Pratique du Shadowing: String Theory - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

Welcome back to Science Click.

Today, String Theory.

Our universe contains matter, which when we look closer is made up of particles.

There are different types of particles, electrons, quarks or neutrinos.

Particles move in the universe and can interact by exchanging other particles.

The electromagnetic force, for example, is mediated by the exchange of photons.

All these different particles are accounted for in what we call the Standard Model.

It is currently our most precise mathematical description of the quantum world.

It contains two main categories of particles, fermions which mostly constitute matter, and bosons which mostly describe interactions.

At first glance, one might think that this is the ultimate theory, that the standard model describes everything.

But unfortunately, there is another interaction that this model doesn't account for, gravity.

On a large scale, we know that gravity is described by general relativity.

Objects curve spacetime, thus attracting other objects.

As with other types of interactions, we expect that the curvature of spacetime is made up of small particles at the quantum scale.

Quanta of spacetime curvature, called gravitons.

But when we try to include the graviton in the standard model, the calculations give absurd results with infinite values that cannot be removed.

We cannot describe gravity on the quantum scale.

It is to solve this problem that physicists have been looking for new theories for more than half a century.

In this video, we are going to build together one of the most promising approaches, string theory.

The basic idea is quite simple.

In the standard model, particles are described as small dimensionless points.

We admit that these points do not all have the same properties to account for the fact

that there are different types of particles.

In string theory, we will assume that this is only an approximation, and that if we zoom in on the particles, they are all made up of a small string,

sometimes open and sometimes closed.

These little strings have tension like tiny rubber bands and they can vibrate.

A guitar string can vibrate in different modes, harmonics.

Likewise, our little strings can in different ways.

One ripple, two ripples, three ripples and so on.

And the different vibrating modes behave on our scale like particles of different types.

When we perform the calculations we discover in particular that some strings behave like photons and better still,

some like gravitons.

Starting from the sole principle that particles are tiny strings with tension, we already explain why there are different types of particles.

We naturally predict the existence of the graviton, thus describing gravity at the quantum scale.

We now want to understand how these strings evolve through the universe.

For that, we will use the same principles as our current models.

Imagine that we throw an electron at a target.

The electron propagates like a wave, and when it reaches the target, we can't know for sure where it will materialise.

At the quantum scale, the same experiment can give different results.

We can only predict the probability of observing such or such result,

and the goal of physics at this scale is to determine these probabilities.

The mathematical approach to determine the probability of observing a particular result

is to consider all possible scenarios that lead to it at the same time.

We sum all trajectories, but also all possible interactions.

For example, an electron can emit a photon, then reabsorb it, or two photons, or even three.

In all the scenarios that we consider, we manually decide to allow such or such types of interactions to reproduce what we observe in reality.

And by summing all these scenarios, we obtain the desired probability.

In string theory, the approach is the same, however the particles are no longer points.

A point traces a trajectory over time, but a string traces a surface.

And to describe the evolution of a string in a probabilistic way as in quantum physics, you will consider all possible geometries that the string can trace over time.

It can follow a specific trajectory, vibrate in a certain way,

but also duplicate itself which amounts to emitting a particle,

or recombine which amounts to reabsorbing the particle, forming a geometry with a whole.

By summing up all possible geometries, string theory automatically includes interactions.

There is no need to add them manually.

Incidentally, interactions in the standard model were local.

The emission of a photon was instantaneous, for example.

In string theory, interactions are now continuous.

are no longer emitted instantaneously, but gradually.

This gets rid of the infinities that we obtained when we tried to include the graviton in the standard model.

In this way, string theory not only predicts the existence of the graviton, but it also allows us to calculate how it interacts with other particles,

and therefore to describe quantum gravity.

So far the theory looks very promising.

It explains why there are different types of particles, it predicts that they can interact,

and it includes a quantum description of gravity.

Unfortunately at this stage the model exhibits three problems.

First problem, all the strings behave like bosons, such as photons or gravitons.

In our world, there is another category of particles, fermions, such as electrons.

But so far our model does not predict such particles.

Second problem, one of the particles predicted by the theory is what we call a tachyon.

Its mass appears to be an imaginary number, the square root of a negative number.

It is a mathematical problem that we must get rid of.

Finally, the third problem.

Our space-time has four dimensions, three dimensions of space and one of time.

But this theory only seems to work in a universe with 26 dimensions.

At this stage, string theory seems very far from describing our universe.

To solve these problems, we'll have to push the theory a little further.

To include fermions in our model, the idea is to add spinners on the strings.

They are the mathematical ingredient that already described fermions in the standard model.

By simply adding spinners to the strings we solve two problems.

The model now predicts the existence of fermions and it no longer predicts the tachyon, the particle that was problematic.

This more complete theory is called super string theory.

In fact, now that we added spinners, our theory exhibits a fundamental symmetry between fermions and bosons.

In a way, it predicts that there would be as many bosons as there are fermions.

This is called supersymmetry.

What about the third problem?

Before we included supersymmetry, the mathematics required a 26 dimensional universe.

Now, superstring theory requires a universe with 10 dimensions.

Unfortunately this third problem is not resolved.

The theory does not seem to fit our universe, which only has 4 dimensions.

Yet so far the model was very promising, should we abandon it for all that?

If they exist, where would these 6 missing dimensions be?

One possibility is that our universe could just be a three dimensional slice of a larger nine dimensional super universe.

Another possibility could be that the six dimensions that we do not observe are curled up on themselves.

To understand, let's imagine an ant walking on a straw.

The straw has two dimensions.

The ant can walk back and forth, and left to right, around the circumference of the straw.

But if we zoom out enough, we only notice one of the two dimensions.

The second one that curls around the straw is very small and cannot be seen on this scale.

100

In string theory we can assume a similar phenomenon.

101

Our universe would have 9 dimensions of space, but 6 of them would be very small dimensions curled up on themselves

102

so that we do not see them on our scale.

103

This hypothesis may seem a little far-fetched.

104

Is it reasonable to assume the existence of dimensions that we do not observe?

105

But it turns out that the existence of additional dimensions is a very interesting question that suggest phenomena that we might observe.

106

For example, we could imagine a massless particle that moves at the speed of light, but partially inside a compact dimension.

107

From our point of view, we do not see this dimension, and therefore the particle seems slower to us, we only observe part of its full motion.

108

It seems slowed down as if it it had a mass.

109

The idea of additional compactified dimensions thus suggests a fairly simple mechanism through which some particles might exhibit a large mass.

110

However, it would currently require too much energy for us to create them in our particle accelerators

111

and confirm or not their existence.

112

The presence of these additional dimensions also allows a much more varied range of vibrational modes,

113

and therefore a greater diversity of potential types of particles.

114

In addition, there are a multitude of different ways to curl up six dimensions, and each possibility will predict a different universe,

115

where the strings can adopt different vibrational modes and therefore behave like different particles.

116

By carefully choosing the way in which these six dimensions are compactified,

117

we can adjust our description so that it predicts the same particles as those we observe in our world.

118

That said, among the myriad of possibilities, it is not yet clear why our universe would contain the particles of the standard model, rather than some other possibility.

119

According to some still speculative hypotheses, the geometry of the universe might even have varied over time,

120

transitioning from one compactification to another, and the laws of physics could thus have changed during the first instance of our universe.

121

To conclude, string theory remains to this day a speculative model,

122

very difficult to test experimentally since the strings would be incredibly tiny,

123

and which is only one approach among many others in the quest of finding the ultimate theory.

124

However, it is still one of the most promising models, whose insights have far exceeded its original goals.

125

Strings allow us to describe gravity on the quantum scale, and open doors to the study of black holes.

126

They help develop several fields of mathematics, and get a better understanding of the standard model itself.

127

String theory even offers hypothetical candidates for particles, such as axions, to potentially explain dark matter.

128

That said, there is still a lot of research to do.

129

In particular, the aspects of string theory that are best understood rely heavily on supersymmetry,

130

which tends to predict the existence of additional particles which we don't seem to observe yet.

131

There are some compactifications that would explain that we don't observe supersymmetry, however these are still very rare and not well understood.

132

Finally, to venture even further, there actually exist five different versions of superstring theory describing different types of universes.

133

We can show mathematically

134

that these five theories are in reality approximations of a single more complete model describing a universe with 11 dimensions.

135

M-theory.

✨ Vidéo recommandée

80 phrases

Qu'est-ce que la technique du Shadowing ?

Le Shadowing est une technique d'apprentissage des langues fondée sur la science, développée à l'origine pour la formation des interprètes professionnels. Le principe est simple mais puissant : vous écoutez de l'anglais natif et le répétez immédiatement à voix haute — comme une ombre suivant le locuteur avec un décalage de 1 à 2 secondes. Les recherches montrent une amélioration significative de la précision de la prononciation, de l'intonation, du rythme, des liaisons, de la compréhension orale et de la fluidité.

Technique du shadowing : lire le guide complet étape par étape →

Pratique du Shadowing: String Theory - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

FINALLY: A Proof that Particles Take All Paths At Once?

Superfluid Dark Matter

What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think

ATOMS ENGLISH

Linguistic Relativity

We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe

Let There Be Light: Maxwell's Equation EXPLAINED for BEGINNERS

We Know More About Time Than You Think

The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)

Arguments for God: The Fine Tuning Argument

Neutron Stars – The Most Extreme Things that are not Black Holes

NASA tested my chain theory in space

Why Practice Speaking with This "String Theory" Video?

Grammar & Expressions in Context

Common Pronunciation Traps

Learn English with YouTube: Make It a Habit

Qu'est-ce que la technique du Shadowing ?