쉐도잉 연습: How to Build an AI-Native Services Company - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

레슨 만드는 중...
1
Some of the biggest companies of the next decade won't be software businesses at all.
2
They'll be services companies like insurance carriers and law firms.
3
rebuilt from scratch with AI doing most of the work.
4
These are what we call AI native service companies.
5
And the markets are trillions of dollars in size: tax, audit, insurance, law, parts of healthcare, and so forth.
6
This opportunity didn't exist even a couple years ago.
7
But advances in the models have unlocked this new type of business, where companies provide the outcome to the customer, versus build a co -pilot that the customer uses internally.
8
These companies also look and feel different than most startups today.
9
In this video, I'll walk through a playbook for founders starting AI services businesses from scratch.
10
It's aimed at people thinking about starting a company, not if you're already running one.
11
I'll share some obvious and non -obvious elements of building these businesses that we've observed here at YC.
12
Topics include: picking a market, forming a team, building the actual product, serving the customers, the P &L,
13
and whether or not you should even buy a business.
14
One general comment before we get started.
15
We're still early here.
16
Like most things in AI, the market is moving fast.
17
We're learning as we go.
18
But the early successes here should get you really excited.
19
First, Picking the right market.
20
The same general advice for all startups applies here, with some important caveats.
21
You should pick a market you're excited to work in for a long time.
22
These companies still take a decade or more, If you don't love some combination of the customers or the market or the technical problem, you're not going to make it.
23
And that part isn't really new, but the best markets for AI services have four new, pretty unique traits.
24
The first is low trust.
25
Meaning the work is already outsourced and the customer cares about the final product, not how they got there.
26
you're displacing a vendor not asking the customer to do something fundamentally different That's a huge deal because you're not changing behavior.
27
You're showing up where the budget already lives and doing the work.
28
Second, low judgment at the task level.
29
If you can break the work into pieces and every piece needs a human exercising actual judgment, you can't really scale.
30
You need most of the steps to be automatable with judgment focused in a few places where humans stay in the loop.
31
The third is a high intelligence threshold.
32
This sounds contradictory, but actually it isn't.
33
The overall work has to be hard.
34
Hard enough that models plus humans are needed to actually deliver an outcome the customer accepts.
35
The fourth is: Regulation could actually be good.
36
Regulated industries have higher expectations and legal accountability.
37
That raises the bar and the moat for founders.
38
For instance, Panacea is a current YC company that provides FDA regulatory services for biotechs and medtechs.
39
They actually hire experienced FDA consultants, pair them with an AI platform to deliver faster, higher quality FDA approvals.
40
So what are some of the specific markets we have in mind here at YC?
41
The known good fit markets include tax, audit, insurance, mortgages, parts of healthcare, and parts of logistics.
42
But there are plenty more markets nobody has touched yet. about on X.
43
And here are a few more things to keep an eye on when it comes to the markets.
44
The first is on the models.
45
Will the models disrupt these businesses?
46
It depends on what I call the Sam Altman test.
47
You should ask yourself, as the models get better, does your service get stronger, Or does the model itself commoditize you?
48
You want to be in the first camp.
49
Where to be careful?
50
Anything involving equipment and on -site labor.
51
The software margin math doesn't apply when you own and operate physical things.
52
It's very hard to create real leverage, though these can be really good businesses.
53
Let's leave this area to the robotics founders.
54
One more honesty check.
55
Ask yourself sincerely, are you using humans because the work genuinely needs judgment, or are you compensating for product gaps?
56
Be honest here so you're not papering over product shortcomings with actual humans.
57
There are still great, massive technology businesses to be built with humans in the loop.
58
Second, and maybe most importantly, the right founding team.
59
The same advice applies for all startups here, but again with some important caveats.
60
You should build companies with people you already know and you've worked with.
61
If you're solo, think about the best people you've ever worked with and ask them to join you.
62
You'd be surprised who says yes.
63
For AI services specifically, there's three attributes that all the best founders share.
64
The first is domain fluency.
65
Direct experience is best, but learned is actually okay.
66
You're selling to skeptical buyers in often regulated spaces.
67
You have to bleed credibility.
68
How you acquire it matters
69
somewhat less the second is model fluency you need to know what frontier models can do today
70
and design the product to ride the curve as they get better there is no substitute for great tech here
71
People underestimate this.
72
Next is operational rigor.
73
Topics like variance, throughput, cycle times, SOPs, this is not an exciting set of words for most founders.
74
but you are fundamentally running an operation.
75
You have to learn that skill set and you have to enjoy it, or at least you have to respect it.
76
The product is in operation.
77
A great example here is the General Legal Team, which is an AI -native law firm that YC recently backed.
78
The founders have a unique mix of actual law firm experience at Cooley and Fenwick, as well as years of technical leadership at Case Text.
79
But most importantly, they think deeply about throughput and how they staff their firm.
80
They've integrated shift work into how they serve clients to reduce cycle times and attract the best lawyers on the team.
81
This is a win -win for scale.
82
Now let's talk about building the actual product.
83
With AI services, the setup is the opposite of most software.
84
The human is the interface of the customer, not the product.
85
The product helps the humans scale their work non -linearly.
86
That changes pretty much everything around building an actual product.
87
First, you need to apply an operations mindset.
88
find the bottlenecks and build for the bottlenecks.
89
Throughput and cycle time are now product metrics, track them like you would daily active users.
90
Variance is the existential problem here.
91
By variance, I mean non -uniform outputs from your actual service.
92
Customers will fire you for variance faster than they will fire you for being a bit slower
93
or a bit more expensive than the incumbents.
94
They need to trust the output.
95
Inconsistency destroys trust, which causes churn.
96
Thirdly, humans in the loop should scale non -linearly.
97
If revenue scale is just in line with the number of humans you add, you'll have major problems.
98
The humans in the loop also need to enjoy the software.
99
They are your users.
100
A general point: it's okay to do things that don't scale at the very beginning, but eventually you really do need to scale.
101
Automating the process is the product.
102
Okay, sales and customer success.
103
The biggest challenge facing founders here is what I'll call the early demand trap.
104
It's easy to sign up a lot of pilot customers when you're just starting out and have nothing, but it can quickly overwhelm your ability to serve them, and you won't be able to build the product to scale.
105
You'll be stuck using humans.
106
It is a literal trap.
107
Our advice here is to cap your first pilot customers to a small handful.
108
Resist the temptation to sign too many too quickly.
109
Assuming you avoid this early demand trap, pre and post sales looks pretty different too.
110
You have to sell outcomes, not seats or tokens.
111
The pilot is the product.
112
For the first handful of customers, don't try and standardize too early.
113
Use those pilots to learn.
114
Find the spots where AI gives you unique leverage versus spots where you're just automating something obvious.
115
Build the product accordingly and do it fast.
116
Pricing is harder than traditional software because you're not competing with other software providers.
117
You're competing directly with the cost of labor, internal or outsourced.
118
A few options here on pricing.
119
There's per unit pricing, so per return, per claim, per loan.
120
This is the cleanest, it's the easiest to explain.
121
There's also outcome based pricing.
122
This aligns incentives beautifully, but it can be harder for you to forecast in your business.
123
Panacea prices on the completed consultant study versus hourly, which is the norm in the industry.
124
There's definitely two pricing strategies to avoid.
125
Cost plus pricing caps your upside permanently don't do it.
126
Straight line undercutting makes your work seem cheap and potentially low quality.
127
"Price on value." Next, the P &L, or the profit and loss statement.
128
This is where these companies live or die, so let's do a quick walkthrough.
129
If you haven't stared at one of these financial statements before, you're not alone among founders, and that's okay.
130
The general structure is, Revenue minus cost of goods sold gets you to gross profit.
131
Gross profit minus operating expenses gets you to operating income.
132
Let's dive into each of these in the context of AI services.
133
Revenue.
134
Ah, the easy part, relatively speaking.
135
You will be able to sign contracts.
136
Can you deliver on them repeatedly?
137
I don't know.
138
That depends on your product and your process.
139
Eventually, you want smooth and predictable growth.
140
A great product process is going to smooth out that lumpiness, but in the early days, it'll be spiky on a monthly basis.
141
That's okay.
142
Cost of goods sold, or COGS, obsess over this from day one.
143
There's three main components here: there's model costs, hosting costs, and those humans in the loop.
144
All three of them need a number, a trendline, and someone who owns them.
145
Be deeply suspicious of zero margin or negative margin pilots.
146
They're fine to learn from, but it's really dangerous to get hooked on those.
147
The core bet here is, The more the product is built, the lower the cogs, the better the gross margin.
148
i call this ai operating leverage okay opex this includes research
149
and development costs so building the product sales and general administrative
150
which is like finance legal exec salaries pretty standard stuff here
151
operating income this is the revenue minus the cogs minus the
152
opex you will be judged on your operating income in these businesses faster than you might expect.
153
Net income.
154
This is the operating income less taxes and interest.
155
That's less important in the medium term.
156
So here's the actual P &L opportunity for these businesses.
157
Traditional services firms top out around 30 % margins.
158
Pure software and agent companies have more margin, but often smaller TAMs.
159
The bet on these services companies is that that AI operating leverage gets you closer to software margins, say 50 % plus, on a market that's two to three times bigger than software.
160
You don't need to be there right away, that's okay, but the trajectory has to be believable.
161
Okay, last but not least.
162
Don't try to buy your way in.
163
There's a temptation we've seen, especially among founders with some operating background, to try and buy an existing services business.
164
Add some AI on top, short circuit the revenue.
165
This is generally a trap.
166
There's one decent reason to do it you need a regulatory mode fast.
167
Insurance licensing, for example.
168
But otherwise, this almost never works.
169
So why is that?
170
You just can't acquire a product market fit.
171
Legacy service businesses are, you know, legacy.
172
They have different expectations on metrics, hiring, and performance.
173
Adding AI on top of that doesn't immediately change any of those realities.
174
Building is almost always better than buying.
175
Okay, to recap, AI services companies present an incredible opportunity for today's founders, but these are fundamentally different startups to build.
176
If you avoid the traps and focus on the process as the product and the product as the process, You have a chance to create a generational company.
177
We're excited to see what you build, and hope you apply to YC.
178
you

맥락 및 배경

이 영상은 "AI 기반 서비스 회사 구축 방법"에 대한 내용을 다루고 있습니다. 발표자는 AI가 대부분의 작업을 수행하는 서비스 회사들이 향후 10년간 소프트웨어 기업을 넘어서는 중요한 역할을 할 것이라고 강조하고 있습니다. 이러한 AI 원주율 서비스 기업은 보험이나 법률과 같은 전통적인 서비스 산업이 AI를 통해 혁신하고 발전하는 모습을 보여줍니다. 이 과정에서 AI 서비스 회사의 창립자들이 직면할 수 있는 여러 과제를 살펴보며 성공적인 비즈니스 모델의 특징을 제시합니다.

일상 소통을 위한 상위 5개 구문

  • “AI 원주율 서비스 기업” - AI를 활용하는 기존 비즈니스 모델의 새로운 접근 방식을 설명합니다.
  • “고객이 최종 제품을 중요시한다” - 고객의 요구를 이해하는 것의 중요성을 나타냅니다.
  • “작업을 조각으로 나눌 수 있어야 한다” - 작업의 자동화를 통해 규모를 확장하는 방법을 강조합니다.
  • “높은 지능 기준” - 고객이 수용할 수 있는 결과를 제공하기 위해 필요하는 전문성을 설명합니다.
  • “규제가 오히려 도움이 될 수 있다” - 특정 산업에서의 법적 책임과 기대치를 강조합니다.

단계별 그림자 따라하기 가이드

이 영상에서 제시된 정보를 바탕으로 영어 회화 연습, 특히 shadowspeak에서 유용한 접근 방법을 제공합니다. 다음 단계를 따라 진행해 보세요:

  1. 주제 이해하기: 발표자가 말하고 있는 주제를 깊이 이해합니다. AI 기반 서비스 기업들이 어떤 특징을 가지는지 파악하세요.
  2. 구문 반복하기: 주요 구문들을 반복하여 말합니다. “AI 원주율 서비스 기업”과 같은 표현을 실제로 사용해보세요.
  3. 발음 교정하기: 발음이 어려운 단어에 집중합니다. “높은 지능 기준”과 같은 구문을 녹음하고 듣고, 발음을 교정해 보세요.
  4. 자세한 상황 예시 만들기: 발표자가 설명한 각 특징에 대해 자신의 예시를 만들어 봅니다. 예를 들어, 특정 산업의 규제가 어떻게 도움이 되는지에 대해 말해보세요.
  5. 상대방과의 대화 시뮬레이션: 다른 학습자와 함께 발표자의 내용을 바탕으로 대화하는 연습을 합니다. 이때 shadowspeaks 기술을 활용하여 더 자연스럽게 대화를 이어가보세요.

이러한 단계를 통해 영어 회화 연습을 보다 효과적으로 할 수 있으며, 특히 IELTS 스피킹 영역에서도 자신감을 느낄 수 있습니다.

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때have unlocked · we've observed · has touched
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점is already outsourced · are needed · be built
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보Team, which is · hourly, which is · someone who owns

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →