Shadowing Practice: How to Build an AI-Native Services Company - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
178 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Some of the biggest companies of the next decade won't be software businesses at all.
2
They'll be services companies like insurance carriers and law firms.
3
rebuilt from scratch with AI doing most of the work.
4
These are what we call AI native service companies.
5
And the markets are trillions of dollars in size: tax, audit, insurance, law, parts of healthcare, and so forth.
6
This opportunity didn't exist even a couple years ago.
7
But advances in the models have unlocked this new type of business, where companies provide the outcome to the customer, versus build a co -pilot that the customer uses internally.
8
These companies also look and feel different than most startups today.
9
In this video, I'll walk through a playbook for founders starting AI services businesses from scratch.
10
It's aimed at people thinking about starting a company, not if you're already running one.
11
I'll share some obvious and non -obvious elements of building these businesses that we've observed here at YC.
12
Topics include: picking a market, forming a team, building the actual product, serving the customers, the P &L,
13
and whether or not you should even buy a business.
14
One general comment before we get started.
15
We're still early here.
16
Like most things in AI, the market is moving fast.
17
We're learning as we go.
18
But the early successes here should get you really excited.
19
First, Picking the right market.
20
The same general advice for all startups applies here, with some important caveats.
21
You should pick a market you're excited to work in for a long time.
22
These companies still take a decade or more, If you don't love some combination of the customers or the market or the technical problem, you're not going to make it.
23
And that part isn't really new, but the best markets for AI services have four new, pretty unique traits.
24
The first is low trust.
25
Meaning the work is already outsourced and the customer cares about the final product, not how they got there.
26
you're displacing a vendor not asking the customer to do something fundamentally different That's a huge deal because you're not changing behavior.
27
You're showing up where the budget already lives and doing the work.
28
Second, low judgment at the task level.
29
If you can break the work into pieces and every piece needs a human exercising actual judgment, you can't really scale.
30
You need most of the steps to be automatable with judgment focused in a few places where humans stay in the loop.
31
The third is a high intelligence threshold.
32
This sounds contradictory, but actually it isn't.
33
The overall work has to be hard.
34
Hard enough that models plus humans are needed to actually deliver an outcome the customer accepts.
35
The fourth is: Regulation could actually be good.
36
Regulated industries have higher expectations and legal accountability.
37
That raises the bar and the moat for founders.
38
For instance, Panacea is a current YC company that provides FDA regulatory services for biotechs and medtechs.
39
They actually hire experienced FDA consultants, pair them with an AI platform to deliver faster, higher quality FDA approvals.
40
So what are some of the specific markets we have in mind here at YC?
41
The known good fit markets include tax, audit, insurance, mortgages, parts of healthcare, and parts of logistics.
42
But there are plenty more markets nobody has touched yet. about on X.
43
And here are a few more things to keep an eye on when it comes to the markets.
44
The first is on the models.
45
Will the models disrupt these businesses?
46
It depends on what I call the Sam Altman test.
47
You should ask yourself, as the models get better, does your service get stronger, Or does the model itself commoditize you?
48
You want to be in the first camp.
49
Where to be careful?
50
Anything involving equipment and on -site labor.
51
The software margin math doesn't apply when you own and operate physical things.
52
It's very hard to create real leverage, though these can be really good businesses.
53
Let's leave this area to the robotics founders.
54
One more honesty check.
55
Ask yourself sincerely, are you using humans because the work genuinely needs judgment, or are you compensating for product gaps?
56
Be honest here so you're not papering over product shortcomings with actual humans.
57
There are still great, massive technology businesses to be built with humans in the loop.
58
Second, and maybe most importantly, the right founding team.
59
The same advice applies for all startups here, but again with some important caveats.
60
You should build companies with people you already know and you've worked with.
61
If you're solo, think about the best people you've ever worked with and ask them to join you.
62
You'd be surprised who says yes.
63
For AI services specifically, there's three attributes that all the best founders share.
64
The first is domain fluency.
65
Direct experience is best, but learned is actually okay.
66
You're selling to skeptical buyers in often regulated spaces.
67
You have to bleed credibility.
68
How you acquire it matters
69
somewhat less the second is model fluency you need to know what frontier models can do today
70
and design the product to ride the curve as they get better there is no substitute for great tech here
71
People underestimate this.
72
Next is operational rigor.
73
Topics like variance, throughput, cycle times, SOPs, this is not an exciting set of words for most founders.
74
but you are fundamentally running an operation.
75
You have to learn that skill set and you have to enjoy it, or at least you have to respect it.
76
The product is in operation.
77
A great example here is the General Legal Team, which is an AI -native law firm that YC recently backed.
78
The founders have a unique mix of actual law firm experience at Cooley and Fenwick, as well as years of technical leadership at Case Text.
79
But most importantly, they think deeply about throughput and how they staff their firm.
80
They've integrated shift work into how they serve clients to reduce cycle times and attract the best lawyers on the team.
81
This is a win -win for scale.
82
Now let's talk about building the actual product.
83
With AI services, the setup is the opposite of most software.
84
The human is the interface of the customer, not the product.
85
The product helps the humans scale their work non -linearly.
86
That changes pretty much everything around building an actual product.
87
First, you need to apply an operations mindset.
88
find the bottlenecks and build for the bottlenecks.
89
Throughput and cycle time are now product metrics, track them like you would daily active users.
90
Variance is the existential problem here.
91
By variance, I mean non -uniform outputs from your actual service.
92
Customers will fire you for variance faster than they will fire you for being a bit slower
93
or a bit more expensive than the incumbents.
94
They need to trust the output.
95
Inconsistency destroys trust, which causes churn.
96
Thirdly, humans in the loop should scale non -linearly.
97
If revenue scale is just in line with the number of humans you add, you'll have major problems.
98
The humans in the loop also need to enjoy the software.
99
They are your users.
100
A general point: it's okay to do things that don't scale at the very beginning, but eventually you really do need to scale.
101
Automating the process is the product.
102
Okay, sales and customer success.
103
The biggest challenge facing founders here is what I'll call the early demand trap.
104
It's easy to sign up a lot of pilot customers when you're just starting out and have nothing, but it can quickly overwhelm your ability to serve them, and you won't be able to build the product to scale.
105
You'll be stuck using humans.
106
It is a literal trap.
107
Our advice here is to cap your first pilot customers to a small handful.
108
Resist the temptation to sign too many too quickly.
109
Assuming you avoid this early demand trap, pre and post sales looks pretty different too.
110
You have to sell outcomes, not seats or tokens.
111
The pilot is the product.
112
For the first handful of customers, don't try and standardize too early.
113
Use those pilots to learn.
114
Find the spots where AI gives you unique leverage versus spots where you're just automating something obvious.
115
Build the product accordingly and do it fast.
116
Pricing is harder than traditional software because you're not competing with other software providers.
117
You're competing directly with the cost of labor, internal or outsourced.
118
A few options here on pricing.
119
There's per unit pricing, so per return, per claim, per loan.
120
This is the cleanest, it's the easiest to explain.
121
There's also outcome based pricing.
122
This aligns incentives beautifully, but it can be harder for you to forecast in your business.
123
Panacea prices on the completed consultant study versus hourly, which is the norm in the industry.
124
There's definitely two pricing strategies to avoid.
125
Cost plus pricing caps your upside permanently don't do it.
126
Straight line undercutting makes your work seem cheap and potentially low quality.
127
"Price on value." Next, the P &L, or the profit and loss statement.
128
This is where these companies live or die, so let's do a quick walkthrough.
129
If you haven't stared at one of these financial statements before, you're not alone among founders, and that's okay.
130
The general structure is, Revenue minus cost of goods sold gets you to gross profit.
131
Gross profit minus operating expenses gets you to operating income.
132
Let's dive into each of these in the context of AI services.
133
Revenue.
134
Ah, the easy part, relatively speaking.
135
You will be able to sign contracts.
136
Can you deliver on them repeatedly?
137
I don't know.
138
That depends on your product and your process.
139
Eventually, you want smooth and predictable growth.
140
A great product process is going to smooth out that lumpiness, but in the early days, it'll be spiky on a monthly basis.
141
That's okay.
142
Cost of goods sold, or COGS, obsess over this from day one.
143
There's three main components here: there's model costs, hosting costs, and those humans in the loop.
144
All three of them need a number, a trendline, and someone who owns them.
145
Be deeply suspicious of zero margin or negative margin pilots.
146
They're fine to learn from, but it's really dangerous to get hooked on those.
147
The core bet here is, The more the product is built, the lower the cogs, the better the gross margin.
148
i call this ai operating leverage okay opex this includes research
149
and development costs so building the product sales and general administrative
150
which is like finance legal exec salaries pretty standard stuff here
151
operating income this is the revenue minus the cogs minus the
152
opex you will be judged on your operating income in these businesses faster than you might expect.
153
Net income.
154
This is the operating income less taxes and interest.
155
That's less important in the medium term.
156
So here's the actual P &L opportunity for these businesses.
157
Traditional services firms top out around 30 % margins.
158
Pure software and agent companies have more margin, but often smaller TAMs.
159
The bet on these services companies is that that AI operating leverage gets you closer to software margins, say 50 % plus, on a market that's two to three times bigger than software.
160
You don't need to be there right away, that's okay, but the trajectory has to be believable.
161
Okay, last but not least.
162
Don't try to buy your way in.
163
There's a temptation we've seen, especially among founders with some operating background, to try and buy an existing services business.
164
Add some AI on top, short circuit the revenue.
165
This is generally a trap.
166
There's one decent reason to do it you need a regulatory mode fast.
167
Insurance licensing, for example.
168
But otherwise, this almost never works.
169
So why is that?
170
You just can't acquire a product market fit.
171
Legacy service businesses are, you know, legacy.
172
They have different expectations on metrics, hiring, and performance.
173
Adding AI on top of that doesn't immediately change any of those realities.
174
Building is almost always better than buying.
175
Okay, to recap, AI services companies present an incredible opportunity for today's founders, but these are fundamentally different startups to build.
176
If you avoid the traps and focus on the process as the product and the product as the process, You have a chance to create a generational company.
177
We're excited to see what you build, and hope you apply to YC.
178
you
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
C17
Alexandr Wang on what matters in an age of abundant intelligence
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
Garry Tan: Own Your Intelligence
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
Dot Plots: How to Actually See What Your Users Are Doing
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B25
How Pitching Investors is Different Than Pitching Customers - Michael Seibel
Business EnglishWorking Adults
B24
Jensen Huang: The Mindset That Built NVIDIA
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1Alexandr Wang: “This is a Once-in-a-Civilization Opportunity”
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B2How to Get Your First 10 Customers
Business EnglishWorking Adults
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C18
249 zinnen
How to Build a $10M Business with AI (Zero Employees)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
190 zinnen
This 25-Year-Old Built a 2-Year Moat Nobody Can Bet Against | Corgi, Nico Laqua & Emily Yuan
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
176 zinnen
Is Amazon Too Big?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
287 zinnen
How to win at work (even if you're the youngest)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
460 zinnen
Welcome to Agentic GTM: The AI Revolution in Sales
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
43 zinnen
Sam Altman explains how to come up with a great startup idea
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
127 zinnen
The Alignment Problem Explained: Crash Course Futures of AI #4
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C113
204 zinnen
The 7 Skills You Need to Build AI Agents
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
338 zinnen
I Wrapped an API Into a Real SaaS (full build / step-by-step)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C143
6 zinnen
Ray Dalio on the AI Bubble
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C15
168 zinnen
How I'd Get Traffic to a New Website if I Had to Start Over (2026)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “How to Build an AI-Native Services Company”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: product, customer, companies, founders, businesses. Deze video bevat 178 zinnen en 2067 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 11:12. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 185 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. 83% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| variance zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈvæɹ.i.əns/ | afwijkend |
| startup zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈstɑɹtˌʌp/ | opstart, opstarting |
| leverage zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈlɛv.(ə.)ɹɪd͡ʒ/ | hefboom, hefboomkracht |
| minus | /ˈmaɪ.nəs/ | min |
| cog zelfstandig naamwoord | /kɔɡ/ | tand, tandwieltand |
| automate werkwoord | /ˈɔ.təˌmeɪt/ | automatiseren |
| bottleneck zelfstandig naamwoord | flessenhals | |
| caveat zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkæviɑt/ | waarschuwing |
| fluency zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈfluːənsi/ | vlotheid |
| outsource werkwoord | /ˈaʊtˌsɔːs/ | uitbesteden |
| temptation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌtɛmpˈteɪʃən/ | verlokking |
| regulate werkwoord | /ˈɹɛɡ.jə.leɪt/ | regelen |
| metric bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈmɛt.ɹɪk/ | metriek |
| expectation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/ | verwachting, afwachting |
| contradictory bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌkɑntɹəˈdɪktəɹi/ | tegenstrijdig, contradictoir |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| show up werkwoord | tentoonstellen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- We're learning as we go.
- Let's leave this area to the robotics founders.
- You'd be surprised who says yes.
- You're selling to skeptical buyers in often regulated spaces.
- Can you deliver on them repeatedly?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | have unlocked · we've observed · has touched |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | is already outsourced · are needed · be built |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | Team, which is · someone who owns |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 48 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals you're, don't, I'll. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: throughput /ˈθɹuː.pʊt/, thirdly /ˈθɚdli/, walkthrough /ˈwɔːk.θɹuː/, threshold /ˈθɹɛʃ(h)oʊld/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: temptation /ˌtɛmpˈteɪʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, existential /ˌɛɡzɪˈstɛnʃl̩/, shortcoming /ˈʃɔːtˌkʌmɪŋ/, threshold /ˈθɹɛʃ(h)oʊld/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, importantly /ɪmˈpɔɹ.tənt.li/, automatable /ˈɔːtə.meɪt.ə.bəl/, contradictory /ˌkɑntɹəˈdɪktəɹi/, inconsistency /ˌɪnkənˈsɪstənsi/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: leverage /ˈlɛv.(ə.)ɹɪd͡ʒ/, cog /kɔɡ/, standardize /ˈstæn.də.daɪz/, bleed /ˈbliːd/, rebuild /ɹiːˈbɪld/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: variance /ˈvæɹ.i.əns/, caveat /ˈkæviɑt/, standardize /ˈstæn.də.daɪz/, attribute /ˈæt.ɹɪˌbjut/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: cog /kɔɡ/, regulate /ˈɹɛɡ.jə.leɪt/, existential /ˌɛɡzɪˈstɛnʃl̩/, rigour /ˈɹɪɡə(ɹ)/, integrate /ˈɪn.tɪ.ɡɹeɪt/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als variance, startup, leverage.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.