쉐도잉 연습: find your soul first, then your soulmate - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

레슨 만드는 중...
1
so i'm going to title this video something along along the
2
lines of find your soul before you find your soulmate
3
and you might think
4
that this video is going to be kind of a long
5
pseudo philosophical kind of ramble about like oh like to find the one you gotta find the one in yourself
6
and it's gonna have a little bit of that
7
but i i think it's actually a pretty interesting uh topic especially
8
if you're looking at uh long -term pair bonding
9
and the statistics behind that and how to find an optimal pairing
10
so i mean i i graduated with a math degree i'm a bit of a nerd um
11
but i'm also a uh definitely like a romeo at heart you know
12
when i was a kid i would i would always love having crushes
13
or whatever and i love like romance movies
14
so it's a it's a mix of like my scientific side in this approach
15
and then also the uh kind of the part of me that's like uh kind of that hopeless romantic archetype as well.
16
So you'll get an interesting mix, but long -term pair bonding is very difficult.
17
Finding someone who is, you know, you could call a soulmate, right?
18
Someone who is, I would like to consider, we're going to try to rigorously define soulmate because you don't want an overloaded term.
19
You know, an overloaded term is a term that is, you know, one word has multiple definitions and they might be slightly different definitions.
20
So if you're getting in an argument with someone and you're both defining something slightly different, you might actually just agree or agree to some extent, right?
21
But if you don't like very much clarify some of these overloaded terms, then it might sound like the other person is spouting nonsense.
22
So when I say soulmate, I mean a little bit of the whimsical kind of this person is meant for me,
23
but I mostly mean if you are going to put the population, right, the potential, you know,
24
dating population for you as an individual, and you're going to put them on a normal curve.
25
So this is where you have like, you know, your mean is going to be here right at the 50th percentile.
26
I'm going to say a soulmate is someone who might be one
27
or two standard deviations of the very kind of end of
28
that tail at and scaled on population of the potential dating pool
29
and your levels of compatibility with this person and what i mean by finding your soul before finding your soul mate
30
is discovering who you are and what is important to you is really important to make sure it's it's
31
really uh essential to make sure that
32
that is clear to you even though finding yourself is a
33
maybe a fruitless task maybe you'll never truly find yourself
34
but at least define it a little bit more don't ignore it right uh
35
because long -term pair bonding is already you know
36
if you look at marriage statistics it's hard it's really hard to find someone
37
that really fits with you especially over the long run
38
but i believe if you really do a lot of self -discovery um
39
and really experimentation for yourself and i don't just mean like oh go sleep with a bunch of people experimentation i'm
40
i mean you could do that i don't care
41
but like i i kind of mean like trying things
42
that are you know trying things
43
that are new you know reading different like philosophies seeing different people's worldviews maybe traveling around a little bit
44
and really kind of getting a better sense of who you are
45
and in part discovering who you are is discovering who you could be
46
and what I mean by
47
that is there's certain it's the unknown unknowns what are the things not to quote Donald Rumsfeld
48
but it's pretty legendary speech not in a good way
49
but know what i mean it is the things
50
that you don't know that you don't know
51
that might end up being a major component of you as
52
soon as they are discovered think about those things in your maybe your childhood
53
or adult and now really or maybe in the future theoretically
54
that you didn't know about them
55
but as soon as you learn about it it just becomes
56
such a clear part of you i believe the self -discovery
57
is also selfish is an expansion right it is like figuring out all the pieces
58
that fit really well with you and the problem with like long -term pair bonding
59
is that there's so many traits that are important and so many kind of levers of compatibility
60
that if you don't understand yourself well enough
61
and you haven't kind of fully defined yourself well enough
62
because there might be something
63
that becomes really important to you in the future you partner with someone in the past right
64
and then once you reach that point in the future where that thing becomes really important to you, maybe it is, you know,
65
contradictory to your partner, right?
66
In some way that is really important.
67
And then your compatibility over, your compatibility at that point gets completely, you know, re -evaluated.
68
And there's also another, you know, and I could keep going on to like compatibility.
69
And I think sometimes like I fight this battle of the, is I look at so much of life through this analytical you know,
70
probabilistic view, and I try to be very logical, but for the world of, like, you know, romance and finding,
71
you know, a partner, I feel like I try to be very careful to be over -logical, overly logical in a situation like that, because I believe that there is art and science in the world.
72
There's more than that, but let's say art and science are two categories.
73
You know, science is something you can, you know, you can address rigorously.
74
Maybe it's in the world of probabilities, So yours can't be, you know, it can't be like a chess game with all the information on the table.
75
You can at least, you know, take the scientific method.
76
You can take logic to it.
77
I think, you know, business is a pretty good avenue for that.
78
I think a lot of decisions of people applied more logic to it and, you know, they would have a better outcome in their life
79
but I also believe it is sometimes it might be in chess terms it might be a blunder to
80
take that scientific lens and that scientific kind of perspective to everything
81
and what I mean by that is I think that you know
82
that experience you get when you go to a great art museum is not not always sometimes
83
when I go there I'm like oh well this is well
84
more of a museum right of like a museum right not
85
an art gallery for a museum i'm like oh this is technically interesting
86
because of this and this and this and you know i recently went
87
and i saw this uh i went to this museum
88
that was like it was like someone uncovered a sunken spanish ship from the you know
89
1600s or something and had all the gold
90
but then went through the history of uh you know kind of the all everything
91
that went on there i thought that's fascinating right
92
when you go to an art exhibit you are you know i'm sure some it could be defined scientifically
93
but i just choose not to right it's your your your
94
it's like you're caught up in between it's like in between
95
the lines in between your thoughts right it is the the it's almost like the fact
96
that sometimes a beautiful piece of art will wipe your mind to the point
97
that you would achieve in deep meditation
98
and you were just able to be there in the moment
99
and experience it in a way that's really hard to rigorously define
100
which is part of the beauty of it and I think
101
when it comes to relationships I also I you know I
102
want to experience the art of life as well I think
103
it's important to have a good life to experience to look
104
at it through the science for a lot of it but for relationships I sometimes feel
105
having an overly technical view is like you're going to extinguish the art
106
that is potentially there the you know the romance like a you know
107
when you know It's like you dance on the dance floor, you feel awkward and you look awkward when you think through it,
108
but you, you know, you don't feel awkward and you don't look awkward when you're, when you're experiencing it, when you're doing what comes naturally.
109
So when I speak about, you know, the optimization, I think if you're looking at the population aggregate, if you understand yourself better, you are going to understand,
110
you know, even intuitively without writing it down on paper, right?
111
A lot of this is just intuitive, partially because your brain has been wired for optimal pair bonding, given, you know, over thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
112
So, right, it's doing calculations, but you can't really consciously tell it's why
113
when you fall in love with someone it's usually not a pros
114
and cons list right if you're deciding if you're in love with someone
115
and you have to go to a pros
116
and cons list you're probably not right um i i also think that
117
if we're talking about you know you must find yourself like
118
find your soul before you find your soulmate i think
119
that i've experienced you know a lot of intense romantic feelings
120
in periods of my life where i was lost i think
121
is a vague term my my purpose was a little bit unclear there were things
122
that i needed to tidy up in my personal life
123
and sometimes it swings up and down right you're you don't tidy up your personal life
124
and then you're done it's it's a long experience you sail
125
through one storm doesn't mean there isn't another you several days out several months out whatever
126
but i've found that my romantic obsession is
127
and not like the movie obsession crazy level but just that kind of uh immediate like almost an infatuation
128
a premature infatuation right you meet with someone a little bit
129
and then you construct this version in your mind uh
130
because of how amazing they are you're always daydreaming about them
131
which fills in the details and then you know you construct this fake version of them
132
that isn't a person and honestly isn't is unfair to them as well
133
because all people have faults
134
and they're not going to be this perfect instruction in your
135
mind usually you find yourself daydreaming about this person all the time
136
when you're there's parts of your life that aren't filled properly
137
so you fill the gaps this way and this is something that's common with me
138
and i realize more and more that you know, I must almost this idea of like, at the point where I can feel content,
139
maybe not happy about it, but theoretically content with being single, that is when I'm ready for a relationship.
140
When I feel whole enough by myself, I'm ready to expand who I am to bring someone in
141
and have this joint union be bigger than either of the two of us, as opposed to, I feel, you know,
142
incomplete and i need someone to complete me that that is usually
143
that usually doesn't lead to good results and when you're thinking
144
and if you want i'm going to shift it a little i have a little
145
you know artsy philosophical whatever uh kind of couple minutes here
146
but i'm going to shift it back to a little bit more
147
that scientific rigorous perspective if you're looking for a long -term partner
148
which let's say that they're your soulmate
149
which we defined earlier is like one to two standard deviations
150
on this kind of compatibility another really important thing to try
151
to be aware of is the difference in short -term
152
and long -term mating you can look i mean i swear
153
it's it's the literature man's technical terms i'm not trying to be weird
154
but you can look up uh dr david buss he's done
155
incredible research on this also mac murphy is a kind of
156
a younger scientist in this field who has great content online
157
as well um you know i bought i have a few textbooks
158
that i purchase to read because you know i'll read once in a
159
while i'm not gonna pretend like i spend all day reading
160
yeah i don't scroll too much i should read more
161
but you know i bought dr david bust a textbook
162
because it's really interesting and his studies are across cultures across history not just like
163
and also cultures
164
that have very little kind of interaction with each other it feels like there's such difference in partnering up
165
but there's it's honestly relatively similar with some cultural variants, right?
166
But there's these kind of two, there's almost like these two categories where you have short -term mating, long -term mating, right?
167
And I mean, in short, it's like someone who you wanna have a casual relationship with, one night stand at the lowest
168
and maybe a friends with benefits situationship type at the most in this kind of short -term window.
169
And then someone that you could consider, you know, having kids with or
170
and having a long -term partnership with what you what people tend to optimize for on those are very different and sometimes
171
you know sometimes it's it's it's hard to shift from one to another
172
because you're so used to that kind of short term right
173
and the kind of the compatibility traits of uh you know
174
what you're looking for in a long -term partner actually can
175
be very different from what is often optimized for for short -term partner
176
and there's a lot of data behind this i think it's
177
important not to make the mistake of flipping the two because it happens quite often.
178
And I think you'll understand if you're a short -term partner, and kind of going back to the original topic too,
179
it's like in short -term partnerships and short -term mating, it doesn't matter as much about that long -term compatibility because it's short -term.
180
And it doesn't matter if you found yourself as much.
181
It doesn't matter if you understand yourself as much.
182
It doesn't matter because it just, it's not going to have long -term consequences.
183
You're not going to bicker over a disagreement six months down the line
184
if you're going to be with them for two weeks.
185
However, once you kind of enter or potentially enter something that is, has long -term, you know, potential, you need to be thinking about,
186
you know, these are the questions I ask myself.
187
You can ask yourself these questions or you can find them irrelevant, right?
188
You know, I, I, I, I, I guess this is almost, uh, you know, I want to be the partner that, but I also want a partner that can,
189
it's like, you want to pick someone who will be like your partner
190
that you pick will likely be the one that is with you when your parents die.
191
I already had my dad died like a couple of years ago.
192
So I, I, I feel like I, since I've gone through that, you know, gone through that experience, I can be a better partner for someone who is going to go through
193
that experience but like my mom's still alive
194
and hopefully for a very long time but
195
if i have a long -term partner
196
that would be the person i pick to be with me there through
197
that if another question to ask yourself is that
198
if you passed away suddenly would you be you know would you be confident
199
and would you feel secure that the partner you chose is going to be the sole partner to raise your children,
200
to instill those values, to raise them correctly, if you were to pass away randomly.
201
Another question I ask, which is pretty important for me, it might be somewhat important to you, but less so, but it's important to me,
202
is if When we're both 60, when we're both 50, I don't know, when we're kind of at the later stage in life,
203
and maybe kids are off in college, and the work stuff is kind of, you've kind of had your career, and it's a Sunday morning,
204
and you walk downstairs, and you brew a cup of coffee, and maybe have a porch, so you and your partner, in my case, me and my wife here,
205
would go and sit out on the porch, right? cups of coffee, whatever, it's a Sunday morning, would I seriously enjoy, it might be the highlight of my week,
206
to talk to them for a couple hours?
207
This is the person you're going to spend the most, statistically, the person you're going to spend the most time with.
208
Do you enjoy spending time with them when the attraction is gone, the raising kids element together is gone, grandkids maybe are on the horizon, right?
209
And it's just you and them.
210
Are you looking forward to that
211
or are you immediately going to hang out with your buddies
212
or do something else
213
because you want you just know the conversation is going to be you know obnoxious right
214
or just stale or bland or you're going to get into fights
215
and bickering and everything like that and there's a lot more questions like
216
that that i ask myself but i wanted to pose a couple
217
that i ask and kind of the final thing this video is i'm going to ask
218
because i'm very curious about this too is for all of
219
you watching what are the questions for a long -term partner
220
that you ask like those three that i just asked
221
because maybe there's going to be a few in the comment section i want to start asking myself So selfishly, I'd love to hear.

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 말하기 레슨은 영상 “find your soul first, then your soulmate”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 221개와 단어 3088개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 16:26입니다. 화자는 분당 약 188단어로 빠르게 말하므로 연음과 약하게 발음되는 소리가 많습니다. 단어의 85%가 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속합니다. 나머지는 연습 전에 미리 확인해 두세요.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어발음뜻
compatibility 명사/kəmˌpætəˈbɪlɪti/호환성
awkward 형용사/ˈɔk.wɚd/서투르다
romantic 형용사/ɹoʊˈmæn(t)ɪk/로맨틱하다
discover 동사/dɪˈskʌvə/발견하다
romance 명사/roʊˈmæn(t)s/연애, 련애
topic 명사/ˈtɑpɪk/화제, 주제
partnership 명사/ˈpɑɹtnɚʃɪp/파트너십
discovery 명사/dɪˈskʌv.ɹi/발견
chess 명사/t͡ʃɛs/체스, 서양장기
porch 명사/pɔɹt͡ʃ/현관, 포치
textbook 명사/ˈtɛkst.bʊk/교과서, 텍스트북
trait 명사/tɹeɪt/특징
tidy 형용사/ˈtaɪ.di/단정한
ignore 동사/ɪɡˈnɔː/무시하다
gap 명사/ɡæp/간극, 극간

영상에 나오는 구동사

단어뜻
pass away 동사돌아가시다

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점is meant · are discovered · could be defined
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보someone who is · someone who might · someone who you
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때has been wired · i've experienced · i've found

주의할 발음

화자는 you're, I'm, don't 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 91번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.

  • “sh”와 “zh” 소리: partnership /ˈpɑɹtnɚʃɪp/, potentially /pəˈtɛnʃ(ə)li/, obsession /əbˈsɛʃən/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, casual /ˈkæʒ(u)əl/
  • 긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: compatibility /kəmˌpætəˈbɪlɪti/, potentially /pəˈtɛnʃ(ə)li/, philosophical /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/

한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:

  • /f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: define /dɪˈfaɪn/, philosophical /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/, flip /flɪp/, unfair /ʌnˈfɛɚ/, selfish /ˈsɛlf.ɪʃ/
  • /v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: discover /dɪˈskʌvə/, discovery /dɪˈskʌv.ɹi/, avenue /ˈæv.əˌn(j)u/, curve /kɚv/, evaluate /ɪˈvaljʊeɪt/
  • /z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: lens /lɛnz/, exhibit /ɪɡˈzɪbɪt/, pose /poʊz/, horizon /həˈɹaɪ.zən/, oppose /əˈpoʊz/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

  1. 먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
  2. 0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
  3. 자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, compatibility, awkward, romantic 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →