It never gets used up.

166

Settlers seek it out, seek out areas of terra preta, and it fits with this notion that no longer a notion,

167

it's a fact, that there was a population of millions in the Amazon 10 ,000 years ago, and they were living a highly productive, sophisticated life.

168

They were using agriculture.

169

They also gardened the Amazon.

170

The hyper -dominant trees in the Amazon are all food -bearing trees.

171

The Brazil nut tree, for example, which is a huge, tall tree, is a food -bearing tree.

172

And they exist in far greater numbers than they should do if they develop naturally.

173

Humans manipulated the Amazon and made it serve human needs thousands and thousands of years ago.

174

And then we have these enormous structures that are appearing in the Amazon, which are being referred to as geoglyphs geoglyphs.

175

They call them geoglyphs after the Nazca lines, actually.

176

The Nazca lines in Peru are huge ground images, sometimes geometrical in form, sometimes showing animals or birds or spiders,

177

other creatures, often actually showing Amazonian animals.

178

But in the Brazilian Amazon, in the state of Acre,

179

as a result of clearances of the Amazon that have been done for farming purposes.

180

There's this rush to just cut the Amazon down and replace it with cattle ranches and soybean farms.

181

Those clearances have revealed something that again, according to the old view of the Amazon, shouldn't be there, which is gigantic earthworks,

182

huge ones, a bit like the henges in Europe, enormous embankments, ditches, and in geometrical forms.

183

So you You get enormous squares, enormous circles, you get a circle within a square.

184

They keep repeating these geometrical images, and they're thousands of years old.

185

When we were down there just recently, we had a local LiDAR guy working with us.

186

These days, you don't have to even use an airplane to find things with LiDAR.

187

You can fly LiDAR off a drone, and flying his drone within a mile of known structures that are outside the rainforest now,

188

he found two more huge geoglyphs under the rainforest canopy, which will be investigated.

189

And this is bizarre and puzzling.

190

They reckon, the team working on this, that's Marty Parson of the University of Helsinki and Alsea Ranzi, who's a Brazilian archaeologist and geologist,

191

they reckon that there's thousands of these things still under the rainforest canopy, and there's a huge untold story.

192

So one of the places I would cook for a lost civilization is the Amazon rainforest.

193

So the Atlantis one So the Rishat structure.

194

I was wondering if you saw those videos.

195

Yeah No, that was that was a big one that I saw

196

because I've been fascinated by the concept of Atlantis You know ever since I had these conversations with Randall Carlson

197

and Graham Hancock about the Younger Dryas impact theory and this concept that somewhere in the roughly around 11 ,000,

198

12 ,000 years ago, we were hit by a series of comets.

199

And it's pretty evident that that's a fact.

200

If you do the core samples of the earth, they find this nuclear glass all over the earth that exists in that time period.

201

And it seems like something happened that reset civilization.

202

And there's very little evidence of advanced civilizations before

203

that up until recently up until the last couple of decades they started uncovering things like gobekli tepe

204

and all these other structures that are clearly from more than 12 000 years ago

205

and they're really complex and really large with enormous stones

206

and it sort of caused people to rethink the history of the earth

207

and the history of human civilizations and atlantis has always been the big one

208

that has been the one that everybody talked about was this incredibly advanced civilization

209

and no one can figure out where it is.

210

Or if it was real.

211

I think that Atlantis, because surely that wouldn't have been necessarily the name just through the change of language over, let's say, 12, 13 ,000 years ago, which would be the timeframe.

212

So surely there would be several different changes of language, but I think it represented a civilization that was doing great things.

213

They were more global than what many people think would be possible.

214

Atlantis was said to be a kingdom made up of – or an empire, excuse me, made up of ten kingdoms.

215

And then there was the lost city of Atlantis, which was the capital, which was said to be made up of concentric circles, two of water, three of land.

216

And essentially that they were obliterated by a cataclysm as passed down by Plato, although it's worth mentioning that Plato got the story of Atlantis from Solon,

217

who was his uncle separated by six generations.

218

But what most people don't realize is that Solon had traveled to Egypt, and so it's the ancient Egyptians is where that tale comes from,

219

which makes it even more bizarre because I would argue that the most spectacular ancient civilization is the Egyptians.

220

I mean, no disrespect to the Romans.

221

It's hard to deny.

222

Right?

223

I mean it let me just say

224

because I want to on this podcast encourage people to travel

225

to Egypt it Joe you got to go I really want to a friend of mine just went

226

and she got back

227

and she was telling me incredible things about it Jamie we

228

pull up the photos of these concentric circles tell him yeah

229

the wrist shot r -i -c -h -a -t It's worth mentioning

230

that yeah in the first couple I just want to say

231

it's a wrist shot I used to call it Rick hot I was mispronouncing it, but let me ask you this Joe real quick

232

When you saw my video was that the very first time you had ever seen this thing before yeah, that's the thing So many

233

when I first saw this I was like what the fuck is

234

that by the way you see that white all those white blemishes Uh -huh, that's salt this was under the ocean

235

and people let me just say you mentioned Randall Carlson

236

and Graham Hancock I love them and I know for sure

237

that they don't particularly think this is the site for a few different reasons

238

So let me say there's absolute doubt even I am not

239

a hundred percent certain I'm not even a percent certain

240

that lenses existed What I am certain is

241

that humans were doing spectacular things in a civil is you know A cataclysmic event happened called the younger Dryas

242

and reset something for somebody.

243

Is there a natural?

244

Explanation for this formation.

245

Yes.

246

So what so let me say

247

that it is considered to be a mysterious They don't they're not a hundred percent certain of it.

248

However, the consensus is that it was a volcanic dome that had risen and collapsed multiple times, like 100 million years ago, allegedly.

249

I don't, I say allegedly, I'm not necessarily disagreeing with that.

250

I'm just saying I would like to know where sometimes they get these figures from.

251

Like explain to me why it was 100 million years ago and not 99 or 98, because here we are talking about how crazy things changed in just the last 12, 13 ,000 years.

252

So when they throw around these numbers, you know, One million years in itself is an incredibly long period of time, but getting back to your question

253

Some had originally thought

254

that maybe was an impact site from a crate from a you know an asteroid or perhaps

255

But there's no evidence for it like there's none of the

256

nanobot The problem is is there's these concentric circles the way I like that.

257

I've never seen anything I mean, obviously I'm not an archaeologist, but I've never seen anything like this in

258

I mean if you study structures that are like man -made structures I've never seen anything like this that humans have made,

259

but I've definitely never seen like— Go to that one where your cursor's on, Jamie.

260

Yeah, please.

261

So is this— You want to see some—all right.

262

What is this?

263

Okay.

264

Okay, one step at a time because we also have to take into consideration that people are just listening.

265

So kind of describe what we're looking at here.

266

Okay, so what you're looking at is approximately 250 miles inland in the total barren desert of Mauritania, Africa.

267

So the Western Sahara.

268

But this image looks like—why is it blue?

269

That's just showing you the— What it used to look like?

270

No, this is what it looks like right now through—I forgot what you call this type of animation, but it's essentially a satellite imagery

271

that they enhanced in order for you to see the difference in elevation and the actual structure to itself.

272

Okay, so if there was water in this area, you would see it this way, that it would be these concentric circles that are raised above the water,

273

and then the water would be inside of it like that.

274

Well, just to clarify, this particular image, no, this is not trying to represent water.

275

So that blue is actually picking up on salt.

276

Salt.

277

All that was salt.

278

But, I mean, it used to be underwater, right?

279

It's salt because it was underwater.

280

That's what I believe, and that's what makes the most sense to me.

281

Others will disagree, and let me tell you why.

282

It is currently 1 ,200, 1 ,300 feet above sea level.

283

It's 250 miles inland.

284

And so some people say this was never under the ocean, at least not for the last tens of millions of years, is what the scientists claim.

285

I argue that since the salt is still there, and not only that, Jamie, If you go to the other images that show you more of the white,

286

the one that you were previously on, the one to the middle to the left right there.

287

So those areas with the most white blemishes happen to be the areas that are the lowest in elevation, which to me tells me that saltwater had settled there.

288

But not only that, Joe, Atlantis was said to be, like we said, you know, multiple rings of, you know, water and land.

289

However, it was said to open to the sea to the south.

290

And what you're looking at here, the south, so this is oriented north, south, east, and west.

291

What do you see to the south?

292

And especially if we could get another.

293

This is a very flat area that looks like it's the lowest elevation.

294

Like, around it looks like it's higher.

295

I mean, it's hard to tell from this image.

296

Jamie, will you Google map it?

297

Just type in, even if you went to Mortania, so you could see this from space.

298

Astronauts use it as a locator, and they weren't really familiar or aware of it until the Gemini missions in the early 1960s.

299

So if you go to like if you just go to Google Earth, you could you'll be able to find this quite quickly It stands out

300

and it's why they call it the eye of Africa or the eye of the Sahara All right, so just pan out a little bit and it'll provide us with a much keep going

301

All that all

302

that white is salt Archaeologists should not seek to isolate the story of Atlantis from other flood myths

303

and traditions all around the world And that's a problem too I mean, we have hundreds of myths and traditions from countries all around the globe

304

Which speak of a great global cataclysm a huge flood often wildfires

305

Destruction of human beings and

306

and of animals a few survivors who seek to restart civil

307

It's a global story not a not a single story told by Plato

308

and I mean if you hear the same story from so many different cultures At what point in time do you go?

309

Maybe there's something to this.

310

I mean, it's just very strange to try to deny that again We have this with the physical evidence.

311

Yeah, especially with the physical evidence and it's interesting with the physical evidence like

312

like Gobekli Tepe Which is eleven thousand six hundred years old.

313

I mean it used to be argued Robert shock

314

and John Anthony West work on the great sphinx suggesting

315

that the Sphinx could be 12 ,000 plus years old it used to be argued

316

that was impossible because there was no other site anywhere in the world no other megalithic site of the same age.

317

And then we discover Gobekli Tepe, and it's 11 ,600 years old.

318

Now, if you can make Gobekli Tepe with its 20 -ton megaliths, beautifully carved representations of human and animal figures in those pillars, if you can do that,

319

you can cut the Great Sphinx out of bedrock as well.

320

There's no reason to dismiss the geological evidence of the Great Sphinx anymore.

321

But instead, what archaeology is doing is trying to finesse Gobekli Tepe.

322

They're trying to say, oh, there was this gradual buildup to Gobekli Tepe.

323

And they now talk about people who they call the Natufians.

324

Again, we don't know what they call themselves, who were predecessors of Gobekli Tepe around 14 ,000 years ago.

325

And they show things that look like a tiny little stone wall that they built.

326

The sort of thing that you can find, a dry stone wall that you can find anywhere in Wales to this day, you know.

327

And this is supposed to be a prequel to Gobekli Tepe.

328

I'm sorry, you just don't start off making dry stone walls

329

and then wake up one morning and create 20 ton megaliths in huge stone circles

330

Perfectly astronomically aligned as we have at Gobekli Tepe.

331

Not only that, but how?

332

Like what did what did they do?

333

How are you even where are you getting those 20 ton megaliths from?

334

How far do they have to transport?

335

In the case of Gobekli Tepe, not far.

336

How far?

337

Oh, hundreds of meters.

338

I've stood on top of one

339

megalith that they partially cut out of the bedrock with the t -shape

340

but then they found a fault in it and they left it there it would have been a 30 -ton

341

megalith they clearly intended to release it from the bedrock

342

but it had a fault so they they left it alone the quarries

343

that the issue of the quarries for the rock at Gobekli

344

Tepe is not too big a problem with the transportation of

345

those even the transportation you get enough people working together

346

and they can and they can move large stones there's that that's that that's not in dispute, but that's where the question comes.

347

How do you get enough people together?

348

How do you have the organizational skills?

349

Where do you have the mindset that plans something like this at the beginning?

350

And that is the problem that is not answered in the case of Gobekli Tepe, that happening suddenly.

351

And what were they using for tools?

352

They're supposed to have just been using stone.

353

There's not supposed to have been any metals at that period.

354

Not even brass?

355

Not even brass, not even copper.

356

I have...

357

I have a complicated view on Gobekli Tepe.

358

Let's say it's my hypothesis.

359

It's not a fact.

360

I don't claim this is a fact.

361

I think that what we're looking at at Gobekli Tepe,

362

there's no doubt that the population around Gobekli Tepe were all hunter -gatherers when Gobekli Tepe started to be made.

363

And that's the weirdest thing of all, because previously archaeology always used to say hunter -gatherer cultures did not have the manpower,

364

did not have the organizational skills, could not generate the surpluses that would allow people to specialize in architecture and engineering and astronomy and so on.

365

So it used to be said that hunter -gatherers couldn't do that.

366

Now archaeologists have backpedaled on that and they're saying, well, yeah, clearly hunter -gatherers did it.

367

The funny thing is that during the 1 ,000 years that Gobekli Tepe functions, and it runs from roughly 11 ,600 years ago to,

368

say, 9 ,600 years ago, 10 ,600 years ago, during those 1 ,000 years,

369

the population of Gobekli Tepe transitions from being hunter -gatherers to being agriculturalists.

370

So we see two new ideas suddenly appearing at Gobekli Tepe, enormous megalithic architecture and a shift from hunter -gathering to agriculture.

371

And what Gobekli Tepe looks like to me is a transfer of technology,

372

that people who already knew how to work megalithic architecture and align it precisely to the risings of particular stars,

373

for example, Sirius, came to Gobekli Tepe at a time of chaos and cataclysm in the world.

374

And they sought to introduce a new way of thinking.

375

I think Gobekli Tepe was created as a project to mobilize the local community, to give them something to work on, to bring them together.

376

And it's not an accident that during that thousand years they transitioned from hunter -gathering to agriculture.

377

I don't see massive technical complications in creating Gobekli Tepe except those very precise alignments

378

but what I do see is a sudden appearance of something that shouldn't have been there and that and that requires explanation.

379

Well if you look at the tablets again they talk about this war right

380

and this war that occurred there's a lot of wars obviously

381

but this one particular war it seems like the same one

382

that damaged the area

383

or the region of the Giza Plateau also Mohenjandar in the Indus Valley up there by Pakistan

384

and the reason why it's interesting is

385

if you look at the war in the text

386

and then go to those areas it looks now almost you

387

can begin to see oh wait a minute it looks like

388

war mohenjandaro indus valley the buildings turned to glass the sand turned to glass

389

and the bodies are still laying in the street right now today holding hands never been scavenged by animals

390

so wait a minute where is this mohen jendaro are there photos

391

that we can look at oh yeah look it up mohenjandaro

392

indus valley dead bodies still laying in the street thousands of years later

393

and nobody just they just lay there no one's covered them up nobody's covered them up yeah

394

when you put a geiger counter over them higher than background level radiation really yeah

395

and if but aren't stones higher than background level radiation some stones are some stones are especially like diorite

396

and uh crystal granite

397

but these bodies these are just bones how come they're higher

398

than background level i can't wait to see this why haven't

399

i ever heard of this mohan jendoro m -o -h -e

400

-n there you go whoa yeah this is evidence of a nuclear war

401

or nuclear go back to the other the one that one there?

402

That one's insane.

403

Yeah.

404

There's bodies that are sitting on the edge of steps next to their own buildings that they lived in.

405

The building is turned to glass.

406

That's 3 ,000 plus degree temperature weapons fire.

407

So there's a bunch of people that seem to die all at once, just scattered around?

408

Yeah.

409

And what's the conventional explanation for how these people died?

410

They have no idea.

411

They have zero idea.

412

The only thing that you can...

413

That was just a couple, Jamie go to the other just the Mohan Jandara mythical mass massacre Yeah, so that they think it's a massacre.

414

Do they there's there any Just laying there laying there and the bed building those stones are vitrified, which means 3000 plus degree temperature.

415

Oh Shit, what kind of you know, what could have caused that level of temperature?

416

Energetic release Well, it could have been a low atmosphere asteroid.

417

It could have been you mean just like that's Tunguska yeah, it could have been a little but then their bones would have been splattered apart

418

and broken up into pieces good call Yeah, that's good call.

419

Yeah, because They don't seem to be broken apart.

420

No, they're not broken apart right that impact would have shattered the bones

421

and spread them out over Right without impact even

422

if you just look at the one that burst in the atmosphere in Tunguska It just flattened trees flattened everything.

423

I think it's some insane like a million acres or something crazy.

424

That's incredible The Tunguska explosion that that one's yeah, so those bodies would be toast because the trees were ripped apart The buildings would have been flattened.

425

The legs would have flown off.

426

There's no way They would just be laying there like that.

427

That's interesting and they don't seem to be like chopped up No, did they have any evidence of stab wounds or anything on them?

428

They don't have any evidence of any injury of any kind of attack or any cutting or like swords or anything.

429

They just all got cooked.

430

Right.

431

And then in the tablets, it says that the evil wind moved over to land after they released these weapons.

432

And then Enki goes to his father.

433

I mean, yeah, Enki goes to his father anew and says, hey, can you stop the evil wind?

434

Because he had fallen in love with some people, you know, and down there.

435

And he's like, there's nothing I can do.

436

He said, get in your sky ship and forebode.

437

That means get the hell out of here.

438

And he said that people's hair was falling out.

439

Their eyes were bleeding.

440

Their nose were bleeding.

441

Their fingernails were curling off.

442

That sounds like radiation sickness So you think it's radiation sickness

443

that did this to all these people or was it an impact that did this all these people?

444

Nobody nobody nobody knows, you know, but they're they're not blown apart, right?

445

They're not blown apart.

446

It seems like whatever wherever whatever struck

447

or whatever energetic weapon it was It could have been not

448

might not have been a weapon whatever it was It seems like

449

that shockwave reached them at some point and whatever was in that wave Just killed everybody.

450

That's what it did.

451

Yeah And they just don't know what it is today.

452

How does a conventional?

453

Archaeologists describe it.

454

They just say it's a massacre.

455

They just call it a mythical massacre, and they stay away from it

Télécharger l'application

Tout pour parler couramment

Prononciation IAChaque phrase notée

Phonétique (IPA)Maîtrisez chaque son

VocabulaireEnrichissez votre lexique

Jeu de vocabulaireApprenez en jouant

Scanner le QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

Vidéo recommandée

169 phrases

Yorkshire Is Hiding Something Nobody Talks About

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

402 phrases

Before We Became the Last Humans:The Lost Species That Once Shared Our World|Prehistoric Documentary

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

129 phrases

Vocabulaire et conseils d’expression pour cette leçon

Cette leçon d’expression orale s’appuie sur la vidéo « Joe Rogan's Best Ancient Civilization Podcasts ». Cette vidéo contient 455 phrases et 5883 mots à répéter en shadowing. La partie parlée dure 31:02. Le locuteur parle vite, environ 190 mots par minute : attendez-vous à des liaisons et à des sons réduits. 82 % des mots font partie des 3 000 mots les plus courants en anglais ; le reste mérite d’être vu avant de commencer.

Vocabulaire clé de cette vidéo

15 mots de la vidéo à retenir, avec leur prononciation et leur sens :

Mot	Prononciation	Sens
civilization nom	/ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/	civilisation
hunter nom	/ˈhʌntɚ/	chien de chasse
enormous adjectif	/ɪˈnɔː.məs/	énorme
statue nom	/ˈstæt͡ʃu/	statue
archaeology nom	/ˌɑɹ.kiˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	archéologie
bone nom	/boʊn/	os
argue verbe	/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/	affirmer, débattre
incredibly adverbe	/ɪŋˈkɹɛdɪbli/	incroyablement
agriculture nom	/ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/	agriculture
radiation nom	/ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/	radiation
massacre nom	/ˈmæs.ə.kə(ɹ)/	massacre
fertile adjectif	/ˈfɝːtəl/	fertile
shock nom	/ʃɔk/	choc
explanation nom	/ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/	explication
architecture nom	/ˈɑː.kɪˌtɛk.t͡ʃə/	architecture

Les verbes à particule que vous entendrez

Mot	Prononciation	Sens
go back verbe		rentrer, retourner
cut down verbe		abattre
fall out verbe		brouiller avec
figure out verbe		cerner
get back verbe		retourner
pass down verbe		transmettre
pull up verbe	/ˌpʊl ˈʌp/	soulever
stick up verbe		rester

Des phrases à répéter

Des phrases courtes et complètes de la vidéo, à réutiliser dans la conversation de tous les jours :

What do you see to the south?
I mean, it's hard to tell from this image.
How do you get enough people together?
How do you have the organizational skills?
Let's say it's my hypothesis.

La grammaire de cette vidéo

Les structures que le locuteur utilise le plus, avec les mots exacts de la vidéo :

Structure	Dans la vidéo
« Used to » used to + verbe — une habitude ou un état passé qui n’est plus vrai	used to run · used to be · used to look
Present perfect have/has + participe passé — une action passée qui compte encore maintenant	I've never reported · has been · has come
Voix passive be + participe passé — l’accent est mis sur ce qui arrive, pas sur qui le fait	were frozen · was called · being accepted
Propositions relatives who / which + proposition — une précision sur une personne ou une chose	people who archaeologists · rainfall, which is · those who made

Prononciation à surveiller

Le locuteur utilise 78 contractions et formes réduites, comme they're, don't, I'm. Prononcez-les sous leur forme courte, telles que vous les entendez.

Les sons « th »: gather /ˈɡæðɚ/, myth /mɪθ/, underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/, megalith /ˈmɛɡəˌlɪθ/, megalithic /ˌmɛɡəˈlɪθɪk/
Les sons « sh » et « zh »: civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, radiation /ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/, shock /ʃɔk/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, elevation /ˌɛlɪˈveɪʃn̩/
Mots longs — placez bien l’accent: civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, archaeology /ˌɑɹ.kiˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, incredibly /ɪŋˈkɹɛdɪbli/, agriculture /ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/, radiation /ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/

Les sons difficiles pour les francophones :

/h/ — il se souffle, il n’est pas muet: hunter /ˈhʌntɚ/, whatsoever /ˌ(h)wʌtsoʊˈɛvɚ/, wherever /(h)wɛɹˈɛvɚ/, headdress /ˈhɛdˌdɹɛs/
/tʃ/ et /dʒ/ — à ne pas adoucir en « ch » et « j »: statue /ˈstæt͡ʃu/, archaeology /ˌɑɹ.kiˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, agriculture /ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/, architecture /ˈɑː.kɪˌtɛk.t͡ʃə/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/
/r/ anglais — langue recourbée, sans frotter la gorge: archaeology /ˌɑɹ.kiˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, argue /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/, incredibly /ɪŋˈkɹɛdɪbli/, agriculture /ˈæɡ.ɹɪˌkʌl.t͡ʃɚ/, radiation /ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/

Comment s’entraîner avec cette vidéo

Écoutez la vidéo en entier une fois sans parler et notez les mots que vous ne connaissez pas.
Commencez à la vitesse 0,75×, répétez phrase par phrase, puis revenez à la vitesse normale quand cela devient facile.
Enregistrez-vous et comparez avec l’original, en faisant attention à des mots comme civilization, hunter, enormous.

Qu'est-ce que la technique du Shadowing ?

Le Shadowing est une technique d'apprentissage des langues fondée sur la science, développée à l'origine pour la formation des interprètes professionnels. Le principe est simple mais puissant : vous écoutez de l'anglais natif et le répétez immédiatement à voix haute — comme une ombre suivant le locuteur avec un décalage de 1 à 2 secondes. Les recherches montrent une amélioration significative de la précision de la prononciation, de l'intonation, du rythme, des liaisons, de la compréhension orale et de la fluidité.

Technique du shadowing : lire le guide complet étape par étape →

Pratique du Shadowing: Joe Rogan's Best Ancient Civilization Podcasts - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

Choisissez un mode d'entraînement

Télécharger l'application

Yorkshire Is Hiding Something Nobody Talks About

Before We Became the Last Humans:The Lost Species That Once Shared Our World|Prehistoric Documentary

The CRAZIEST Survival Methods Used by Ancient Humans During Ice Age

Why is Stephen Fry so passionate about the ancient Greeks?

My Joe Rogan Appearance: What I Learned (ft. Young Jamie & Viktor Hovland)

This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence

Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found

“3 Meals a Day is Marketing” - Dr David Sinclair

When Did Ancient Humans Start Drinking Alcohol?

Who Destroyed The Library of Alexandria? | The Rest is History

Why did white men conquer the world?

How living abroad rewires your brain.