シャドーイング練習: Why is Metro Vancouver Creating a New Downtown? - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。

230 文

文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。

When I say let's go downtown,

you probably think of this, Vancouver's downtown.

But increasingly, it is not the only downtown.

If you take a look across the Metro Vancouver region,

you'll see clusters of high-rises rising up to create mini skylines everywhere.

There's Brentwood Town Center, Metrotown,

Lougheed Town Center, New Westminster,

and of course, the subject of our video today, this area right here.

Because many believe that this is going to be the next major downtown.

Surrey.

I'm Siri.

Shush.

God.

That's right.

Surrey.

The city's been growing fast,

and its population is eventually expected to exceed that of Vancouver's to become the largest city in Metro Vancouver.

But people have actually been talking about Surrey being a new downtown from Metro Vancouver for decades.

In fact, there's a story here a plan to create a new regional center that goes back to the 1970s.

And I think there's something really interesting about this story,

because it speaks to a much larger idea and,

frankly, a debate within urban planning about how cities should grow.

Should they grow towards one center or multiple?

Our story starts in 1976.

Trudeau is Prime Minister.

No, not that Trudeau.

Canada is still winning Stanley Cups.

No, not those Stanley Cups.

And the 21 different cities across Metro Vancouver have come together to address a concerning issue.

Growth.

The population was growing quickly

and local governments across the region felt it was important to coordinate their efforts to manage that growth.

What they came up with was the livable region.

In the first page, they write that this plan is to manage population growth

and still keep the region a good place to live.

A core part of their plan was to spread out growth into four different centers across Metro Vancouver

and connect them via rapid transit.

One of those centers, this little area on the northwest side of Surrey.

Now, at the time, Surrey had about a quarter of the population of Vancouver.

It was a quiet bedroom community surrounded by vast stretches of forest and farmland.

That area that was supposed to become Surrey's new centre looked like this.

A mall and a giant parking lot.

But in the following decades, Surrey exploded in population.

All those undeveloped lands filled with homes,

and the city became a hub for Canada's growing South Asian community.

Surrey soon blew past every other city to become the second most populous in the region,

and many predicted that it would one day grow even larger than Vancouver.

In the midst of all this growth,

Surrey's downtown gradually started to take shape as well.

The SkyTrain arrived in the 90s,

SFU's third campus in 2006,

a new central library in 2011,

a new city hall in 2014,

and of course, dozens and dozens of condo towers.

So this plan clearly worked,

and we can soon expect Surrey to become,

well, it would be a mistake to attribute all of this growth to a single plan.

There were other factors at play here.

Surrey already had much more open land than other cities,

which meant it had more room to grow,

and its central location between several other cities made it a natural hub for development.

So much of this growth could have happened anyways,

and the actual impact of this plan is totally up for debate.

Okay, fair, but what's undeniable is that Surrey is becoming a new center in Metro Vancouver today,

and whether you think that growth is happening organically or through planning,

it is interesting that we did in fact make a plan for that growth to happen here.

So this feels like a good place to ask a question.

Why?

Why make a plan to distribute growth to places like Surrey in the first place?

I think the first thing you should know is that Metro Vancouver is not alone.

Cities all over the world are increasingly creating plans to establish new downtowns.

Portland, plans have been underway here since the 1990s to spread growth into regional centers around the cities downtown,

such as Beaverton and Gateway.

Sydney recently announced plans to establish a second commercial business district in Parramatta.

And Madrid, about to redevelop a northern train station and its surrounding neighborhoods,

into Nuevo Norte, a new city center with hundreds of new office buildings and thousands of apartment units.

This approach to growth goes by different names,

like decentralization, or polycentric city planning, or John.

But here's the gist.

Instead of focusing development into one dominant center,

you spread out that growth into multiple.

So why do this?

Well, I think Metro Vancouver's original plan from 1976 actually gives a pretty good overview.

The preservation of open space and recreation areas,

minimizing travel time and inconvenience,

and minimizing disruption to existing communities.

So let's break these down.

First, preserve open space and recreation areas.

The more a city grows,

the more pressure it faces to develop over open spaces such as farmland and wilderness.

The theory is that distributing and concentrating that growth into other centers can take pressure off of developing those spaces.

An often cited case study is the Randstad region in the Netherlands,

where the four cities of Amsterdam,

Utrecht, The Hague, and Rotterdam accommodate much of the region's population growth,

allowing for plenty of protected green space and farmland in between them.

About 60% of the land area here is still used for agriculture.

Second, minimize travel time and inconvenience.

As cities grow, they often sprawl outwards,

which can then result in people commuting further and further downtown.

100

The theory is that by developing new economic centers in suburban communities,

101

residents won't have to work downtown,

102

reducing commutes and traffic congestion.

103

I think the Puget Sound region is a noteworthy example.

104

It ranks second lowest in vehicle miles traveled among the 100 largest US metros partially

105

because jobs here are distributed across a number of different centers in Bellevue and Tacoma,

106

not just Seattle.

107

People living in those communities don't have to travel all the way downtown for work.

108

Third, minimize disruption to existing communities.

109

As cities grow, its older neighborhoods often experience a lot of pressure to redevelop,

110

which can be difficult and controversial.

111

It means neighborhood opposition, replacing pipes and other infrastructure.

112

This ends up being another key motivator behind spreading out growth.

113

The thinking is that instead of drastically changing old neighborhoods,

114

you can build new homes and businesses outside the city and create the infrastructure to support it there.

115

A fascinating example of this is Paris.

116

It's an iconic city that's incredibly sensitive about changing its looks too much,

117

so the government here decided to create this.

118

La Défense.

119

Once the cyberbombed the outskirts of Paris,

120

it's now one of Europe's largest global business centers.

121

So those are the main benefits driving cities towards creating new downtowns.

122

But there is one more benefit I want to mention that's actually not really brought up in these sorts of plans.

123

One that's really more of a positive side effect.

124

Competition.

125

Developing a new centre puts it in competition with the old centre for businesses,

126

residents and investment, which can create a healthy rivalry between both.

127

Take London, for example.

128

In the 1980s,

129

the UK government made plans to develop the former portlands of

130

Canary Wharf into a new financial centre away from the old downtown.

131

It gradually became home to some of London's first skyscrapers,

132

which attracted the head offices of major companies.

133

Because of that, the old city of London felt the pressure to adapt.

134

Canary Wharf, a gigantic American-style office complex,

135

was seen as a direct challenge to the city's preeminence.

136

It began relaxing its strict building regulations,

137

paving the way for new office towers like the Gherkin and the Cheese Grater.

138

In London's case, establishing a second economic center has pushed both centers to innovate and prevent themselves from stagnating.

139

So I hope that gives you a good overview about why cities might create plans to build new downtowns.

140

But here's the thing about plans.

141

Things don't always go to plan.

142

Today, it's clear that Metro Vancouver has been great at spreading out growth in some ways.

143

New towers have clustered around SkyTrain stations,

144

protected farmlands still exist near urban areas,

145

and for better or for worse,

146

many old single-family neighborhoods remain largely unchanged near the downtown core.

147

But there's one goal that has taken much longer to pan out.

148

Spreading out jobs.

149

Data from 2021 shows that the city of Vancouver houses 26% of the population and 33% of the jobs,

150

while Surrey and Langley combined house 28% of the population and just 21% of the jobs.

151

When you look at the head offices of the 100 largest organizations by revenue in British Columbia,

152

only one of them is headquartered in Surrey city center

153

and just four others are located in the rest of the city of Surrey.

154

66 are located in the city of Vancouver.

155

You can really see this imbalance in what gets built in Metro Vancouver's centers.

156

Residential high-rises.

157

These are people's homes, but they aren't destinations in themselves.

158

People might live in these towers,

159

but they often take transit elsewhere for work and other activities.

160

Vancouver still holds the overwhelming majority of office space in the region,

161

at over 60% of the total square footage.

162

Burnaby is a distant second,

163

while Surrey is third at just under 9%.

164

Now, offices aren't the only thing that matter for cities,

165

but because of factors like these,

166

commuting traffic in Metro Vancouver continues to be an issue.

167

Cities like Coquitlam, North Vancouver,

168

and New Westminster each have distinct city centers,

169

But the vast majority of their residents commute outside of their city for work.

170

Surrey presents a more complex picture.

171

About half the residents here still work within the city.

172

But there's a difference when you look at Surrey's city center.

173

The majority of residents here still commute outside of Surrey for work.

174

A striking difference compared to Vancouver's downtown.

175

There are many theories for why it's been difficult to establish a new city center in Surrey.

176

A lack of coordination between Metro Vancouver's local governments a lack of transit connections within Surrey itself,

177

stigma about Surrey, and competition from other city centres in Richmond and Burnaby.

178

I could honestly spend a lot of time talking about each one of these topics.

179

But there is one challenge that pretty much any new city centre faces, the agglomeration effect.

180

When businesses and people cluster together,

181

they create a bit of a feedback loop.

182

More people move to that area to be closer to jobs and amenities,

183

and then more jobs and amenities move to that area to be near those people.

184

And then more people move to that area to be closer to jobs and amenities and then more jobs and amenities.

185

This has a significant impact on what gets built.

186

According to a study on office development commissioned by the city of Surrey,

187

agglomeration economics reduce the risk for office developers,

188

as there is more certainty that space can be filled within a building if a major tenant vacates.

189

to establish a new economic hub away from the original one can often feel like swimming against the current.

190

We might want to spread out growth,

191

but at the same time,

192

there is a ton of momentum for it to stay within the original center,

193

where all the action is.

194

Now this is not to say that making plans to create new downtowns or spread out growth is a futile endeavor.

195

Richmond, for example, has seen a ton of job growth thanks to its proximity to the Vancouver airport.

196

And in Surrey, there are promising signs of momentum as well.

197

For example, the Surrey Memorial Hospital has helped attract over 200 health technology companies to move into the neighborhood.

198

That, in turn, has spurred investments to build new office spaces,

199

a medical school for Simon Fraser University,

200

and a third campus for the University of British Columbia.

201

At the end of the day,

202

cities are complicated, and they grow in complicated ways.

203

But there's one thing that is undeniable.

204

There are a lot of people who live in Surrey today.

205

It's home to 680,000 people right now and an estimated 1 million by 2044.

206

Encouraging more opportunities and amenities right here in Surrey for Surrey's residents is a good idea.

207

One that's worth thinking about and planning for.

208

And there's an opportunity right now to shape how that happens.

209

I've worked with the city of Surrey to produce this video because they're currently writing an update to their official community plan,

210

a policy document to guide the future growth and change in Surrey.

211

At this stage, they are focusing on priority policy directions that will guide the next chapter of Surrey's growth.

212

And right now, I wanna talk about transportation priorities because Surrey has a pretty serious public transit problem.

213

Surrey's transit ridership is currently at 125% of pre-pandemic levels,

214

the highest recovery rate in both Metro Vancouver and North America.

215

In fact, 13 of the region's 20 most overcrowded bus routes are in Surrey.

216

If you put wheels on a sardine can,

217

this is what it might look like.

218

Overcrowding on public transit is easily one of the biggest challenges to growth in Surrey right now.

219

But it's also a bit of an opportunity.

220

Many of those overcrowded buses like the 345,

221

the 321, or the 503 are bus routes that connect Surrey's city center to other centers throughout the region.

222

There's clearly a lot of people who want better connections around Surrey,

223

and upgrading its public transit will no doubt benefit those commuters while improving Surrey's ability to further develop its centers.

224

So that's just one piece of the puzzle.

225

But I'd ultimately like to hear your thoughts.

226

What matters most for Surrey's future?

227

If you live in Surrey,

228

or you care about the city in general,

229

we'd love to hear your feedback on this plan.

230

Learn more about it at surrey.ca.ocp Thank you.

アプリをダウンロード

流暢に話すために必要なすべて

AI発音採点文ごとに採点

IPA練習すべての音をマスター

単語学習自分の単語帳を作る

単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える

QRをスキャン

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

この動画でスピーキングを練習する理由

この動画は、バンクーバーの新しいダウンタウンに関する興味深いトピックを扱っています。英語スピーキング練習を行う際、実際の会話の流れやトピックに基づいて発音や表現を学ぶことができるので非常に有益です。特に、都市計画や地域社会の成長に関する議論は、他の場面でも多く使われる表現が含まれているため、リスニングとスピーキングのスキルを同時に向上させることが期待できます。shadow speechのテクニックを活用することで、学んだ表現を自分のものにしやすくなります。

文法と表現の文脈

「人口が急速に増えている」 - この表現は「人口増加」を意味し、問題の重要性を強調します。
「中心に向かうべきか、複数の中心に向かうべきか」 - この構文は、選択肢を示す際に使われる一般的な表現です。
「さまざまな地域センターの設立」 - これは、地域の発展を計画する際に使うフレーズで、都市計画に関連する重要な語彙が含まれています。
「交通網で接続する」 - 交通網の重要性を強調する場合に使われる文句で、英語スピーキング練習での用途も広いです。

これらの表現をshadowingすることで、発音や文法の理解が深まります。

一般的な発音の罠

この動画では、いくつかの発音が難しい単語やフレーズが登場します。特に「Surrey」や「center」の発音には注意が必要です。また、言葉のリズムやイントネーションも、理解を助ける重要な要素です。

「rapid transit」や「population」というフレーズは、母音の強調や音のつながりが難しいため、shadowspeakの練習に適しています。これらの音を繰り返し練習することで、より流暢に話せるようになるでしょう。

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型	動画での表現
現在完了進行形 have/has been + -ing — 以前に始まり今も続いている動作	city's been growing · have actually been talking
現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している	have come · have been · has pushed
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる	is eventually expected · is still used · are distributed
関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加える	investment, which can · people who live · people who want

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →

シャドーイング練習: Why is Metro Vancouver Creating a New Downtown? - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

アプリをダウンロード

おすすめ動画

PM Lawrence Wong at World Cities Summit 2026

GO Expansion - Ontario's $27B Rail Electrification Plan

Why So Many Luxury Apartments Are Popping Up In The U.S.

Global renewables: Pioneering the energy transition | DW Documentary

The Impact of Alberta's Referendum Results

Vancouver Vacation Travel Guide | Expedia

Learn English From The News - Google, Elon Musk's SpaceX Discuss Launching Data Centers Into Orbit

Is Chongqing REALLY a Cyberpunk City?

Bac Ninh province eyes city status | Vietnam Today

STRATA MANAGEMENT WITH ASSOCIA BRITISH COLUMBIA

UNIT 10 CD2 TRACK 7 COMPLETE FIRST

Data centres: balancing economic gain with energy concerns | Vietnam Today

この動画でスピーキングを練習する理由

文法と表現の文脈

一般的な発音の罠

この動画の文法

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由