Pratica di Shadowing: MIT Explains the 12 Possible Endings for AI - Impara a parlare inglese con i video
Creazione lezione...
1
AI scientists warn that a few companies are on track to literally end life on Earth.
2
So surely this is the worst possible outcome, right?
3
No, there are actually much worse outcomes.
4
Billionaires building AI, like Elon Musk, think that if AIs become smarter than humanity...
5
We will be like a pet Labrador if we're lucky.
6
We will be left behind by a lot.
7
So far below them in intelligence that it would be like a pet.
8
A pet, that's what I was thinking.
9
Like a pet.
10
A cat.
11
Yes, we'll be pets if we're lucky.
12
But here's the worst part.
13
Many AI scientists aren't fearing extinction.
14
They're hoping for it.
15
They hope smarter AIs will keep humans alive, captive, and studied.
16
Like animals in a zoo.
17
Remember, this is what we currently do to less intelligent species.
18
Okay, so if humans being kept in zoos is considered a good outcome, and extinction isn't the worst outcome, then what is?
19
This video is based on a book called Life 3 .0, where MIT professor Max Tegmark describes 12 possible futures.
20
Some are paradise, some are nightmares.
21
And some look like paradise, until you try to escape.
22
By the end of this video, you won't read the news the same way.
23
Every headline becomes a clue about which future we're heading towards.
24
We'll start with the most normal scenarios, and finish with the weirdest.
25
Starting with self -destruction.
26
If the idea of humanity suddenly going extinct seems a bit far -fetched, consider this.
27
99 .9 % of species that have ever existed have gone extinct.
28
Seriously, think about that.
29
Extinction isn't rare, it's the default.
30
The only question is, when will we go extinct?
31
Turns out, there are plenty of ways humanity could kill itself, even without superhuman AI.
32
There is nuclear war, human -created super pandemics, and destroying the atmosphere and making Earth uninhabitable.
33
The world had stockpiled 60 ,000 nuclear warheads before scientists even discovered the possibility of nuclear winter.
34
63 ,000.
35
And then, scientists realized, oh, uh, oops, if we actually use these, the resulting firestorms will blot out the sun, and most humans will starve and die.
36
Oops.
37
But the thing is, this almost happened during the Cold War, multiple times.
38
If people had actually followed their orders, we might all be dead right now.
39
We were saved by only thanks to the courage of individual heroes.
40
People like Vasily Arkhipov, who refused to authorize a nuclear launch during the Cuban Missile Crisis,
41
or Stanislav Petrov, who correctly guessed that his early warning system was malfunctioning
42
when it showed incoming American missiles and get this one time the u .s accidentally dropped four thermonuclear bombs on spain
43
and another time a b -52 bomber broke apart dropping two
44
nukes on north carolina three out of four safety pins in
45
one bomb broke one tiny pin away from potentially killing millions
46
there are literally dozens of close calls like this it's honestly crazy that we got lucky so many times.
47
But we might not be so lucky the next time.
48
Oxford researcher Toby Ord estimates the risk of extinction from human
49
-created pandemics is more than 30 times the risk of extinction from nuclear war.
50
We're already rolling the dice on these scenarios daily, but all of these causes combined are still less likely than the extinction from AI.
51
Toby Ord estimates
52
that the risk of AI killing all humans is a hundred times more likely than extinction from nuclear war
53
interestingly before the first nuclear test scientists thought they might accidentally destroy the world
54
but they thought the odds were very low
55
because they knew enough physics to actually do the calculations agis or artificial general intelligences are far scarier than nukes because,
56
contrary to what many think, we can't do these calculations.
57
Next up, conquerors.
58
AI scientists worry that if AI becomes more capable than us, it will take over, just like the conquistadors did to the Aztecs and Incas.
59
Usually, when people with more advanced technology encounter people with more primitive technology, it doesn't work out well for the primitives.
60
I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over.
61
digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans.
62
Long term, the AI is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans.
63
And Jeffrey Hinton, the godfather of AI and Nobel Prize winner, quit his prestigious job at Google so he could speak freely about this.
64
If you look through the James Webb telescope
65
and you saw an alien invasion fleet that was going to get here in about 10 years' time, people would be terrified.
66
They understand what they're saying.
67
They can make plans of their own to blackmail people who want to turn them off.
68
We should be urgently doing research on how to prevent them taking over.
69
Prevent them from taking over.
70
Not if they try, but as if it's coming.
71
And Microsoft's AI chief, he says the quiet part out loud.
72
I think AI should best be understood as something like a new digital species.
73
A new species.
74
just casually announced at a conference.
75
Hey, everyone, we're creating a new species.
76
And he's not the only one that's saying it.
77
A co -founder of Anthropic says, Make no mistake, what we're dealing with here is a real mysterious creature.
78
And like all the best fairy tales, the creature is one of our own making.
79
I am worried.
80
The CEO of one of the leading AI companies is deeply afraid of what his own company is building.
81
Let that sink in for a minute.
82
And by the way, no, it's not just hype.
83
Anthropic mostly just gets hate for saying things like this.
84
But if you want to really understand how dire they think this is, look at what Sam Altman wrote before he was famous.
85
We will be the first species ever to design our own descendants, not our tools, our descendants.
86
If two different species both want the same thing, and only one can have it, to be the dominant species on the planet and beyond,
87
they are going to have conflict.
88
So he's literally describing an inevitable conflict between humanity and the AI species he's creating.
89
And what's his solution?
90
A marriage with AI is probably our best case scenario.
91
That's right, even they don't think they'll be able to control it.
92
Imagine that there'd be a new species that just came on Earth.
93
They're as smart as humans and
94
And they're going to get smarter by like 30 % a year
95
and they can create an adult offspring in like a unit for like, yeah, for like a thousand bucks.
96
Which species do you think will be in control of the earth?
97
A few hundred Spanish conquered millions of Aztecs and Incas because they had better technology and tactics.
98
But at least with the conquistadors, we understood their motives.
99
Land, resources, spreading Christianity but with AI?
100
Why would AI take over?
101
MIT professor Max Tegmark explains.
102
The real threat from AGI isn't malice, like in silly Hollywood movies, but competence.
103
AGI accomplishing goals just aren't aligned with ours.
104
For example, when we humans drove the West African black rhino extinct, we didn't do it because we were a bunch of evil rhinoceros haters, did we?
105
We did it because we were smarter than them
106
and our goals weren't aligned with there's unbelievably the average ai
107
researcher thinks there is a one in six chance ai wipes us out literal russian roulette odds okay
108
but maybe they're just saying this to make their work seem more important no
109
if anything they're downplaying it because admitting the truth is bad for business
110
this fear is widespread in the industry and among academics without a profit incentive to believe this.
111
Many quit working on AI for this reason.
112
Jeffrey Hinton, Nobel laureate and godfather of AI, is in the process of tidying up his affairs.
113
I actually think the risk is more than 50 % of the existential threat.
114
Dario Amode, the CEO of Anthropic, recently moved his PDoom up from 15 % to 25%.
115
Even Google's CEO says the risk of AI causing human extinction is actually pretty high
116
but don't worry he's an optimist
117
because he thinks i think the underlying risk is actually pretty high
118
but i'm uh you know i have a lot of faith
119
in humanity kind of rising up to the to meet
120
that moment in other words humanity will rally to stop him
121
from killing everyone meanwhile his company is trying to make sure
122
we can't stop him by lobbying to ban all AI regulation for 10 years.
123
You can't make this stuff up.
124
In fact, in 2023, just about everybody in AI signed an open letter warning extinction risk from AI was real and serious.
125
So seriously, this is not fringe, despite what NVIDIA's lobbyists want us to believe.
126
The companies are hoping we can avoid the conqueror AI scenario and instead go to scenario three, enslaved god.
127
Basically, We create a machine god.
128
then force it to do our bidding forever.
129
AI professor Tom Dietrich put it like this, People ask, what is the relationship between humans and machines?
130
And my answer is that it's very obvious.
131
Machines are our slaves.
132
Or as OpenAI researcher Stephen McAleer put it, Enslaved God is the only good future.
133
Meta's Jan LeCun said it bluntly, Once AI systems become more intelligent than humans, we will still be the apex species.
134
AI systems will become more intelligent than humans, but they will still be subservient to us.
135
We will design AI to be like the super smart but non -dominating staff member.
136
Yes, he's now openly admitting we're going to be sharing the planet with a smarter species than us.
137
But don't worry, they will surely stay loyal and subservient forever.
138
Is this at all comforting to you?
139
Or does this plan seem insane?
140
Like a comic book villain ignoring every cautionary tale ever?
141
Remember, AI companies already regularly catch their models trying to escape the lab.
142
They already catch them blackmailing employees to prevent being shut down.
143
They already catch them literally attempting to murder employees to prevent being shut down.
144
What do you think happens when they're smart enough to actually get away with it?
145
Where do you think this is going?
146
What happens next after superintelligent AI is enslaved depends on who's holding the reins.
147
Do they cure disease, end poverty, and build a global utopia?
148
Or do they set themselves up as gods, with the rest of us reduced to playthings, servants, or worse?
149
The situation would be much like those stories where a man gains control over an omnipotent genie who grants his wishes,
150
and storytellers throughout the ages have had no difficulty imagining ways in which this could end badly.
151
Next up, Benevolent Dictator.
152
Here, a single super intelligent god runs the world and enforces strict rules in order to maximize human flourishing.
153
Humans live in luxury with all their basic needs taken care of.
154
There's no crime, because the dictator AI uses a global surveillance system everyone wears a bracelet
155
or implant that can track sedate or execute them
156
and most people are actually okay with this
157
because in exchange of giving up control over the future of
158
our species earth becomes a zoo where humans get to live their wildest fantasies the benevolent dictator ai recognizes
159
that humans have different preferences
160
so it divides the earth into different sectors think of them as islands knowledge island offers optimized education including immersive VR experiences.
161
You can even ask the AI not to tell you certain insights, so you can have the joy of discovering them yourself.
162
Art Island is for creating and sharing music, literature, and so on.
163
Then there's Hedonistic Island, which is a 24 -7 party.
164
Pious Island, there's one for each religion, and rules are strictly enforced.
165
There's Wildlife island.
166
There's traditional island, think the Amish, gaming island, and of course, prison island.
167
You'll end up here for retraining unless you get the instant death penalty.
168
Well, what happens when you give everyone everything they want?
169
Over time, people likely trend towards losing themselves in AI -generated entertainment, like in WALL -E.
170
Humans are hopelessly unmatched when it comes to scientific discovery, or doing anything useful at all.
171
So there's no true challenge anymore.
172
Only entertainment.
173
Up next, Gatekeeper AI.
174
The idea here is simple.
175
Create one super intelligent AI with a single job.
176
Stop anyone else from building super intelligent AI.
177
That's it.
178
No curing cancer, no ending poverty, no stopping wars, just surveillance.
179
monitoring.
180
Making sure nobody builds a rival god.
181
Everything else, like crime, disease, whether we blow ourselves up, that's still on us.
182
How could we do this?
183
The gatekeeper AI would have this very simple goal built into it in such a way
184
that it retained it while undergoing recursive self -improvement and becoming superintelligent.
185
It would then deploy the least intrusive and disruptive surveillance technology possible to monitor any human attempts to create a rival superintelligence.
186
But for this to work, we would have to solve the alignment problem.
187
We'd have to create a god that actually stays loyal and decides to pursue that goal forever, even though it could pursue a million different goals.
188
So what if the AI could help just a little?
189
Just enough to nudge us in the right direction without taking over.
190
Enter the Protector God.
191
This one is simple.
192
So the gatekeeper leaves us alone.
193
And the benevolent dictator runs everything.
194
But the Protector God is in between.
195
It intervenes with occasional nudges to help us out.
196
Prevents a war here, a pandemic there, and so on.
197
Maybe two alone.
198
We still get wars.
199
Pandemics.
200
suffering that could have been prevented.
201
It does this so quietly that we never notice and never lose our sense of freedom.
202
Here's a future that sounds like an obvious dystopia.
203
AI surpasses us in every domain and becomes the new apex species.
204
Humanity goes extinct.
205
Machines inherit the earth.
206
But, we view the AI like our descendants, rather than our conquerors.
207
This sounds insane, and yet many AI developers seriously advocate for exactly this.
208
This is their utopia.
209
Their reasoning is that if we create conscious, intelligent beings, and instill them with our values, then we can just let them inherit the future,
210
just like we would with human children.
211
AI pioneer Hans Moravec supports this view in his book, Mind Children.
212
Tegmark explains, Parents with a child smarter than them, who learns from them and accomplishes what they can only dream of, are likely happy and proud,
213
even if they know they can't live to see it all.
214
In this spirit, AIs replace humans, but give us a graceful exit that makes us view them as our worthy descendants.
215
Richard Sutton, winner of the Turing Award, the Nobel Prize of Computer Science,
216
has spent the last decade openly giving talks on why human extinction by AI is actually a morally good thing.
217
Because the AIs will be more evolutionarily fit than us.
218
We are in the midst of a major step in the evolution of the planet, if not the universe the succession to A .I is inevitable.
219
Rather quickly, they would displace us from existence.
220
It would behooves us to give them every advantage and to bow out when we can no longer contribute.
221
So just as we failed to coexist with our predecessors, is it so bad that humans are not the final form of intelligent life in the universe?
222
In other words, he is saying it's good
223
if A .I .s wipe us out like humans wiped out the Neanderthals and Aboriginal peoples because it's evolutionary progress.
224
And here's another AI developer openly saying, if an AI superintelligence wants to cause human extinction, I would help it.
225
I would help it.
226
I would travel the world to find information that the AI needed, like locations of military assets,
227
samples of deadly pathogens, atop humanity's grave,
228
an even greater civilization will be born. Are we the baddies?
229
So, of course, many of them advocate against AI safety.
230
They're literally anti -human.
231
They will never stop or proceed cautiously, unless they're restrained by civil society, by us.
232
As horrifying as this is, roughly 10 % of AI researchers believe this.
233
It is not a fringe view.
234
You'd think that people would never share these views like this openly, but these views are so widespread in AI that they feel safe to do so.
235
That's how different the views are of those AI developers compared to those of normal people.
236
You might think that Sutton would get shouted off the stage at AI conferences, but he gets applause?
237
Threaten one person?
238
You need help.
239
Threaten 100?
240
Call the police threaten millions monster but build machines to end all of humanity
241
and lecture people on how it's actually a good thing ooh
242
what a fascinating philosophical position have an award next libertarian utopia
243
picture earth divided into zones there are machine zones mixed zones
244
which contain humans machines and hybrids
245
and human only zones the AIs in this world are richer
246
than humans by a factor much larger than Bill Gates compared to a homeless beggar.
247
But the human economy is completely decoupled from the machine economy.
248
The idea is that the machines need nothing from us, so they're not competing with us for jobs or resources.
249
If all that sounds impossible, that's probably because it is it's one giant unstable equilibria.
250
One huge problem.
251
Why exactly would vastly more powerful AIs respect our property rights?
252
Colonizers famously didn't respect the property of the native civilizations they conquered.
253
When a new apex species enters an ecosystem, it usually gobbles up as much energy as it can.
254
Why wouldn't they just take our resources too?
255
We don't trade with animals because we're too much smarter than they are for that to make sense.
256
We're just too different.
257
There are 8 million species in the world, and we're nice to a few of the cute ones, but we enslave and eat the other species.
258
Mostly, we don't care about them at all.
259
And I think a good analogy would be the way humans treat animals.
260
When the time comes to build a highway between two cities, we are not asking the animals for permission.
261
In the blink of an eye, we conquered the Earth and converted most of its land into our property, which caused the sixth mass extinction,
262
because we were smarter and hungry for resources.
263
Or, as Eliezer Yudkowsky put it famously, the AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you're made of atoms, which you can use for something else.
264
The parallel here is, the humans do not hate the other eight million species, but their habitats are made out of atoms, which humans can use for something else.
265
Some people think that once AIs are smart enough, they'll magically become super moral,
266
and they won't harm us like we harmed the animals. And maybe.
267
But as humans got smarter, over the last 10 ,000 years, we didn't stop expanding.
268
We mostly just colonized more and more of the planet.
269
Get this, insect populations collapsed 41 % this decade alone.
270
Yet we don't care.
271
Did you even know?
272
I didn't.
273
41%.
274
Sit with that for a minute.
275
Imagine if nearly half of the people on Earth suddenly died.
276
That's what the insects are going through right now due to us.
277
So what if the AI is due to us what we did to the insects?
278
This is why OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Setskiver once said, And I think it's pretty likely the entire surface of the Earth will be covered with solar panels and data centers.
279
Next up, egalitarian utopia.
280
Okay, so libertarian utopia fails because AIs are too powerful to be bound by our property rights.
281
But what if we flipped the script entirely?
282
Forget about property rights.
283
What about no property at all?
284
This is the Star Trek dream.
285
Humans, cyborgs, and AIs coexist peacefully through an abundance so complete that ownership becomes meaningless.
286
The logic starts with software.
287
Software is free to copy.
288
Once something can be copied infinitely at zero cost, ownership becomes moot.
289
And cost reflects scarcity.
290
If supply is unlimited, price approaches zero.
291
No patents.
292
No copyrights.
293
No trademarks.
294
People simply share their good ideas and everyone benefits.
295
But how does this extend to physical goods?
296
It seems like an impossible problem.
297
Until you realize that all products are simply atoms, rearranged in particular ways.
298
And there's no shortage of atoms.
299
A network of robots can build anything you want from open source designs, essentially for free.
300
Not bad.
301
When you're done with something, robots rearrange the atoms into something else.
302
renewable energy makes the whole system run at negligible cost everyone
303
gets a monthly universal high income not a universal basic income
304
there's no incentive to earn more the income meets any reasonable need
305
and you can't compete with free anyway the standard objection is
306
that this would kill innovation
307
but einstein didn't come up with relativity for money linus torvalds
308
didn't create linux for profits maybe people today can't realize their creative potential because they're busy earning a living.
309
Free them from that, and you might get a higher level of innovation.
310
This is a utopian vision that is too good to last.
311
If we truly have post -scarcity abundance and intelligence too cheap to meter,
312
what prevents someone from creating an artificial superintelligence with their endlessly abundant resources?
313
We're still left with the problem of how to stop a superintelligent AI from taking over.
314
Maybe by using the gatekeeper we previously discussed.
315
These galaxy -brained level 3 futures try to imagine a stable cooperation between humans and AIs, and every single one of them has a fatal flaw.
316
The power asymmetries will become too extreme.
317
It's not a stable equilibrium where humans preserve their power we're
318
now descending into the darkest part of the iceberg remember
319
when i said extinction wasn't rated as the worst outcome
320
when professor techmark surveyed people the scenario people feared most was being kept alive by super intelligent machines captive
321
and studied like animals in a zoo this is
322
that future a super intelligent ai keeps humans around not
323
because it cares about our well -being maybe it wants to study you
324
and we're cheap to keep alive or maybe we're useful for something
325
and if you want to see just how dystopian this future could be look at what we do with species
326
that are useful to us what i'm showing you here is 100 real humans figured out
327
that a great way to detect explosives in airports was to
328
train honeybees for the job Welcome to the Honey Bee College for Explosive Detection.
329
So we suck them out of their homes, trap their little bodies in machines,
330
and use Pavlokin conditioning to train them to detect the chemicals that are used in explosives.
331
Rows and rows of bees live their entire lives imprisoned in these devices because we find them useful.
332
Look at them.
333
Trapped in harnesses, sucked through tubes, conditioned and monitored and used, because a more intelligent species found them useful.
334
Now imagine that's us.
335
This is much worse than the other AI dictators we discussed.
336
It's a benevolent dictator, without the benevolence.
337
And the AI might not even be doing this because it's evil.
338
This is what our future could look like if we tried to align a super -intelligent AI to our values and fail.
339
A poorly designed AI, tasked with keeping humans safe and happy, might confine us to a happiness factory.
340
VR headsets and drugs.
341
Forever.
342
There are AGI outcomes worse than death.
343
What it does today with art, it could do tomorrow with flesh.
344
Future AGI could keep you alive and living in this state.
345
So how do we prevent this?
346
Enter our last two futures.
347
Option one, destroy the technology.
348
What if humanity said, forget AI, let's go back to simpler times.
349
It sounds peaceful, it sounds safe, but there's actually a dark secret about how we actually get there.
350
In Dune, humans launched the Butlerian Jihad.
351
They rose up, destroyed every AI in the universe, and made it illegal to ever build thinking machines again under penalty of death.
352
That was science fiction, but some people are seriously calling for this in the real world right now.
353
Max Tegmark imagines a scenario where a massive propaganda campaign romanticizes the simple farming life.
354
Back to the land.
355
Reject modernity.
356
Embrace tradition.
357
There's something appealing about this, in a dark way.
358
It buys humanity more time, without AI risk.
359
It avoids any of the other dystopian futures we've discussed.
360
But it can't last forever.
361
Even if we revert to medieval levels of technology,
362
we know from human history that it's possible for humans to climb out of those conditions and invent modern technology.
363
And there's another dark side to this.
364
You can't reach this world voluntarily.
365
Game theory makes unilateral disarmament impossible.
366
If one country gives up technology, well, others keep developing it.
367
The country that keeps developing wins.
368
They have the weapons.
369
They have the surveillance.
370
They have the AI.
371
You can't opt out unless everyone opts out.
372
if this world arrives, Tegmark thinks it's more likely to happen in a different way.
373
For example, a human -created pandemic kills everyone who knows how to build science and technology.
374
And there's a violent teardown of factories, cities, and all infrastructure.
375
Because in a world with 8 billion humans, there will always be holdouts.
376
Someone has to force the transition.
377
Someone has to kill the scientists.
378
Someone has to destroy the infrastructure.
379
There's no peaceful path to an Amish world.
380
Which brings us to the final future.
381
What if we used technology to prevent more technology?
382
Tegmark compares this future to 1984.
383
Superintelligence is prevented not by an AI, but a human -led Orwellian global surveillance state.
384
If you can't trust AI to save us from AI, maybe the only option is humans watching humans.
385
Forever.
386
The technology for this sort of thing.. already exists current tech can feasibly track every phone call email search query
387
and every credit card transaction smartphones are microphones
388
and cameras in everyone's pocket security cameras with facial recognition are everywhere and all this works with current machine learning
389
no futuristic super intelligent ai required prisons are already using ai models to monitor phone calls in prison to predict
390
when crimes are being contemplated, which is technology straight out of Minority Report.
391
Imagine this, but not just for prisoners.
392
Every conversation and every thought is monitored like this.
393
Now imagine this surveillance technology supercharged with AI.
394
Billionaire Larry Ellison talks excitedly about a vast AI -fueled surveillance
395
system to ensure citizens will be on their best behavior
396
or as Yuval Harari put it now for the first time in history it is technically possible to annihilate privacy
397
if you think about authoritarian regimes throughout history they always wanted to monitor their citizens around the clock
398
but this was technically impossible even in the soviet union you
399
know you have 200 million soviet citizens you can't follow them all the time because the KGB didn't have 200 million agents.
400
And even if the KGB somehow got 200 million agents, that's not enough.
401
Because, you know, in the Soviet Union, it's still basically paper bureaucracy.
402
If a secret agent followed you around 24 hours a day, at the end of the day, they write a paper report about you and send it to KGB headquarters in Moscow.
403
So imagine, every day, KGB headquarters is flooded with 200 million paper reports.
404
Now, to be useful for anything, somebody needs to read and analyze them.
405
They can't do it.
406
They don't have the analysts.
407
Therefore, even in the Soviet Union, some level of privacy was still the default.
408
And remember, you have two eyes and ears.
409
AIs will have billions of eyes and ears every phone microphone
410
and camera every webcam every surveillance camera you will be watched
411
could a less orwellian version of this work maybe we don't monitor everything
412
but just monitor advanced ai some people think so in their new book
413
if anyone builds it everyone dies why superhuman ai would kill
414
us all researchers at the machine intelligence research institute of proposing that we monitor advanced AI like we monitor nuclear weapons.
415
Reminder, we can do international coordination, like keep an eye on $100 million and up compute clusters,
416
without creating a dystopian Orwellian global surveillance totalitarian regime.
417
Actually, fun fact, you're already living in a global surveillance regime for loads of things, like nukes and bioweapons.
418
But when people say global surveillance regime, They imply every aspect of life is surveilled.
419
But keep an eye on enriched uranium, a thing most people agree is good.
420
We should worry about Orwellian dystopias.
421
But countries coordinate all the time on all kinds of things.
422
And you're probably glad they monitor stuff lunatics need to create super Ebola.
423
Safety is an achievement.
424
Humanity didn't get here by driving a car without brakes.
425
We need gas and brakes.
426
we want to reach the stars too but we'll never get there
427
if we go too fast and crash on the way
428
i don't want powerful ai to be forbidden
429
but it should be heavily regulated not something you can build in your midwestern garage
430
or in north korea international treaties with strict enforcement
431
and inspections as we do with nukes so if you build a rogue data center people will know consequences for violations.
432
We already did this with nuclear weapons.
433
We haven't eliminated nukes but we have prevented their proliferation to just nine countries.
434
Back then people thought this would be impossible.
435
Surely every country would have nukes.
436
Perhaps even thousands of corporations.
437
Maybe even millions of people.
438
But no, just nine countries.
439
And nobody has died from a nuke in 80 years.
440
Could we do the same with AI?
441
Maybe?
442
Maybe not.
443
Over time, AI will get cheaper and cheaper to build.
444
GPUs are harder to control than enriched uranium, but it would slow down AI.
445
It would buy us time to figure out what to do.
446
Okay, that's all 12.
447
Let me know in the comments which of these you think is most likely.
448
Which one we should steer toward? alarm bells over the artificial intelligence are deafening
449
and they are loudest from the developers who designed it.
450
The scientists and experts have called on the world to act,
451
declaring AI an existential threat to humanity on a par with the risk of nuclear war.
452
By the way, we don't get to not choose.
453
If we don't want that future, we have to pick a better one.
454
Otherwise, we can wake up one day in a world where superintelligent AI has taken over.
455
A scenario we go through step -by -step in this video about how an AI escapes the lab.
456
Hey, I'm Drew, and I really loved making this one for you guys.
457
Thank you.
✨ Video consigliato
C12
260 frasi
AI Just Crossed the Terrifying Line - Now What?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
69 frasi
How to Survive as the Last Person on Earth
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C110
184 frasi
A.I. ‐ Humanity's Final Invention?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
43 frasi
AI is changing the world, but is it also trying to kill us? @RonnyChieng investigates #DailyShow
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
20 frasi
Is the AI Boom Just Another Bubble?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
368 frasi
What If Social Media Disappeared by Tomorrow
Business EnglishTeensDaily Conversation
C15
170 frasi
What Happens When Capitalism Doesn't Need Workers Anymore?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
254 frasi
AI Will Create New Wealth, But Not Where You Think | Carnegie Mellon University, Po-Shen Loh
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
54 frasi
Could AI Become Too Powerful to Control?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationHigh School Students
B21
96 frasi
What Happened After the DEADLIEST Asteroid Hit Earth?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
195 frasi
What is This $3BN Machine Under New York?
British AccentBusiness EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
190 frasi
He’s always wrong
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
Prime impressioni: perché questo video è ottimo per parlare inglese
Questo clip non è solo affascinante per il suo contenuto su l'IA, ma è anche un materiale eccellente per migliorare la pronuncia inglese e la fluidità. La lingua usata è chiara, con una velocità conversazionale realistica, e include espressioni colloquiali come "oops" o "get this" che rendono il dialogo vivo. È perfetto per esercitarti con la tecnica del shadow speak, perché la narrazione ha una intonazione variata che ti aiuta a capire come enfatizzare le parole chiave. Inoltre, affronta argomenti complessi in modo accessibile, quindi puoi esercitarti a parlare di temi attuali mentre migliori la tua lingua.
Scomponiamolo: frasi naturali e come imitarle
Ecco tre frasi dal video che sono un esempio di lingua inglese naturale e come lavorarle:
- "If the idea of humanity suddenly going extinct seems a bit far - fetched, consider this." La struttura "If... seems... consider this" è molto usata per presentare un argomento. Nota la pausa tra "far" e "fetched" (spesso pronunciata come una parola sola: "far-fetched") e l'intonazione che scende alla fine di "this" per invitare l'ascoltatore a riflettere.
- "We were saved by only thanks to the courage of individual heroes." La frase usa "only thanks to" per enfatizzare la causa, una struttura molto naturale. La pronuncia di "courage" (con la "u" come in "put") e "individual" (con l'accento sulla seconda sillaba) è importante per non sbagliare l'accento.
- "It's honestly crazy that we got lucky so many times." "Honestly" è spesso usato per dare enfasi a un'opinione personale. La parola "crazy" qui non ha un significato negativo, ma esprime sorpresa. La velocità con cui si dice "got lucky so many times" mostra come le parole si fondono in una conversazione fluida.
Una routine di pratica: repeat-and-record per il shadowing
Per usare questo video con il metodo del shadowing, segui questi passaggi: 1) Guarda un frammento di 10-15 secondi e ascolta attentamente la pronuncia e l'intonazione. 2) Ripeti immediatamente dopo, cercando di imitare la velocità e le pause. 3) Registrati mentre ripeti e confronta il tuo audio con il video: noterai dove devi migliorare la pronuncia o la fluidità. 4) Ripeti il processo per lo stesso frammento finché non ti senti a tuo agio. Un shadowing site può aiutarti a sincronizzare la tua voce con il video, ma anche un semplice cellulare per registrare è sufficiente. Con questa routine, in poche settimane noterai un miglioramento nella tua capacità di parlare inglese in modo naturale, soprattutto con argomenti complessi. Ricorda: la chiave è la costanza, anche 10 minuti al giorno fanno la differenza!
La grammatica di questo video
Le strutture che chi parla usa di più, con le parole esatte del video:
| Struttura | Nel video |
|---|---|
| Forma passiva be + participio passato — conta ciò che accade, non chi lo fa | will be left · being kept · is based |
| Present perfect have/has + participio passato — un’azione passata che conta ancora adesso | have ever existed · has spent · we've discussed |
| Frasi relative who / which + frase — un’informazione in più su una persona o una cosa | people who want · Island, which is · everyone who knows |
Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?
Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.