Практика Shadowing: How to Build an AI-Native Services Company - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Каждый режим открывает полноэкранную комнату практики.

178 предложений

Если предложения слишком короткие или длинные, нажмите Edit, чтобы их изменить.

Some of the biggest companies of the next decade won't be software businesses at all.

They'll be services companies like insurance carriers and law firms.

rebuilt from scratch with AI doing most of the work.

These are what we call AI native service companies.

And the markets are trillions of dollars in size: tax, audit, insurance, law, parts of healthcare, and so forth.

This opportunity didn't exist even a couple years ago.

But advances in the models have unlocked this new type of business, where companies provide the outcome to the customer, versus build a co -pilot that the customer uses internally.

These companies also look and feel different than most startups today.

In this video, I'll walk through a playbook for founders starting AI services businesses from scratch.

It's aimed at people thinking about starting a company, not if you're already running one.

I'll share some obvious and non -obvious elements of building these businesses that we've observed here at YC.

Topics include: picking a market, forming a team, building the actual product, serving the customers, the P &L,

and whether or not you should even buy a business.

One general comment before we get started.

We're still early here.

Like most things in AI, the market is moving fast.

We're learning as we go.

But the early successes here should get you really excited.

First, Picking the right market.

The same general advice for all startups applies here, with some important caveats.

You should pick a market you're excited to work in for a long time.

These companies still take a decade or more, If you don't love some combination of the customers or the market or the technical problem, you're not going to make it.

And that part isn't really new, but the best markets for AI services have four new, pretty unique traits.

The first is low trust.

Meaning the work is already outsourced and the customer cares about the final product, not how they got there.

you're displacing a vendor not asking the customer to do something fundamentally different That's a huge deal because you're not changing behavior.

You're showing up where the budget already lives and doing the work.

Second, low judgment at the task level.

If you can break the work into pieces and every piece needs a human exercising actual judgment, you can't really scale.

You need most of the steps to be automatable with judgment focused in a few places where humans stay in the loop.

The third is a high intelligence threshold.

This sounds contradictory, but actually it isn't.

The overall work has to be hard.

Hard enough that models plus humans are needed to actually deliver an outcome the customer accepts.

The fourth is: Regulation could actually be good.

Regulated industries have higher expectations and legal accountability.

That raises the bar and the moat for founders.

For instance, Panacea is a current YC company that provides FDA regulatory services for biotechs and medtechs.

They actually hire experienced FDA consultants, pair them with an AI platform to deliver faster, higher quality FDA approvals.

So what are some of the specific markets we have in mind here at YC?

The known good fit markets include tax, audit, insurance, mortgages, parts of healthcare, and parts of logistics.

But there are plenty more markets nobody has touched yet. about on X.

And here are a few more things to keep an eye on when it comes to the markets.

The first is on the models.

Will the models disrupt these businesses?

It depends on what I call the Sam Altman test.

You should ask yourself, as the models get better, does your service get stronger, Or does the model itself commoditize you?

You want to be in the first camp.

Where to be careful?

Anything involving equipment and on -site labor.

The software margin math doesn't apply when you own and operate physical things.

It's very hard to create real leverage, though these can be really good businesses.

Let's leave this area to the robotics founders.

One more honesty check.

Ask yourself sincerely, are you using humans because the work genuinely needs judgment, or are you compensating for product gaps?

Be honest here so you're not papering over product shortcomings with actual humans.

There are still great, massive technology businesses to be built with humans in the loop.

Second, and maybe most importantly, the right founding team.

The same advice applies for all startups here, but again with some important caveats.

You should build companies with people you already know and you've worked with.

If you're solo, think about the best people you've ever worked with and ask them to join you.

You'd be surprised who says yes.

For AI services specifically, there's three attributes that all the best founders share.

The first is domain fluency.

Direct experience is best, but learned is actually okay.

You're selling to skeptical buyers in often regulated spaces.

You have to bleed credibility.

How you acquire it matters

somewhat less the second is model fluency you need to know what frontier models can do today

and design the product to ride the curve as they get better there is no substitute for great tech here

People underestimate this.

Next is operational rigor.

Topics like variance, throughput, cycle times, SOPs, this is not an exciting set of words for most founders.

but you are fundamentally running an operation.

You have to learn that skill set and you have to enjoy it, or at least you have to respect it.

The product is in operation.

A great example here is the General Legal Team, which is an AI -native law firm that YC recently backed.

The founders have a unique mix of actual law firm experience at Cooley and Fenwick, as well as years of technical leadership at Case Text.

But most importantly, they think deeply about throughput and how they staff their firm.

They've integrated shift work into how they serve clients to reduce cycle times and attract the best lawyers on the team.

This is a win -win for scale.

Now let's talk about building the actual product.

With AI services, the setup is the opposite of most software.

The human is the interface of the customer, not the product.

The product helps the humans scale their work non -linearly.

That changes pretty much everything around building an actual product.

First, you need to apply an operations mindset.

find the bottlenecks and build for the bottlenecks.

Throughput and cycle time are now product metrics, track them like you would daily active users.

Variance is the existential problem here.

By variance, I mean non -uniform outputs from your actual service.

Customers will fire you for variance faster than they will fire you for being a bit slower

or a bit more expensive than the incumbents.

They need to trust the output.

Inconsistency destroys trust, which causes churn.

Thirdly, humans in the loop should scale non -linearly.

If revenue scale is just in line with the number of humans you add, you'll have major problems.

The humans in the loop also need to enjoy the software.

They are your users.

100

A general point: it's okay to do things that don't scale at the very beginning, but eventually you really do need to scale.

101

Automating the process is the product.

102

Okay, sales and customer success.

103

The biggest challenge facing founders here is what I'll call the early demand trap.

104

It's easy to sign up a lot of pilot customers when you're just starting out and have nothing, but it can quickly overwhelm your ability to serve them, and you won't be able to build the product to scale.

105

You'll be stuck using humans.

106

It is a literal trap.

107

Our advice here is to cap your first pilot customers to a small handful.

108

Resist the temptation to sign too many too quickly.

109

Assuming you avoid this early demand trap, pre and post sales looks pretty different too.

110

You have to sell outcomes, not seats or tokens.

111

The pilot is the product.

112

For the first handful of customers, don't try and standardize too early.

113

Use those pilots to learn.

114

Find the spots where AI gives you unique leverage versus spots where you're just automating something obvious.

115

Build the product accordingly and do it fast.

116

Pricing is harder than traditional software because you're not competing with other software providers.

117

You're competing directly with the cost of labor, internal or outsourced.

118

A few options here on pricing.

119

There's per unit pricing, so per return, per claim, per loan.

120

This is the cleanest, it's the easiest to explain.

121

There's also outcome based pricing.

122

This aligns incentives beautifully, but it can be harder for you to forecast in your business.

123

Panacea prices on the completed consultant study versus hourly, which is the norm in the industry.

124

There's definitely two pricing strategies to avoid.

125

Cost plus pricing caps your upside permanently don't do it.

126

Straight line undercutting makes your work seem cheap and potentially low quality.

127

"Price on value." Next, the P &L, or the profit and loss statement.

128

This is where these companies live or die, so let's do a quick walkthrough.

129

If you haven't stared at one of these financial statements before, you're not alone among founders, and that's okay.

130

The general structure is, Revenue minus cost of goods sold gets you to gross profit.

131

Gross profit minus operating expenses gets you to operating income.

132

Let's dive into each of these in the context of AI services.

133

Revenue.

134

Ah, the easy part, relatively speaking.

135

You will be able to sign contracts.

136

Can you deliver on them repeatedly?

137

I don't know.

138

That depends on your product and your process.

139

Eventually, you want smooth and predictable growth.

140

A great product process is going to smooth out that lumpiness, but in the early days, it'll be spiky on a monthly basis.

141

That's okay.

142

Cost of goods sold, or COGS, obsess over this from day one.

143

There's three main components here: there's model costs, hosting costs, and those humans in the loop.

144

All three of them need a number, a trendline, and someone who owns them.

145

Be deeply suspicious of zero margin or negative margin pilots.

146

They're fine to learn from, but it's really dangerous to get hooked on those.

147

The core bet here is, The more the product is built, the lower the cogs, the better the gross margin.

148

i call this ai operating leverage okay opex this includes research

149

and development costs so building the product sales and general administrative

150

which is like finance legal exec salaries pretty standard stuff here

151

operating income this is the revenue minus the cogs minus the

152

opex you will be judged on your operating income in these businesses faster than you might expect.

153

Net income.

154

This is the operating income less taxes and interest.

155

That's less important in the medium term.

156

So here's the actual P &L opportunity for these businesses.

157

Traditional services firms top out around 30 % margins.

158

Pure software and agent companies have more margin, but often smaller TAMs.

159

The bet on these services companies is that that AI operating leverage gets you closer to software margins, say 50 % plus, on a market that's two to three times bigger than software.

160

You don't need to be there right away, that's okay, but the trajectory has to be believable.

161

Okay, last but not least.

162

Don't try to buy your way in.

163

There's a temptation we've seen, especially among founders with some operating background, to try and buy an existing services business.

164

Add some AI on top, short circuit the revenue.

165

This is generally a trap.

166

There's one decent reason to do it you need a regulatory mode fast.

167

Insurance licensing, for example.

168

But otherwise, this almost never works.

169

So why is that?

170

You just can't acquire a product market fit.

171

Legacy service businesses are, you know, legacy.

172

They have different expectations on metrics, hiring, and performance.

173

Adding AI on top of that doesn't immediately change any of those realities.

174

Building is almost always better than buying.

175

Okay, to recap, AI services companies present an incredible opportunity for today's founders, but these are fundamentally different startups to build.

176

If you avoid the traps and focus on the process as the product and the product as the process, You have a chance to create a generational company.

177

We're excited to see what you build, and hope you apply to YC.

178

you

Скачать приложение

Всё для свободной речи

ИИ-оценка произношенияОценка каждой фразы

Практика IPAОсвойте каждый звук

СловарьСоберите свой словарный запас

Игра со словамиУчитесь играя

Сканировать QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Тот же канал

FOR YOU

Почему стоит практиковать разговор по этому видео?

Это видео предлагает углубленный анализ ключевых аспектов создания компаний, ориентированных на услуги с использованием ИИ. Практика разговорного английского на основе этой темы помогает улучшить не только речь, но и понимание сложных бизнес-концепций. Вы сможете услышать, как спикер делится опытом и советами, что особенно полезно для тех, кто хочет стать стартапером или просто интересуется новыми трендами в бизнесе. Вступая в обсуждение таких тем, как выбор рынка и формирование команды, вы сможете лучше освоить специализированную лексику и улучшить произношение английского, слушая и повторяя за говорящим.

Грамматика и выражения в контексте

В видео используются различные структуры и выражения, которые полезны для изучения. Рассмотрим несколько из них:

“will be” - данная конструкция используется для обозначения будущего времени, что важно в бизнес-коммуникации. Например, “Some of the biggest companies will be services companies.”
“should pick” - наличие модального глагола "should" указывает на рекомендацию или совет. Это выражение часто используется в контексте принятия решений.
“not asking the customer to do” - это структура используется для того, чтобы указать на действия, которые не требуют изменений со стороны клиента, создавая больше доверия и комфорта при работе с услугами.
“is good” - данный простой глагольный оборот служит для выражения мнения и может быть применим в обсуждениях о качестве услуг или продуктов.

Распространенные ловушки произношения

В видео вы найдете несколько слов и выражений, которые могут быть сложными для произношения. Например:

“services” - часто звучит слишком быстро; важно тренироваться, чтобы четко произносить слоги.
“accountability” - это слово имеет много слогов и требует внимательного подхода к произношению.
“regulation” - важно правильно акцентировать, чтобы избежать путаницы.

Используя технику shadow speech, вы сможете повторять и одновременно улучшить произношение английского, что значительно упростит понимание разговора. Shadowing английский позволяет вам учиться на практике, что особенно важно для закрепления навыков разговорного английского.

Грамматика в этом видео

Конструкции, которые говорящий использует чаще всего, с точными словами из видео:

Конструкция	В видео
Present Perfect have/has + причастие прошедшего времени — прошлое действие, важное сейчас	have unlocked · we've observed · has touched
Пассивный залог be + причастие прошедшего времени — важно, что происходит, а не кто это делает	is already outsourced · are needed · be built
Придаточные определительные who / which + предложение — уточнение о человеке или предмете	Team, which is · someone who owns

Что такое техника Shadowing?

Shadowing — это научно обоснованная техника изучения языка, изначально разработанная для подготовки профессиональных переводчиков и популяризированная полиглотом доктором Александром Аргуэльесом. Метод прост, но эффективен: вы слушаете аудио на английском от носителей языка и немедленно повторяете вслух — как тень, следующая за говорящим с задержкой в 1–2 секунды. В отличие от пассивного прослушивания или грамматических упражнений, Shadowing заставляет мозг и мышцы рта одновременно обрабатывать и воспроизводить реальные речевые паттерны. Исследования показывают, что это значительно улучшает точность произношения, интонацию, ритм, связную речь, понимание на слух и беглость речи — что делает его одним из самых эффективных методов для подготовки к IELTS Speaking и реального общения на английском.

Техника шедоуинга: читать полное пошаговое руководство →

Практика Shadowing: How to Build an AI-Native Services Company - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Скачать приложение

Тот же канал

Alexandr Wang on what matters in an age of abundant intelligence

Garry Tan: Own Your Intelligence

Dot Plots: How to Actually See What Your Users Are Doing

How Pitching Investors is Different Than Pitching Customers - Michael Seibel

Jensen Huang: The Mindset That Built NVIDIA

Alexandr Wang: “This is a Once-in-a-Civilization Opportunity”

How to Get Your First 10 Customers

Рекомендуемое видео

How to Build a $10M Business with AI (Zero Employees)

This 25-Year-Old Built a 2-Year Moat Nobody Can Bet Against | Corgi, Nico Laqua & Emily Yuan

Is Amazon Too Big?

How to win at work (even if you're the youngest)

Welcome to Agentic GTM: The AI Revolution in Sales

Sam Altman explains how to come up with a great startup idea

The Alignment Problem Explained: Crash Course Futures of AI #4

The 7 Skills You Need to Build AI Agents

I Wrapped an API Into a Real SaaS (full build / step-by-step)

Ray Dalio on the AI Bubble

How I'd Get Traffic to a New Website if I Had to Start Over (2026)

Почему стоит практиковать разговор по этому видео?

Грамматика и выражения в контексте

Распространенные ловушки произношения

Грамматика в этом видео

Что такое техника Shadowing?