Shadowing Practice: Did Prophet Muhammadﷺ Really Exist? What Historians Actually Say About the Evidence - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

116 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Did Muhammad really exist?
2
Now you might think this was a silly question
3
but in fact online now on YouTube an increasing number of videos have been made mainly I think by missionary
4
Christians from a certain background questioning his existence.
5
So I thought I'd just do a brief video just surveying
6
the historical evidence from a reputable historian just to see what the truth of the matter is
7
and I'll just turn again to the wonderful Jonathan AC Brown
8
book Mohammed a very short introduction he's a recognized expert on
9
this subject chosen by Oxford University Press to share with its
10
readers the truth about Mohammed from an historian's point of view
11
so I'll just share with you this very question did Mohammed really exist revisionist history
12
that's how this section of the book is entitled.
13
I'll just read to you what Jonathan Brown has to say.
14
Now he gives a long survey at the beginning about the problems
15
that some people see with establishing the existence of Muhammad as an historical person
16
and then he concludes with what mainstream historians are saying about this subject.
17
Modern historians have generally concluded that by reading the Sira in light of the various influences and agendas pursued within the text,
18
we can sift out forged reports.
19
Looking at the material that remains, we can retrieve an authentic kernel that represents the historical reality of Muhammad's career.
20
According to this mainstream scholarly opinion, scepticism about the details of the Sira should not lead us to doubt its overall narrative.
21
Some Western historians however have called for more extreme scepticism towards Muslim sources.
22
Known as revisionist historians these scholars point out
23
that we have no detailed history for Islam or biography of Muhammad for some 150 years after his death.
24
Moreover, what we do have is all written by Muslims.
25
These Muslims thus had over a century to manufacture whatever history they wanted about Muhammad and his faith.
26
How then can we trust any
27
Muslim version of his life or the origins of Islam?
28
How do we know that Muhammad even existed?
29
In a controversial 1977 book entitled Hagerism, the historians Patricia Crone and Michael Cook argued
30
that we can circumvent these challenges by relying on non -Muslim sources to reconstruct the origins of Islam.
31
Not only were such sources not biased towards glorifying Muhammad,
32
they were also much older than our earliest Muslim histories.
33
Using Christian sources such as the writings of an Armenian bishop named Sibius from the 1660s CE,
34
Cook and Crone contended that
35
Islam was really a form of late messianic Judaism.
36
Awakened to the Abrahamic roots, Mohammed
37
and the Arabs had joined with the Jews of the Hijaz in an apocalyptic movement to retake the Abrahamic homeland of Palestine.
38
Crook and Crone conclude from Christian sources that Mohammed was in fact still alive during the Muslim conquest of Syria.
39
The scholar John Walnsborough also argued that we can never locate the factual kernel of the historical Muhammad.
40
All we can discover is the sacred history constructed by the Muslim community as it gelled in the late 700s
41
and early 800s.
42
In his books Quranic studies and the sectarian milieu
43
Walnsborough argues that it was at this time
44
that the Muslims constructed the Quran and the Sira to create a religious vision anchored in 7th century Arabia.
45
The life of Mohammed and the Quran were merely cobbled together from elements drawn from the ancient
46
Near Eastern religious heritage.
47
Based on archaeological evidence, the Israeli historian Yehuda Nivo argued that
48
Islam was originally a form of vague monotheism which only solidified into its Mohammedan form after 692 AD.
49
He points to a papyrus tax receipt from Egypt dated
50
22 hijri which begins with the formula in the name of god but makes no mention of muhammad.
51
nevo states
52
that we do not see the phrase mentioning muhammad until a
53
coin minted in damascus in 72 hijri with the phrase muhammad is the messenger of god
54
and then jonathan brown puts in brackets in fact
55
there is an earlier coin mentioning his name issued in 66
56
hijri after 692 however muhammad's name appears regularly in umayyad coins
57
and monumental inscriptions the person of muhammad before
58
that time nebo concludes must not have been a significant part of islam
59
so nebo concludes that muhammad was not a significant part of islam at all.
60
Most modern scholars however object to the revisionist recasting of Muhammad and the origins of Islam.
61
In other words they reject these revisionist theories.
62
First of all how were Muslims able to orchestrate a conspiracy as massive as rewriting the entire first century of their history?
63
We must remember that during this time the Muslim community was wracked by civil wars and sectarian strife.
64
Warring Umayyad, Kharijite, Shiite and Abbasid Muslims could not agree on anything let alone join forces to rewrite their collective history.
65
As for the absence of archaeological evidence naming Muhammad before 691, it is not conclusive.
66
Just because no earlier coins or evidence have survived does not mean they did not exist.
67
Perhaps the Arabs continued their tradition of oral commemoration and did not record such things in written form.
68
Finally, the Quran itself is the most conclusive evidence that the Muslim narrative of Muhammad's mission is reliable in its overall structure.
69
Unlike the Sira, the Quran bears no traces of civil war or sectarian propaganda.
70
It never mentions Ali, Abu Bakr or the Umayyads.
71
Furthermore, there are no conflicting versions of the Quran.
72
If the Quran was not affected by these forces,
73
it must have taken permanent form before them this means
74
that the Quran consists of material dating back to the time of the prophet
75
or soon after his death one person the Quran does mention by name is Muhammad urging his followers over
76
and over again to obey God and his messenger Muhammad thus seems to have been very important to Islam indeed.
77
We must also be cautious of uncritically accepting Christian descriptions of Muhammad's teachings.
78
Christian writers may not have been biased towards Muhammad but they were certainly not objective observers.
79
They were describing the faith of the armies that had just steamrolled over them so it is not surprising that they saw
80
Islam and Mohammed in an inexact light.
81
To rely solely on these Christian sources in writing the history
82
of Mohammed would be like writing a history of the Soviet Union during the Cold War using only American newspapers.
83
I think that's a rather clever analogy.
84
More importantly viewed together these early non -Muslim sources paint a picture of Islam
85
that does not actually differ markedly from the major themes of the Muslim version.
86
The Greek historian of the first century before the common era
87
Diodorus mentions a temple in the Hejaz honoured by the peoples of Arabia
88
and the second century AD Alexandrian geographer Ptolemy mentions the Arabian towns of Yathripa and Mecoraba.
89
Sound familiar?
90
We thus know that Mecca and Yathrib and most likely the Kaaba existed long before Islam.
91
Moreover, the Jewish historian Josephus, who died in the first century AD,
92
tells us that it had long been held that the Arabs were the descendants of Abraham through Ishmael.
93
Non -Muslim sources certainly leave leave no doubt
94
that a prophetic figure named Muhammad existed and they provide an unsurprising description of what he meant to his followers.
95
An anti -Jewish Christian text written in 634 just two years
96
after Muhammad's death notes how the armies of an Arabian prophet had conquered Palestine.
97
Writing in the year 687, the Mesopotamian Christian monk John of Fanak wrote
98
that the Muslims considered Muhammad to be their guide
99
and instructor who taught the Arabs to worship the one god in accordance with ancient law.
100
He remarks how strictly they kept to the tradition of Muhammad.
101
Another mid -8th century Syriac Christian writer tells us that Muhammad went on caravan journeys to Syria as a youth.
102
An anonymous chronicle written in the mid 700s in the Zoukine
103
Monastery in northern Mesopotamia calls Muhammad the first king of Arabs who considered him a prophet
104
because he turned them in from polytheism to worship of the one God.
105
Muhammad gave them laws and they called him the messenger of God."
106
So clearly there is an abundance of very early reliable evidence from non -Muslim sources and Muslim sources.
107
The Qur 'an itself names Muhammad.
108
The Qur 'an is now securely dated in the form even
109
that we have it today back to the even the lifetime of the prophet
110
or very shortly after his death according to the majority view of western scholars
111
and obviously muslim scholars too so
112
if you were to come across any youtube videos
113
or any other missionary propaganda casting doubt on muhammad's existence
114
i do recommend you get a good reliable scholarly analysis of the facts
115
from a world -class academic publisher to get the reliable factual information and not rely on missionary propaganda.
116
Till next time.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Did Prophet Muhammadﷺ Really Exist? What Historians Actually Say About the Evidence”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: muhammad, muslim, islam, sources, historian. Deze video bevat 116 zinnen en 1489 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 11:49. De spreker praat in een gelijkmatig tempo van ongeveer 126 woorden per minuut, prettig om te shadowen. Slechts 73% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
historian zelfstandig naamwoord/hɪˈstɔɹi.ən/historicus, geschiedkundige
scholar zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈskɑlɚ/geleerde
conclude werkwoord/kənˈkluːd/besluiten, concluderen
argue werkwoord/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/redetwisten
reliable bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ɹɪˈlaɪəbl̩/betrouwbaar, zeker
coin zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈkoɪ̯n/munt, muntstuk
prophet zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈpɹɑ.fɪt/profeet, profete
rely werkwoord/ɹɪˈlaɪ/rekenen op
messenger zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈmɛs.ən.d͡ʒɚ/boodschapper, bode
narrative zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈnæɹ.ə.tɪv/verhaal, vertelling
phrase zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈfɹeɪ̯z/uitspraak
worship zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈwɝ.ʃɪp/verering, aanbidding
mainstream bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈmeɪn.stɹiːm/mainstream, hoofdstroom
bias zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈbaɪ.əs/neiging, vooroordeel
moreover bijwoord/mɔːˈɹəʊ.və/bovendien, daarnaast

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
come across werkwoordoverkomen
point out werkwoordaanwijzen, aanduiden

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doethave been made · is entitled · were merely cobbled
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telthave been made · have generally concluded · have called

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 4 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals I'll, I'd. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: furthermore /ˈfɜː(ɹ).ðə(ɹ)ˌmɔː(ɹ)/, authentic /ɔˈθɛn.tɪk/, monotheism /ˌmɑnoʊ̯ˈθiɪzm̩/, polytheism /pɒl.ɪˈθiː.ɪz.əm/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: worship /ˈwɝ.ʃɪp/, shortly /ˈʃɔɹtli/, establish /ɪˈstæb.lɪʃ/, bishop /ˈbɪʃəp/, controversial /ˌkɑn.tɹəˈvɝ.ʃəl/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: historian /hɪˈstɔɹi.ən/, conspiracy /kənˈspɪɹəsi/, controversial /ˌkɑn.tɹəˈvɝ.ʃəl/, anonymous /əˈnɒn.ə.məs/, importantly /ɪmˈpɔɹ.tənt.li/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

  • Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: conclude /kənˈkluːd/, narrative /ˈnæɹ.ə.tɪv/, phrase /ˈfɹeɪ̯z/, heritage /ˈhɛɹ.ɪ.tɪd͡ʒ/, objective /ɒbˈd͡ʒɛk.tɪv/
  • /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: narrative /ˈnæɹ.ə.tɪv/, factual /ˈfæk.tʃ(u)əl/, establish /ɪˈstæb.lɪʃ/, absence /ˈæb.s(ə)n̩s/, anchor /ˈæŋ.kəː/
  • /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: argue /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/, biography /baɪˈɑɡɹəfi/, vague /veɪɡ/, geographer /d͡ʒiˈɑ.ɡɹə.fɚ/, glorify /ˈɡlɔːɹɪfaɪ/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Spreek zin voor zin na op normale snelheid en herhaal elke zin tot je ritme gelijk is aan dat van de spreker.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als historian, scholar, conclude.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →