シャドーイング練習: Sec Growth DataScience staff meeting Sep 14 2022 - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。

398 文

文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。

So it is the SEC, meaning secure and govern, growth and data science, meaning applied ML, ML ops,

and anti -abuse team meeting.

That's a big mouthful.

We might get a better name over time.

And that's our meeting for September 14th or 15th in APAC.

And hi, Alan.

Glad you're here why are you here

when it's midnight we can talk uh glad you're here don't make

it happen to come to this meeting since it's really late for you uh

and so but i'm glad thanks for coming at least once

so um news and events uh i've got a lot of things on the agenda today

because of some of this uh so apologies for that

but i think it's going to go down over time based on feedback

I'm going to work to do more summarized communications to improve

the signal to noise ratio in my communications to groups of people, including this group of people.

This was wrote in for this group, adding more items to our staff meeting agenda, often as read -only, rather than posting to our Slack channel.

And I am going to be assuming

that people leaders on the team will attend this meeting or read the notes and not rely on the Slack channel.

So keep that in mind.

Let's see.

B is a read -only item, unless anybody wants to discuss it. and see Phil has.

Hi, welcome Alan to the meeting.

I've asked Alan to step in as acting full stack manager for security policies while I hire an EM.

Alan has graciously accepted this wonderful opportunity.

So welcome, Alan.

Thank you.

I've got the next item as well.

So anti -abuse is moving product sections from SEC to data science.

Data science is effectively a rename of the model ops section.

So data science will include two stages.

The existing model ops, which has three groups in it, which Mom can talk more about.

And the anti -abuse stage, which only currently has one group, which is called anti -abuse.

I think at some point there are plans to split anti -abuse into two groups, but that's not in the near two.

And we're working through all the changes around that.

There's lots of workday changes, lots of handbook changes.

Mon, did you want to say anything more about data science or model ops?

No, I think for us we just roll up to data science.

Everything else stays the same.

We still have the two main groups, applied ML, ML Ops, and then later

Data Ops as part of it, yeah. So,

Inee, thanks, Thomas, for continuing to compile and report across all of my teams

that I'm responsible for in the engineering allocation meeting on error budgets and reliability and security incidents.

So, really do appreciate that.

Got to give Neil a high five, too.

He does half of these now.

And apologies for the noise

if I keep asking for what's the story behind what's going on with reliability or error budget stuff.

Just trying to provide air cover. And apologies, Neil.

I totally forgot you took half of these since Thomas has been doing it for so long.

But I appreciate it, Neil.

I know you volunteered for it and we discussed it, but I just forgot.

Kind of a thankless role, honestly.

And I volunteered because of the exposure I get from it.

It's nice to be part of a different collective group of people.

I was going to mention, I'll type this in here, but Tiago had set up for container security a bot that weekly,

I think it's Mondays or like Sunday, will ping the team and ask for a volunteer to go and resource that data.

And we just enabled it for Threat Insights.

It's actually pretty sweet and it does all the work for you, Thomas.

Right?

We don't have to ping people ourselves.

So I'll put a note in there for that.

Pete, F is read only, and Bill, you've got G.

Yeah, talent assessment.

So we had an update from Juliana.

The dates haven't been confirmed yet, but it'll be sometime from mid -October through to December.

I think eGroup sign -off is expected to be mid -December before everyone goes on holiday.

They've got a draft timeline in there, but the dates aren't in the handbook yet.

The big change is we're moving to do it in Workday.

That's not available yet.

I haven't seen a demo of it.

I don't know what.

questions will be asked but there's an optional self -evaluation which will move into workday and

the work that we do as managers will also happen in workday

at the moment some people are using the google doc

which is listed on the talent assessment page for self -evaluations

and for the manager work i'd suggest continuing to use those docs until we get access to work day

and see what the exact differences are.

H, I, and J are read only unless anybody wants to discuss them.

Thomas, you got item K.

Yeah, apologies for the late like live addition to the agenda on this one, but one more note on a change we're rolling out within

Secure pretty lightweight and that we're establishing a second team within dynamic analysis um

and so uh issue is there for folks want to play

that would like to follow along

or ask any questions about it um for the plan for right

now is i'm going to be serving as a team to acting em

and in addition to normally scheduled uh some duties for lack of a better way of putting it

and so happy to answer any questions that folks have about that I had a quick question.

We've done the same thing in Threat Insights with Neil and Tiago each having teams.

What are you going to call your new team or how will you differentiate?

Was not planning to differentiate it.

It's just a second team within dynamic analysis.

We're not creating a new group, which I think is the same pattern that's happening within

Threat Insights as well.

It's just two teams.

I know that there's Tangerine and there's Navy.

I'm not a tangerine person myself.

So we'll have to figure it out.

Yeah, I don't know if there's another tea color, Thomas.

I struggled with that one.

100

That's the theme.

101

Tomato.

102

I don't know.

103

We'll figure it out.

104

We'll figure it out.

105

We'll figure it out.

106

The differentiation, I think the difference between what's happening in Threat Insights

107

and within dynamic analysis is that this is a split or long feature category.

108

even though we're keeping that we're not superior new group.

109

It is there's the distinction is along like who's working on specific feature categories themselves.

110

So the the the the where the fracture point is happening is is a little different.

111

But the but the approach and effect are the same.

112

I hope.

113

So on to big rocks and hot issues section.

114

I don't know if it's a big rock, but kind of long here perhaps more than that.

115

So I did

116

that survey where you got an awesome response rate from the team on how to improve the MR rate for the team.

117

And then I took a really long time to go through all the results and summarize and make initial recommendations.

118

So I lost a little bit of momentum.

119

I got caught up in other things like cross -functional prioritization and the customer escalation.

120

So since then, this is actually used by John Hope to lead a discussion

121

at the development offsite last week on just improving engineering velocity is one of the things he used to power it.

122

So it had value there.

123

But I've seen no comments, I think, from anybody in this group, which means either no time forgot about it or it doesn't,

124

we looked at it and it doesn't have much value.

125

And any of those things are okay.

126

I'm just curious where the group landed.

127

And if you haven't taken a look yet to see

128

if there's anything you want to take away from it on things you might want to consider, I'm asking you to do so and to consider,

129

not to do, but to consider.

130

Anybody got a chance to read it yet and think about it or not just yet?

131

My guess is perhaps everybody's really busy and they haven't left yet.

132

I mean at a high level

133

Jay, Neil, Tiago we've talked about changes.

134

I think Jay you've already looked at some changes around refinement

135

that was an area that you were going to look at for anti -abuse

136

and report back by the end of the quarter.

137

Tiago and Neil I can't remember what where we ended up with for threat insights.

138

Yeah I'm hoping that MR rate is kind of an artifact or byproduct of some other actions.

139

The big thing we're doing is more whole type of work, like random miscellaneous, not schedule, not PM necessarily actions or issues.

140

And that actually is creating some more additional work.

141

Like it's just like free time work.

142

I want to change of pace, move to something else momentarily.

143

And these are generally smaller types of issues too.

144

So they're quicker to knock out.

145

Therefore they create more MRs, which has been a cool byproduct.

146

So I think that's helping us succeed there.

147

Yeah, we're also seeing some success with, we've implemented like a weekly refinement meeting,

148

kind of check in, make sure that stories are broken down tiny enough.

149

I think with smaller bits of work, we're seeing a higher MR rate.

150

It's debatable whether or not that's like just inflated, right?

151

Like you can work on a small piece of code

152

and ship it and you can do

153

that a lot of times you're going to get a higher MR rate we're trying to be reasonable with

154

that um I am noticing a nice tick up uh after implementing the refinement meeting so let's hope for the best

155

I was going to say one note on refinements um in static analysis

156

we're experimenting with the new section in our planning feature, which is called looking forward.

157

And in there, we're using that as like a baseline where we add issues

158

that we think need refinement that will most likely be worked on in the next one to three milestones.

159

So we're using that as kind of a base cover for some engineer to go in

160

and add their issues and make sure they get refined within this milestone, not necessarily any implementation, but just refinement itself.

161

I should stop talking on mute.

162

Thank you, Omar.

163

Thomas, you want to verbalize your comment?

164

Yeah, I'll verbalize and then I'll say more

165

and then I'll finish writing what I was going to put down underneath it in just a moment.

166

So this was an agenda item with the EMS

167

and I can say it now in the secure stage since that is the analyzer teams now.

168

So this was a topic yesterday.

169

So I would assume that this is more like I had a chance to read but not digest the content.

170

And what I was about to write, and I am cautious in saying this because it almost comes across as smug,

171

and that is not my intent.

172

In that, looking at the MR rate within SEC compared to company -wide,

173

historically it runs two to three MRs per engineer per month higher.

174

And I think a good bit of that has to do with the, I mean, we've taken this to be true,

175

or at least asserted it to be true in

176

that it's smaller teams that are working closely together in less busy projects than we see within the Rails platform itself,

177

which does have an impact.

178

It's, that's not to say that we cannot do better, but the comparison and the favorable comparison,

179

at least to me, and I will admit this, at times will lessen the urgency on this particular topic.

180

And I have to admit that bias that I have.

181

Thanks, Thomas.

182

Thanks, everyone.

183

So I didn't see any comments on the issue, but that's totally fine.

184

People found some of it useful, some of the analysis useful, and that's great.

185

So I will close the issue accordingly

186

and just link to these notes good stuff thomas

187

you've got item b okay i'll write after this then all right fed ramp

188

and the can't or won't fix security issues

189

that way maybe we may be having there's uh so we've got um uh

190

the for security issues that are subject to fed ramp

191

if we if you have a feature category that is fips compliant

192

or certified you're probably going to be part of the fed ramp evaluation

193

and any security issue that has a CVE associated with it, which means dependency or container scanning specifically, has to have a remediation plan,

194

even if they're false positives.

195

And so that's led to a separate discussion on what do we need to do for,

196

do we need to do anything related to security findings on the commercial versions of analyzers specifically?

197

That was the catalyst for this particular conversation

198

because on container scanning we get a lot of findings related to debian based images

199

that that project has not shipped a fix for or won't fix ship a fix for

200

so there is a separate thread that is going on here about what to do

201

and can we do deviation requests in bulk for this class

202

of for this for this class of um of findings um the the tldr is below.

203

And there's a couple of options that are being brainstormed within this particular thread.

204

So I wanted, and I know I've said a lot of words and I didn't say it well,

205

but I wanted to bring it here in case there was any questions or commentary.

206

Nothing directly related to what you've just talked about, but but sort of related for FedRAMP,

207

you're looking at any FIPS related security issues that have been raised.

208

How far are you going in terms of auditing to find anything that hasn't already been identified?

209

There is, I'll link in another issue, a separate issue

210

that has instructions from AppSec on what they would like us to do as far as setting up container scanning.

211

And they have set up a project with a single configuration that they're asking us to use.

212

There is some debate as to how that project has been configured

213

because it uses a combination of three container scanning tools rather than one.

214

And so they've asked us to use that as a baseline for the FIPS images specifically,

215

since they're UBI or the UBI specific images.

216

they're they're equivalent in my mind even though they're they're they're different meanings

217

so tld out talk to appsec got

218

it nakil nakil george is our stable counterpart of folks don't know at least in sec um

219

and so he's been quite responsive and keen

220

and he is also helping chase down answers when uh

221

when he doesn't have them so uh that's a big uh he's been he's been a big help thus far Yeah.

222

So in, thanks for bringing this up, Thomas.

223

So in the hallway, so from the development staff meeting,

224

I copied and pasted the notes in there,

225

but net is the TLDR is can folks,

226

the request to me and my peers was can folks check with their teams to see if the approvals are affecting them.

227

So this is the new approval rules on segregation of duties.

228

So last this group, not that everybody's here, but in the group and they shouldn't be because all meetings are optional,

229

but has this had an impact, these new approval rules?

230

Anecdotally, I've seen a few cases where team members have realized that they need to get an additional approval,

231

but I'm not aware that it's actually slowing things down.

232

Okay.

233

No news is good news on this probably, unless it's happening and we're not noticing it.

234

We're just slowing things down, but just keep an eye on it in case it does.

235

Everyone, please.

236

It's good stuff.

237

With recent changes, we've done a couple of different changes with secure, govern, broken out from secure,

238

and a data ops team, and this and that.

239

I just compared the name of my team with my peers.

240

My peers have one word team names, ops, dev, create, et cetera.

241

Mine is growth and data science, which is pretty wordy.

242

It also makes sense that when I go into dashboards, I have to pull data from multiple places across my teams.

243

So I was thinking about a one word name.

244

I've started to get feedback on it.

245

Naming things is really important at GitLab to name the right kinds of things and give them good names.

246

So I'm going to run it by David DeSanto tomorrow.

247

He's a great person to bounce such things off of.

248

I landed on enrichment because what we do makes other things better.

249

We enrich them.

250

It's kind of a very broad term, but it does cover what we do.

251

Not sure we're going to change the name, which I'm not sure it's going to affect anyone but me.

252

That's actually my intent is it only affects my stuff,

253

not everyone else's, but at least everyone else's in a small way or others in a small way, but we'll see.

254

Any thoughts on this?

255

Good idea, bad idea?

256

I'm not wed to this, I'm looking for feedback.

257

Yeah, obviously the other examples relate to either sections or stages, whereas enrichment doesn't.

258

So you'd be introducing something new here.

259

This affects me as well.

260

I have a subset of enrichment, so it would be kind of enrichment light?

261

I'm not sure.

262

I'm not sure we'll, I think you and I have spoken about this.

263

I'm not sure we would get approval to introduce a new name or department level.

264

We'd certainly have to talk to people ops about introducing that in Workday.

265

Okay.

266

Okay.

267

So a couple of things, you know, these kinds of things I would sometimes put in Slack,

268

but I'm trying to avoid a number of distinct Slack messages.

269

So putting it in here, making a lot read -only when possible.

270

So I've got C though, which is not read -only.

271

So I would like to add announcements of work anniversaries and new hires to the meeting template.

272

PM does this.

273

I attended the PM staff meeting.

274

I was a guest speaker there this week.

275

And like the camaraderie, we have good camaraderie.

276

The camaraderie there was pretty good.

277

You know, Fern, who's shadowing me today, I think he sat in on the PM meeting as well.

278

It was a pretty good feel of just people really knowing each other well and getting along well.

279

So those are just two things I took away from it, is anniversaries and new hires.

280

I'll verbalize Tiago's comment.

281

Great idea for new hires.

282

Don't care much about work anniversaries.

283

We already have a bot for that.

284

What I'd say is I always seem to miss the bot announcements

285

as they cover the whole company versus Abad just announcing for our team.

286

If no interest in that part, I'm happy to exclude.

287

So Neil, you like the idea of adding such a great anniversary or you don't?

288

I mean, just last week, I think it was Phil celebrated his third year and I congratulated him,

289

but then I missed another team member in SEC.

290

You know, because there's like 20 people on that list.

291

Plus it's team member updates.

292

That's not a channel I look at a lot, like weekly.

293

I just happen to see that the day of.

294

So I do like being able to celebrate together in this group.

295

Maybe also a thanks or praise section.

296

Like, thanks for doing this.

297

Great job on that.

298

To remind ourselves to do that.

299

And as engineers, we tend to focus on the problems and challenges and not the celebrating the wins.

300

Are you suggesting that we add new content into this document for that, or that we just link to the Slack announcements that we've already made.

301

I think it's nice to verbalize them.

302

So maybe link to the Slack announcements, but also verbalize it.

303

I know it sounds like a bunch of busy work.

304

I don't want to do things twice.

305

Maybe we add the sections and people use them as they see fit, whatever that happens to be.

306

But please don't create busy work for yourself either.

307

So judgment call by each person.

308

Thomas, it looks like you had a Thomas and Mon, you had some thoughts on this too.

309

Yeah, I like it.

310

We don't celebrate enough.

311

We don't do enough for team cohesion, team celebration across the board.

312

And just as a corollary related thing that I haven't communicated well,

313

I was hoping to add this kind of thing to our monthly section -wide retrospectives new hires, discretionary bonuses, work anniversaries, big feature releases.

314

I mean, anything that we want to announce and celebrate, we ought to make sure that it's, I don't want to say shout to the rooftops,

315

or shout to the heavens, but they're big deals and we don't make, and we undersell, in my opinion.

316

Yeah.

317

Oh, sorry.

318

And hey, Fernando here.

319

So I'm shadowing Wayne now just to introduce myself.

320

from the technical marketing team.

321

And I'll send the document right now, which is something that we do for our kind of get together team meetings.

322

And it kind of shows you can you can look through it.

323

I shared it to everyone on the Zoom chat, but you can see that we provide updates, the new team members and small little introductions.

324

And you can see sections that we have on gratitude and actual spotlights that we show like who we're actually praising, what they've done that's good,

325

and how we can highlight that because that will motivate employees, kind of really increase that morale because what we're seeing is

326

these employees are actually getting recognized for good work that they've done and they're getting shout outs because a lot of times,

327

at least in our team, the case is we don't really, although we work with each other, we sometimes are kind of siloed,

328

busy working on different things.

329

So it's good to know what everyone's working on and what everyone's doing.

330

So somewhat related to what you were just speaking on, but just thought I'd share that.

331

Thanks, Fernando.

332

In D, so I'm not going to read all of this from Daniel Croft,

333

but summarizing, he is looking for feedback on the development vision and mission and direction.

334

We're brainstorming in the development department.

335

on Mission Envision in particular.

336

The approach is we want everybody to open up a little spreadsheet and follow the instructions, anybody interested.

337

So if you're interested in doing so, it should take about 10 to 15 minutes.

338

Please do it in the next week.

339

Good stuff there.

340

Something we covered also at the development offsite that Daniel took as an action item to follow up on.

341

Thomas, you've got E.

342

Yep.

343

All right.

344

Because I cannot remember.

345

And so I'm hoping to crowdsource a little bit of configuration archaeology, so to speak.

346

Is there a reason that we don't use reviewer roulette? If folks can remember.

347

The reason I'm asking is contained within that thread.

348

But that is a tool that actually is being used to track if we have enough maintainers on any given project.

349

And since we don't use it, we're showing up.

350

and so that's why I was that's why I'm asking

351

when you say reviewer roulette are you talking about on the individual analyzers yeah

352

speaking only for dash we haven't had a need for it because we have

353

six engineers that's just going to roulette the same six people

354

yeah rule a six sided die that's what I kind of think it is but it's

355

from a larger like if the company like where do we need more maintainers is the question that the organization is asking.

356

I mean I'd suggest they're looking in the wrong place if they're looking in roulette

357

to see to find out the number of maintainers

358

that's the wrong place the engineering projects page should list all the maintainers

359

if you set up your team yaml entries correctly I would have thought that was more than single source of truth.

360

apparently not so yeah

361

yeah I'm looking at the chart I mean

362

I think on some of these projects we just haven't filled

363

it out um I'll give you like we have the API um like hub fuzz we have one engineer

364

that works on it uh so we haven't gone

365

and added a maintainer there because they know who they are um

366

so if we trying to maintain

367

that as a single source of truth we need to just go through and scrub it

368

sorry seth i'm reminded

369

i'm reminded of the spider -man meme with the two

370

spider -men pointing at each other who's the reviewer who's the author it's it's the same person

371

it's been it's been a long day so i'm a little punchy so but yes that makes sense

372

so seth are you saying you you haven't added it to individual team members yaml files in the handbook yet.

373

Right.

374

I believe for that one, there's just no entry for it.

375

I mean, we could.

376

I think if you do that, that should do it.

377

Yeah.

378

Well, it should.

379

They shouldn't be using just roulette.

380

They should be using that as a source of trades.

381

And I think if you've listed maintainers, that should cover it.

382

A follow -up question would be, does that cover the senior plus engineers must be a maintainer requirement or not?

383

Thomas, you buried the lead.

384

I took the read only off your comment there so you can announce it.

385

Well, we're going to end with the best news of the day.

386

That's all.

387

But the maintainer requirement, yes, it does.

388

I mean, because it's required for senior plus, going back to that, is just maintaining one or more,

389

I think, is the requirement, if I remember correctly.

390

so i was talking about the olivier news yeah i know

391

i was just making sure we were finished with the topic above all right

392

and we're at time so i will move on and take

393

that as a prompt yeah olivier has uh popped back on slack to announce

394

that the newest edition of their family is here

395

and happened over the weekend uh so uh uh so uh big big congrats to his family for that and uh

396

We'll be hoping to celebrate him later when he returns to work.

397

Google, thanks everybody.

398

Have a great day.

アプリをダウンロード

流暢に話すために必要なすべて

AI発音採点文ごとに採点

IPA練習すべての音をマスター

単語学習自分の単語帳を作る

単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える

QRをスキャン

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同じチャンネル

FOR YOU

このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント

このスピーキングレッスンは、動画「Sec Growth DataScience staff meeting Sep 14 2022」を教材にしています。この動画には、シャドーイング用の文が398文、単語が4517語あります。音声の長さは28:58です。話す速さは1分あたり約156語で、日常会話に近い自然なペースです。単語の83%は英語の頻出3,000語に含まれます。残りは練習の前に確認しておきましょう。

この動画の重要語彙

動画に出てくる覚えておきたい単語15語を、発音と意味つきで紹介します。

単語	発音	意味
hire 動詞	/ˈhaɪɹ/	借りる
container 名詞	/kənˈteɪ.nəɹ/	容器
introduce 動詞	/ˌɪntɹəˈdus/	紹介する, 引き合わせる
feedback 名詞	/ˈfiːdˌbæk/	フィードバック, 反応
announcement 名詞	/əˈnaʊns.mənt/	発表, お知らせ
agenda 名詞	/əˈd͡ʒɛn.də/	議題, 議事
announce 動詞	/əˈnaʊn(t)s/	発表する, 知らせる
apology 名詞	/əˈpɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	詫び, 侘び
topic 名詞	/ˈtɑpɪk/	話題, テーマ
thread 名詞	/ˈθɹɛd/	糸
remind 動詞	/ɹəˈmaɪnd/	思い出させる
dynamic 形容詞	/daɪˈnæm.ɪk/	動的
volunteer 名詞	/ˌvɑlənˈtɪɹ/	有志, ボランティア
requirement 名詞	/ɹɪˈkwaɪɹmənt/	要求
peer 名詞	/pɪɹ/	同輩

動画に出てくる句動詞

単語	意味
find out 動詞	見出す, 調べる
get along 動詞	気が合う, 折り合う
show up 動詞	現れる

繰り返し練習したい文

動画に出てくる短く完結した文です。日常会話でそのまま使えます。

I've got the next item as well.
We don't have to ping people ourselves.
I haven't seen a demo of it.
Thomas, you want to verbalize your comment?
Is there a reason that we don't use reviewer roulette?

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型	動画での表現
現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している	I've asked · has graciously accepted · haven't been confirmed
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる	is called · is read · been confirmed
関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加える	ops, which has · group, which is · evaluation which will

注意したい発音

話し手はI'm, we're, don'tなど、短縮形や弱形を159回使っています。聞こえたとおりの短い形で発音しましょう。

「th」の音: thread /ˈθɹɛd/, underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/
「sh」と「zh」の音: shout /ʃaʊt/, shadow /ˈʃædəʊ̯/, evaluation /ɪˌvæljuˈeɪʃn̩/, instruction /ɪnˈstɹʌkʃən/, configuration /kənˌfɪɡ.əˈɹeɪ̯.ʃən/
長い単語（アクセントの位置に注意）: apology /əˈpɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/, evaluation /ɪˌvæljuˈeɪʃn̩/, configuration /kənˌfɪɡ.əˈɹeɪ̯.ʃən/, differentiate /dɪf.əˈɹɛn.ʃi.eɪt/

日本語話者が苦手な音：

/r/ と /l/ の区別 — /l/ は舌先を歯茎につけ、/r/ はどこにもつけない: volunteer /ˌvɑlənˈtɪɹ/, necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/, correctly /kəˈɹɛk(t).li/, congratulations /kənˌɡɹæt͡ʃəˈleɪʃ(ə)nz/, celebration /ˌsɛl.ɪˈbɹeɪ.ʃən/
/v/ — /b/ にならないように、上の歯を下唇に当てる: volunteer /ˌvɑlənˈtɪɹ/, evaluation /ɪˌvæljuˈeɪʃn̩/, govern /ˈɡʌv.ən/, versus /ˈvɝsəs/, collective /kəˈlɛktɪv/
/f/ — 「フ」ではなく、上の歯と下唇で出す: feedback /ˈfiːdˌbæk/, configuration /kənˌfɪɡ.əˈɹeɪ̯.ʃən/, differentiate /dɪf.əˈɹɛn.ʃi.eɪt/, functional /ˈfʌŋkt͡ʃənəl/, fracture /ˈfɹæk.t͡ʃʰəː/

この動画での練習方法

まず声を出さずに動画を最後まで聞き、知らない単語をメモします。
まず0.75倍速で一文ずつシャドーイングし、慣れてきたら通常の速度に戻します。
自分の声を録音して元の音声と比べます。hire, container, introduceなどの単語に特に注意しましょう。

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →

シャドーイング練習: Sec Growth DataScience staff meeting Sep 14 2022 - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

アプリをダウンロード

同じチャンネル

2026-05-05 Tufts Capstone project presentation

2022-07-25 Analytics Section Meeting

[REC] Key Meeting - Engineering (Public Stream)

Product Marketing Meeting (weekly) 2021-06-28

おすすめ動画

The Only SaaS Moats Left in 2026

Inside a Biotech Company: Roles, Teams & Where You Could Fit In | EP 14

Database Sharding! Designing Data-Intensive Applications chapter 6

Running AI Agents in Secure Sandboxes with E2B & Docker MCP | Docker’s AI Guide to the Galaxy

How Anthropic uses Claude in Product Management

Effective Team Meetings - Getting it Right

OpenAI’s lead engineer was secretly a spy...

Your AI Agent Starts Every Session Like a New Hire - Killian Carlsen-Phelan, Sonar

Trust the Process: How to Design Teams That Actually Work

What's New in Zephyr 4.5?

We've got separation of concerns wrong

"Dive Deep" Leadership Principle Explained by Amazon CEO Andy Jassy

このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント

この動画の重要語彙

動画に出てくる句動詞

繰り返し練習したい文

この動画の文法

注意したい発音

この動画での練習方法

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由